User talk:Volcanoguy
Page contents not supported in other languages.
The articleSheep Track Member you nominated as agood article has passed
; seeTalk:Sheep Track Member for comments about the article, andTalk:Sheep Track Member/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofJaguar --Jaguar (talk)16:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleMount Edziza you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Mount Edziza for comments about the article, andTalk:Mount Edziza/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofJaguar --Jaguar (talk)16:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| story ·music ·places |
|---|
Thank you for many recent quality articles, and today especially forMount Edziza volcanic complex, "about a group of volcanoes in British Columbia, Canada. It includes Mount Edziza, one of the highest volcanoes in Canada. The volcanic complex has been an area of volcanic activity for at least 7.4 million years, most recently in the last 2,000 years. It is also the most active volcanic system in Canada, having erupted more than 29 times during the Holocene. It also remains as one of the best-studied volcanic centres in northwestern British Columbia."! --Gerda Arendt (talk)08:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Volcanoguy :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interviewhere. Feel free to pass if you're not interested.Clovermoss🍀(talk)22:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings,since you took part in the review atWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mount Hudson/archive1 I was wondering if you had any thoughts onWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerro Panizos/archive1, especially the disagreement between me and David Fuchs.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk)08:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Volcanoguy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Volcano Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)23:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Volcanoguy. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Volcano Group".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!22:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleNahta Cone you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofDora the Axe-plorer --Dora the Axe-plorer (talk)13:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, and the RM at the talk page ofEurasian Plate was relisted on the 15th, so not much time left. Logic and commonsense would keep the uppercasing on the 90+ plates under discussion, but lowercasers are using the casing guideline, which some of us have countered withWP:IAR andWP:COMMONSENSE which is under fairly intense discussion. If you agree with this approach, or even have more comments, your additional participation may be useful. Thanks.Randy Kryn (talk)14:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleNahta Cone you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Nahta Cone for comments about the article, andTalk:Nahta Cone/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofDora the Axe-plorer --Dora the Axe-plorer (talk)23:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onCategory:Border Ranges indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.LizRead!Talk!20:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subaqueous volcano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Clone commando sev (talk)23:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled astoday's featured article for January 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found atWikipedia:Today's featured article/January 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article atWikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there byuser:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlistWikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work!SchroCat (talk)11:21, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Gold Maple Leaf Award | |
| This maple leaf is awarded toVolcanoguy for writing and expanding numerousCanadian geography articles of the highest quality during the eighth year ofThe 10,000 Challenge ofWikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!Reidgreg (talk)17:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
The articleTennena Cone you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Tennena Cone andTalk:Tennena Cone/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCrisco 1492 --Crisco 1492 (talk)15:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleTennena Cone you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Tennena Cone for comments about the article, andTalk:Tennena Cone/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCrisco 1492 --Crisco 1492 (talk)16:43, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleSpectrum Range you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)17:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleSpectrum Range you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Spectrum Range andTalk:Spectrum Range/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)19:03, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleSpectrum Range you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Spectrum Range for comments about the article, andTalk:Spectrum Range/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)20:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| story ·music ·places |
|---|
Thank you today forVolcanism of the Mount Edziza volcanic complex, "about volcanism of a volcanic complex in British Columbia, Canada, that has been erupting episodically for at least the last 7.4 million years. I'm renominating it for FA because there was no consensus for promotion in the last FAC, not to mention there were incomplete reviews. As I've explained in the previous FAC, the reason this article cites Souther a lot is because he's the only geologist to have studied the Mount Edziza volcanic complex in detail, not because the article isn't well-researched which is 1c of the featured article criteria. Most volcanoes in Canada are not well-studied due to their remote locations; Canada also doesn't have a lot of volcanologists."! --Gerda Arendt (talk)07:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Today,pictured on the Main page,Tosca, in memory of her first appearance on stage OTD in 1900, and of principal authorBrian Boulton. --Gerda Arendt (talk)18:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 19 § Natural disasters by year on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk)19:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleCocoa Crater you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Cocoa Crater andTalk:Cocoa Crater/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCrisco 1492 --Crisco 1492 (talk)21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleCocoa Crater you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Cocoa Crater for comments about the article, andTalk:Cocoa Crater/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCrisco 1492 --Crisco 1492 (talk)02:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleKitsu Plateau you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofKimikel --Kimikel (talk)04:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleKitsu Plateau you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Kitsu Plateau for comments about the article, andTalk:Kitsu Plateau/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofKimikel --Kimikel (talk)00:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleCoffee Crater you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPi.1415926535 --Pi.1415926535 (talk)23:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)08:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleCoffee Crater you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Coffee Crater for comments about the article, andTalk:Coffee Crater/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPi.1415926535 --Pi.1415926535 (talk)05:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Volcanoguy. Your recent edits to both categories (e.g.Category:Creeks of the Sierra Nevada (United States)) and articles (e.g.,Oak Creek Canyon) appear to be making a distinction between creeks and rivers. Are you going purely by the name? I don't think there is any well-established technical distinction between the two types of flowing water bodies. Because of this, I'm unsure that "Creek"ness is adefining characteristic of these objects: would a creek almost always be referred to as a "creek" in reliable sources (outside the name), or would they also use "stream" or "river"? Something to consider. —hike395 (talk)17:15, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion atWT:RIVERS has died down a bit, and it appears that
I have a suggestion: how about if I mark the "creeks" category discussion as aSNOW close and we revert your "creeks" splits of the "rivers" categories? If you would like, I can help with AWB.
It looks like the majority of editors want the "river" categories to be named something else, but it looks evenly split between "watercourses" and "rivers and streams". Perhaps we can go to CfD with one of them to get a wider view? or maybe you or someone else has a better idea of how to break the deadlock? —hike395 (talk)05:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleThe Pyramid (British Columbia) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGN22 --GN22 (talk)16:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleThe Pyramid (British Columbia) you nominated as agood article has failed
; seeTalk:The Pyramid (British Columbia) for reasons whythe nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGN22 --GN22 (talk)17:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleNanook Dome you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGGOTCC --GGOTCC (talk)23:27, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleNanook Dome you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Nanook Dome for comments about the article, andTalk:Nanook Dome/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGGOTCC --GGOTCC (talk)23:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OnJudy Fierstein,Wes Hildreth, andFrank C. Calkins, you changed all instances of "geologic mapping" to "geological mapping". Is there a reason for these changes?BhamBoi (talk)21:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I'm just curious why you recategorized everything atCategory:Oxford Clay Formation asCategory:Oxford Clay. There is no article ofOxford Clay while there is one ofOxford Clay Formation, so I would think the most natural category name would match, but maybe there's other logic behind it.IJReid {{T -C -D -R}}02:57, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for volcanoes or anything which interests you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦Dr. Blofeld11:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleEve Cone you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)21:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleEve Cone you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article needs changes or clarifications to meet thegood article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Eve Cone andTalk:Eve Cone/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)22:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleEve Cone you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Eve Cone for comments about the article, andTalk:Eve Cone/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)00:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Volcanoguy,
It looks like you are in the process of recategorizing articles and categories. Is this due to a discussion that occurred anywhere on the project? We discourage editors from emptying categories "out of process" rather than going throughWP:CFD which is more suited for category renames, merges and deletions. Just thought I'd check in with you. Thanks.LizRead!Talk!03:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)"[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleBig Raven Plateau isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMediaKyle --MediaKyle (talk)16:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleBig Raven Plateau haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofMediaKyle --MediaKyle (talk)10:42, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Volcanoguy,You may be interested to read a recent paperhttps://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL116050 regarding the Tintina Fault in Canada, which I noticed you created the page for back in 2009. -Indefensible (talk)06:10, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleExile Hill isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofJackFromWisconsin --JackFromWisconsin (talk)23:28, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleExile Hill haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofJackFromWisconsin --JackFromWisconsin (talk)23:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
Thank you for more quality content! --Gerda Arendt (talk)08:45, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
please contact mehere AngryOldCanadian (OC)2604:3D08:5776:7900:586F:5170:7AF9:ECD2 (talk)21:46, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleIce Peak Formation isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofI2Overcome --I2Overcome (talk)01:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleIce Peak isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSnowyRiver28 --SnowyRiver28 (talk)12:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleSnowshoe Lava Field isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofZKang123 --ZKang123 (talk)11:48, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleIce Peak has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSnowyRiver28 --SnowyRiver28 (talk)04:27, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleIce Peak haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSnowyRiver28 --SnowyRiver28 (talk)23:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleBelcher Mountains has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Cannot find a single source for article subject beyond this article and mirrors of it, not even in Google Scholar. No further information, images coordinates or sources can be added.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to thepage's history for further information.DatBot (talk)00:30, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleSnowshoe Lava Field has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofZKang123 --ZKang123 (talk)06:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleIce Peak Formation has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofI2Overcome --I2Overcome (talk)05:27, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleIce Peak Formation haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofI2Overcome --I2Overcome (talk)01:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleSnowshoe Lava Field haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofZKang123 --ZKang123 (talk)05:43, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleTseax (disambiguation) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:ONEOTHER disambiguation page. Can adequately be handled with hatnote directly fromTseax Cone toKsi Sii Aks.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. --Tamzin[cetacean needed](they|xe|🤷)10:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleMess Creek Escarpment isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofI2Overcome --I2Overcome (talk)23:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleDesolation Lava Field has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCrystalite13 --Crystalite13 (talk)05:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleWilliams Cone isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)18:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleWilliams Cone has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)19:07, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleWilliams Cone haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSammi Brie --Sammi Brie (talk)00:45, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleMess Creek Escarpment has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofI2Overcome --I2Overcome (talk)03:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleDesolation Lava Field haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCrystalite13 --Crystalite13 (talk)01:28, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yourgood article nomination of the articleMess Creek Escarpment haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofI2Overcome --I2Overcome (talk)22:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just reverted what I judged to beedit that eliminated critisism of research by Greg Retallack in theDouglas Lake Member article, which you edited a number of times. The edit is byRetallack. I suspect that is a conflict of interest. Should I report it somewhere or simply note it onhis talk page or in the comments?Paul H. (talk)19:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The fracture zone nomination has been relisted. You may want to alert some of the Wikiprojects that may not know that this discussion exists. Thanks.Randy Kryn (talk)09:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
