Welcome to my talk page feel free to talk to me if you love food or bowling! (edited 11/5/2025 9 AM (CST))Zakkgamesontwitch (talk)15:41, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloYourLocalZakkFromSomewhere! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Lets make the WikiProject Bowling active again!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:28, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been trouted for: I got minnowed

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

It appears that there is clear consensus atTalk:LeBron James against this particular split. Please gain consensus for your split first.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:LeBron James Professional Career (Split Article) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk)05:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,YourLocalZakkFromSomewhere!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!MCE89 (talk)05:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nah its fine. It was for the denied split.YourLocalZakkFromSomewhere (talk)13:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page, and seekconsensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did atPirzada, you may beblocked from editing.

I don't know why you made those reverts; you're just making extra work for me. Doing it without explanation is rude. Mind you, I actually looked through all the sources.~2025-39408-19 (talk)18:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated you are blanking a article.YourLocalZakkFromSomewhere (talk)18:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well you were wrong, and that's because you didn't look at the content, and didn't actually check the sources.~2025-39408-19 (talk)18:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Pleasestop editing the page and use thetalk page to work toward creating a version of the page that representsconsensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaininghow this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution such as athird opinion. In some cases, you may wish to requestpage protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editormust not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. I don't think youneed this, but I gave it to the TA so I'll give it to you as well.FantasticWikiUser (talk)18:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stop. But it seems like the TA is blanking the article. I'm a recent changes patroller & I saw that the TA was removing stuff that seemed like Section Blanking/Blanking in multiple edits. Neither too was the TA using reasons for most of those edits.YourLocalZakkFromSomewhere (talk)18:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any regards of the current edit war. I've stopped undoing the changes. I always use good faith. I thought the TA was section Blanking/blanking the article. I am wanting to become a administrator in the future.YourLocalZakkFromSomewhere (talk)18:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to trout me on it as well. (On my userpage)YourLocalZakkFromSomewhere (talk)18:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that you nominated the articleAJR forGood article status. You do not appear to have made significant edits to the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page.Current practice is that only editors who have significantly contributed to the article are able to nominate it (seethe nomination instructions). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. Thank you.Leafy46 (talk)02:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And who would be signifcant editors? Zakk😎 (talk)14:01, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! If you look atWP:GA/I, you'll see that a significant editor is the author of either at least 10% of the prose, or is ranked #5 or higher on the authorship ranking. You can see your own ranking, as well as the rankings of others,here.Leafy46 (talk)16:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its restricted on my end. (Zakk😎)18:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloYourLocalZakkFromSomewhere! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Do I have enough contributions to suggest AJR for GAA, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)05:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloYourLocalZakkFromSomewhere! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Should we do a GAA (Good article assessment) on Eminem?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)04:34, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloYourLocalZakkFromSomewhere! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Should we revive the WP:Bowling Project, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

YourLocalZakkFromSomewhere,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001^☎18:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001^☎18:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC