Hello, Wikipietime. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMichael Tyler (DNC spokesman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tyler (DNC spokesman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.power~enwiki (π,ν)21:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great, done with wikiP anywayWikipietime (talk)13:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wellWikipietime (talk)13:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "DoThink Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Legacypac (talk)17:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Jeff King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Legacypac (talk)16:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onConcord Management and Consulting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Comatmebro (talk)20:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikipietime. I've reverted a number of your recent article talk page comments because they appear to violateWP:BLP. I see you've been given what I'd consider to be final warnings for similar problems, so I'd hope my concerns are obvious. Should we discuss this, or would it be better to get others involved? --Ronz (talk)02:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "DoThink Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.SamSailor19:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Jeff King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Hhkohh (talk)09:46, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMikhail Bystrov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikhail Bystrov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —JFG^talk16:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCitizens Against Gambling Expansion has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

FailsWP:NORG. Local organization with local coverage only

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Rogermx (talk)21:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)don't much care anymore, about done with wikipedia and stifling editors[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "DoThink Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!02:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Bergen performing arts center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Legacypac (talk)20:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Palisades Amusement and Exhibition Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Legacypac (talk)20:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipietime. Why have you created a new account,User:Tinybirds? Is it for yourself to use? Please note that one person isn't supposed to have more than one account, unless they have some good reason for it and the different accounts are linked by a note about the connection.Bishonen |talk13:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I have a good reasonWikipietime (talk)15:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite reference addressing “good reason” as you state “ Please note that one person isn't supposed to have more than one account, unless they have some good reason for it and the different accounts are linked by a note about the connection”

Wikipietime (talk)15:37, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Please explain how you intend to use the extra account, and read the policyWP:SOCK for information.Bishonen |talk20:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Please reply below within a reasonable timespan (say 24 hours from now — I can see you have edited fromboth accounts since I posted, and have already got them mixed up), or I will simply block your second account.Bishonen |talk17:58, 17 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

FineWikipietime (talk)18:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It, the second account, accomplished what I needed. Thanks!Wikipietime (talk)18:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking both accounts need blocking.Lard Almighty (talk)19:55, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we'll see. Wikipietime is a 13-years-old account, so I won't block it on a whim. But you have danced around our questions concerning Tinybirds long enough, Wikipietime. I don't know if by "it accomplished what I needed" you mean that its usefulness is now over ("accomplished"), or not, nor do I care. I have blocked it as a sockpuppet. Don't create any more accounts without explaining in detail, on both the extra accounts' userpages and Wikipietime's, what exactly they are for, and it better be something acceptable.Bishonen |talk22:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

IntimidatingWikipietime (talk)02:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the idea. This is a serious warning from an administrator, so please take it seriously. Bishonen | tålk 20:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC).

Please stop with the offensive tone and what feels to me as intimidating bullying.Wikipietime (talk)21:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You done?Wikipietime (talk)04:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to add to his talk page;Rather high? Any comparisons that would be relevant? I recently was “nailed” in rather harsh terms for having unknowingly creating a second account, sock puppet. Not reading it violated policy if done fo no good reason. With the high rate of anom contributions on this article combined with masking of ip, makes one wonder. the integrity of this article and Wikipedia ads a whole. This article seems overly puffy pr. My recent dust up over sockpuppetry has me thinking the tone was overly harsh, interrogation like, when done without knowledge that it violated the policy. I am exploring the “good reason” criteria. What you say, bo and lard?Wikipietime (talk)01:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to know how to use talkpages,Wikipietime, even though you have been here for 13 years. Asking questions into empty air on your own page is meaningless. If you want particular people to see what you say, ask ontheir talkpages, or at leastping them here, using their actual account names. Ain't nobody here called "bo" or "lard".Bishonen |tålk20:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

notedWikipietime (talk)14:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate if you would stay off my talk pageWikipietime (talk)00:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this not trolling?Wikipietime (talk)00:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can watch a talk page and comment.Bishonen has made only helpful comments here, so it's definitely not trolling.Lard Almighty (talk)08:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bullied into oblivion for ?? By ?? Oh well wtfWikipietime (talk)17:38, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikipietime. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Total Noise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!22:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ready to quit and stop fundingWikipietime (talk)17:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Railroaded to oblivion, make note of how attention was garnered by most recent edits and trolling, watchdog, editors.... as plannedWikipietime (talk)02:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk03:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just about done with contributions to Wikipedia, obvious what is going on.Wikipietime (talk)02:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reeling from unrestrained editor deletions of my contributions….Wikipietime (talk)13:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoning shipWikipietime (talk)04:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quitting for goodWikipietime (talk)16:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMike Sarimsakci has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minimally sourced BLP. I'm betweenWP:ANYBIO andWP:BLP1E here but it's had a notability tag since 2017 and I'm not sure there's much to say about this dude.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.FalconK (talk)06:35, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should not be deletedWikipietime (talk)13:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/business/trump-organization-scion-hotel-deal.htmlSignificantWikipietime (talk)13:22, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you foryour contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as ageneral rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such asTalk:Eupatorium capillifolium are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They arenot a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at theTeahouse. Thanks.Toddst1(talk)17:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is youronly warning; if you makepersonal attacks on others again, as you did atUser talk:Wikipietime, you may beblocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.I've removed severalWP:POLEMIC sections from your talk page. Knock it off.WP:YANI.Toddst1(talk)18:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

threateningWikipietime (talk)12:44, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you should not be editing my talk pageWikipietime (talk)12:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleScott Hatch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Hatch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jps (talk)13:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

should stayTinybirdie (talk)03:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The articleEd Butowsky has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable financial advisor. No significant in-depth coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]