User talk:Winged Blades of Godric
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Winged Blades of Godric has not edited Wikipediasince July 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hello, I'd like to ask you to take a look at this page and tell me if everything's fine and it can be published on Wikipedia-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outhentic . Thank you very much! Best, Rayna --Rayna Vasileva (talk)08:10, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you have moved the article Kumar Swami to draft.
I am not being paid for anything on Wikipedia. My discussion with Harshil got heated because he was trying to dictate the tone of the article without discussing any details. I wrote this article passionately since it's my first article on Wikipedia.But to be clear once again, I have no association with the subject of the article. I already told in my discussion that I am ready to improve the article if someone guides me to.I will still improve the article to meet Wikipedia's standards.
Regarding the reliability of sources, why do you think that sources are not reliable ? They are from well reputed newspapers and official government websites. I would appreciate if you will guide me which references are unreliable in your view.
What else this draft needs in order to be able to be included in article space ??
I have seen many articles on Wikipedia which are much shorter than mine, have much less references and have lesser quality of references than the ones I have used.
I guess the reason that you have moved the article to draft is because of my heated discussion with Harshil, for which I have already apologized.
I find it unfair that such a well researched article which was earlier accepted has now been moved to draft.
Please reconsider your decision of reverting the article to draft. The references are indeed reliable and independent. I request you to again have a thorough look. I will keep working on improving the quality of the content but I feel it should be in the article space.
Thanks— Precedingunsigned comment added byPrincehr999 (talk •contribs)16:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Did you end up fixing ICPH's querry with the updated syntax? I fixed a query once before but it's not my strength and if you've already done it all the better. I would like to go through and actually do the removal of anyone who has been inactive on Wikipedia a year. Best,Barkeep49 (talk)03:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you are doing well. Please can you review this section? It seems to have a different meaning. Previously it was [[1]]. Now it is [[2]]. It seems like the very edits based on your discussion here [[3]] are reverted. Thanks.
WP:BLP applies even to non biographies if the article talks about actions by people still living-- or allegations against them.--Deepfriedokra13:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't doubt it. After my own harrowing, I'm much more sensitive to this than before.Of course, as I learned watchingLaw and Order, the best way to avoid an accusation of impropriety is to avoid the appearance there of. So I will almost always advocate for the removal of unsavory content when it is challenged.--Deepfriedokra13:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have refactored my support comment that you refer to in Fram's RfA.28bytes (talk)00:36, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to see that you decided to edit-war onNadja Malacrida. I believe you are mistaken in your actions and conclusions, and I am formally warning you that further edit-warring may lead to a block. I sincerely hope that it will not come to that. Removing sourced content is rarely a constructive edit, and your efforts would be better directed to proposing alternate wording on the talk page in an effort to find common ground over how best to summarise what Tinniswood wrote. --RexxS (talk)14:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
{{fact}} tag should be avoided unless you can demonstrate you have checked the source and found the claims are not present, in which case it's better to tag at{{failed verification}}, and even then only if you can back up and justify your tags. It's not really surprising your edits were reverted, as they don't seem to show any empathy for the subject matter.Ritchie333(talk)(cont)15:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]Hey there. I've noticed on a couple user talks that I watch that you'll sometimes make a comment and then decided shortly after to self-revert - in looking at your edits to user talks I see 4 such examples in the last week. Because of the nature of talk page notifications I'm guessing that in most situations that the person is still seeing your edit. So rather than walking back comments you think better of - what I am sure is your intent - it now causes all the impact of the post without allowing the person it's directed at to have a chance to respond. I'd like to suggest that you think just a tad harder before publishing comments to user talks. Best,Barkeep49 (talk)14:44, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nurul_Alam_Chowdhury&diff=918265589&oldid=918255460 Just to let you know, I didn't mean to make this revert of your addition, not sure how it happened, mis click perhaps. RegardsGovindaharihari (talk)10:04, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
——SerialNumber5412909:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Whack!
You've beenwhacked with a wet trout.
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.Seriously[4],[5]?I understand your concerns about self cite/walled garden issues. I also appreciate your efforts to weed them out. However, for this particular article, the deletion discussion did not come up with a consensus to remove the content. I have started a discussion atTalk:Inner Engineering: A Yogi's Guide to Joy regarding this.--DreamLinker (talk)14:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This IP 157.43.235.10 is continuing your slow edit war. Please refrain if it is you. It is highly unlikely for a new user to dig up someone else's edit and type in those words. The IP is from where you live. --Jaydayal (talk)10:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I will kindly ask you toWP:REFACTOR your edits about me atdisgraced and[6] in light ofWP:NPA andWP:CIV. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here03:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Having fallen from favour or aposition ofpower orhonour).And to me, someone (irrespective of whether he is an editor of our site or not) being intrinsically involved in trying to remove a piece critical of him, from being used a source over an article, is textbook violation of our COI policy. On some reflections, I have struck off my statement that he should have been shown the door aka banned long ago, which do remain my feelings but is fairly irrelevant.∯WBGconverse14:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
but also suggests that somehow the community got it wrong the whole time. That's not impossible, but it's really hurtful.. The community shallnot be compelled or expected to engage in some sort of group-think-like-reverence towards any event that have happened in this project; dissent (irrespective of however misplaced they might seem to individual eyes) have a place. I have definitely read you stating over somewhere (circa 2012/13; some AN/ANI thread, probably) that you did not (personally) agree with certain old blocks of Eric and thought they were poor to the extent of not mattering any, for determining a future sanction. Do you see that there is a scope of asking the same question to you, in a slightly re-framed manner?FWIW, I do not seek to comment on the merit of Eric's past blocks, in any manner. An example for the sake of it and where I agreed with your assessment.∯WBGconverse14:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please copy editCauvery calling? Previously, it was written in promotional way, I requested deletion and recreated from scratch? —Harshilwant to talk?12:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know, we're not the best of buddies, and I don't want any words to sound patronising. But I had to share this with you. I've followed the tone of your discussions with fellow editors in the past few weeks and I've noticed that you are being very supportive, helpful and are taking criticism with all good faith. Of course, even I have bad days like you, but just thought I'll drop in and tell you what I am perceiving. Thank you.Lourdes 12:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! You removed 4 pictures fromD. J. Sindh Government Science College on 12:59 pm, 25 November 2016, Friday (UTC +5). Those pictures are not watermarked and are available underCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0. Link to the pictures are available on the bottom my talk page along with your notice.ZaeemAkhtr (talk)17:35, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was just sitting here (at a major equestrian event) with some extra time on my hands while waiting for the vet to finish checking my granddaughter’s horse (he came up lame) and read what you just added to your very interesting user page info. I must say, WBG, I am duly impressed - you are the first male I’ve known who hascrystal balls,
and I hope your account never goes rogue.AtsmeTalk📧18:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am unfamiliar with Indian clothing customs. In the "Social disruption" section ofBengal famine of 1943 there is a photo that Fowler&fowler (who is on wikibreak, and I do not wish to disturb him) has labeled "Destitute mother and child Bengal famine 1943". Following this description, I made the alt text: "Alt text: Old photograph of a woman squatting and tiny, emaciated toddler standing on a sidewalk. The woman is shirtless but squatting to conceal her breasts. The toddler is wearing rags." But ... you know... those arms look kinda muscular, and so does the back.. the face is a bit unclear and a bit androgynous, somight be a young man, maybe late teens (?) .. do the bracelets definitely mark the wearer as female? ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk)02:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted your edit toRamesh Nagaraj Rao. Please do not remove sourced content, particularly during a deletion debate.Aymatth2 (talk)12:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, being the nominator of the AFD, you areWP:INVOLVED to take any administrative actions at the AFD, the same applies touser:Serial Number 54129. Also your removal of the IP vote is against policy, whether you're involved or not. There's no rule that prevents IPs from voting. Please self-revert. Thank you.SD0001 (talk)19:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi.
I noticed your recent deletion, with the note "How is this a RS?"
Well. . .
So: How is thisnot an RS?
I recognize that the views expressed are controversial (one might say "flaky"). But "The content is flaky, therefore the source is unreliable" would be circular logic.
So?
Cordially,
O Govinda (talk)06:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You are most welcome.
Fylindfotberserk (talk)07:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi WBG, since you have the book and seem to enjoy this stuff, you might try and improveMirza Hassan Khan andAslam Khan (Pakistani brigadier). If you have the energy, you might even write a whole article on the1947 Gilgit Rebellion, which is dearly in need! --Kautilya3 (talk)18:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
bilal202.69.15.95 (talk)08:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Specifically:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#NPA, NOTHERE, or am I being too sensitive?Walter Görlitz (talk)18:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think generally? As perlink should "Revocation" be changed to "Abrogation" in the page "Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir"?DiplomatTesterMan (talk)10:33, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea. I have created a category. I am in the process of expanding each of those book articles. In fact, there are half a dozen more such books that I am going to read and create book-pages. Thanks again.Scenecontra (talk)12:36, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since you are actively editing the Wikipedia page now, I find calling Republic TV a 'mouthpiece' of the ruling government is equally wrong too. That too in the first paragraph.The exactly same issue was earlier discussed in the talk page.Many hold similar opinions on NDTV type media too.... But NDTV's page has nothing of the sort...It would be strictly wrong to refer to any news channel as a mouthpiece. Please remove that too. Content like this can find place in criticism section only.HarshithaHappyGoLucky (talk)10:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also please update the Audience share to the week 42 most recent figures.
The first line in criticism section looks more like a POV(*pushing of view). I'm sure the same information about the 'right wing bias' opinion of certain other sections of the medis could be written in an NPOV way.(*less aggressive way). This one's upto you. You may do it once you're done with the page overhaul.
Regards _/\_ :)HarshithaHappyGoLucky (talk)11:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for that. :) I only meant the view was put in a rather aggressive way. Also thank you for the edits.HarshithaHappyGoLucky (talk)16:18, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that you removed material from an article with an edit summary describing it asfluff solely introduced for the sake of ref-spamming. I would strongly advise that you avoid directing language of this sort towards editors generally well-respected in the community for the quality of their work. In fact, I would generally advise that where sources which you find disagreeable are introduced to an article during the course of a deletion discussion, that you address the deficiencies of those sources in the deletion discussion rather than removing them from the article while the discussion is ongoing. Cheers!bd2412T21:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
sorry to bother you, but this materialSoon after the 1979 revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini established the death penalty for homosexuality. In February and March of 1979, there were 16 executions for crimes related to sexual violations.
which was inserted duringthis edit is copied fromthis source.Saff V. (talk)07:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Khomeini defined transsexuality as a disease that can be healed by means of an operationis copied fromthis source in this edits (1,2).Saff V. (talk)09:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, WBG. Atthis ANRFC listing you said you were working on a close for the RfC. Is that still the case? I almost waded in to close it myself but I don't want to do so if you've been working on it. Thanks.Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)05:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Original Barnstar |
| Woahhh Tentree 15:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC) |
 | Thank you for taking out the time to improveRepublic TV.DBigXrayᗙ10:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi Winged, I have been recently been given access to EPW by Wikipedia library. How to have access of it? It is being shown that new issues will be sent in a week. Will I be able to access archives then? Also, I have too many reference books and access to library offside Wiki. Can you tell how it will help here in resource exchange? --Harshilwant to talk?13:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please addSwaminarayan Sampraday andMorari Bapu to your watchlist. Several Hindutvavadis or their followers are removing sourced content from the article without proper logic. I think there’s some off-wiki connection here. I am thinking to take long break but just handle these zealots. —Harshilwant to talk?07:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
—Compassionate727 (T·C)18:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about our little "edit war" (if that's what is called an edit war) on the actual article. I'm a relatively inexperienced editor, just trying to do the right thing, and absolutely nothing else.Karan (Theintuitus) (talk)14:11, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I started editing after a few months. From the history on my talk pageIndianHistoryEnthusiast (talk) 14:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC), I can see you are the same guy who was following me the last time? Is there some personal animosity? Why are youWikipedia:Hounding me?IndianHistoryEnthusiast (talk)14:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Lightburst (talk)18:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you makethis change? How is labeling someone as "discredited" following [[WP::NPOV]] or encyclopedic?Rabbabodrool (talk)00:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This is heading towards aWP:SNOW keep, so I thought you might like the opportunity to withdraw the nomination. Cheers!BD2412T00:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you have a moment to clean this up, I'd greatly appreciate it; I'm stretched really thin at the moment.Vanamonde (Talk)16:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Winged Blades of Godric,
Your scriptUser:Winged Blades of Godric/EFFPTest.js is no longer functional because it attempts to get aneditToken frommw.user.tokens. The script should instead get acsrfToken.editTokens were removed frommw.user.tokens on October 3, 2019 at Phabricator duringthis edit as they were redundant tocsrfTokens.–BrandonXLF (talk)00:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
...then here is articleMensXP.com related to one portal. I did cleanup and if you have some sources then add some content. Good Night!--Harshilwant to talk?16:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SectionsCircuit analogs andTelegraphic codes for India—Compassionate727 (T·C)20:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I will restore the content you removed from this article, which you said you "will rewrite". Please see the article's edit history - the content has been controversial since it was added in June, but the current wording is the result of the collaboration of multiple editors. The content is well-sourced (indeed, it is theonly sourced part of the article) but has been repeatedly removed by anonymous and newly registered editors as "incorrect", "unnecessary", "fake news", "wrong news to defame" etc. - to the point where the article has been protected twice to prevent that and at least one user (Ezio bhumihar) was blocked. As you can see, you are walking into a bit of a minefield! You are an experienced editor; I am not reverting your change because I oppose any change at all, but because any rewrite would clearly need discussion on the talk page first.Dorsetonian (talk)08:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello:
Although I do accept occasional requests to copy edit articles from editors with whom I have had extensive dealings in the past, I prefer that GA copy edit requests such as yours be listed on the Guild of Copy Editors Requests page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests ). That way they are dealt with in order, in a timely manner.
That being said, I did run through the article as you requested and made what I think are appropriate changes.
The following paragraph has me completely baffled, however. This may be because of my lack of mathematical knowledge or because of the run-on sentences.
For example, multiple techniques in the book involve the use of high-precision decimal fractions. These were unknown during the Vedic times and were introduced in India only in the sixteenth century.[11] The works of numerous ancient mathematicians such as Aryabhata, Brahmagupta and Bhaskara were entirely based on fractions.[2] Some of the sutras even claimed to run parallel to the General Leibniz rule and Taylor's theorem (which, per Krishna Tirtha, were to be yet studied by the western world during the time of his writing) but did ultimately boil down to the sub-elementary performative operations of basic differentiation on polynomials notwithstanding the fact that historic India had no minimal knowledge about the conceptual notions of differentiation and integration.[2] Sutras have been further leveraged to claim that analytic geometry of conics occupied an important tier in Vedic mathematics and some others have been applied or asserted as being applicable to topics as diverse as statics and pneumatics to astronomy and financial domains.[2][11]
This sentence: "For example, multiple techniques in the book involve the use of high-precision decimal fractions. These were unknown during the Vedic times and were introduced in India only in the sixteenth century." Then there appears to be a contradiction with the sentence that follows: "The works of numerous ancient mathematicians such as Aryabhata, Brahmagupta and Bhaskara were entirely based on fractions."
I think that the rest of that paragraph needs to be rewritten in plain English so that it can be understood by the average reader.
The rest of the article is in good shape, I believe.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Twofingered Typist (talk)15:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Godric. I have made alot of drafts of actors and actresses. Can I show them to you. I am new and i am learning new stuff around. Thank you.
This is actually very old, but I'm guessing you never got it...—Compassionate727 (T·C)17:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Shurbanm (talk)17:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC) could you please elaborate on why you reverted my additions to the Gradeshnitsa Tablets?[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Harshilwant to talk?10:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete the content ofThakur Anukulchandra page without any refeence. If you have any please post on the page.— Precedingunsigned comment added byTheLoanWalker (talk •contribs)15:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to addpromotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you have been continuously doing atAnukulchandra Chakravarty, you may beblocked from editing. Stop threatening me on my user page to hide your systematicvandalism to deleteWikipedia:Reliable_sources contents like ISBN page references and stamps issued by yourGovernment_of_India. My friend, you speak good English. So congratulations but first deal with your third world country issues and don't show me your talent on my talk page. If you are deleting content pt appropriate comments and delete.WikiLoneCrusader (talk)16:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
—Compassionate727 (T·C)17:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think there are enough sources now to create an article forNewslaundry? It was creation protected indefinitely on 13 January 2016 by an admin. It's been quite sometime since then and articles from it have also been used as sources a couple of times.DTM (talk)14:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the{{proposed deletion/dated}} tag fromThePrint, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add{{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it atWikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!Djm-leighpark (talk)04:25, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I dropped you a talkback about this a few days ago, but I'm not sure you got it.SpinningSpark received the requested article about Indian telegraphic codes, but there was some kind of error with the circuit analogs one. Could you try sending it again? Thanks,—Compassionate727 (T·C)18:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[8]–Levivich04:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)][reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Don't worry, you're not in trouble, it simply regardsKumar Swami and some longstanding issues around it. Seeing as you were previously involved, and I mentioned you in the AN, this is out of courtesy and a broad interpretation of the AN notice policy :)Captain EekEdits Ho Cap'n!⚓19:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I said when I returned, I want to have a more amicable experience this round, and the way I responded to your message does not exactly confer that message properly, nor does it help me attain that goal (it was a defensive gesture because as you obviously know, we do not have the best relationship). So, even though we might disagree strongly, I will ask you directly what relists you were precisely referring to. I have looked them over myself to see if I missed something, and asked fellow admins to as well. As of yet, no one seems to think much of them other than one could have potentially faced a no consensus close (yet the relist was still was within reasonable discretion). So please, at least let me know where you stand properly, so I can take it into account for reflection if nothing else.—Coffee //have a ☕️ //beans //19:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!--Saff V. (talk)06:13, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you clarify which sources you are flagging as unreliable? Thanks.Wwwhatsup (talk)09:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Winged Blades of Godric, please stop by your review here the next time you edit to indicate whether you will be returning to the review, and if so, how soon you plan on finishing it. The review will be nine months old on December 23.BlueMoonset (talk)02:38, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
this.∯WBGconverse15:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! |  |
|
... is the face of Modi 2. Who is going to work on his page? --Kautilya3 (talk)12:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WBG: When I read your commenthere, I was baffled and repelled by it's aggressive and threatening tone. That theedit in question was ill-considered I will grant. I had spent considerable time on producing a concise, focused, well-written lead for that article - only to find dumped into it a mass of ungrammatical and repetitive material that, in any case, I thought belonged elsewhere in the article. This last point was based on the misconception expressed in the commenthere and acknowledged as incorrecthere.
But please do not be distracted by the fact that I was mistaken in that respect. The more important fact is that my efforts were directed toward improving the writing and the structure of the article and in no way warranted your aggressive and insulting lack ofgood faith. Please in future do not address me (or hopefully any other editor) in such manner, do not make unfounded accusations, and do not impugn my motives in editing Wikipedia.
Thank you for your attention.Dayirmiter (talk)13:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | Season's Greetings | |
| May your Holidays and the Year that follows shine as much as this coin still does beneath the tarnish of bygone weather and long use.Fowler&fowler«Talk»22:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] |
 |
HappyHolidayCheer!! |
in the spirit of the season. What's especially nice about this digitized version: *it doesn't need water *won't catch fire *and batteries aren't required. |
and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉 |
Keep Shaj Mohan, Divya Dwivedi and their book in watchlist. Their original creators were confirmed socks, added much details about their works in multiple pages and there’s continuous disruption from france and kerala where divya and shaj belongs respectively.WP:Sockpuppet investigations/WWorringer lists all socks.Harshilwant to talk?15:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | Have a WikiChristmas and a PediaNewYear |
Be well. Keep well. Have a lovely Christmas.SilkTork (talk)12:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] |
Exactly. Did you check the source? --Kautilya3 (talk)13:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Will reply, morrow.∯WBGconverse19:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
Hello Winged Blades of Godric, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion. Spread theWikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはWinged Blades of Godricたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP04:08, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrateChristmas,Hanukkah,Kwanzaa,Hogmanay,Festivus or your hemisphere'sSolstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Thank you for the Christmas cheer! I was surprised to see your username on my talk page, but I am very glad we can start a new path forward. Sorry for how things went before. You needed to give me some tough words before I left, but after a long deliberate absence I at least found how to fully see where I had been over interpreting too many things and how I overstepped in my dealings with you (if only I could walk back in time to correct my former self). At any rate, I hope we can find new beginnings and new friendship in the New Year, and I truly hope you and your family have a wondeful season and beyond!—Coffee //have a ☕️ //beans //21:05, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
Hi. You've made repeated edits to the pageSavarna (gotra) where many points were well-referenced, indulging inedit warring. Please create a talk page for the article and have a discussion regarding this. It is ideal to resolve disagreements through discussions and not edits. Thanks!TheodoreIndiana (talk)12:39, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Adding this , just to let you know that I have mentioned you in my response. regards.
On27 December 2019,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleStribodh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatStribodh, first published in 1857, was one of the earliest magazines in India to be aimed at a female audience? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Stribodh. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Stribodh), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
--valereee (talk)12:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAsian News International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMinistry of Information and Broadcasting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I submitted video proofs why deleted? That section it's wrong !! Protest happened it cant be denied .We can add thatBkr3da (talk)17:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Andwe will protect it even in future.At any case, what do you intend to do withthis draft?∯WBGconverse16:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission ofSwami Chakrapani at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneathyour nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!BlueMoonset (talk)19:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, can we talk about your draftification of the article on GD Vashist toDraft:GD Vashist (2)? Your edit summary was "FailsWP:N".
Draftifying instead of nominating for deletion implies the draftifier's sense that an article doesn't qualify for inclusion now but may become qualified through improvement. However, it's established that notability is determined based on factors external to an article, and a lack of it can't be fixed through improvements to an article. So draftifying an article based on one's reckoning that the subject isn't notable is a contradiction.
In addition, if notability is a concern, there are already two valid treatments: AFD or, if one isn't sure one has a strong enough case that notability isn't met and wants to give others a chance to identify sources to support it, tagging. Draftifying, which will probably lead to G13 speedy deletion six months later, looks like an evasion of the normal protocol calling for articles to be discussed before deleting them for lack of notability.
If you feel strongly enough that GD Vashist isn't notable, why did you not simply nominate the article for deletion?Largoplazo (talk)16:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
May I know the reason because of which you put this article to draft. IF Notability is the factor please let me know the Wikipedia's criteria for Hindu Spiritual Saints and Astrologers.--Babitahamdard (talk)16:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Winged Blades of Godric: Enjoy theholiday season andwinter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expandWikipedia. Cheers,Fylindfotberserk (talk)15:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
%2c_cropped.jpg)
A page you proposed for deletion,Muhammed Majeed, was contested viaWP:REFUND by the paid editor involved in the page. – Muboshgu (talk)16:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
Hello Winged Blades of Godric: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles withaxes,hammers andchisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessaryblisters. |
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RHaworth. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RHaworth/Evidence.Please add your evidence by January 14, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RHaworth/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, seeWikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee,CodeLyokotalk03:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Winged Blades of Godric,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyableNew Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ21:03, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
.jpg)
–2020 is aleap year –news article.
–Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's2020 Color of the year
–Utopes (talk)04:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! This is just to let you know that I have begun copyediting your article that you requestedhere. Thank you!Puddleglum 2.018:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I found a couple more clarifications I need. (All in the lede)
Thanks,Puddleglum 2.005:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No photos, the scans from newspapers are awful.∯WBGconverse07:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to let you know that I should be done copyediting, let me know if you find any problems with it still. Thank you for helping me!Puddleglum 2.019:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I thought you'd tried to speedy delete and AfD the article at the same time so I thought the tag was an error, which was why I removed it. You should have asked for the AfD to be speedy closed as withdrawn if it was a mistake.Bookscale (talk)23:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am curious. You wrote: "His historical methods have been challenged and his interpretations are now deemed to be quite unreliable, courtesy his religious acceptance of the-then prevalent caste hierarchy as a longstanding form of social order along with a strong antipathy towards the Muslim rule in India". I wonder what you mean.Malaiya (talk)22:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.∯WBGconverse06:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On7 January 2020,Did you know was updated with a fact from the article1990 Bijnor riot, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that the1990 Bijnor riot was the most destructive event during concurrent Hindu nationalist campaigns in India, which eventually led to thedemolition of the Babri Masjid? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/1990 Bijnor riot. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,1990 Bijnor riot), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk·contribs)00:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please see,WP:RX#Australian poem reviews. Thanks. --Gazal world (talk)16:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Harshilwant to talk?04:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can't laxmi Agarwal page be locked ?https://twitter.com/OpIndia_com/status/1214890746777522176?s=20Anshul k007 (talk)14:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Praxidicae (talk)15:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TBH, I was surprised that it took this long for the foundation to swing into action. --DBigXrayᗙ10:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Winged Blades of Godric, this nomination has been waiting about a month for you to provide new hooks, the original nominator having bowed out in your favor. As you can see from my post at the nomination, there are significant issues with the hotel and its eatery—despite the initial publicity, it appears that Chakrapani wasn't at the auction where the hotel and other Dawood Ibrahim properties were sold and someone else acquired the building—so it isn't suitable for a hook and may not even belong in the article (unless perhaps as a publicity stunt). Right now, the article is without hooks, and needs to be revised.
I'm hoping you'll be able to provide what's needed in the next few days. Given the recent discoveries, and the fact that this has been the oldest DYK nomination for a while now—the article will be three months old in a week—if we don't have significant progress within seven days I think it will be time to think about closing the nomination as unsuccessful. Thanks for whatever you can do.BlueMoonset (talk)23:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You left me a message on my talk page, I read it. Thank you Sir for your parenting advice & guidance. I am a new Wikipedian so i don't know everything about it. In Anjana Om Kashyap's page i done small edits about her Social knowledge. I do this because i am also from Ranchi & currently living in Ranchi. When i was a child she was young. She was a student of Missionary School. I known her & her family well. That's reason i made some edits. I request you please give me your love and parenting. Thanks.Ps.prashantsingh16 (talk)18:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Provide reliable sources for anjana om kashyap being pro BJP.Xhubham mishra (talk)16:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have the time to clean this up? It's strewn with violations of SOAPBOX.Vanamonde (Talk)19:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yo WBoG, d'you have access to this through the Wikilibrary? I'm trying to find a category of people who do, but it seems very secretive :)——SN5412916:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I didn't reply to you but somehow my replies to the other discussion on the same talk page are forwarded to your discussion. So, do not be confused. I'm unable to find the reason behind the diversions of the reply, so I thought it is better to tell you this here . I hope you understand.Abhayoct13th (talk)14:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isPunjabCinema07 and Gurbaksh Chahal.Lepricavark (talk)14:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WBG, you know the case very well. See, If you will not let people edit the article, there can be no constructive editing. It seems like few people behave, as if they are the only custodian of the article by reverting every edit that doesn't matches with their line of thought. Not everytime one would edit and revert the same actions. It appears to be absurd after a point. With a broad perspective, try to understand this. The subject has been accused of Irrationality, psuedo-scientific views, his organisation of breaking rules, all that is very true. But this also need to be mentioned he has been invited to share his views at various platforms as UN, MIT, World Economic Forum, Tedx and various summits etc. And his organisation has helped to increase the green cover of Tamil Nadu Region, health-wise benefitted people and gathered worldwide attention. His books are also well received. His controversial statements and criticisms should be mentioned along with the appraisals that he received.You also know that many of the sources mentioned in the article are clearly of a different political ideology and the subject is associated (not by him, but others) with some other ideology. It doesn't mean that they should not be mentioned but they must also not effect the writing of the article. After reading the article, one must not get the chance to say that it sounds being a little more than neutral. Every side needs to be shown and conclusions should be left to reader's conscience. The faith on Wikipedia articles and it's sanctity must remain intact. This was a humble message to you, I hope you'll assess the situation wisely. This one being last of my efforts, Thanks.Abhayoct13th (talk)13:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"increase(ing) the green cover of Tamil Nadu Region, health-wise benefit(ing) people". Truth has a left-liberal bias, and you need to live with it. Also seeWP:FALSEBALANCE.∯WBGconverse14:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please live with it. Thankyou so much.Abhayoct13th (talk)14:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello my friend. Amake shahajjo korun. Ami shotti totto likhar chesta korchi, kintu Musulmanra amar shob editke noshto kore jisse. Bakhtiar he ekjon hinshro prani chilo ta shobar jante hoba. Dhonnobad— Precedingunsigned comment added bySiddhartananda (talk •contribs)14:33, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the real world identity of an en-Wiki editor and some sort of accusation of breaking of our rules, please contact arbcom via email. If you want to email me evidence that an editor has identified himself on en-Wiki, you may, if you wish, email that information. I don't understand the relevance of this to The Signpost, and I will remove any attempted outing from The Signpost's pages. Please be clear that:
Smallbones(smalltalk)15:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Jaggi_Vasudev--DBigXrayᗙ10:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Praxidicae (talk)00:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My reply to you bounced, for some reason? Gmail tells me your email "couldn't be found or is unable to receive email." In any case, short version; if content is already uncontroversially on-wiki, it is usually not suppressible when added again; I haven't the time to investigate and start a discussion; you could email the functionaries list, or email the oversight otrs, if you have concerns.Vanamonde (Talk)18:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
... then here are two articles which need your attention--Dhirendranath Datta andBhupendra Kumar Datta. Both are Bengalis, from your ethnicity, and their articles are in poor conditions and not in encyclopedic language. Let me know if you can't improve them. I will request resources to improve them, I'm sure you can provide them. Quite busy but will look after week or two.--Harshilwant to talk?04:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey buddy,Ritchie333 gave me your reference, i have one article i want to submit for reviewDraft:Agnel_Roman pls chack this and send this for review pls. or should i submit ?
Annki777 (talk)23:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Harshilwant to talk?04:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user wants me to encourage you in the work you've done. Which is easy to do as you've improved the page and fixed the related draft.--Deepfriedokra15:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry to bother you, but i though that may be you didn’t receive my ping so I leave massage here, I wonder if you take a look at the last discussion in thisTP. Thanks!Saff V. (talk)18:11, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
'
Hey,User:Winged Blades of Godric this is about my articleDraft:Agnel Roman. If you don't know The Times of India is a reputed newspaper in India. AND NOT A BlOG, seeWP:NEWSBLOG - so this is the verifiable source. also, the article is clearly about Agnel and is a significant coverage not a passing mentions - so pls tell me how this is not valid for notability ???.
and also there is another article in the Marathi language from Divya Bhaskar Marathi - another well-reputed newspaper of India seeWP:NONENG I request you to read that first.
at last- pls do fair job buddy - Thanks
Annki777 (talk)11:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Winged Blades of Godric (talk)03:15, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
References
I shepherdedWP:WPSCH for nearly ten years but I've now retired from being its lead coord. Apart from the collaboration of the other coords (whom I have mostly brought into the project since Chris Cameron retired), the project is pretty much as effective as herding cats. The traditional schools and values I upheld for Wikipedia school articles have been diluted in recent years by waves of new stubs about schools of dubious notability in the Himalayas or commercial cram schools in the streets of South Asian cities. Neither of which are within my sphere of interest or expertise. With en.Wiki fast becoming the South Asian Wikipedia in English (or so it seems when one takes a glance at the New Pages Feed these days), the schools project seriously needs help from people with regional knowledge. With everything else you have on your plate, I'm not suggesting you make WP:WPSCH one of your priorities, but if you or anyone you know has the required background and would like to help out, do let the other coords know.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)06:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have undone redirect and placed partial blocks. It looks like you are compromised by an outside influence. This needs to be taken up at ANI or ArbCom. It all needs to be sorted. Any admin may reverse me or take any other needed action. I am on a Wikibreak till at least Tuesday. --Deepfriedokra21:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
compromised by an outside influence? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖21:50, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Chisme (talk)01:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am willing to unblock you per the statement I made at AN. Are you willing to stay away from all articles relating to Gurbaksh Chahal for the duration of the conflict? --qedk (t桜c)08:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
--qedk (t桜c)14:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] | Hello Winged Blades of Godric. You have been invited to joinWikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, aWikiProject dedicated to improving theAsia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit theproject page, and add your name to theparticipants. If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge Invite (1)|~~~~}}Thanks, |
Winged Blades of Godric, your review of this nomination has now been open for over nine months, and really needs your attention. Please stop by at your next opportunity and at least indicate how soon you plan to get back to it. If you'd prefer, I can try to find a new reviewer to finish it for you. Many thanks.BlueMoonset (talk)17:32, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello sir, I had added some historical facts toKachari Kingdom page which were ignored by some scholars. But one editorChaipau, don't allow me to insert my point. According to him, Everything written in Ahom chronicle is perfect. He forcefully made Ahom chroncicles accepted everywhere. Scholarship in Assam is very poor, Scholars don't know difference between Heramba and Hidimba. Heramba means Ganesh and Hidimba means Rakshashi wife of Bhim. Ahom used Timisa word for Kacharis. Timisa is Ahom term. It is abusive term according to dictionary of Ahom. Similary Ahom used Tunisa for Moran , Tiura for SadiaL Kacharis and Kha-lang for Borahis. EditorChaipau forcefully remove facts which don't fit Ahom claims. Actually, Boro history is related to Heramba kingdom . Dimasa history is related Hidimba kingdom. Boros of Heramba called themselves Ramsa. Tiprasa = Tripura , Dimasa = Hidimba , Ramsa = Heraamba. All this terms are avalable in Kachari kingdom. ButChaipau don't allow me to add Ramsa and Bodosa term. Chaipau had made Assam historical pages based on his personal goal. Sir, Actually there was two migration , One is from Guwahati to Cachar and Another is from Upper assam to Cachar. Some scholars mixed uped both tradition into one. Some scholars treated them correctly but Chaipau don't allow me to correct one. Ramsa tradition
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=0TQzAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA829
and
Kakoty, Suchitra (1981). "The Historical Background of the Bodo-Kacharis". A study of the educational development of the bodo tribe during the post independence period with particular reference to the northern region of Assam (PhD). Guwahati University. Dimasa traditionhttps://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.463827/page/n23/mode/2up
This one example of Chaipau's contribution which is unreliable wihtout any citation.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Major_kingdoms_of_Assam.pngSir, Please help me to add my points. I have added both Ramsa , Dimasa , Bodosa terms with citation but Chaipau don't allow me to add terms related to Bodo. His edits are kind of jealousy and personal hatred towards Bodo community. There is clear evidence that All people don't call themselves Dimasa. Ahom chronicle are unrealiable because they don't have real name.Thank you sir , Please help me.DinaBasumatary (talk)21:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In 2018, you offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has now accepted that request for arbitration, and an arbitration case has been opened atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 23, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage,Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jytdog/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
All content, links, and diffs from theoriginal ARC and thelatest ARC are being read into the evidence for this case.
The secondary mailing list is in use for this case: arbcom-en-b@wikimedia.org
For the Arbitration Committee,CThomas3 (talk)17:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew02:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:OpIndia Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Newslinger talk21:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Winged Blades of Godric, it is now three months since you began expanding this article and three days fewer since it was nominated; time is running out. You have been unresponsive to pings in the nomination and on your talk page while you've been actively editing elsewhere on Wikipedia. The two "clarification needed" templates have not been addressed although I first mentioned them back on January 14, and I imagine it is the lack of response since that has discouraged potential reviewers, despite the fact that I've been calling for reviewers on theWT:DYK page for many weeks now.
If you're not going to address this issue, please let me know, and I'll close the nomination. Otherwise, it needs your attention when you next return to editing. Although it is still waiting for a review, I cannot, in good faith, more actively recruit a reviewer given your lack of response over the past months. Thank you very much.BlueMoonset (talk)04:34, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello WBG. As noted by BlueMoonset above, a review has already been done, and significant article issues remain. Despite this, there has been no response from you since January. Please indicate if you still wish to pursue the nomination and if you can address the concerns. As the nomination is now the oldest remaining one on WP:DYKN and there has been no significant progress since January, the nomination will likely be marked for closure within the next few days if there is still no response. Thank you and happy editing.Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew00:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleOpIndia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpIndia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Brihaspati(talk)03:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Unfortunately, as there has been no response from you in spite of multiple pings and talk page messages, the nomination has now been marked for closure by another editor. If you still wish to continue the nomination, please leave a message stating so before the nomination is closed. Thank you and happy editing.Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew07:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Was just thinking of you and hoping you’re well. Hadn’t seen you around as much. Also I looked at your user page and noticed some ideas I like :) Anyway, stay safe during this mess and if there’s anything I can help with on-wiki, feel free to ping.TonyBallioni (talk)21:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to add about the same thing, considering you last edited on en-wiki in July. I remembered you when noticing some of your good work at AfD, thanks for that. —PaleoNeonate –05:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Unviable draft has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.Anarchyte(talk •work)10:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)08:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You gave up in desperation?Talk:Criticism of Swaminarayan sect#The way.Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk!12:54, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I come in peace!
I am relatively new to wikipedia when it comes to active editing. However, i value a NPOV and came across your commentshere. A question --the first link you shared was about national herald and not the wire? the second piece you shared, seemed like good journalism. Often in a battle to be objective we forget that we don't live in an objective world? I mean, is there any thing such as pure objectivity? if not, shouldn't we all embrace our very many biases and subjectivities, and us being aware of our bias would make us somewhat objective?
A lot of right wing websites, and a few left wing websites do have a 'point of view', and i find these discussions on wikipedia really interesting because they can potentially help us out of the hate-speech and bjp versus congress that we (india) been full of since our inception. And on the other hand, i am afraid of us on wikipedia censoring website etc on the basis of which political wing they come from, instead of 'fact checking'. In the long run, as left and right twist each others arms, some more than the others, I feel that that would be fruitful. I concede that this is a mountain of a task, a slow, unending, must-always-be-at-it process.. Any thoughts?Tanyasingh (talk)05:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:ZHYXCBG has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.ProcrastinatingReader (talk)19:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onOpIndia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OpIndia.com. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.ChunnuBhai (talk)18:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings! Hope you are doing well!
In the past, spammy & under-sourcedNishita Goswami was redirected by you to her mother's pageMoloya Goswami.Nishita Goswami is one of the leading actress fromAssam. She surely meets all BLP norms. I want to recreate the page in an encyclopedic way with proper references. This is for your information.
Best regards,
Nalbarian (talk)10:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You say on your user page that you are "bilingual fluent in Bangla, English and Assamese". Surely you are trilingual not bilingual?Sarandone2 (talk)18:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Religious fanatics are takingownership atKalaripayattu and not allowing any edits deviating from their agenda. The worst part is it is pending-changes protected and they all are confirmed accounts who can make changes without scrutiny. None of them give proper explanation for reverting, and sometimes blatantly reverts multiple edits (edited with proper edit summary) without explanation. Two of them have COI as evident from their usernames (Kalari). Their main business is promoting their POV and highlighting Hinduism part, though Kalaripayattu do have rituals based on Hinduism, the art itself is not a "Hindu art", it just happened to have originated when only Hindu "religion" was prevalent inKerala. It is a martial art practised by all religious communities, many of the masters are Muslims, the Christians even havea folk dance derived from Kalaripayattu. Some Hindu extremists are "making statements" by projecting Hinduism on an otherwise communally harmonious martial art. BTW, I am also a Hindu, but this is too much.
The first timemy edit gotreverted (see history here onward), I never thought it was religious agenda, but now it's becoming clearer, as User:Kalariwarrior changed "Indian mythology" to "Hindu mythology" (source says former), and User:Kalari Poothara's recent Hinduism promotion in lead, and as Outlander07 is now trying tore-insert Hinduism claims (not in the source) in lead which I hadremoved; he had alsoremoved a sourced mention about a Hindu lower-caste community –Thiyya. There are multiple legends on the creator - Parashurama, Shiva, Agasthya; they want Parashurama, not only that, they don't want to attribute it as "legend" (I agree with[9]). I suspect Outlander07 and Kalariwarrior to be the same person, all three are incompetent in editing. The article requires serious cleanup for sourcing and NPOV. Should I report this activity toWP:ANI, or somewhere else, or what? Please help.157.46.136.127 (talk)19:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I'm writing here in case you don't havemy talk page on your watch list: I finally replied to your message. Have a nice day.—Gennaro Prota•Talk08:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Winged Blades of Godric! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed on theAFC's participants list, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months. Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to regain access to the AFCH script, you can do so at any time by visitingWT:AFCP. Thank you for your work at AFC, and if you start editing Wikipedia again we hope you will rejoin us.Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you're doing okay, miss seeing you around even if we disagree sometimes.CUPIDICAE💕19:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Winged Blades of Godric! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed atWikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visitingWikipedia:Local Embassy.
Thank you!Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)06:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Z184 has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Mathglot (talk)01:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. A long time has been passed. But regardingyour request at WP:RX, which was archived unfulfilled. The book is now available in my library. If you are still interested in it, feel free to put new request, and I will send you whatever you want from the book. Thanks. --Gazal world (talk)13:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello WBG, several account flags that have 12 month activity standards have been removed, should you return to editing and wish to volunteer in these areas again pleas take time to familiarize yourself with any relevant updates to the policies and processes related to them, then you may request access atWP:PERM or other venues. Best regards, —xaosfluxTalk18:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
With regard to24 June 2018 edits of New RFC on linking to Wikidata (WP:Manual of Style), you wrote:
As to the other proposed exception of linking to WD, by inline inter-language link, given that there is roughly a numerical tie and there's no clear-cut refutable argument(s) from either side, I am unable to see any consensus.
. But I think I am properly perplexed when this becomes:
Wikidata should not be linked to within the body of the article except in the manner of hidden comment(s) as to mentioning the Q-number.
It seems to me that you get to this depending on how the proposition is structured. For instance, if this had been interpreted as the following independent propositions:
then we'd have no consensus on the use of Wikidata links in interlanguage links, and given that the current state had been to allow them, they would continue to be allowed.
As an aside of sorts, one of the main objections to Wikidata links had been that the Wikidata "reliable source" requirement might not be up to the standards of the enwiki reliable source requirements. But insofar as QIDs are concerned, is it not the case that Wikidata is in factauthoritative? This point could have been expected to overcome most of the objections to their use in interlanguage links.Fabrickator (talk)03:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
...since your last edit. I hope that's a sign that you're just too busy enjoying life. You are missed! (It's not nearly as much fun arguing with other editors.) Cheers,Levivich16:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
...make that two years! Hope you're alright, brother.Chisme (talk)00:23, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 | CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you aMerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotesWikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Hi Godric, its been a while since I saw you. Hope things are ok.scope_creepTalk12:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I want to create page titled 'Hemant Dhome' but I realized when this article was deleted on Wikipedia. But at present this person has acted in famousMarathi films and directed some films. I think Dhome eligible it now, let me know what you think
Thank you -User:Morekar(talk)— Precedingundated comment added21:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
| A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | %2c_frontispiece_-_BL.jpg) |
|
Aquaporin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Onegreatjoke (talk)14:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Nagendranath Basu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
