V.K.N. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | (1929-04-07)7 April 1929 |
| Died | 25 January 2004(2004-01-25) (aged 74) |
| Occupation | Writer, journalist |
| Language | Malayalam |
| Genre | Novel, short story, humour, essay, screenplay (Appunni). |
| Notable works | Arohanam,Payyan Kathakal |
| Spouse | Vedavathi |
| Children | Balachandran, Ranjana |
Vadakkke Koottala Narayanankutty Nair, commonly known asV.K.N. (7 April 1929 – 25 January 2004), was a prominentMalayalam writer, noted mainly for hishighbrowsatire.[1] He wrote novels, short stories and political commentaries. His works are noted for their multi-layered humour, trenchant criticism of the socio-political classes and ability to twist the meanings of words contextually and lend a touch of magic to his language.[2]
A native ofKerala in south India, V.K.N. was born on 7 April 1929 inThiruvilwamala inTrichur district (now Thrissur). (C. P. Nair, one of his close friends, tells that V.K.N's correct date of birth is 7 April 1929.)[3] After completing his matriculation, he joined the Malabar Devaswom Board and worked there for 9 years. Like a number of modern Malayalam writers such asO. V. Vijayan, V.K.N. spent many years in New Delhi (from 1959 to 1969) as an English journalist. The experiences he gained during these years, which coincided with the nascent post-independent India, are reflected in his book,Pitamahan (The Great Grandfather).[2] V.K.N.'s first storyParajithan was published in the October 1953 issue ofMathrubhumi Weekly.
V.K.N was married to Vedavathi Amma. They had a son Balachandran & a daughter Ranjana.[4]
VKN's entry intoMalayalam literature was in 1950s. Like for many others, his first love had been poetry. Though, before long, he gave it up, he kept up this adolescent infatuation all through his life. And he could quote from the Megasandesha or the Ramayanam chambu as quickly and effortlessly as he could from a new generation poet. This textual proficiency did not confine to poetry or literature alone. It was generic. Anything from under the sun, from contemporary politics to primitive occultism, from modernastrophysics toChanakya'sArthashastra, or fromDas Kapital toKamasutra, was a narrative device for him, which he brought into play in his stories and novels.
It was in the 1960s that VKN came to prominence as a writer. But, by then he had leftKerala for New Delhi, where he spent about 10 years as a journalist. The New Delhi of the 1960s had a defining role in modern Malayalam literature. It was the group of young writers who happened to come together on various professional engagements in the country's capital that madeMalayalam literature, fiction in particular, what it is today. Prominent among whom wereO.V. Vijayan,M. Mukundan,George Varghese Kakkanadan andM. P. Narayana Pillai. VKN "landed" in this circle. These writers used to meet regularly to thrash out literature, politics or whatever else was the topic of the day – a preparation that capacitated them to accomplish new heights in writing.
The Delhi life in 1960s had significantly contributed to framing VKN's social outlook as well. The institutionalisation of unscrupulous political manipulations, power brokerage, corruption and the murky dealings in the corridors of power; all that to which he became a silent, nonetheless alert, head-on witness deepened his distrust of the entire social and political order. And, what he did was to make them materials for a laugh that begot another laugh, which finally spread across our body, mind and intellect. For that reason, he was labelled "humorist".He called his novels "Pennpada", "Manchal" and "Pithamahan" "historical satires", a new genre he created.
VKN's important works arePithamahan (The Great Grandfather),Arohanam, which literally means "The Ascend" but "Bovine Bugles" in the author's own translation, Adhikaram (The Power),Payyan Kathakal (The Stories of Payyan), Sir Chathuleecock, Kavi (The Saffron), Chathans, and Chitrakeralam (Kerala Pictures). "Humour", in none of these works, did mean just a laugh. Certainly, he made use of all that is available in the repertoire of humour: irony, satire, parody and burlesque. But, be it about the misuse of power, the abuse of female body, the libertinism of the affluent, or about the fate of the poor of the day; his narration was historically and politically many-voiced. Nothing escaped his keen-eyed scrutiny by which he puzzled readers as to how they should take it; laugh, cry or get agitated. His humour, in substance, was a lamentation on human fallacies. And, just like that, a resistance to authoritarianism of all sorts. He dispassionately chronicled the transition of society from one phase to another. And "laughed" because, like his favourite character Payyan, "he could not cry".[5]
| Sl. No: | Designation | Institution/Board | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chairman | Kunchan Nambiar Society | Unknown |
| 2 | Vice chairman | Kerala Sahitya Academy | Unknown |
He died on 25 January 2004 at his residence inThiruvilwamala. He was 74. He was ailing for some time. The last rites were performed at Pambadi on the banks of theBharathappuzha.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
