User talk:~2026-92530-1
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, I'mAdakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one ofyour recent contributions—specificallythis edit toGlossary of video game terms—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse or theHelp desk. Thanks.Adakiko (talk)01:29, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~2026-92530-1 has given you acookie! Cookies promoteWikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
This is an additional message that you can add if you'd like.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
~2026-92530-1 (talk)23:21, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Quinlan (talk)02:03, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]Hello, ~2026-92530-1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit theTeahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try theTask Center.
Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Help is available: check outWikipedia:Questions orask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!Blue Sonnet (talk)23:53, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 21:33, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ...discospinstertalk23:37, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
~2026-92530-1(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
understand the rules I realize my past edits were disruptive and did not help the project. I was just messing around and didn't take the site's rules seriously. I have since read the 'Not Here' and Vandalism policies, and I understand why my actions were flagged by the filter log. If unblocked, I want to focus on fixing spelling and grammar mistakes in Useful Edits rather than making Vandalism or troll edits I did before. I am very sorry I understand what I did was wrong and won't do it again. Sincerely - r0cu— Precedingunsigned comment added by~2026-92530-1 (talk)
Decline reason:
I see no benefit to lifting this block. Plus,WP:COMPROMISED.Yamla (talk)18:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(Non-administrator comment) This is not a good look for you - you were blocked because your friend apparently took over your account, then as soon as you're unblocked you begin to vandalise Wikipedia again. Seethis page for why that excuse doesn't work here.
You were aware that this would lead to a block then chose to do it again as soon as the block expired. I tried to help you by giving advice, with a Welcome message that gave you enough information that you should have known better than this.
Wikipedia is run by volunteers; if you mess about, someone else has to spend their own personal spare time fixing it. That's time they could spend making Wikipedia better, or with their family or friends - thankfully your edits were caught by an automated filter and no-one had to waste their time on this.
I'm going to ask you a very important question that you'll need to answer in order to persuade an administrator to consider lifting yoursecond block in less than a week. Please take this matter seriously (more seriously than you've taken Wikipedia so far) and answer this yourself, without AI or chatbots.
Why should we trust you now, when we couldn't trust you before? Why should we give you a third chance to edit Wikipedia?Blue Sonnet (talk)01:19, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]