Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia. It looks like you're doing a lot of constructive editing and maintenance tasks! I must say it's unusual to see a first-time editor whose first day's worth of edits includeplacing a maintenance tag,opening a deletion discussion andadding templates to infoboxes. Did you previously edit here under another account?Dclemens1971 (talk)23:28, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the welcome! This is my first time editing Wikipedia, so I'm very open to critiques/corrections/etc. I have just been following the 'newcomer-suggested easy edit' train the last day or so (perhaps somewhat enthusiastically?).InsomniaOpossum (talk)23:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No critiques; deletion is a little bit of an unusual place to find a first-timer, that's all, so I wanted to ask. Best of luck.Dclemens1971 (talk)02:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest youmake an account to gaina bunch of privileges. Happy editing!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, InsomniaOpossum! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you foryour contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try theTask Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Again, welcome!User:Sushidude21! (talk) 05:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Sushidude21! (talk)04:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome!InsomniaOpossum (talk)05:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch at[1]. That addition is actually part of an abusive-edit pattern by a fairly wide range of IPs. I have no idea what its origin is.DMacks (talk)21:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Zzz plant (talk)21:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded toZzz plant for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during theGOCE February 2025 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Dhtwiki (talk)15:39, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded toZzz plant for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during theGOCE March 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Dhtwiki (talk)06:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded toZzz plant for copyediting 14 articles during theGOCE March 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Dhtwiki (talk)06:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded toZzz plant for copyediting 1 long article during theGOCE March 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Dhtwiki (talk)06:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beartown (series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk)04:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion atUser talk:Valorrr § Your submission at Articles for creation: Derek Verdone (April 26).Valorrr^{(lets chat)}01:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz plant, I just wanted to let you know that I have added thenew page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to thepage curation tools and can start patrolling pages from thenew pages feed. If you asked for this atrequests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance atWikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• AddWikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you useTwinkle,configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to thelist of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers atWikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone!Sohom (talk)16:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much!Zzz plant (talk)16:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, zzz plant, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm glad to see you have already created a well-presented biography of a woman and look forward to many more. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through our essays, perhaps beginning with ourPrimer. If you would like others to see your interest in the project, you can sign up under "New registrations" onWikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. I'm also happy to see you are a new page reviewer. From time to time you might like to review new articles about women, most of which are displayed atUser:SDZeroBot/NPP sorting/Culture/Biography/Women. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk)13:32, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!Zzz plant (talk)21:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you very much for enforcingWP:BLPPRIMARY.~ ToBeFree (talk)00:49, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :')Zzz plant (talk)00:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your professional nomination ofCleveland Palestine Advocacy Community. Thank you for being a Wikipedian!gidonb (talk)22:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!Zzz plant (talk)22:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Zzz plant for accumulating at least 50 points during the May 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 17,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Hey man im josh (talk)19:38, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given in recognition to Zzz plant for accumulating at least 7 points during each week of the May 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 17,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Hey man im josh (talk)19:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	June 2025 AfC backlog drive award
	Thank you Zzz plant for participating in theJune 2025 AfC backlog drive. Your dedication and sustained efforts in reducing the backlog and contributions to Wikipedia's content review process are sincerely appreciated!~/Bunnypranav:<ping>13:40, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your work on Claude H. Organ. So greatly appreciated. Excellent job! BTW, do you know why it is still a Start-Class?JoseyWales019 (talk)22:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi of course, happy to help! You did a great job putting it together. Classification below featured/good/A classes is not always updated very often - you can occasionally even find super thorough, well-cited articles around that are still classed as stubs.
My only remaining thought is about the photo's copyright status / licensing note - maybe I missed something in the bio but was he an employee of the federal government? Usually that licensing note is used when an image is sourced from a congressperson's bio on that governmental website, for example. The link provided looks like an exhibition from the history of medicine department at the NLM, which sounds slightly different to me. But to be honest I find copyright super confusing so I usually check at the copyright help desk if I'm not sure about something. If you or someone else can confirm the photo is definitely okay, that would be great, and then the article can unquestionably be re-classed as C or B :)Zzz plant (talk)22:59, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! That was one of my difficult articles.

Copyrights are very confusing. Because I am a musician, I am extra careful when it comes to copyright material. The photo is from a .gov (NIH) website which is public domain. If you do a lookup on his name, you will see the same photo on a NIH website. FYI: Anything that is in the public domain (.gov) is free use. I keyed all the required data in Wikimedia when I uploaded. I hope this helps.JoseyWales019 (talk)23:17, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's great, thank you for confirming! I've re-classed accordingly to B as it looks to meet all the requirements. Thanks again,Zzz plant (talk)23:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thank you! I will continue to review your comments and work to improve the article. Your second eyes on the article gave me great insight!JoseyWales019 (talk)23:28, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part ofGlobal reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew atWP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved.To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself tom:Global reminder bot/Exclusion.Leaderbot (talk)19:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz plant, I just wanted to let you know that I have added thenew page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to thepage curation tools and can start patrolling pages from thenew pages feed. If you asked for this atrequests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance atWikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• AddWikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you useTwinkle,configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to thelist of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers atWikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone!_signed,Rosguill^talk19:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :-)Zzz plant (talk)21:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz plant, if you get a chance, could you please take a look at the article onLaSalle D. Leffall Jr.? I’ve made major improvements to the article, expanding it significantly with reliable sources, detailed career and military coverage, infoboxes, tables, and a full timeline.

It was initially rated asStart-Class, but I believe it now meets the criteria for a higher class. Your review would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!JoseyWales019 (talk)23:38, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@JoseyWales019:, youdefinitely have enough text and sources for B, but I think it could benefit from a neutral POV red pen. To me it does read as if it was written by an admirer of Leffall. Here are a few selected examples:

• ”In addition to his distinguished academic career...” The source backing this up is his ex-employer, so it’s non-independent- I wouldn't use it to back up a non-neutral characterization of him. An easy fix would be to just remove the word distinguished- most readers would probably infer for themselves that he has had quite a distinguished career.
• ”Leffall served as chair for 25 years, shaping generations of surgeons and medical leaders at Howard.” - Being chair for 25 years is a fact, the rest is subjective and could probably be trimmed.
• ”His legacy continues in the achievements of the surgeons and physicians he trained, the health disparities programs he pioneered, and the leadership roles he made accessible for future generations.” this seems like something that could be included in an obituary or paper honoring him
• The whole mentorship and legacy section - I would recommend eliminating this, or pruning + integrating with other sections. As a standalone area of block quotes it reads more like a memorial/eulogy wall. Sometimes less is more when it comes to reporting on compliments a person was given, or maybe just trying to summarize in a few sentences.

Rating of articles below GA/FA is not an exact science (and tbh I am not an expert) but I just wanted to share with you my initial thoughts after giving it another read. Regardless of the rating, you've done a very commendable job finding sources and expanding the text! Truly very impressive work.Zzz plant (talk)00:43, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent info! Will implement the changes ASAP.JoseyWales019 (talk)00:48, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz plant, Thanks for reviewing my draft,Draft:Act on Åland Autonomy, and especially for pointing me toward the Swedish articlesv:Självstyrelselagen.

As you correctly pointed out, my article is related to Självstyrelselagen. However, Självstyrelselagen is currently linked to the English articleConstitution of Åland, even though they cover different topics. I think this topic deserves its own article, and maybe Självstyrelselagen could be unlinked from Constitution of Åland. I’d appreciate hearing your thoughts on this. Thanks again for your time and help!Klippor (talk)14:00, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Klippor: no problem, it was an enjoyable read! So just to clarify, do you think that sv-wiki Självstyrelselagen should be un-linked from en-wiki Constitution of Åland? I would recommend maybe clarifying on the talk page of your draft how your draft covers a different topic than the current article, just to prevent any confusion from AfC reviewers. Thanks and happy editing,Zzz plant (talk)13:01, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking time to respond and I'm glad you had a good read! As suggested I made a comment on the talk page which I hope clearly outlines my thoughts. In short, Åland doesn't have a constitution so the English article seems a bit misleading. I would appreciate any advice you have in moving forward.Klippor (talk)00:32, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klippor:, thanks for writing up the explanation! It sounds like the article currently in mainspace shouldn't exist at its current title. Personally I think the easiest option may be to rename the page to the more appropriate title and then add your draft content in a merge. You can also ask atteahouse or a relevant WikiProject talk page to get additional feedback from other editors.Zzz plant (talk)01:10, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. After you movedThe Hallmarked Man to a draft, I have replaced the fan site citations with press ones, and have submitted the page for review. If you have a moment, please take a look at it. The book is releasing tomorrow, and will generate a lot of search volume and interest. Also, I am unable to add a cover image while it is still a draft. Thank you.MadScientist (talk)08:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Madscientistjaidev: = looks great! I've accepted the draft.Zzz plant (talk)10:49, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thank you for the quick response.MadScientist (talk)18:14, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzzplant - thank you for your feedback on my submission for the musician Matthew Legard. I would like to respectfully request a re-review, and here is my reasoning. As far as the unofficial sources issue, I believe this is inaccurate. Sources include Apple Music, PBS, Blackhouse Records, knifetwister records, and WTBC-FM in Chicago. In terms of notability, I will point out that there are current Wikipedia pages for musicians that are far less notable. As an example, take the band Arthur & Yu, who hail from the same area. This band has a page of shorter length, far fewer sources, and two of their seven sources are MySpace; I understand that social media is not a legitimate source on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time.— Precedingunsigned comment added byAoxomoxoa1313 (talk •contribs)17:49, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for reaching out. During my review of the draft's sources I did not see any that are independent, secondary sources which also provide the subject with significant coverage. For instance, both the KSPS-TV and knifetwister records pieces are interviews and thus primary sources. Blackhouse records appears to be a self-published Wordpress blog without clear editorial oversight. SeeWP:42 for a general summary of what sources are needed to demonstrate notability. Also, I advise you to avoid the'other stuff exists' pitfall. Because Wikipedia is run by volunteer editors, there are many pages here which should not be here (and vice versa). I see you have already resubmitted; for the sake of neutrality I will allow another AfC reviewer inspect your draft with a fresh set of eyes. Thanks,Zzz plant (talk)18:04, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response, I do appreciate it. I have added two more primary sources to the draft.Aoxomoxoa1313 (talk)05:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz plant. I see thatPdfFiller has been nominated for deletion. Would you consider unreviewing it? It struck me as too promotional in its present form. I notified the creator of the article but they haven’t updated it, and now I see it’s been nominated for deletion. --Northernhenge (talk)09:09, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Northernhenge:, I thought that articles nominated for deletion were marked as reviewed after being checked for copyvio, which is why I marked it. There is a section about AfD noms onWP:New pages patrol/Reports/Easy reviews.Zzz plant (talk)11:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. Thanks for letting me know, and sorry for me missing that. I’ve learned something new! --Northernhenge (talk)18:44, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :-)Zzz plant (talk)21:22, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zzz plant. You have new messages atWikipedia:Peer review/The Woman in the House Across the Street from the Girl in the Window/archive1.
You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

M.Billoo01:28, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz plant, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded theautopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in thenew pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have beenrequested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload ofnew page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevantWikiProject templates,stub tags,categories, andincoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such asRater andStubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia'score content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become anew page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!KylieTastic (talk)09:42, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do note that as an AfC reviewer, accepted submissions will also be auto-patrolled so you need to make sure standard NPP tasks such as tagging are done, or you can mark un-patrolled if you want another set of eyes on it.KylieTastic (talk)09:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow thank you!Zzz plant (talk)10:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick approval of my addition ofVigilance. I'll try to trim the NPR quote, but not from my phone.

And much admiration for your productivity. So many edits in just eight months! Ten times what I've done in 19 years.Steve98052 (talk)01:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course- nice job putting together the article! And thank you for the kind words :-)Zzz plant (talk)01:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cut the in-line quote of the summary, and moved the full quote to a footnote. I'm not sure whether it needs to be there at all, but better there than in-line. I also added some description of the review, with less direct quotation. —Steve98052 (talk)18:47, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it looks great! I removed the excessive quote tag.Zzz plant (talk)21:47, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You added Category:Unprintworthy redirects toList of World Heritage Sites of Mauretania andWorld Heritage Sites of Mauretania. This is not needed, just tag them with Category:Incorrect names, which is already tagged as unprintworthy. Also, I think Mauretania isn't a misspelling but an incorrect name, you can create a request for consensus if you disagree. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩02:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No opposition to classifying them as R from incorrect names, but the only thing I've seen about the redundant printworthiness is hereWikipedia:Printability#Redundant, which seems to be in favor of allowing it. If there's been any other recent discussion or RfC that I'm not aware of feel free to link. It doesn't seem like a redirect can appear more than once in an (un)printworthy category either way.Zzz plant (talk)02:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to thank you again for the kind message, and I also have come asking for some advice. I have been considering requesting NPR rights for a while, and since you have had NPR for a few months, it seems, I was wondering if you think I should run now (or in the near future) or if I should wait a bit. I have read thecriteria and I appear to satisfy everything, but that of course doesn't guarantee anything. I would appreciate some input. Thanks!Lynch4421:44, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, of course, and thank you again for your nice articles :-)

A spot check of your activity looks quite good to me, but as I’ve never evaluated any requests for permission I can’t say for sure what the outcome would be. FWIW, I believe it's a bit more relaxed to get AFC perm versus NPP perm, so you could start with the former if you want to build some more confidence there first. I think that's what I did.Zzz plant (talk)22:13, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I translated anarticle from Russian Wikipedia. If you have time, please take a look. Thank you!178.219.170.136 (talk)13:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wouldn't feel confident evaluating this draft because I don't speak Russian + I'm not familiar with the Russian media landscape (i.e. which sources are consideredreliable). Best,Zzz plant (talk)13:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mae Capone has a update atUser:Davinjp/sandbox

Draft:Sallie Fiske

Draft:Pegi Boucher

Draft:Logic (magazine)

Draft:Candy Samples

Draft:Mary Beth Barone

Draft:National Technical Schools founded by Vrena Bender Rosenkrantz

Draft:Alex Ward (comedian)

Draft:Evan Kleiman

redirect:Mary Desti (Mary Estelle Dempsey, Mary D'Esti) mother toPreston Sturges andIsadora Duncan's close friend

Piñanana (talk)18:12, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure what I'm meant to do with these links. From a cursory look, at least one is not in English + several are not submitted and/or otherwise clearly not ready for mainspace.Zzz plant (talk)19:15, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just wanted to thank you for the creation of the Gothenburg rent strike article!

Also, if you have any interest in joining theWikiProject Housing and Tenant Rights you're more then welcome to join! It's pretty active despite the small group.Catboy69 is working on the2025 rent strike against Capital Realty Group currently for example. There's a lot of tenant history that simply isn't covered on Wikipedia at the moment, including even much of the tactics tenants used historically still needing coverage. Again thanks for creating the article! -LoomCreek (talk)20:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thank you for the welcome and linking to the wikiproject! It's still definitely a work in progress (waiting on some interlibrary loan requests as a lot of the sources for it seem to be offline). I'm probably most interested in Nordic (esp. Swedish) social/labor history but there's a lot of overlap with housing/tenant rights as well. Thanks again :-)Zzz plant (talk)20:47, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Zzz plant. Thank you for your feedback on the above-named article. I have already moved it to draft, so I can write it according to the Wikipedia policy and make all the necessary corrections. I am now confused about the speedy deletion nomination. Could you please advise if moving it to draft is helpful to avoid it being deleted? Thanks for your help.SyzygyRebel (talk)14:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I nominated for deletion simply because it was a cross-namespace redirect (from mainspace into draftspace) perWP:R2. I did not otherwise evaluate the article - although from a spot check of page history I see there were previously issues with copyright violation and citing of self-published sources. Since the subject has been tagged as potentially not meeting theacademic notability guideline, I would recommend using theAFC process to submit the draft for evaluation. You are free to continue working on it in draftspace. Thanks,Zzz plant (talk)14:42, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't know what. Would you be kind enough to move it toAFC for me, please? I am recognising that I may not be able to do this myself. Also, the subject did not cite self-publishing sources but rather, primary sources, and I want to fix that because my intention is not to violate any policy. Thank you.SyzygyRebel (talk)07:55, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's already in draft space so it didn't need to be moved - but I added a template so you now should be able to submit the draft for AFC review when you're finished. Thanks,Zzz plant (talk)12:16, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@[[User:Zzz plant|Zzz plant], thanks a bunch. You've been so helpful. Massive appreciation.SyzygyRebel (talk)13:42, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Good luck with your draft, and happy editingZzz plant (talk)13:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're up for another editing job, I've completed Earl Ellis, another swim coach. The editing shouldn't be too bad as I've checked repeatedly for grammer and spelling. Earl Ellis (swim coach). Check for any obvious signs of pledgarism if you normally do this, though I do rewrite source information consistently. Let me know if you can edit this article. You've done several of my swimmers and coaches. Thanks!!Dcw2003 (talk)dcw2003 And thanks again for your previous edits.

Hi@Dcw2003: - no problem, I hope you don't mind I moved this to my talk page. I will probably do some NPP reviewing later or tomorrow and can take a look then. If someone gets to it before me that's fine too. Thanks,Zzz plant (talk)19:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Zzz plant for accumulating at least 200 points the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Utopes(talk /cont)03:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Geneva mechanism Award
		This award is given in recognition to Zzz plant for accumulating at least 25 points during each week of the September 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles reviewed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Utopes(talk /cont)04:13, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zzz Plant!

Thank you immensely for reviewing the pages, adding categories, and updating my pages it means a great deal!  Please keep up the excellent work!

Additionally, I would greatly appreciate it if you could also review my other pages.

108 names of Shiva, TraceX Guard ,1930 (Indian Cybercrime Helpline).

Thank you once again!Bech07 (talk)16:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry but I prefer to review things randomly from the queue or browser. It looks like one has already been reviewed, hopefully the others are two are soon as well~Zzz plant (talk)15:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]