|
Archives | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
This page has archives. Topics inactive for31 days are automatically archived1 or more at a time byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than4. |
14:56, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Hey, just saw your edit of the diagram. Assume you're still working on it (e.g. Cooper's Creek has your username next to it), I'll come back in a bit and recheck. I specifically wanted the "Gippsland Line" link inline with the rest of the text to keep the infobox narrow. I couldn't get cite book to work without breaking other formatting, but it's referenced in the main article as<ref name="Trainor"/>.Anothersignalman (talk)17:11, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Useddenim (talk)15:08, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Useddenim. Just a friendly note having seen some of your activity on my watchlist. A few of your edits (in which you're changingTemplate:K+A-B-B toTemplate:K+A-B-B, etc.) were to others' talk page comments, and on archived talk pages. I'm flagging this in case it's semi-automated editing and those edits have slipped through the gap (seeHelp:Archiving_a_talk_page#May_I_edit_an_archived_talk_page? andWP:TPO, if you're not aware). Without knowing your rationale, I'd hesitantly say there's no reasonable need to change hypertext fromTemplate:K+A-B-B (etc.)in talkspace as itredirects to the new template location.
If it were me I'd revert those edits where other editors' talk page comments have been changed (archived page or not), but that's for you to decide how to progress. Now and again I make batches of edits usingWP:AWB, and have greatly appreciated editors giving me a nudge if there's an oversight in my edit settings, so I hope that's how you take this :) Thanks,MIDI (talk)07:57, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Fremantle railway station has beenlisted for discussion, which may result in the template beingmerged ordeleted byconsensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Gonnym (talk)13:21, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]