This is anarchive of past discussions withUser:Tomobe03.Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on thecurrent talk page.

...to se you back to editing Wikipedia! :-) --Saxum (talk)11:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission ofTito–Stalin split at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Yoninah (talk)20:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December!Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the articleTito-Stalin split has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I noticed that the article uses an en dash rather than a hyphen in every instance of "Tito-Stalin". En dashes are generally used for a range of dates, times or numbers. You might want to consider whether these instances should be changed.Congratulations on bringing the article to GA status.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk)14:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your time and effort. I had a look at the changes you made last night and I am confident that the article is greatly improved now. I'll have a look at the en dash issue, but I'm quite certain the matter will be discussed at the ACR soon.--Tomobe03 (talk)14:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleInformbiro period you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaiser matias --Kaiser matias (talk)23:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Greetings there,

I noticed that you included the article in the WikiProject Croatia. Should we do the same for similar articles, such as:Alojzije Mišić,Petar Čule,Ratko Perić? I intend to make all these articles GA. I would appreciate any help from your project and am aware of the connection that exists between the Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. Sometimes it's really hard to distinguish them into separate categories since there's much interdependence between the two (Perić headed the Saint Jerome college in Rome, which regards itself as a Croatian college; Buconjić maintained close relations with Zagreb and so forth). --Governor Sheng (talk)18:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi there. Yes, I added the WPCro template as the scope of theWP:CRO includes articles related to Croatia or Croats - regardless where they live(d). It is quite alright to have one article tagged with multiple WikiProjects since their interests are likely to overlap. I would suggest you to add other articles as well if they meet this requirement too. A potential benefit for the article from such inclusion is that this might lead to attention from other contributors/reviewers. Of course, this applies to all relevant wiki projects, depending on how their scope is defined. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk)22:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The articleInformbiro period you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Informbiro period for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaiser matias --Kaiser matias (talk)23:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the articleInformbiro period has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk)22:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

On8 January 2021,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleTito–Stalin split, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theCominform Resolution of 28 June 1948 publicly announced theTito–Stalin split? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Tito–Stalin split. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Tito–Stalin split), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added tothe statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

— Maile (talk)12:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

The articleInformbiro period you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Informbiro period for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofKaiser matias --Kaiser matias (talk)04:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks Australian artillery in World War I Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on no-win scenarios

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forAnti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome! Cheers,Baffle☿gab01:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your time and efforts. I'm certain quality of the article has improved as a result of your work. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk)02:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTreaties of Rome (1941), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBritish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:22, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofRuling party --Ruling party (talk)12:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleState Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)18:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

		Military history service award
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of your consistent improvement to a high quality of articles within the scope of the Military History Project. This is appreciated.Gog the Mild (talk)22:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

PS And when are you going to bite the bullet and nominate one of your fine articles for FA?Gog the Mild (talk)22:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank youGog the Mild. I really appreciate this. And - soon, I promise ;) --Tomobe03 (talk)22:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleAnti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofIndy beetle --Indy beetle (talk)00:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forTito–Šubašić Agreements at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!Dhtwiki (talk)18:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Dhtwiki thank you very much.--Tomobe03 (talk)22:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

The articleState Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Bosnia and Herzegovina for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)00:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The articleAnti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Anti-Fascist Council for the National Liberation of Yugoslavia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofIndy beetle --Indy beetle (talk)02:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page for the articleTreaties of Rome (1941). Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary.Kncny11 (talk)15:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forTreaties of Rome (1941) at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!Kncny11 (talk)17:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Many of my improvements were done as requested, with a focus on improving the quality of prose and grammar. While I corrected any typos that I may have made in the editing process, it would be worth taking another look to make sure that the article is written in accordance with British English, as I and my spellcheck are American, and to double-check all dates mentioned, as I have a learning disability known asdyscalculia that sometimes causes me to switch numbers around. Best of luck with the nomination process!Kncny11 (talk)17:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Kncny11 thank you for the time you took to copyedit this article. I have reverted a couple of changes which would otherwise change the meaning of specific sentences, and switched spelling of a couple of words to BE. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk)17:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleTreaties of Rome (1941) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofNo Great Shaker --No Great Shaker (talk)15:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The articleTreaties of Rome (1941) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Treaties of Rome (1941) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofNo Great Shaker --No Great Shaker (talk)12:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleTito–Šubašić Agreements you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)15:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

The articleTito–Šubaši? Agreements you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:Tito–Šubaši? Agreements for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofSturmvogel 66 --Sturmvogel 66 (talk)15:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

The article6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofRuling party --Ruling party (talk)10:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Legobot doesn't seem to have delivered this (probably because it's a second nomination), so I'm doing it the old-fashioned way.Extraordinary Writ (talk)19:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the in-person delivery. I only just realised this was not Legobot message.--Tomobe03 (talk)22:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

The article6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:6th Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofExtraordinary Writ --Extraordinary Writ (talk)01:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The article cites "Hayden 2011" and "Ramet 2003" but no such sources are listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Or are these typos in years? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and pasteimportScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js');// Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] toyour common.js page. Thanks,Renata (talk)04:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Renata3 thanks for pointing these out. Yes, they appear to be typos. I checked the Ramet reference, and it is found in Ramet's Three Yugoslavias (2006) on the indicated page. Hayden was likewise a typo, but I also changed the ref in the bibliography section a bit. Namely, the Google books seems to indicate that the book was published in 2012, but the book itself (I have access to a copy) says 2013, and the two cites check out fine - so I changed it to 2013. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk)07:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on female computers, Nick-D on the Israeli Defence Forces

Hey y'all, theApril 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on theAutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed atWP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles atWP:GAN orWP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted atWP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up atWikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at thedrive talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleState Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)11:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello,

I would like to discuss your removal of Afterwar paragraph in article1st Croatian Guards Corps, for saying that the source is unreliable. I would like to point out that I disagree with your statement that the source is unreliable, since it contains direct words of a man (Anri Targuš) who was a member of this unit, and took part in the events and can therefore give a first hand account of what was happening. I think that it is, therefore, unrightfully removed. It also gives an insight to lesser known episode of this unit and it is therefore a worthy contribution to the overall article.

Franjo Tahy (talk)20:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Franjo Tahy, the source is reliable if it meetsWP:RS policy which means, among other things, that it is a published source requiring "editorial oversight". Portals such as braniteljski.hr may well report accurately, but portals (usually) fail the oversight criterion. I don't mean to belittle the source of information - it just fails WP:RS. Such interviews are quite useful for further research, especially as first-hand accounts.

As indicated in the edit summary removing the information - the information that the 1.HGZ continued to discharge its duty of protecting the President of Croatia adds nothing to the existing information in the article. If the addition were detailing an otherwise unreported combat, this would be quite different. Regards--Tomobe03 (talk)21:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forState Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best,Miniapolis23:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

‎Miniapolis, thank you very much for copyediting the article. I had a look at the diffs whenever you edited and I'm very happy how the prose has been improved. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)23:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words,Tomobe03; it helps when a topic is interesting. Stay well and all the best,Miniapolis23:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleCroatian Peasant Party during World War II you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofAmitchell125 --Amitchell125 (talk)18:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

HiTomobe03, I've started the review for this article by reading it through, and it is clear that the prose, spelling and grammar need to be attended to. There is too much for me to list, but unless the text is put into correct English the article will be failed. One solution to the problem is to ask for the article to be copy edited atWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests—you wait about 3 weeks before it gets done.

Are you happy for me to put a request in?Amitchell125 (talk)20:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

HiAmitchell125! Thank you for taking time to review the article. I have already made the request to GOCE a while ago (17 March), and I believe they might be tending to the article quite soon since the request is now near the top of the list. If you find it acceptable, you could resume the review once the GOCE copyedit is done. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)21:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I'll resume post my review comments after you've contacted me to let me know the GOCE copyedit is finished. Regards,Amitchell125 (talk)21:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I'll ping you then.--Tomobe03 (talk)21:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Amitchell125, I just wanted to ping you to let you know that the GOCE copyedit is now done. The editor was most helpful in pointing out few other problems. I hope I resolved them satisfactorily. You can review them on the article talk. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)13:22, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know,Tomobe03. Regards,Amitchell125 (talk)13:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

The articleState Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:State Anti-fascist Council for the National Liberation of Croatia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)23:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

	The Writer's Barnstar
	A very good-working editor in my opinion, thank you for your edits!Vacant0 (talk)14:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kind wordsVacant0!--Tomobe03 (talk)15:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

No problem!Vacant0 (talk)15:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

The articleCroatian Peasant Party during World War II you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Croatian Peasant Party during World War II for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofAmitchell125 --Amitchell125 (talk)07:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Montgomery's doctrine and Nick-D on Mussolini's wars

The articleCroatian Peasant Party during World War II you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Croatian Peasant Party during World War II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofAmitchell125 --Amitchell125 (talk)08:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCroatian Spring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pagePetar Šegedin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Just dropping by to sayvery nice job on the article. Back in the day I did some work on it, but it was basically just plugging the holes, hardly anything more than that. Being a fairly major topic, it needed a much more thorough treatment - and it looks like it got one. ;-) I haven't taken a closer look though; I'd volunteer to provide feedback at some point if you're interested.GregorB (talk)12:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

GregorB thank you for your kind words. The article is currently awaiting GOCE copyedit (it's fairly high in the queue now) and then I plan to submit it to GAN and then (if successful) to FAC - i.e. I'll be interested in all sorts of feedback. Also, it occurred to me that the 50th anniversary of 1 Dec Karađorđevo meeting is coming up, so hopefully possibly maybe there might be a TFA.--Tomobe03 (talk)12:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick- D and Hawkeye7 look at intelligence gathering, doctrine and strategy

Well, the image caption should explain what's shown, and saying "Random New Proper Name" is shown, in an article not about that, just leads the reader to think "but what is Random New Proper Name?" :) Perhaps "Yugoslav newspaper Telegram"? Or "a contemporary literary newspaper"? --Joy [shallot] (talk)19:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The article has been promoted. Good job! --Governor Sheng (talk)16:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the message and taking time to review wiki content. However, in this case, I just did some minor tweaks - the original nominator should receive all the credit.--Tomobe03 (talk)16:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on RAAF aircraft, Hawkeye7 on mission command and nuclear secrecy

Good article nominations |July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between April and June 2021.Peacemaker67 (talk) viaMilHistBot (talk)00:36, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleCroatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofTayi Arajakate --Tayi Arajakate (talk)00:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on World War I

The articleCroatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofTayi Arajakate --Tayi Arajakate (talk)00:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

The articleCroatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Croatian Republican Peasant Party (1945) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofTayi Arajakate --Tayi Arajakate (talk)15:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedMay Declaration, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesSouth Slavic andAntun Bauer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

I saw your messages onWT:CRO; you seem to be knowledgeable about public domain in Croatia. I'm currently working on expanding the1964 Zagreb flood article and putting up some pictures. There's a PDF of the day's newspapershere from which I've extracted photos (example). Can you doublecheck that this is PD? Would it somehow be possible to use the map providedhere (fromthis webpage)? I've drafted a fairly long article offline and I'm hoping I can put some photos and illustrations to liven it up ;)DaßWölf15:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

HiDaß Wölf. Any photograph published in Yugoslavia before 1 January 1966 became public domain on 1 January 1991. This does not mean that photographs published in Yugoslavia on or after 1 January 1966 are not PD. For example, photographs published in (Socialist Republic of) Croatia on or after 1 January 1966 but before 1 January 1971 became public domain on 1 January 1996 under applicable Croatian law. Regardless of any subsequent expiry of copyrights under Croatian law (to stick with that example) later photos are not PD for the purposes of Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia because everything still copyrighted on that day received an extension of copyright in the US (therefore being relevant for the Wikimedia Commons) until expiry of 95 years following publication (i.e. photo published in Croatia on 1 January 1971 will only become PD for Wikimedia Commons on 1 January 2067). The extension of the copyright protection did not apply if the particular work was not copyrighted on 1 January 1971. In short, any photos published in Yugoslav/Croatian papers before 1 January 1971 are ok to use - just make sure you indicate the source and publication date in the Commons, and add two approppriate PD notices:{{PD-Yugoslavia}} (for photos published before 1 January 1966) or{{PD-Croatia}} (for photos published in 1966-1970 period) and{{PD-US-1996}}.

As regards the map, I don't think it would be PD and could not be used as such in the article. However, it can be used as a source (if deemed reliable per WP:RS - did not check myself). If the map source is reliable, I'd suggest you to seek help regarding creation of a map atWikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop.

Thank you for taking time and effort to contribute to Wikipedia. I'm looking forward to reading the 1964 flood article as soon as I get the chance. I hope the above is helpful to you and please ping me if I can assist with anything. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)16:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

And a clarification, when I typed "published in Yugoslav/Croatian papers" I should have said just "published in Yugoslavia/Croatia" - applies to newspapers, journals, books and all other forms of lawful publication.--Tomobe03 (talk)16:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed reply! In that case I'm also going to upload the photos credited to Zagrebačka panorama's special flood issue. According tothe city library, it was published in November 1964.This review states the magazine was published by City of Zagreb's People's Council (Narodni odbor) and intended for a wide audience. Sadly I don't really know much more about it -- I was planning to take a look at it in the library before I finished the article, and hopefully dig up more material about the flood, but the new covid wave snuck up on me.DaßWölf14:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

No problem. Hope everything turns out fine covid-wise. If that library happens to be in Zagreb, I would be interested if you could leaf through a specific book to check if any Croatian Spring-related photographs were published there in 1970 - also making them PD ;) --Tomobe03 (talk)15:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying Op-ed:RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleNiš Declaration you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)14:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The articleNiš Declaration you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Niš Declaration for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)19:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleCorfu Declaration you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)22:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The articleCorfu Declaration you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Corfu Declaration for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)16:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

The articleNiš Declaration you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Niš Declaration for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)19:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

The articleCorfu Declaration you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Corfu Declaration for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)20:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running,please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forMay Declaration at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!PaxVerbum17:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Pax85 thank you for taking time to copyedit the May Declaration article. I'm confident its quality has been improved. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)22:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleMay Declaration you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)15:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

The articleMay Declaration you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:May Declaration for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)18:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

The articleMay Declaration you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:May Declaration for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofThe Rambling Man --The Rambling Man (talk)10:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, voting for the2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted atthe 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For your valued work in theJuly 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk)05:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed:Nick-D on writing about military procurement

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleGreen Cadres you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofZawed --Zawed (talk)01:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, voting for the2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted atthe 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the articleYugoslavism has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I left a "clarification needed" tag in the Illyrian contribution to linguistic unity section because one sentence is incomplete. I suspect the correct wording should be "language creates nations", but I'm not certain.

I notice that a non-registered editor changed "Bulgars" to "Bulgarians" in theBackground section. Again, I am not sure if this is correct.

Best of luck with the GAR when you get to it. You've clearly done a massive amount of work on the article to improve it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk)15:24, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist thank you very much for copyediting the article. I took a quick look at the changes and nothing appears to be problematic. The IP editor was correct to change Bulgars to Bulgarians. I rephrased the bit where you added te clarification needed tag (around Starčević). Could you please take another look at that bit to see if it's any clearer now? Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)10:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Tomobe03 That makes sense! The section looks fine now.Twofingered Typist (talk)11:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

The articleGreen Cadres you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Green Cadres for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofZawed --Zawed (talk)10:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleCroatian Spring you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)21:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

The articleCroatian Spring you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Croatian Spring for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)19:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

The articleCroatian Spring you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Croatian Spring for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)17:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleZagreb Resolution you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)16:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

The articleZagreb Resolution you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Zagreb Resolution for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)17:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the articleCorfu Declaration has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I have added a "clarification needed" tags to the use of one term which is unclear to me. "Entenete" in theBackground section does not make clear which countries assisted in Serbia's rescue.

Best of luck with the article moving forward.

Twofingered Typist (talk)15:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist thank you very much!--Tomobe03 (talk)16:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

The articleZagreb Resolution you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Zagreb Resolution for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofGhostRiver --GhostRiver (talk)17:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleTreaty of London (1915) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofZawed --Zawed (talk)10:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

The articleTreaty of London (1915) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Treaty of London (1915) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofZawed --Zawed (talk)09:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've finally added my text about1964 Zagreb flood and a short bio ofPero Pirker. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find out much about Pirker's role in the Croatian Spring online and I don't know what the authoritative sources are. Since you've nominatedCroatian Spring for FAC, I was hoping if you knew more or could fact-check the existing info in that section of his article. I'll gladly share the DYK credit :)

P.S. Unfortunately I never got around to checking that source I mentioned the last time. I was going to visit the Starčevićev trg library and check your book while I'm at it when the covid cases thinned out a bit, but it doesn't seem like that's about to happen any time soon, so I just published what I've got.DaßWölf03:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

No problemDaß Wölf, I'll take a look later today.--Tomobe03 (talk)09:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for addingCroatian Spring toWikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 1. There's only one problem, which is that the facts described in the blurb do not seem to actually be in the article. I don't see where it says that the purges began on the 1st. "On 1 December, Tito convened a joint meeting of the leaders of the SKJ and the SKH at the Karađorđevo hunting ground in Vojvodina," but it seems that the part that says, "tens of thousands were expelled from the SKH" didn't happen until after 11 December. Also, the infobox says that the Croatian Spring ended on 1 December, but it's not clear in the article how the movement ended on that day. So despite the GA promotion, I think this needs a little bit of work before we can feature it on OTD. Thanks.—howcheng{chat}08:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Howcheng thanks for pointing this out - a sentence was missing from the article.--Tomobe03 (talk)09:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

Congratulations, Tomobe03! The article you nominated,Croatian Spring, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,Gog the Mild (talk) viaFACBot (talk)00:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

		The Featured Article Medal
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to Featured status".Gog the Mild (talk)18:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank youGog the Mild for the kind message... and for patience with the review.--Tomobe03 (talk)18:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

On12 December 2021,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleTreaty of London (1915), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that unkept promises made in the 1915Treaty of London created the sense ofmutilated victory in Italy after World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Treaty of London (1915). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Treaty of London (1915)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added tothe statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk)00:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay:Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

Good article nominations |January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofWikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleYugoslavism you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)19:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleArmistice of Belgrade you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)19:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleLipošćak affair you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)19:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

The articleLipoš?ak affair you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:Lipoš?ak affair for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)19:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 3 reviews between October and December 2021.Peacemaker67 (talk) viaMilHistBot (talk)19:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The articleYugoslavism you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Yugoslavism for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)15:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

The articleLipošćak affair you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Lipošćak affair for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)17:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

The articleArmistice of Belgrade you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Armistice of Belgrade for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)17:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

The articleYugoslavism you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Yugoslavism for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

The articleArmistice of Belgrade you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Armistice of Belgrade for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofVacant0 --Vacant0 (talk)18:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

This is to let you know that theCroatian Spring article has been scheduled as atoday's featured article for January 11, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so atWikipedia:Today's featured article/January 11, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We suggest that you watchlistWikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks!Jimfbleak -talk to me?14:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article "about a period in history of Yugoslavia and Croatia marked by a peak in a wider and longer-lasting conflict between centralisation and decentralisation of Yugoslavia. The period saw a rise in Croatian national sentiment and nationalist forces framing their objectives around economic issues of (de)centralisation. At the same time, those advocating decentralisation embraced (to a degree) support from the nationalists. Actions of the leadership of the Socialist Republic of Croatia drew response from Croatian Serbs and caused ethnic tensions. The period ended when the Croatian leadership was removed from power following an intervention by Yugoslav president Josip Broz Tito. Croatian Spring and associated events had a significant impact on the final years of Yugoslavia."! --Gerda Arendt (talk)06:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Croatia

Thank you for quality articles about Croatia within Yugoslavia, such asCroatian Spring, for a steady flow of GAs in the field (111 today!) includingArmistice of Belgrade,Armistice of Belgrade andLipošćak affair, for reviewing others, for excellent quotations on your user page andseven pillars, - you are anawesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.2694 of Precious, a prize ofQAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk)10:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Gerda Arendt, thank you very much!--Tomobe03 (talk)16:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay:Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

Dobra večer. Članak o meni vandaliziran je na engleskome i hrvatskome. Precizno: uneseno je negativno mišljenje koje je o meni u ne baš pristojnoj polemici izrazio Viktor Ivančić i kao izvor navedene su Ivančićeve polemike. Ti dodaci su uneseni posve anonimno, samo s IP brojem, s mobilnog telefona. Budući da je članak o meni, ne bih htio sam intervenirati. Što mi savjetujete? Unaprijed hvala. --Inoslav Bešker (talk)19:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

Good article nominations |June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part?Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t ·c)buidhe04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. Voting is conducted using simpleapproval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploadingFile:Surrender of RSK 21st Krajina Corps to Croatian Army, Glina, Croatia, 8 August 1995.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occurhere; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. Voting is conducted using simpleapproval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurringhere If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:Meet some of the project coordinators

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed:Meet some more of the coordinators

I'm not sure. Seeding red links in hatnotes is not accepted practice, cf.WP:REDHAT. --Joy [shallot] (talk)12:27, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me to try to establish a continuity over so many decades and different political systems inbetween. See if you can have a general summary article about the old counties, or just make stubs if they have any potential. --Joy [shallot] (talk)13:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

There's already an article forModruš-Rijeka County... --Joy [shallot] (talk)15:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I just realized you saidlatter in reference to that. The words were transposed, that threw me off. Yeah, I guess those two short periods can start of as a background section of that article. It's somewhat more appropriate since the context is the same empire. --Joy [shallot] (talk)17:32, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview:On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay:Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed:Meet some more of the coordinators

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II Review essay:Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)20:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies Review essay:Catlemur on military museums in Athens

You are receiving this message because you were aGood article reviewer on at least one article that is part ofWikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. AnAN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group ofGood articles forcopyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independentGood article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please reviewWikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be foundhere. Questions or comments can be made atthe project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages atthis page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page for the articleJanko Drašković. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers,Baffle☿gab04:48, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleGeneva Declaration (1918) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAirshipJungleman29 --AirshipJungleman29 (talk)17:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

The articleGeneva Declaration (1918) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Geneva Declaration (1918) andTalk:Geneva Declaration (1918)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAirshipJungleman29 --AirshipJungleman29 (talk)17:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello,

Can I usethis non-free picture of Croatian Army in Operation Flash which you uploaded on Wikipedia for the articleMilitary history of Croatia?

I am very surprised to see that we have very few pictures of Croatian Army in Croatian War of Independence on Commons in comparrison with all the other Croatian wars in history, despite the fact that this conflict is relatively recent.

Franjo Tahy (talk)17:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I'm afraid fair-use rationale would not cover it, thought I'm not 100% sure on this. Generally, fair-use means a low-res, small image may be used to illustrate the article dealing specifically with the topic shown, i.e. only one article.

You are right, there are sadly few PD images from a relatively recent war - while there are plenty high quality images available to the HMDCDR and other publicly funded bodies barred from use by restrictive licensing. I tried arguing with one custodian of a photo library about the issue of over-restrictive licensing (unrelated to the war photos) only to be rebuffed with the argument that "others would use the photos then".--Tomobe03 (talk)23:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

The articleGeneva Declaration (1918) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Geneva Declaration (1918) for comments about the article, andTalk:Geneva Declaration (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofAirshipJungleman29 --AirshipJungleman29 (talk)14:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

Hello! Your submission ofGeneva Declaration (1918) at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!CMD (talk)14:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed:Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed:Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

On8 June 2023,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleGeneva Declaration (1918), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that thePresident of Serbia signed the 1918Geneva Declaration after intervention from thePresident of France? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Geneva Declaration (1918). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Geneva Declaration (1918)), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

--RoySmith(talk)00:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi!

You wrote several excellent articles on Yugoslav-related subjects, especially the6th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia. I also presume you are from that geographic area. I've created (or totally revised) on the Central Committee terms of the League of Communists, such asCentral Committee of the 6th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia. I am trying to - presently - to create an article about theCentral Council of the 1st Congress of the Communist Party of Yugoslaviahere.

The reason why I contacted you is that you created theSocial Democratic Party of Bosnia–Herzegovina (1909). I am presuming then that you probably have an overview of who attended the KPJ's founding congress or were elected to its central bodies.

If you could help, I would appreciate it. If not, keep up the excellent work!TheUzbek (talk)10:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words. The best thing I can offer you is Koprivica-Oštrić article on the 1st Congress available online in Croatian (with English summary) here[1] for free. I trust you can use machine translation tools on the text if necessary. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk)21:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the article1918 protest in Zagreb you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofBuidhe --Buidhe (talk)07:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

The article1918 protest in Zagreb you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:1918 protest in Zagreb for comments about the article, andTalk:1918 protest in Zagreb/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as abold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofBuidhe --Buidhe (talk)14:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

Good article nominations |August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t ·c)buidhe05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

—delivered byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi 1979 → on19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested for1918 occupation of Međimurje at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome! Cheers,Baffle☿gab00:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for taking up this copyedit. I'll keep track of the article (and its talk) if you need any clarification. Cheers --Tomobe03 (talk)04:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

No worries; I didn't enounter any problems during my c/e. Good luck with your planned GA nom and cheers,Baffle☿gab00:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the article1918 occupation of Međimurje you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofBuidhe --Buidhe (talk)19:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The article1918 occupation of Međimurje you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:1918 occupation of Međimurje for comments about the article, andTalk:1918 occupation of Međimurje/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you cannominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofBuidhe --Buidhe (talk)16:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2022.Peacemaker67 (talk) viaMilHistBot (talk)06:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forTreaty of Rapallo (1920) at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!Dhtwiki (talk)23:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking time to improve this article's prose. I'll review the changes and check back with you if I have any questions afterwards. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)23:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

I was going to mention that "Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes" gets repeated too often, but I abandoned my mental attempts at a short form, say "Serbia", for fear of its being wrong for some reason, such as slighting the other ethnicities or glossing over its monarchical nature.Dhtwiki (talk)03:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

A commonly used solution here on wiki is "Kingdom SCS" or "KSCS". Shortening to "Serbia" is incorrect - that's a different country. The problem of impractical name was present in the country at the time also and it was more or less commonly referred to as "Yugoslavia" until it was formally renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1929 - a name proposed for the country back in late 1918 (by the Yugoslav Committee representatives), but avoided at insistence of the Kingdom of Serbia as a means to keep the name of Serbia in the name of the new country. How about having at the first occurrence of the name in the body text "Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (KSCS)" and using the acronym later on?--Tomobe03 (talk)10:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleJanko Drašković you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofBorsoka --Borsoka (talk)07:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine Op-ed:Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votesvote here andhere respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year.Hawkeye7 (talk ·contribs) viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested for1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!

Baffle gab1978 thank you for taking time to copyedit this article. I had a look at the edits and only made some minor corrections of typos. Cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk)10:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

The articleJanko Drašković you nominated as agood article has failed; seeTalk:Janko Drašković for reasons whythe nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofBorsoka --Borsoka (talk)01:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)17:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Tang campaign against Kucha has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)22:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleD401 road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/D401 road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk)17:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article nominations |March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here orask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t ·c)buidhe02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the article1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofZ1720 --Z1720 (talk)02:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The article1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion andTalk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofZ1720 --Z1720 (talk)03:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03, just reminding you about this GAN. If there is no response in a few days I'll close this as unsuccessful.Z1720 (talk)15:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi,Z1720. Sorry for the wait, I was on the road past 7 days. I plan to address the issues you raised today and tomorrow. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk)13:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forPodgorica Assembly at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!Sheriff |☎ 911 |01:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

The article1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion for comments about the article, andTalk:1920 Croatian Peasant Rebellion/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofZ1720 --Z1720 (talk)02:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forYugoslav Committee at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome! Cheers,Baffle☿gab00:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

The articleTreaty of Rapallo (1920) you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920) andTalk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofThaesOfereode --ThaesOfereode (talk)02:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

The articleTreaty of Rapallo (1920) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920) for comments about the article, andTalk:Treaty of Rapallo (1920)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofThaesOfereode --ThaesOfereode (talk)00:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at a diverse range of works Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on the "center of gravity"

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at the Tokyo war crimes trials

		The Croatian Barnstar of National Merit
		WOW ok that is some SERIOUS dedication towards Croatian topics.48JCL • (📲/📝)22:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!--Tomobe03 (talk)09:35, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articlePodgorica Assembly you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofThaesOfereode --ThaesOfereode (talk)21:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

The articlePodgorica Assembly you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Podgorica Assembly andTalk:Podgorica Assembly/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofThaesOfereode --ThaesOfereode (talk)22:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

The articlePodgorica Assembly you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Podgorica Assembly for comments about the article, andTalk:Podgorica Assembly/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofThaesOfereode --ThaesOfereode (talk)01:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

ThaesOfereode thank you very much for taking time and effort to review this GAN and thank you for helpful remarks. I'm happy that quality of the article improved as a consequence of the review.--Tomobe03 (talk)21:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Recent external reviews

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

I'm marking your goce request as fulfilled, hope you are happy with it (t ·c)buidhe14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank youbuidhe. I was on the road for a couple of weeks and I had no opportunity to look at it yet. I'll look it over probably tonight or tomorrow and respond. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)16:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

buidhe I reviewed your edits and tweaked a couple of things. Everything looks great. Thanks for the GOCE copyedit and your time. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)10:24, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleNational Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)15:06, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

The articleNational Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs andTalk:National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)16:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

The articleNational Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs for comments about the article, andTalk:National Council of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofSimongraham --Simongraham (talk)04:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your votehere by 23:59 UTC on 29 September!MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forYugoslav krone at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome! Cheers,Baffle☿gab00:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Tomobe03, I've now finished my c/e. Most of the article was straightforward but I rewrote some of the text, particularly the second paragraph of the lede, which i found had some repetitious material, so you might like to check my work in case I have introduced any inaccuracies. I don't think I did though. Cheers,Baffle☿gab00:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank youBaffle gab1978 for your time and effort. The article prose reads much better now. There's just one thing that seems odd to me, hyphenation in the following segment seems inconsistent and I'm wondering what is missing or extra:

...exchange would be at par, but that was interpreted as meaning krone-at-par for krone and dinar at-par for dinar.

Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk)09:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out, I think I made a mistake with "krone-at-par", which I'll go back and fix. I wanted to tie "at-par" to avoid a difficult-to-follow sentence. I can't think of a better way to phrase that sentence though. Cheers,Baffle☿gab19:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Adriatic Sea has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)22:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on US Army divisions in the Pacific War, Nick-D on the First Indochina War

I am planning to review your GAN for Yugoslav Committee but I would understand if you preferred me not to be involved because of our previous conflict.Borsoka (talk)02:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I think it is not appropriate for the nominator to pick the reviewer, but I'd be cautious about (non-)neutrality in cases such as that.--Tomobe03 (talk)15:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

OK. Yes, neutrality is one of our basic values.Borsoka (talk)04:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm aware of the project. I've added some previous WW2 articles I created/expanded (1st Split Partisan Detachment,Raid on Šolta,Velimir Škorpik...) to their list but never took the time to actually write myself up as a member. Thanks! --Saxum (talk)18:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Nominations now open for theWikiProject Military Historynewcomer of the year andmilitary historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are openhere andhere respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Hawkeye7 looks at battles of Operation Veritable in 1945

Voting is now open for theWikiProject Military Historynewcomer of the year andmilitary historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your voteshere andhere respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed you are a user who frequentsWP:GAN and thought you might be interested inGood Article Review Circles. It is an initiative that helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you will review another user's article and get your own GA nomination reviewed in return.Check out the project page for more details! —GMH Melbourne (talk)02:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello Tomobe03, You have been paired atgood article review circles to review2007 Greensburg tornado. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated.Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visitWT:GARC#Circle #18.

GMH Melbourne (talk)22:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleCroatian state right you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLee Vilenski --Lee Vilenski (talk)17:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

The articleCroatian state right you nominated as agood article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting thegood article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. SeeTalk:Croatian state right andTalk:Croatian state right/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLee Vilenski --Lee Vilenski (talk)15:23, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Tomobe03. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forLand reform in interwar Yugoslavia at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!Dhtwiki (talk)00:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Tomobe03, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion. Spread theWikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, Abishe (talk)23:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk)23:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

The articleCroatian state right you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Croatian state right for comments about the article, andTalk:Croatian state right/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofLee Vilenski --Lee Vilenski (talk)23:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Nick-D on the Franco-Prussian War Op-ed:Nick-D visits the Swiss Air Force Museum

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleYugoslav Committee you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGanesha811 --Ganesha811 (talk)19:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleIvo Frank you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHistory6042 --History6042 (talk)13:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

The articleIvo Frank you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Ivo Frank for comments about the article, andTalk:Ivo Frank/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofHistory6042 --History6042 (talk)02:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

The articleYugoslav Committee you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Yugoslav Committee for comments about the article, andTalk:Yugoslav Committee/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofGanesha811 --Ganesha811 (talk)16:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Best wishes likewise :)

The way this is fixed is to go on either of those pages on Wikipedia, click on the edit button in the language area, and then search for the other one.

So just now I clicked that on the English one, entered "sr" so it brings up the Serbian one, chose that, and then below entered "Jadranska straža", which then autocompleted to the title over there which is in Cyrillic. After that there's a confirmation, and voila.

There can be a complex situation where e.g. two articles' wikidata are identified differently, for example list vs. disambiguation page or similar, which requires further intervention, but connecting normal articles is usually straightforward. --Joy (talk)13:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi!

I've just gone out of my way to expand the LCY 12th Congress article, and I know you're a prolific creator and editor who has created a ton of very good articles, including the6th Congress of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia article. I am not completely finished, but I was hoping that if you have any sources or information on the 12th LCY Congress, you would spare some time to take a quick glance.

I am planning to turn all the red links on theTemplate:League of Communists of Yugoslavia green (at the very minimum, everything on the "Central Organisation" bar) blue, and I have been working on creating and expanding the congress articles.TheUzbek (talk)12:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words. I don't have much on the 12th Congress specifically, but there are mentions of some of its aspects here[2] and here[3]. The originals are in Croatian, but I expect Google Translate to be capable of producing usable machine translations. Cheers and best of luck in 2025!

Tomobe03 (talk)15:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Geography of Croatia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)00:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)09:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much!Tomobe03 (talk)13:43, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review:Pickersgill-Cunliffe and Nick-D look at Germans in the Flanders Campaign and 50 years of Australian military history Op-ed:Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject