Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム

Jump to content

User talk:Yovt

Page contents not supported in other languages.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This isYovt'stalk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help.

If I have left you a message: please answer onyour talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer onmy talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This usershouldnot be givenanyalerts forcontentious topics, as he has readthe entire list.

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Yovt! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs)15:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Icop" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectIcop has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 22 § Icop until a consensus is reached.1234qwer 1234qwer 4 18:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting the "Battle of Jabalia" page

[edit]

Hi, I've made an edir request for splitting the "Battle of Jabalia" page, and you referenced me toWP:SPLIT.
As I'm not extended-protected user I can't start a discussion in the talk page about splitting the page. Could you please help me with that?ThanksGuy Haddad 1 (talk)13:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Guy Haddad 1! I can indeed give you some assistance. You are right, theBattle of Jabalia’s talk page states that non extended-confirmed users cannot discuss the topic besides making edit requests. I apologize for not having notified you of that onmy answer to your edit request. Now the main issue with a split is due to the lack ofreliable sources on theBattle of Jabalia article. The sources in the article generally fail to establish the battle’sverifiability, let alone a second battle. In the event that you find enoughWP:SIGCOV sources for the Second Battle of Jabalia,~~I’d suggest following the instructionshere in order to proceed with your proposed article, which you can create a draft for.~~ Feel free to ask any further questions or concerns here.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)13:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youGuy Haddad 1 (talk)14:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HiYovt, draft pages are not exempt fromWP:ARBECR /WP:A/I/PIA andGuy Haddad 1's draft was deleted for this reason. There is an exception for "userspace" well-hidden atWP:A/I/PIA's fourth point. This exception does not apply to any other topic area with such a restriction, so normally even userspace pages are restricted.~ ToBeFree (talk)23:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's an additional absurdity describedon Guy Haddad 1's talk page now. I did all I could to change this situation to a less confusing one, but I only have one vote.~ ToBeFree (talk)23:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ToBeFree, thank you for notifying me of this situation. I understand now what I have done and take full responsibility.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)13:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good, this is pretty confusing.~ ToBeFree (talk)15:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofCriticism of David Cross in Alvin and the Chipmunks for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleCriticism of David Cross in Alvin and the Chipmunks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of David Cross in Alvin and the Chipmunks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CS1 errors (embarrassing)
CS1 error onMid90s [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMid90s, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)17:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error onMid90s [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMid90s, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)14:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error onAlvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageAlvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)15:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error onMid90s [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMid90s, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)17:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error onAlvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageAlvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)17:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error onLyla in the Loop [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageLyla in the Loop, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)21:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error on42 (film) [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the page42 (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)22:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error onMoneyball (film) [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMoneyball (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL andmissing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)18:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] CS1 error onLuka Dončić trade [edit] Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageLuka Dončić trade, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix \|Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)00:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 errors (embarrassing)

CS1 error onMid90s

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMid90s, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)17:19, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onMid90s

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMid90s, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)14:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onAlvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageAlvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)15:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onMid90s

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMid90s, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)17:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onAlvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageAlvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)17:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onLyla in the Loop

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageLyla in the Loop, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)21:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on42 (film)

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the page42 (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)22:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onMoneyball (film)

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageMoneyball (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL andmissing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)18:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onLuka Dončić trade

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageLuka Dončić trade, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)00:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moneyball

[edit]

Hi there - I have no general objection to your edits to theMoneyball (film) synopsis, but I'm confused by your statement that the synopsis was well over 700 words. I just double-checked the word count on wordcounter.net and it gives me 697 words. Is there some other counter you've been using? Cheers.

Namelessposter (talk)05:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nameless, I believe what happened here was that I was pasting the text into a google document when I was trimming the plot, and what likely happened was that I pasted the source code rather than the prose. I understand your concern and I encourage you to fix whatever I broke, thank you for reaching out.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)15:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't break anything. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't messing up any of the other film articles I've edited. Happy editing!Namelessposter (talk)15:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ReTalk:Carousel (film)

[edit]

Could you explain how you saw a consensus to not move there? It's numerically 3:3, which would default tono consensus and I don't see any particular basis to give the opposing arguments more weight.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}20:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pppery, thanks for reaching out. As you know, consensus on Wikipedia isn't determined by a simple vote count but by the strength of arguments. In this case, the opposes provided convincing rationale. "Carousel (film)" serves as theWP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as the page views for the 1956 film way exceed those of other films with the same name. Also, disambiguation conventions allow for partial disambiguation when the topic is highly dominant, which was well supported here. Although adding the year would offer clarity, this argument was subjective, not strongly address consistency. The statementas to disambiguate with "film" implies it's the only film calledCarousel was also not compelling to override established primary topic. More input is welcome.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)22:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're approaching this totally wrong.consistency with what? The default position is to disambiguate fully. Partial disambiguation is an exceptional situation, andis widely agreed to require more than just being the primary topic (although how much more is subject to dispute).And there's a guideline explicitly saying not to use it for films. While sometimes individual discussions can produce consensus for an exception to a guideline, you can't create such a consensus out of an evenly-matched discussion.

And if you think, by your own words thatMore input is welcome, then why didn't you relist?* Pppery *_{it has begun...}23:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency withother primary topic films which do not disambiguate entirely. This current requested move falls under that exceptional situation, and althoughWP:PRIMARYFILM does mention recommendation, it ultimately falls under consensus on whether to omit it or not. When I saidmore input is welcome, I was referring to my talk page. However, I do not discourage a move review.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)15:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2024 November#Carousel (film)* Pppery *_{it has begun...}16:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]

HelloYovt! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Leagues Cup labeled map, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread.

See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diff links in requested moves

[edit]

Hey there, I really like that you linked the diff of the discussion in your request atWP:RM/TR. Next time, though, it'd be even better if you linked the diff of the discussion right after the close, instead of right before. (Putting this here since I've already removed the relevant entry at RM/TR.)Toadspike[Talk]18:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I think what happened here was thatthis script had linked the diff before I closed. I appreciate you reaching out.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)18:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh...I didn't know about that script. I might try using it myself!Toadspike[Talk]18:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content fromAlvin and the Chipmunks intoThe Chipmunk Song (Christmas Don't Be Late). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere),Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.Diannaa (talk)12:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofThe Super Mario Bros. Movie

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleThe Super Mario Bros. Movie you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAli Beary --Ali Beary (talk)17:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hello! Hello, dear Wikipedian, how do you create a template for a contributor page? Thank you. Happy editing!Abduvaitov Sherzod 2008 Wiki X (talk)08:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination ofFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed onFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 12#From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Kline •talk •contribs 02:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge templates should be on article pages

[edit]

Just a quick note to let you know that merge templates should be on article pages, and not on talk pages. I noted that youedited the talk page onTalk:History of Fox News. However, the template was correctly on the article, and shouldn't be on the talk page too (this makes maintainance lists unduly complicated);nowiki was there deliberately to stop the template working. So, templates on the article, discussion on the talk page; seeWP:MERGEPROP Step 2.Klbrain (talk)22:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)18:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofAlvin and the Chipmunks (film)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleAlvin and the Chipmunks (film) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf of1989 --1989 (talk)05:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofAlvin and the Chipmunks (film)

[edit]

The articleAlvin and the Chipmunks (film) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Alvin and the Chipmunks (film) andTalk:Alvin and the Chipmunks (film)/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf of1989 --1989 (talk)17:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited42 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWendell Smith. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)08:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination of42 (film)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the article42 (film) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)21:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofPixels (2015 film)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articlePixels (2015 film) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)11:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofThe Super Mario Bros. Movie

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleThe Super Mario Bros. Movie you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)06:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofThe Super Mario Bros. Movie

[edit]

The articleThe Super Mario Bros. Movie you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:The Super Mario Bros. Movie for reasons whythe nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)06:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofAlvin and the Chipmunks (film)

[edit]

The articleAlvin and the Chipmunks (film) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Alvin and the Chipmunks (film) for comments about the article, andTalk:Alvin and the Chipmunks (film)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf of1989 --1989 (talk)18:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda." listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectI'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda. has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 21 § I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda. until a consensus is reached.Blethering Scot 21:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectI'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 21 § I'll have two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda until a consensus is reached.Blethering Scot 21:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Yovt. Thank you for your work onBatman Rises. Another editor,Utopes, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

No mention of "Batman Rises".

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Utopes}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Utopes_{(talk /cont)}01:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review howcopyright works

[edit]

Copyright means that one has to examine copyright at every level when dealing with creative works, not just who was the person who took a particular photograph. In this case, theLego Movie film set is technically a sculpture, a creative work to which copyright automatically attaches by operation of law. The set was likely built as a work for hire for the production company that made the film, and then the right to depict it was licensed by that company to Warner Bros.

I deliberately uploaded my photo of the film set to the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale and not Commons because I am not a Warner Bros. Entertainment employee. I do not have the power to license the right to depict the film set to the Wikimedia Foundation. It's obvious that the person who took that photo on Commons didn't have that power either, so that latter photo is going to have to be deleted. In the meantime, I've reverted your edit toThe Lego Movie article.Coolcaesar (talk)19:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This image is under a creative commons license, one verified in May 2019.

Hello @Coolcaesar, thanks for bringing this up. The photo you speak of that you restored,File:Thelegomovieset.jpg, is indeed under a not free license and is thus required to have a lesser resolution. On the other hand, the clearer image I added (set to|thumb here) would be of more encyclopedic value. If you claim the image does not have the appropriate license, I suggest bringing this up to Commons along with the other imagesFile:The Lego Movie movie set at legoland ca DSC 8563 (14501619997).jpg,File:The Lego Movie movie set at legoland ca DSC 8587 (14684885111).jpg, andFile:The Lego Movie movie set at legoland ca DSC 8562 (14707951843).jpg to see if you can get consensus to delete those. If you cannot do so, I will restore the file I added previously. Thanks,𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)22:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The_Elephant_Man_(film)

[edit]

Again you've closed a discussion as "not moved" in favor of partial disambiguation when there wasn't a consensus for that. This discussion has very similar numbers and arguments toTalk:Carousel (film) which was overturned to no consensus at move review, so "not moved" seems like it's really reaching.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}01:35, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pppery, with all due respect, you did not even participate in theElephant Man RM you mention. Neither of the participants there have reached out to me regarding the closure. Additionally,This discussion has very similar numbers and arguments toTalk:Carousel (film) seems like the reaching statement here. If I were you I would consider asking the participants of the Elephant RM if the closure was appropriate. I can give my own 2 cents as well, but I would rather inquire with the actual participants of the article renaming discussion in question.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)17:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not required to have participated in a discussion to challenge its closure. In this case I apparently missed the discussion until the page was added toWP:Partially disambiguated page names, which is on my watchlist - if I had participated I would have opposed. And dismissing my statement asreaching without more substance feels wrong.

Contrary to your claim, uninvolved users are actually better at assessing consensus than involved ones, which is why closers have to be uninvolved.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}18:47, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

uninvolved users are actually better at assessing consensus than involved ones Agree, that's why I closed the discussion.

If substance if what you're asking for then here it goes:

The nominator Tbhotch only cited theWP:NCF guideline
The sole supporter Erik noted... unless there is preference to make the Lynch film the primary topic.
Supporters Station1 and Amakuru brought uppage view comparison andWP:INCDAB as well asWP:CONLEVEL, claimingThe Elephant Man (film) is the primary topic (with Station 1 proposing to move toThe Elephant Man).

The supporting parties overall claim thatthere is preference to make the Lynch film the primary topic (thus Tbhotch's stance could have changed, maybe ask) due to contrasting statistical (pageviews) and broader-guideline (that being WP:INCDAB) perspectives. INCDAB states:In individual cases consensus may determine that a parenthetically disambiguated title that is still ambiguous has aprimary topic...

Overall,this discussion was rightfully closed asNot Moved because itjust wasn't moved. If you still believe this wasn't a warranted closure, I would't recommend taking this toWP:MR without first discussing it with the RM participators, but that's really splitting hairs.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)17:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Move review/Log/2025 January#The Elephant Man (film).* Pppery *_{it has begun...}22:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to make the same request, so I'm glad someone else has already gotten to it.InfiniteNexus (talk)23:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to inform you (edit: solved)

[edit]

Per the editorial discretion you gave, I mergedItalian Ethiopia/Italian occupation of Ethiopia toItalian East Africa with a bold move; the two articles covered the same and the 1st was contained in (and derived from) the 2nd with copied content. Initially I did not realize it and very much misread your comment; I was changing it to "Ethiopia in Italian East Africa" for MoS:clarity to do the various administrative and infobox corrections noted by users in the talk page. I fixed this by abandoning the changes I was making and redirecting it toItalian East Africa. So basically I created an intermediate redirect page that was not needed, just to inform you.Barjimoa (talk)09:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I fixed this by redirecting the previous ones to Italian East Africa and not to the intermediate one. Now it's fine.Barjimoa (talk)10:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wizard of Oz

[edit]

Hi, why did you revert my edit on the talk page of The Wizard of Oz?Jorge906 (talk)11:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jorge, thank you for reaching out. On Wikipedia,one must be a significant contributor to what they wish to nominate for Good Article. Looking at theTop 50 authors list forThe Wizard of Oz, you do not even appear, and GA requires the nominator to either be rank 5 or higher, or contact a significant contributor. In the event you make enough contributions to that article, or contact a significant contributor and have their permission to move forward, them you may nominateThe Wizard of Oz.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)21:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

im on the top 50 for the Judy garland articleJorge906 (talk)09:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"What is wikipedia about" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectWhat is wikipedia about has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 6 § What is wikipedia about until a consensus is reached.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}17:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I swear I'm not intentionally following you, even though I've started 3 discussions about your actions in the last few weeks - this came to my attention via a report for titles created as a suffix of a salted title, not anything specific to you.* Pppery *_{it has begun...}17:28, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]

HelloYovt! The thread you created at theTeahouse,"Combined footnote" help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread.

Trump began his second presidency by restoring biological truth to the federal government.

[edit]

That's what you made the article say when you made this edit:Special:Diff/1276224026

Please check out the concept ofWP:WIKIVOICE regarding such statements. There are things we can stay in own voice and things we can't. To say that Trump restored biological truth to the federal government, we would need a secondary source about how this event occurred, not on paper, not as an officially proclaimed aim, but as the physical truth, the ground truth, the truth about the shared reality. Sincerely—Alalch E.23:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"That's what you made the article say" sounds like the WIKIVOICE statement to me. To clear up, I pipedExecutive Order 14168 in there, whose full title was "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism andRestoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government"; the addition was per the titling. I understand my addition would seen not neutral, and believe a better additionmay have beenTrump began his second presidency byrolling back federal recognition of genders besides male and female, or something more concise; hmm...𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)03:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That suggestion would have worked. We don't even have to see it as a neutrality issue, because the statement fails already at verifiability. The statement "Trump began his second presidency by restoring biological truth to the federal government" is a statement of fact which is not verifiable. —Alalch E.04:12, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teamwork on México

[edit]

Hi, old timer here. Thanks for supplying the ref for the president of Mexico. I'm contributing in my cell phone, and it's hard to copy and paste and format, etc.Uncle Ed (talk)19:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, and I find a smartphone editor with over 59k edits impressive.𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝)19:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YourGA nomination ofPixels (2015 film)

[edit]

The articlePixels (2015 film) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Pixels (2015 film) for comments about the article, andTalk:Pixels (2015 film)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofVestrian24Bio --Vestrian24Bio (talk)11:44, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Carl Azuz

[edit]

Thank you for your help withDraft:Carl Azuz. The bit about Azuz’s genealogy comes from an interview with him from the homeschool curriculum company Sonlight. We know Azuz produced content for Sonlight, the video is from Sonlight, we know Azuz is in the video, therefore I feel like it is a quality source. The channel it was posted on has is an established account (joined YT in 2008) with over 8,000 subscribers and 600+ videos. I’m not sure how YouTube verification works, but that would appear legitimate to me.Pveclaire (talk)01:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Jd v" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectJd v has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 26 § Jd v until a consensus is reached.Rusalkii (talk)03:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited42 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBen Chapman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:56, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Knight page move

[edit]

HiYovt! I noticed you closed the discussion for Heather Knight but moved the pageHeather Knight toHeather Knight (disambiguation), but didn't move the article about the cricketer. I suggest you revert one of these moves or moveHeather Knight (cricketer) to simplyHeather Knight. Thank you.Servite et contribuere (talk)16:58, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Mt mc" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectMt mc has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 7 § Mt mc until a consensus is reached.Hey man im josh (talk)20:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Mt ev" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectMt ev has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 7 § Mt ev until a consensus is reached.Hey man im josh (talk)20:12, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 18 § 0.99999.... until a consensus is reached.Rusalkii (talk)03:47, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Michael Jordans" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectMichael Jordans has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 18 § Michael Jordans until a consensus is reached.35.139.154.158 (talk)19:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error onSeven Days in Utopia

[edit]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageSeven Days in Utopia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)02:22, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yovt&oldid=1281226820"

[8]ページ先頭