Vahakn Dadrian | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | Vahakn Norair Dadrian (1926-05-26)May 26, 1926 Istanbul (Constantinople), Turkey |
| Died | August 2, 2019(2019-08-02) (aged 93) Geneseo, New York, U.S. |
| Awards | see below |
| Scientific career | |
| Fields | Sociology |
| Institutions | Zoryan Institute |
| Signature | |
.jpg) | |
Vahakn Norair Dadrian (Armenian:Վահագն Տատրեան; 26 May 1926 – 2 August 2019) was anArmenian-Americansociologist andhistorian, born inTurkey, professor of sociology, historian, and an expert on theArmenian genocide.[1]
Dadrian was born in 1926 inTurkey to a family that lost many members during theArmenian genocide.[2] Dadrian first studiedmathematics at theUniversity of Berlin, after which he decided to switch to a completely different field, and studiedphilosophy[3][4] at theUniversity of Vienna, and later,international law at theUniversity of Zürich. He completed hisPh.D. insociology underRobert Redfield at theUniversity of Chicago.[5] Dadrian understood many languages, includingGerman,English,French,Turkish,Ottoman Turkish, andArmenian, and worked in the archives of different countries.[6]Thomas de Waal suggests that Dadrian's research was motivated by a political agenda, noting that Dadrian wrote a 1964 letter toThe New York Times asking: "on what conceivable grounds can the Armenians be denied the right to reclaim their ancestral territories which Turkey absorbed after massacring their inhabitants?"[7]
He was awarded an honorary doctorate degree for his research in the field of Armenian Genocide Studies by theArmenian National Academy of Sciences, and later, in 1998, he was made a member of the academy and honored by thePresident of Armenia, the republic's highest cultural award, theKhorenatzi medal. In 1999, Dadrian was awarded on behalf of theHoly See of Cilicia the Mesrob Mashdots Medal.[8] TheHarry Frank Guggenheim Foundation sponsored him as director of a large Genocide study project, which culminated with the publication of articles, mainly in theHolocaust andGenocide studies magazines. He was the keynote speaker at the centennial of theJohn Marshall Law School and delivered a lecture to theBritish House of Commons in 1995. He also received theEllis Island Medal of Honor.[2] He has lectured extensively in French, English and German in theFree University of Berlin, the Universities ofMunich,Parma,Torino,Zürich,Uppsala,Frankfurt am Main,Cologne,Bochum,Münster,Amsterdam,Utrecht,Geneva,Brussels andUNESCO’s Paris center.[9]
In 1970–1991 Dadrian was a professor of sociology atState University of New York-College at Geneseo.
Dadrian was the director of Genocide Research atZoryan Institute.
Dadrian died on 2 August 2019, at the age of 93.[10] After his death, the President of ArmeniaArmen Sarkissian sent a letter of condolences to Dadrian's family and friends.[11] In accordance with his wishes, his remains were cremated and transported to Armenia for burial.[12] Dadrian was buried in Tokhmakh Cemetery inYerevan, Armenia after a state ceremony and visitation at theArmenian National Academy of Sciences.[12]
In August 2022, Dadrian's former student and colleagueTaner Akçam and others brought attention to the fact that the historian's grave in Yerevan's Tokhmakh Cemetery had been left unmarked and untended.[12] The grave was then cleaned up and a temporary marker was placed.[12] A state burial commission had been established by the Armenian government in 2019 to attend to Dadrian's funeral.[12] The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Armenia explained on Twitter that work on Dadrian's gravestone had been delayed due to "objective reasons" such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, but would resume soon.[13]
Roger W. Smith praised Dadrian's bookThe History of the Armenian Genocide as a "rare work, over 20 years in the making, that is at once fascinating to read, comprehensive in scope, and unsurpassed in the documentation of the events it describes."[14] According toWilliam Schabas, the president of theInternational Association of Genocide Scholars, "Dadrian's historical research on the Armenian Genocide is informed by a rich grasp of the legal issues", and "his contribution both to historical and legal scholarship is enormous."[15]
A specialist on the Armenian Genocide of 1915–23, his many contributions to the investigation of that event, through multilingual original research in a number of archival collections throughout the world, has stamped him as one of foremost thinkers on the nature of the Armenian Genocide and how it was carried out.
— Paul R. Bartrop andSteven L. Jacobs, Fifty Key Thinkers on the Holocaust and Genocide, p. 79
According toDavid Bruce MacDonald, Dadrian is a "towering figure in the field of Armenian genocide history".[16]Taner Akcam writes that by employingJustin McCarthy's own method of calculating population figures and classifying individuals, Dadrian has shown the ridiculousness of the claim that "the events of 1915 were in fact a civil war between the Armenians and Turks".[17] German Swiss scholarHans-Lukas Kieser writes that the documents related to fifteen Turkish ministers published by V. Dadrian show best the ministers' conception of their responsibility in the "abuses" committed against Ottoman Armenians.[18]
De Waal states that "The analysis that Dadrian presents comes across today as rather Orientalist, a more sophisticated version of the postwar AlliedTurcophobic literature."[7] De Waal as well asMalcolm E. Yapp of London University, state that Dadrian's work more closely resembles a prosecutor's argument than analytic history.[7][19] Dadrian's theory that the genocide resulted from prewar patterns, was caused by Islam and "the repressive and sanguinary aspects of Ottoman culture" has been rejected by the majority of 21st century historians, although expounded in the 2019 bookThe Thirty-Year Genocide.[7][20]Ronald Suny explains the shift away from the previous historiography: "neither Dadrian nor Balakian explain why religion should have led to genocidal violence in the first year of the World War but not throughout Ottoman and Islamic history".[21]
According toDonald Bloxham, the accusations leveled by Dadrian "are often simply unfounded", especially "the idea of a German role in the formation of genocidal policy".[22] Bloxham states that while Dadrian supports the authenticity of the so-called "Ten Commandments", on the other hand, "Most serious historians accept that this document is dubious at best, and probably a fake."[23] According to German historianTessa Hofmann, "Dadrian’s inconsistencies have been abundantly criticized by scholars".[24]
Mary Schaeffer Conroy, professor of Russian history atUniversity of Colorado Denver, andHilmar Kaiser criticize Dadrian's tone, and failure to use Turkish archival sources.[25][26]
Soon after he settled to United States, on 4 January 1955, he was arrested in Chicago on sex crime charges involving a 10-year-old boy. According to the report inChicago Daily Tribune, Dadrian was arrested in his home by a police officer on complaint of the boy's father and charged with crime against nature and crime against a child. The child told police that Dadrian had stopped him on the street and persuaded to go to Dadrian's home, asking the boy to carry a package.[27]
In 1979, Dadrian was reported by five students atSUNY Geneseo forsexual harassment. In 1981, an arbitrator found Dadrian guilty on four charges but dismissed some others. He ruled that Dadrian should be suspended for one month without pay.[28] Following this decision, members of the university community formed the group Geneseo Committee Against Sexual Harassment and hundreds of people signed a petition urging college administrators to "protect students from further harassment by Professor Dadrian".[29][30] Dadrian was relieved from his position in 1991 following new allegations of sexual harassment. On April 24, 1990, Dadrian returned to college after attending several international conferences ongenocide studies and began harassing his 18-year-old student. The college administration offered the 64-year-old professor voluntary resignation, but Dadrian appealed the decision and lost.[29]
 | This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(November 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Dadrian's books and articles have been translated into more than 10 languages:
Awards granted to Dadrian include:[31]
A few typos and small factual errors, such as the implication that Russian-Ottoman relations were always adversarial in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, mar the book. However, the most egregious flaws in this book are its polemical tone, its sketchiness, and its failure to use Turkish archival sources. Therefore, while the book delivers intriguing insights into Ottoman-Kurdish relations and the views of individual Turkish statesmen regarding Armenians, and while it suggests convincing theories for Turkish massacres of Armenians, it does not convincingly document these theories. It is thus unsatisfying as a whole. This book is more a work of journalism than solid history and is not recommended.
