Archives

User talk:TheStrayDog/Archive 1 User talk:TheStrayDog/Archives/ 1 User talk:TheStrayDog/Archives/ 2

Hello, TheStrayDog. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated<font> tags, which are causingObsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[user:TheStrayDog|<font color="#99H099">The Stray Dog</font>]] [[user talk:TheStrayDog|<font color="#33A744">Talk Page</font>]] :

to

[[user:TheStrayDog|<span>The Stray Dog</span>]] [[user talk:TheStrayDog|<span>Talk Page</span>]] :The Stray DogTalk Page

—Anomalocaris (talk)01:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomalocaris: DoneThe Stray DogTalk Page13:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk)03:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingEdward Haghverdian, TheStrayDog!

Wikipedia editorBoleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. It has been tagged (by another editor) in 2 places, you may choose to look it over. Thanks again!

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn'stalk page.

Learn more aboutpage curation.

Boleyn (talk)21:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: Thank you too. I would, as soon as I can. Happy editing!The Stray DogTalk Page17:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Freedom sculpture-logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.ShakespeareFan00 (talk)19:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCiyos Guran has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you canrequest that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Natureium (talk)00:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Stray Dog. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Staged Photography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.Bot0612 (talk)12:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Stray Dog. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Iranian American portal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.Bot0612 (talk)20:03, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Stray Dog. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi greetings. I would like to submit my proposal of a new logo form:AWWDCCW. Is this good for association? Hope you will like it.-

--PATH SLOPU ^(Talk)07:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I am writing on behalf of Deborah Smith Ford and her page. I'm Janna Joos her agent. I have read the "warnings" and am trying to abide by them by removing most of what I think is incorrect and slowly adding more. Thank you for your support in all those areas.

In the area of photos - would someone please guide me to the area that states which photos are allowed and how to submit them? When she has permission from photographers to use photos, they are hers, she owns them. I just double checked with one photographer, and he confirmed that. I understand if you need something in writing. If so, what is it? I've already asked said photographer what he uses, and he uses his word or a simple email saying similar to "Photos I take are yours, but I prefer you credit me when you can."

I've been an agent for decades and handle much of my talents' images, but this is new to me. Other than selfies "someone" has to take another's photo. We do not have any paperwork to prove who owns what, but again, please direct me to where that is explained and what is needed by Wikipedia? Sorry that I can't find that area. What about when friends and family take photos?Jannajoos (talk)16:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Janna Joos, I just wrote about photos but thought I should respond to another of your/Wiki's concerns.

This is about: A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject.

I'm quite sure that is referring to me, but actually wouldn't it refer to anyone who represents someone else and has such detailed information about them? In my case Ford has been one of my many professional talents for over a decade. We have a professional connection, and this is one of those incidents - helping her professionally by getting her on Wikipedia. Since I represent her, one of many others, I have offered to step in and submit Ford to Wikipedia. Yes, she gives me any information I need, although after having worked with her a long time I know a lot about her. I keep files on each talent.

I have to admit that this is the first time though that I have attempted to submit anyone to Wikipedia, so I hope I am not reflecting poorly to you or being a hinderance to Ford possibly keeping her out of Wikipedia. IF Ford does not qualify would someone please inform me immediately so everyone's time is not further wasted. Thank you.Jannajoos (talk)16:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:"The Case".jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Persian Gulf Forever Song by Ebi Hamedi.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Vandalism on the song "Persian Gulf Forever".ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Persian Gulf naming dispute has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk)20:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

@GorillaWarfare: Hello Madam,! Unfortunately, I was busy with my cancer disease and I wasn't active here for almost a year. So What is that? Sanctions? It soundsOrwellian andMinistry of Truth-ish to me. Can you describe this please, that why is this in my talk-page? What's the relation? I hope we don't need to fight back any unnecessary regulations. Regards.The Stray DogTalk Page23:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In a nutshell, discretionary sanctions are authorized in contentious topic areas that are particularly prone to disruptive editing. Post-1992 American politics is one of them. All it means is that uninvolved administrators can levy harsher sanctions (nothing Orwellian—just a catch-all term to describe blocks, topic bans, etc.) on editors when they are disruptive in the topic area. As this notice mentions, this is just to inform you that they have been authorized in this topic area, and is not itself any kind of sanction or threat of sanction. I hope that helps; you'll also find additional info in the linked portions of the notice.GorillaWarfare (talk)01:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member ofWikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, atQW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	for youHomaaaa (talk)08:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleIranian pizza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iranian pizza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein16:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDraft:Let's Go Brandon! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Fuck Joe Biden. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.GhostOfDanGurney (talk)05:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The correct course of action here is to request adeletion review ofFuck Joe Biden.GhostOfDanGurney (talk)05:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which I have now done.GhostOfDanGurney (talk)06:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostOfDanGurney: Let's go Brandon's article was not made, it was just a wrong redirect to another article. So speedy deletion is invalid. I removed the tag. It's obvious that Let's Go Brandon deserves to have its own articlce in Wikipedia, and it will. It satisfies our main giuidlines for creating an article. Best regards.The Stray DogTalk Page06:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Let's Go Brandon!, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Let's Go Brandon! and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofDraft:Let's Go Brandon! during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.GhostOfDanGurney (talk)06:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently, I didn't know what I was talking about. I apologize for the disruption.GhostOfDanGurney (talk)18:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostOfDanGurney: Dude, you're great. You don't need to apologize. This topic is highly political and some users don't like it. That's understandable. Some get emotional about certain topics that are challenging to their own bias, and It's a natural routine. We are all human beings and we all are biased, but we just need to tame our bias when it comes to editing an encclopedia. Which is a thing that I am definitely sure you apply more than me. Best regards.The Stray DogTalk Page20:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleLet's Go Brandon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Go Brandon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Beccaynr (talk)15:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. روزتون بخیر. ببخشید من به تازگی علاقه‌مند به ویرایش ویکی‌‌پدیا شدم. محتواهای اولم رو هم وارد دانشنامه کردم. الان می‌خواستم توی بخش ترجمه هم فعالیت کنم و یکی از مقاله‌های ویکیپدیا رو وقت خیلی زیادی گذاشتم و ترجمه کردم، اما الان متوجه شدم که به خاطر سابقه‌ی کم پیجم نمی‌تونم مطلب رو وارد ترجمه‌ی انگلیسی محتوا کنم. ویکیپدیا شما رو به عنوان مترجم معتبر معرفی کرد. امکانش هست که شما بهم کمک کنید که این ترجمه وارد دانشنامه بشه؟--رضا مظاهری (talk)12:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@رضا مظاهری:

درود بی‌پایان بر شما باد. جناب مظاهری، ابتدا اگر امکانش هست آن ترجمه‌ای که تهیه کردید را در صفحه تمرین خودتان قرار داده تا این حقیر بتوانم محتوایش را ببینم. سپاس روزافزونThe Stray DogTalk Page14:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleLet's Go Brandon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Go Brandon (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

soibangla (talk)03:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMaseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ElKevbo (talk)22:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Freedom sculpture-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Logo of Portland State University in brown.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did atTalk:Fascism, you may beblocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.I see this was one of the reasons for your prior block. I would think you would have learned better by now.Doug Wellertalk09:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheStrayDog/Userbox Let's Go Brandon, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheStrayDog/Userbox Let's Go Brandon and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofUser:TheStrayDog/Userbox Let's Go Brandon during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Dronebogus (talk)14:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You said you were going to, but it doesn't look as though you have.Doug Wellertalk09:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear colleague and thank you for asking. Since I have leukemia, unfortunately, I don't have much time for editing. That is why my promises are not kept on time. But I guarantee as long as I'm alive my promises will be kept at the end. Also, I would be happy if other editors could help me in developing a meta-wiki case for the ideological hijack of Wikipedia. Best Regards!The Stray DogTalk Page16:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources say fascism is a right-wing ideology, which is explained very well in the FAQ. Just because it doesn’t align with your odd, narrow personal definition of “right-wing” as only referring toRight-libertarianism doesn’t make it not true or “biased”, andWP:BLUDGEONING isn’t going to change that.Dronebogus (talk)12:59, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dronebogus: Wikipedia article talk pages are for discussion about an article. And I exactly did that. I did only express and share my civil and polite opinion about an article. I was discussing Wikipedia rules.The article says "fascism is a right-wing ideology", despite the fact that right-wing discourse is quite the opposite of fascist discourse. Fascism is about "absolute government control" and right-wing discourse is about limiting and minimizing government control. So that statement in that article is paradoxical and mathematically non-factual and non-objective and only relies on biased anti-right-wing media outlets. It is left-wing propaganda. That violates many Wikipedia policies includingWikipedia:Neutral point of view. Talk pages are not shown in the search engines and they are just there to talk. So I technically did not disrupt anything. I just want to keep Wikipedia articles neutral and not written in the point of view of one side against the other. If that's POV it must be put in POV sections, not in the lead section. That violates the ruleWikipedia:Lead. Then what are you so upset about? Please stop labeling me. This encyclopedia is a place for tolerance when it comes to opposition views. So be tolerant of opposition views and try not to silence the other side by labeling them because that act will defeat the purpose of a talk page. Thank you very much.The Stray DogTalk Page17:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn’t a continuation of the “debate” (which is firmly cut and dry per the giant warning sticker on the talk page and explained in depth attalk:Fascism/FAQ).This is a warning, which I’ve tried to be polite about. If you continue to bludgeon your personal opinions ontalk:fascism you will be reported.Dronebogus (talk)20:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Stray Dog! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed atWikipedia:Local Embassy, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visitingWikipedia:Local Embassy.

Thank you!Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleShirzad Peik Herfeh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirzad Peik Herfeh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- car chasm (talk)15:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRoozbeh Pournader is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roozbeh Pournader until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Xpander (talk)16:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMansour Hedayati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mansour Hedayati (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG(talk)14:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]