Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you were quick to use the reference desk for one of your questions. There's also the handy help desk too - you can get there if you typeWP:HD in the search box. Lots of Wikipedia pages have abbreviations. Also, to use the user talk pages, you can click on the little plus sign (+) next to the "edit this page" link. This automatically makes a new heading, and is very convenient to use. Happy editing! :-) --HappyCamper 11:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message onmy talk page. Or, please come to theWikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type{{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!

I saw your entry on the New Users page, especially your note about American English. Make sure you read overthe national varieties of English policy. --Essjay · Talk 08:13, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

That's not what I meant, I swear! I didn't mean to imply you couldn't use American English; I just wanted to give you the heads up about the way Wikipedia deals with the diversity of "versions." There have been "edit wars" over using one way or the other and new users can easily get"bitten" by other users if they make changes without realizing that there's a policy. (It wouldn't be the first time someone innocently changed "center" to "centre" or "honor" to "honour.") Rencently, there was a flare up over "gasoline" v. "petrol"; I wouldn't want you to wander into the middle of something like that unprepared. Just trying to keep the "vicious" users at bay by giving you the heads up; I feel like the lion tamer! "Back you bitter oldies! He's new! Back I say!"

I hope you enjoy the wiki, and if you have any questions, let me know.  :-> --Essjay · Talk 09:07, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

I just saw your one of comments recently, and I wanted to stop by and say another welcome to the Wikipedia community, and also have a Happy 17th Birthday! =) --Andylkl^(talk) July 2, 2005 03:47 (UTC)

Hi there. I saw your summary at theCarrie Underwood article, and I've noticed that you said that you didn't know how to revert.Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version is the link that will show you how to revert articles to previous versions. I hope this will be of great help to you! Regards, --Gramaic |Talk07:46, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on mytalk page.Oleg Alexandrov15:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A picture containing nudity clearly does not meet thecriteria for speedy deletion. If you want that image deleted, follow the properimage for deletion process. Some related pages that you may want to read over include:

• Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors - where it states that pornography related articles may contain nudity
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy - all aspects of the deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Content disclaimer - the general disclaimer of content

--JamesTeterenko15:31, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up on theU.S. Congressional Delegations from American Samoa. This wasn't never meant to be an article, per se; but they were meant as Templates for the Congressional member articles floating around . -Hoshie |Support the Chagossians!08:44, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was doing several at the same time and I must have hit this one by mistake.CambridgeBayWeather09:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,You were asking why I blanked out the redirecting of Hopen to Smøla. It's simply because they have nothing to do with each other!
Smøla is as described correctly in Wikipedia a municipality far away from Svalbard and the Hopen redirecting to it.

I think there might be a confusion with Hopen Brygge, which is part of Smøla.

Best regards./John.

-- ** ADDED LATER ** --

Hmm. OK, I suppose it is in a way correct to redirect it as Hopen is ALSO indeed a part of Smøla. Sorry for what I wrote earlier. The reason I blanked it out in the first place was that I stumbled upon it when reading about the 3 islands of Svalbard and Hopen there linked directly to Smøla through that redirect.

So, there is are obviously two places in Norway that can be refered to as Hopen, and I therefore I still don't think there should be an automatic redirect to Smøla.

Best regards,/John.

No need to tell me of something like that...and I really can tell the difference between a banana and a chemical. Trust me.  :) If you look at the edit history, you'll see the original entry was near nonsense. Redirects have the advantages of being both cheap and preventing red links. -Lucky 6.907:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You put the cleanup tag onEagle River, Alaska, and I'm a native of there, so I could help you out. I just don't quite know what to add.DevastatorIIC 20:53, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

My message about the bolding was directed at people who might want to de-bold the list of winners. I wanted the winners in bold so that I could add the nominees later in unbold--if someone unbolded the winners just because the nominees weren't added yet, it would be more difficult for me to re-bold when I added the nominees! So don't look at the top of the list (where nominees haven't been added yet), look at the bottom of the list where there are nominees. Some bold is certainly needed so that the winner stands out; I'm not really sure whether the winning writer should be bold as well. In terms of emphasis, I think both the name of the play and the name of the writer deserve emphasis; this award is given to the writer's contribution to the play, not to the play as a whole. It doesn't really matter to me, so I'll yield to your judgement in the matter. If you think one line out of four in bold is too much, I won't object. What does need to be changed, in my opinion, is the winner being on a separate line from the year. That I'm changing back, because it's important to do that to make the winner stand out--that way, it's easier for the eye just to pick out the winners from year to year with the indentation. If there's any other formatting thoughts you have, feel free to post atTalk:Tony Award for Best Book of a Musical and we can discuss it there.Kevin M Marshall04:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your comment onTalk:Main Page that said Wikipedia is written in American English except for certain cases. This is not the policy. For the English Wikipedia, there is no preference among the major national varieties of English. Though articles that focus on a topic specific to a particular English-speaking country should generally conform to the spelling of that country.Evil Monkey∴Hello04:31, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the deletion of this article. I am new to Wikipedia (I mean editing it, not reading) and is getting a feel of things. Will be careful next time..

PeaSea

Thanks for fixing{{selfref}}, but do you know why the editors included that <hidden> part with the{{main}} and See also in the first place? (And this has been a recent addition as well). —jiy (talk)02:09, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I meant <noinclude> oops. I understand why it would be used for things like categorizing the template into sayCategory:Wikipedia maintenance, but shouldn't comments, rationale, usage instructions, etc. go in the template's talk page? Actually, it seemsUser:Zondor has been applying this convention of including meta-info within the template for several templates. I'm not sure if he's doing this alone or if there is some discussion behind it? Personally I find it confusing. —jiy (talk)02:42, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I notice you left a comment several paragraphs long atTalk:Proof that 0.999... equals 1. You tagged the comment as a "minor edit", which is not what you want. A typical minor edit corrects spelling or punctuation. Busy editors can hide all minor edits from theirWatchlist if they choose; they would never be aware of your comment. Since all your edits are tagged minor, it's likely that you selected that option in yourPreferences under the Editing tab. Either choice is fine of default is fine, but you still need to decide for each edit whether it is minor. For your protection, I would recommendnot using "minor" as default, because it's a mere nuisance if a truly minor edit is not so tagged, but it is consideredbad behavior to tag some major edits as minor.

There is no need to reply, but if you wish you can do so here. Happy editing. --KSmrq^T08:26, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I leave that by default is because the majority of my editsare minor.  :)x42bn6Talk08:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rick vanover does not give 36000 google hits. With quotes it gives 83 hits, which is definitely a lot less. (my name in quotes gives 15 hits and I haven't authored a book.Any I support the deletion of the article..PeaSea

You are right. I replaced the text with what is in your sandbox. With one exception, I like the period (.) inside of the math tags. Otherwise, if it is outside, it can look a bit misaligned, and sometimes it even goes to a new line. Thank you for your patience.Oleg Alexandrov (talk)01:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page, to keep all discussion in one place.Oleg Alexandrov (talk)04:01, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And I replied again. on my talk page. :) Let me know when you get that article done.Oleg Alexandrov (talk)22:07, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I know themethod of differences under the nametelescoping series, and we already have an article under the latter name. I know, it's very annoying, isn't it? I put a merge tag on your article, but afterwards I thought that it would be nicer to tell you personally. So here you are. Would you mind looking if you can combine the articles? I especially like your discussion on how it does not always work. Cheers,Jitse Niesen (talk)17:57, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. I did not recognize the method astelescoping series when X42bn6 mentioned it to me before writing the article. Yes, I guess the two will need to be merged now.Oleg Alexandrov (talk)22:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it again to{{lowercase-user}}, lol. There's a category as well. Hopefully if the software ever changes to allow lowercase titles, that will allow users who want their name changed to quickly do so. —()16:45, Jan. 30, 2006

I'm not quite sure what you're referring to. The most recent change I've done to theDigimon page is changing the vocal credits for the 02, Tamers, and Frontier ED songs.Digimon: Digital Monsters (anime) is not on my watchlist, so I don't edit anything on it.Soulsteelgray02:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's a bit mad to say this - and I know you've no real reason to believe me, as I'm just some guy you've bumped into on Wikipedia - but while Frontier was airing in the US, I was in regular contact with the dub director, Mary Elizabeth McGlynn, to gain information on voice actors and such things for my [website]. She confirmed that "Loewemon" spelling for me as the one used in the show's scripts, but since the character's name never appeared onscreen, and since Bandai called him "Loweemon," that spelling never really entered popular use with fans. -Chris McFeely 30th December 2005

Technically, they are the same thing mind, as oe is a way of writing ö without the umlaut. Oh, and PS.. while I'm also just another random person on the internet, I can vouch for Chris' veracity on matters concerning the Digimon dubShiroi Hane03:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to get some stuff done over at the digimon wikiproject, and have reorganized the project page. I also added a To-do list. In hoping we can collaborate.Circeus17:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit toTrue Love introducedpiping to the disambiguation page.Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) prescribes not using piping on disambigaution pages. Thanks, --Commander Keane09:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? If it is aboutTemplate:Announcements/Community bulletin board, if you look at the edit history, you'll notice the multiple exclamation marks were there before I added the link to the PR release. If not, then I honestly have no idea what you are talking about; I can't remember the last time I even used an exclamation mark on Wikipedia. --llywrch02:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We all make mistakes. If you still feel guilty, edit a random article. ;-)llywrch03:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, f is usually associated with a function, while a, b, c, are usually associated with either constants or cconstant coefficients (that change with n if its a_n etc). So I changed it to f to make it ever so slightly clearer that the ratio test takes the nth *function* of the summation series, rather than a coefficient or constant.Fresheneesz10:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh sorry I realised I'd been doing something wrong after a while so I posted on the talk page, because I wasnt sure. My apologies. What does it mean to pipe links?_T+C11:24, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, I think youve misunderstood what I was doing, I was unpiping all the Manchester United links that linked to Manchester United F.C., partly because as far as I am aware the club is named Manchester United and not Manchester Untied F.C., as it changed its name. I posted on the talk page about this though, because no-one else seems to have mentioned it, so it might not be true._T+C

I'm sorry if you think I'm too new to be an adminship but I've been being a Wikipedian since December, 2003. I just didn't have an account. I know all about Wikipedia. I have interviewed many Wikipedians and have even made friends with a few. I WAS a perfect adminship nominee. An old nominee,General Eisenhower17:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot03:04, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your feedback on my edits of the article for the footballer 'Alan Smith', and although out of respect for your work i have not changed what you wrote there, i feel the need to point out that i disagree with your appraisal of my contribution. firstly, i wrote that all incidents involving friction between smith and leeds united supporters were 'alleged' which is different from saying that they definately occured. in addition, as a leeds united supporter and someone who is in constant contact with many other leeds supporters, i can say definitely that alan smith DID offend many leeds fans by moving to manchester united, and that he did not finish the season by kissing the badge, but rather cursed at leeds fans during his final away game. west yorkshire police also advised against smith appearing in the testimonial for former leeds player Lucas Radebe in 2005 because they were unable to guarantee the security of the match if Smith took part. this is clear evidence that Smith's relationship with Leeds supporters is tarnished beyond repair, following his comments and actions immediately prior to his departure from the club. this negative apsect of his reputation has been completely glossed over in the article on Smith's career, however, and i feel that this is fundamentally wrong, and that it is not in the best interests of wikipedia accuracy to ignore these extremely negative aspects of his character. as you are a more senior editor, however, i leave it to your discration to decide what is right. thank you - perry w.b.—Precedingunsigned comment added byPxw324 (talk •contribs)

My uncle might not be called a reliable source but Bandai New York has an article about it on their information website but good luck finding the website funny boy.—Precedingunsigned comment added byApril2 (talk •contribs)

I'm assuming you can keep this person (↑) in check? I'll be going off.Circeus02:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of thekindness campaign, and on behalf of all the Wikipedians out there, I'd like to thank you for your tireless contributions to Wikipedia with this cookie. Feel free to add it to your user page or similar, and tell the world :) --Draicone^(talk)10:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot11:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are of course totally right, I think I slipped that one in a moment of distraction. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up though. Take care --Xasf 08:26, 11 August 2006 (GMT+3)

Hey, i noticed on your userpage that your "Current Crusade" is to"Standardise all Digimon articles. Not yet started. List of Digimon#A."

You may be interested to take a look atthis project page (and it's talk page) where a few of us are trying to reorganized all the -mon articles on Wikipedia. It's a big task (considering how many digimon articles there are) so any help would be appreciated ^_^ -07:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot21:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say sorry I missed the added nicknames when I reverted a POV edit on the wayne rooney page, I should have checked the last few previous edits. Many thanks for sorting it outRyanPostlethwaite^{Seethe mess I've created orlet's have banter}23:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my respons on your edits at Malay'sKedai Kopi. :) &mdashPolar 16:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I've made an edit to yourhelp desk answer regarding a user's edit. As I'm sure you're aware of,WP:BLP encourages us to avoid unsourced negative info about living persons, and we could avoid repeating such comments inadvertently. Just a note. Thanks for helping out at the desk. Cheers.Xiner (talk,email)03:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clean up, it needed it, and I hope to learn from it. Is external link a reference? <Yoradler515:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC)>[reply]

I know no one "owns" a page, but I should get credit for making one if I started it in the first place. --

But surely you must get some "personal satisfaction" in knowing that you began a page for something that turns out to be quite popular? --

Thanks! The guy had some nerve, so I was only too happy to minimise the damage he was causing. -Dudesleeper ·Talk00:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why'd you remove my question from aiv page? It's a legit admin question.Rlevse00:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. no problem.Rlevse00:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your username is more like a password. I suppose that after a while I'll be able to keyboard it without checking it over and over. I also suppose that it'snot without significant meaning, why else?  ;-) --hydnjotalk 08:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Oops, fixed username. --hydnjotalk19:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you are threating me and me and Craxy were doning nothing please stop threating and we have the freedom if a black man was to beat you up because you did first thats called self defence and should not be accused of vilonce this is not a threat or mad note this is simpley telling you to please repeat PLEASE stop threating me and my homie im only mad at Kyltym because of his rude aggenst Blacks and Hispanic note—The precedingunsigned comment was added byButterrum (talk •contribs)04:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

sir i do not like or love and will not take racisum he should be warned as well and tell that guy that is saying im racist to please back off i was only using self defence and will not take this i dont not like the fact 100 people are warning me for nothing he should be warn ~Jesus loves remeber that~ and freedom is beatiful

yes i do bealvie your claims of me being cool but nop that is not what started this this is a new issue i am curtly angered by the fact of him saying he hates Blacks and Hispanics and he shall also be warned

i demand to talk to the owner of wikipedia all the adfmin are curropted and seem to follow one person--Butterrum10:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been throwing around accusations of racism, personal attacks, and corruption for some time (and is probably lucky not to have been blocked for them); when asked for evidence, he simply repeats the accusations at louder volume. I've tried to find any evidence for his accusations, but have failed. Judging by his writing, it may be that his reading skills have misled him as to what other editors are saying (though that might be assuming good faith one step too far). Have a look at my Talk page for a taste. --Mel Etitis ()13:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I semi-protected one page and have been trying to persuade people to be nice to one another and concentrate on putting type to page, rather than getting caught up in feuds. Probably best this is dealt with by multiple admins, so it can be seen as impersonal.TimVickers04:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand me. I am not one to deny that love at first sight exists, or that couples fortunate enough to be blessed with it find courtship unnecessary. However, in its earlier version, the article implied that it was enough forone person to fall in love from first sight for the courtship ritual to be abandoned. As I am sure You'll agree, this is not the case. I simply wanted clarity. --132.69.234.7320:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remove some lines at the discussion page for John Francis O'Shea page (the footballer), that had no reliable source. Other persons had replied to the material and therefor I removed that also making the discussion page for John Francis O'Shea blank. I can't see any wrongdoing. Infact if any person can put a comment on a articles discussion page with remarks to sexual preferences with no reliable source I might be tempted to put one here and I will complain if you remove it due to lack of source material. "Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately"—The precedingunsigned comment was added by83.243.177.248 (talk •contribs).

Thank you for your message and your concern. Actually, I did not consider myself in any danger of running afoul of the canvassing guideline, as it allows for friendly notification of a limited number of familiar, like-minded individuals. All of the people who have been notified have been previously involved in some capacity in the most recent, style-related discussions connected with the Clamp group and its work, with the two most vocal supporters of stylized typography in these matters - pfahlstrom and Kyaa the Catlord, I believe the later voiced the respective canvassing concerns - already being present at the table. Regards -Cyrus XIII23:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi X42bn6. Thank you for your support in my RfA. Rest assured that I heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Please don't hesitate to give me constructive criticism anytime.

Now, let me smother you.Xiner (talk,email)13:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what im talking about is all the admintors are leting a single person get away with some stuff a user was dealted and he didnt state why he deated him or blocked him at all and this certain user is sort of controlling aidmin to come here say that i cant spell then leave or even let me write anything and i already listed the resion for my stuff all the admin i know are to curropt or is/are sockpuppets--Butterrum16:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to apologize for all of this nonsense I'm dealing with; I'm doing my best not to egg him on, but it seems like it's not doing any good, and more and more people, perhaps unnecessarily, are getting involved. Something that was a simple content dispute between 2 editors 4 months ago has become something much worse. I just wish to apologize for all of the stress this may have caused you. ♣Klptyzm^{Chat wit' me§Contributions} ♣18:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but I didn't want any other people dealing with this "jackass-edness" I had to deal with for more that 3 months. It's pretty annoying and I'd rather no one else have to deal with it. ♣Klptyzm^{Chat wit' me§Contributions} ♣00:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

im geting clean admin to take a look at this problem he threaten me and your not even doing anything about ti he swore to thyis is called Fraud you chould be stripped of your rank as a admin so i got a few clean one to scope this out and deal with certin users that are bending admin --Butterrum02:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

because i need help i need tusted help because i hate that theres curroted users and people geting blocked because of crazyness and that im blame for sock puppeting i dont need your help if your the one thats making it even more worse--Butterrum14:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both Craxy and Butterrum have been getting in on the sockpuppeting craze; I don't have any concrete evidence but I'm sure it's them; check my talk page. Man, this is annoying.... ♣Klptyzm^{Chat wit' me§Contributions} ♣15:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind; Mel Etis (I hope I spelled that right) has handled it. Thanks anyway. ♣Klptyzm^{Chat wit' me§Contributions} ♣15:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need. It's been taken care of: Mel Etitis blocked him, along with a sockpuppet of Butterrum's. ♣Klptyzm^{Chat wit' me§Contributions} ♣23:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the intervention onTalk:Pallywood. Regarding the deleted tag, I can't restore it due to 3RR - could you please sort it out? --ChrisO01:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unless it is in bad faith - and this is not bad faith.see POV pushing discussion

as for the rest of your argument, i believe that people who have some expertiese on the topic have shown why it is indeed notable - you can examine the article for starters, and i believe i've included some still missing information in my linked reply (i.e. "jenin, jenin" + pierre rehov, full length ducumentry, response).Jaakobou03:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well i dont know if i should trust you anymore after all you did suspect me of sockpuppeting and helped that user Klyptzm out and made up lame and fake excuses to get me blocked without proof of me being a sock puppeting or helping others many users have been blocked from wikipedia becuaser of the gta article and they trace to KLP he makes fuin of how i type man this should be taken care of if i owned wikipedia id stop the rage and battle started by that kid there is no justice in this place no more just corrupted and the bent all frauding therre way out of troble and geting people blocked i dont wanna list a complant because i know your just gonna tell Klp again and start this mess all over like u said you have a thick skin--Butterrum14:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes i do wanna file a commplant and i looked at the edits i made on its page theres nothing wrong with him and see he blamed me for somthing witfch he hid he wrote this witch i retreved from your pageBoth Craxy and Butterrum have been getting in on the sockpuppeting craze; I don't have any concrete evidence but I'm sure it's them; check my talk page. Man, this is annoying.... what is that then huh you helped him --Butterrum14:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thats because he was harrasing me first always saying on a Sean mc Sean charater and junk or Craxy he blocked a kid because he said he was a sock puppet lots of people are being blocked because of him and i wanna end this YOU GOTTA HELP ME this is going on for tio long and what dose that haev to do with anything--Butterrum17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok but you gotta help me an other user lost there account and they were blamed for sock puppeting WITHOUT PROOF and now im being blamed i have to say yes thats me for everything to stay out of troble im paranoid here i dont know who to trust at all anymore the only people i trusted arer blocked they had proof on Klyptzm to but scien there blocked i cant get any proof besides ones that your gonna say is useless he broke the 3RR rule but no 1 did anything i did it before and i got blocked for it nahh i dont think this is a excelpida i think this is GRand Theft Auto Wikipedia--Butterrum14:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

but why is Liberty City's Miguel, ptpGTA and GTAXI all got blocked and when i checked it said these wordsBLOCKED for SOCKPUPPETING then it said the suposovly owner Craxy i think this is becominhg stupid and sorry i didnt know whaqt 3RR was i thought it was short for reverting well ok ill stop till we finally find out what is what--Butterrum15:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's just the thing: itis resolved; Butterrum willnever agree on something that isn't going his way. I've, along with other users, have told him why he's wrong, yet he still persists to add those incorrect edits to the article. You've told me to stop reverting the article until that dispute is resolve; crap, you might as well tell me to wait until forever, because that's exactly how long it's going to take. Go take a look at the talk page archives to see what I mean. I had to archive the page 2 times due to his unnecessary stubborness. ♣Klptyzm^{Chat wit' me§Contributions} ♣21:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh heh, we'll see, man, we'll see.... ♣Klptyzm^{Chat wit' me§Contributions} ♣22:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It will be allowed to add dota.brainmarket.ru to thehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DotA in case if i will add all listed in article types of DotA maps to my download section? I can extend content of my site to cover all DotAs not only Allstars. Regards,Rrrichi.

Please see the discussion on theTalk:North Buffalo, New York page regarding your change of the name.
T.C.03:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not sure if I followed your instructions correctly. I taggedNorth Buffalo, Buffalo, New York for speedy deletion, but it did not get blown away yet. Maybe I just need to be patient, but could you take a look to make sure that I did it right?

T.C.02:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,North Buffalo, Buffalo, New York got turned down for speedy deletion. What should I do now?

T.C.01:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say, thanks for the help, expecially as I know you didn't completely agree with my idea here. I was thinking about creating articles for all of the different neighborhoods just so that all of the names would be defined already. If I just put a title into those articles do you think that they would just be deleted right away?

T.C.03:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nowmost of the alt codes work :) but I still cant get the smileys :(. Thanks again for your help, Razorclaw • 20070419161452

Thank you for the assist with the DeVry article! I like the new layout and phrasing on the site -- I think you found the compromise that myself and the other major current editor of the page weren't able to find on our own. I'm happy to see other editors jump in and work on the page, whereas before it was being very much driven by one user's vision of the article.OtterZero17:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)OtterZero[reply]

Thanks for fixing the logo. You're doing some great work on the DeVry article - keep it up!Vagary22:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the BLP pruning. Looks like we got it right before it got under lock and key.:-D --Iamunknown00:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching my unsigned warning notices on Codeplowed's talk page. I wasn't sure if those are intended to be signed or not, but I think you're right, it's better with a signature.

I also saw that you removed the latest rant that he added on the DeVry talk page. I know the Wikiguides permit removing un-civil content, but I wonder in this situation if it might be better to leave it in place and instead use strike-text tags and then add a comment about why it was struck.

The only reason I suggest that is I have a feeling this is going to be an administrator case pretty soon and it might be less confusing that way.

Just a suggestion - You're within your rights and the policies to choose either method.

Have a good day... --Parzival41822:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Received & understood your message on my talk page. Do you want to let this go for a while and monitor the page as you have been, or are you consideringWP:AIV orWP:RFC/U? I'm not directly involved in editing the article and just came to help from seeing the Wikiquette Alert, so I don't feel it's my place to start that kind of report. If you decide to proceed though, I would be willing to add third-party comments about what I observed. --Parzival41822:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me about the misplaced warning on my user page, I've moved it to the talk page and replied.

I notice there is a problem with your user page too. It seems it was tagged for speedy deletion and now it is redlinked, though your talk page and contribs are still here. That might be a technical glitch unrelated to the ongoing issues, but I thought you should know so you can check it out.

Meanwhile, I also saw your continuing discussions with Codeplowed and that he again removed all the warnings from his talk page. I'm not going to do anything further on this unless he harrasses me directly. But if you decide to proceed with a report and need support, please let me know.

Good luck... --Parzival41823:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got your note about remodeling your page. I noticed in your prior comment, you mentioned RfC. I've never done one of those myself, but I saw it done regarding someone else and as it turned out it was rejected. The main thing is to make sure you use the right one. PlainWikipedia:Requests for comment is for articles and other stuff; for user issues you needWikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. Instructions are atWikipedia:Requests for comment#Request comment on users. RfC/U page has detailed proceudres. You need to have at least two editors certifying the problem with that user, and showing examples of how they tried to resolve it directly first. I think you have several others who would certify, but it's important if you do that method to get it set up in advance so it doesn't go stale. The certifying entries need to be made within 48 hours or they drop the request.

I wonder for this situation if it might be better to useWikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism orWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, because those are less formal. This is all just casual advice though, I don't know for sure what's best. Once an administrator is invovled, they might not see it the same way as you do, so that's something to consider as well. --Parzival41823:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, seems like you know what you're doing with those procedures. Let me know if you need any help later. Have a good one. --Parzival41823:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks for informing me of the COIN report. There are some comments there now you might want to read. I'm not able to keep going with this though, it's been too much work for me already. At first things seemed to improve but the multiple talk page reversions and edits of others' comments is a real mess. If that were an article I really cared about, I think I would try to find an individual administrator to ask for help rather than continuing to post procedures. I don't know, unless things are really obvious the procedures can take a lot of time - you have to show evidence, lists of diffs, concise explanations so they can review it fast. Maybe you can just ignore the disruptive stuff and as long as several editors are improving the article, so what if the talk page is messy? Sorry I couldn't help further. Good luck! --Parzival41803:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"And the personal attacks on myself are not so bad - I can handle it - I am more concerned about the others involved." - I agree with you on that, I feel the same way. As I said, I'm burned out on this one so I'm letting it go for now. But if you need someone to back you up on a report or something, let me know and I'll chime in. --Parzival41803:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New development, someone posted an RFCU. You may wish to view or comment at:Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Codeplowed --Parzival418_Hello22:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You already has complained about my posting, therefore, continue just work to improve Wikipedia content, I just tell you that at the end of the day DeVry Inc. will be something but a University, Controversy is part of any entry DeVry as you have learned and perhaps do not want to see it, has multiple systemic problems. "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks, for instance, stating "Your statement is a personal attack..." is not itself a personal attack." However, you have cross the line, and not probably we need arbitration, it is fine for me, but you deserve this warnings, that previously were stipulated in DeVry:Talk page in very civil manner, Template:Unsigned -->

Please do not use talk pages such asTalk:DeVry University for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. Seehere for more information. Thank you.—The precedingunsigned

This is yourlast warning. If you continue to use talk pages forinappropriate discussions youwill be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your work withWP:HELPDESK. Good work! --Sharkface21709:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]