what's up with putting sales numbers in the "release" section?MrGuyWasTaken (talk)22:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For me sales should be part of release since it's not really tied to how the game is received. I mean, it sold a million copies before reviews even dropped. I've grouped sales with release in all of the FAs I've written and never faced pushbackJOEBRO⁶⁴00:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion isAirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion,BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place,Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are:Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points,Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points,BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points,Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, andAryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited tosign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.Cwmhiraeth (talk ·contribs),Epicgenius (talk ·contribs), andFrostly (talk ·contribs).MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today forDonkey Kong Country, introduced as one of those rare (ba-dum-chiss) video games where it's impossible to overstate its influence. It transformedDonkey Kong from a dusty, archaic product ofthe olden days into a multimillion-dollar franchising juggernaut, turned the tide of the 16-bitconsole wars by giving players a taste of 3D graphics well before they could actually playnext-generation hardware, and elevated Rare from a tiny, unknown studio into one of the video game industry's premier developers. --Gerda Arendt (talk)11:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted forre-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already tagged you regardingWikipedia:2024 Top 50 Report, but here's another call to see if you're available to write on some topics.igordebraga≠17:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder! Claiming some entries nowJOEBRO⁶⁴00:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be foundhere. If you have not yet signed up, you canadd your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to theWikiCup talk page.

For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implementedseveral changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receivetournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are:Cwmhiraeth (talk ·contribs ·email),Epicgenius (talk ·contribs ·email),Frostly (talk ·contribs ·email),Guerillero (talk ·contribs ·email) andLee Vilenski (talk ·contribs ·email). Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Donkey Kong 94 and 64 characters.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Donkey Kong Country Gameplay Elements.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, TheJoebro64! The article you nominated,Donkey Kong, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. Thenomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you maynominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,Gog the Mild (talk) viaFACBot (talk)00:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRetro Engine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro Engine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgelRM (talk)23:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, congrats on the FAC for DK. I've been a bit inspired by your layout for the article, especially running critical commentary inline in the history, rather than lumping stuff together and trying to badly summarize things at the end when the sources don't really exist. The Halo franchise article needed a thorough cleanup anyhow, so I've been reworking it to align a bit more with how DK does it. Right now it's very much in the middle of the mess, slash and burn phase, but in the next couple of weeks, could I ping you to the talk to give feedback?Z1720 already brought up some of the issues on the talk page, and it'd be good to have a second pair of eyes on if the improvements work well enough for keeping it at GA, or if a reassessment would still be useful at that point.Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^talk15:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@David Fuchs: yeah, totally! I'm no longer as busy as I was, so I'll definitely have time to give it a look. (Thanks by the way, feels nice to know people like my work lol!)JOEBRO⁶⁴16:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receivetournament points at the end of each round. Unlike theround points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers.This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,168 round points, mainly from 4featured articles and 4good articles on old military history, in addition to an assortment of GA and FA reviews.
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, mainly from 2 FAs, 2featured lists, 8 GAs, and 16Did You Know articles mainly on historical topics.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions), with 866 round points from 20 GAs, 23 DYKs, and 2In the News articles primarily about athletes.
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 846 round points from 16 GAs about radio and TV stations, 45 GA reviews, and 3 DYKs.
• Hey man im josh (submissions), with 816 round points from 5 FLs about sports and Olympic topics, 46 FL reviews, 3 ITN articles, and a large number of bonus points.
• MaranoFan (submissions), with 815 round points primarily from 3 FAs and 1 GA about music, in addition to 9 article reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seenhere. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleUnreleased Sonic the Hedgehog games you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPokelego999 --Pokelego999 (talk)22:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleUnreleased Sonic the Hedgehog games you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Unreleased Sonic the Hedgehog games for comments about the article, andTalk:Unreleased Sonic the Hedgehog games/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPokelego999 --Pokelego999 (talk)02:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote:

19:23, 9 April 2025TheJoebro64talkcontribs  135,172 bytes−3,928  →Antisemitism: restoring previous versions of the first two sections, these new changes are horrendous

What is particular do you think is horrendous about the new changes that you reverted?

Central16 (talk)00:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It had way too many quotes, said quotes were improperly formatted, there was a lot of repeated information, and the antisemitic tweet belongs in a quote box because it's way too long to be shoved into prose.JOEBRO⁶⁴00:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receivetournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round.This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,233 round points from 24good articles, 28Did you know articles, and oneIn the news nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplierfeatured articles onBlack Widow (Natasha Romanova) andGrace Coolidge, in addition to two GAs and two reviews
• History6042 (submissions) with 1,088 round points from fourfeatured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and agood topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
• Arconning (submissions) with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognizeGeneralissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seenhere. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleDonkey Kong (character) you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCukie Gherkin --Cukie Gherkin (talk)21:23, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Sonic Crackers and Knuckles Chaotix comparison.png, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK)02:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussions atTalk:Sinners (2025 film) §  Plot summary edits andTalk:Sinners (2025 film) § Edit War Dispute.Lord Sjones23 (talk -contributions)06:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Donkey Kong Bananza Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)02:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story ·music ·places

Thank you today forDonkey Kong Land, introduced (in 2023): "This 1995 Game Boy game attempted to bring the groundbreaking pre-rendered graphics of Donkey Kong Country to vastly inferior hardware. Rare was well known for pushing the hardware they were working with to its limits, and Donkey Kong Land is no exception. It's hardly a classic nowadays, despite being one of the bestselling Game Boy games (and the bestselling handheld Donkey Kong game)—the visuals are a muddy mess, making it incredibly difficult to play, and subsequent handheld ports of Donkey Kong Country rendered it obsolete within just a few years. Still, it's hard not to appreciate the craftsmanship and novelty of Donkey Kong Land's ambitions."! --Gerda Arendt (talk)09:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,314 round points, mostly from articles about athletes and politicians, including 20good articles and 48did you know articles
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,197 round points, mostly from military history articles, including 9featured topic articles, twofeatured articles, and four good articles
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9good topic articles

Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn.This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seenhere. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16featured lists, 1featured picture, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18In the News articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDonkey Kong (character) you nominated as agood article has passed; seeTalk:Donkey Kong (character) for comments about the article, andTalk:Donkey Kong (character)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofCukie Gherkin --Cukie Gherkin (talk)18:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anything new to add in Mario Kart World's talk, or are we settled? :)174.243.241.40 (talk)01:29, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm fine with a successor mention as long as it's sourced within the article itself.JOEBRO⁶⁴12:43, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edithere. The manual of the firstCountry game, clearly states the banana hoard is specifically just Donkey Kong's collection of bananas, rather than something belonging to the entire Kong family. TheDonkey Kong Country 2 manual further confirms that the hoard is DK's and not possessed by all of the Kongs.

So I think we should go back to my plot summary.Delsait (talk)04:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, big fan of your work, especially since I am a mediocre editor and I admire those who improve and elevate articles.

While far from the most exciting and action-packed set of games, Gran Turismo is Sony's best selling franchise thanks in no small part to the first game's success, which, due to its revolutionary depth and visuals for a racing game, essentially single-handedly established the modern sim racing genre.

The game's article, however, leaves a lot to be desired, and my attempts to expand it were reverted, so I ask for your assistance in improving it, if you don't mind. Much regards!Bill L. Hal (talk)21:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll take a look and provide some comments on talk when I get a chanceJOEBRO⁶⁴11:59, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much mate, I am sure your contribution will be crucial to any progress for that article.Bill L. Hal (talk)13:29, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket League has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)04:47, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloJOEBRO64, how are you?

I noticed you removed all my recent changes, including some quotes, from theDonkey Kong Bananza article. Could I kindly ask the reason for that?

I'm not planning to edit that article again. I'm just curious to understand your perspective.

Also, as a Donkey Kong fan, can I ask a quick question? Are Donkey Kong and Donkey Kong Jr. the same character?Carloseow (talk)22:30, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sources already support the cited statements so quotes are unnecessary. The summary in the plot was already a concise and accurate summary of the game, and the other changes were unnecessary and poorly worded.JOEBRO⁶⁴01:15, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. "the player seeks to collect the Banandium Gems, golden banana-shaped diamonds, while exploring" can be interpreted in two ways: 1) That Banandium Gems and golden banana-shaped diamonds are two separate types of collectibles. 2) That Banandium Gemsare golden banana-shaped diamonds. The source said "you'll be able to unearth golden bananas for DK. These are called Banandium gems after they've been broken". What about use: "As the gorilla Donkey Kong, the player explores sandbox-like levels in an underground world, unearthing golden bananas that become Banandium Gems after being broken."?Carloseow (talk)17:35, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 Backlog Drive |New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:PeacemakerWhosWho.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:38, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 29 August. The penultimate round saw three contestants score more than 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,175 round points, mainly from sports-related articles, including 17 good articles, 27 did you know articles, and 9in the news articles
• Arconning (submissions) with 1,090 round points, mainly from articles about athletes and politicians, including afeatured article onPhilippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics, 9good articles, 28did you know articles, and a wide assortment of featured and good article reviews
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 854 round points, mostly from a high-scoring featured article on the Indian leaderRani of Jhansi and two good articles, in addition to 13 featured and good article reviews

Everyone who competed in Round 4 will advance to Round 5 unless they have withdrawn.This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for Round 4 can be seenhere. During this round, contestants have claimed 9 featured articles, 12featured lists, 98 good articles, 9good topic articles, more than 150 reviews, nearly 100 did you know articles, and 18 in the news articles.

In advance of the fifth and final round, the judges would like to thank every contestant for their hard work. As a reminder, any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. In addition, note that Round 5 will end on 31 October at 23:59 UTC. Awards at the end of Round 5 will be distributed based on who has the most tournament points over all five rounds, and special awards will be distributed based on high performance in particular areas of content creation (e.g., most featured articles in a single round).

Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it onWikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome onWikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges –Cwmhiraeth (talk ·contribs),Epicgenius (talk ·contribs),Frostly (talk ·contribs),Guerillero (talk ·contribs) andLee Vilenski (talk ·contribs) – are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I am trying to edit the Sonic franchise page on the sales but, it wont let me edit. I have noticed a few things.

1.) Sonic Superstars isn't in italiacs for some reason.

2.) Sonic and the Secret Rings isn't on there. Sold 1.2 million according to this source -https://www.engadget.com/2008-03-21-wiis-third-party-million-sellers-revealed.html

3.) Team Sonic Racing is missing. Sold 3.5 million according to this source -https://www.gematsu.com/2025/06/sega-mistakenly-reveals-sales-numbers-for-like-a-dragon-infinite-wealth-persona-3-reload-shin-megami-tensei-v-and-more

4.) Sonic Riders isn't on there. Per its own Wikipedia page, "Sonic Riders was a commercial success; upon release, the GameCube version was the second best-selling game for the system, remaining among the top 10 until June 2006. Throughout 2006, the game sold 930,000 copies, with an additional 560,000 units in North America by the end of March 2007." <- that definitely puts it over 1 million

5.) Likewise a similar situation for Sonic Advance 2. It's page says "Sonic Advance 2 received "generally favorable reviews", according to review aggregator Metacritic. The game was also commercially successful, selling approximately 176,541 copies in Japan, 740,000 copies in the United States, and 100,000 copies in the United Kingdom, for a total of 1.016 million copies."

6.) The 2008 CESA Games White Paper also has some SKUs:

Sonic Adventure DX - 1.6 million (GC)Sonic Rush - 1.6 million (DS)Sonic Heroes - 2.9 million (PS2)Sonic Heroes - 1.42 million (GC)

SOURCE:https://www.installbaseforum.com/threads/2008-cesa-games-white-paper.289/

7.) Sonic Colours Wii + DS sold 4 million. It comes from a Famitsu interview:https://nintendoeverything.com/sonic-colors-ultimate-devs-on-the-games-return-and-tails-save-feature-series-30th-anniversary-more/SonicKamran (talk)22:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HiSonicKamran, I can make these changes once I get the chance. Will likely be sometime tomorrow. I will note that I can't add CESA numbers unless I have access to the papers themselves to verify.JOEBRO⁶⁴14:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:PeacemakerWhosWho.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim ofnon-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL💬⬆  15:36, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:DreamOfTheEndless.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance withsection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you. ${\displaystyle 999}$REAL💬⬆  15:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I did some cleanup forSonic Superstars, but I can't nominate the GA as I've only done cleanup and archiving, but I welcome you for the option to nominate the article for status.RTSthestardust (talk)18:03, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to get to it eventually. The reception section still needs a fair amount of work.JOEBRO⁶⁴18:04, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The 2025 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seenhere), are:

1. BeanieFan11 (submissions) with1,604 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
2. Gog the Mild (submissions) with1,075 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
3. Arconning (submissions) with860 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
4. History6042 (submissions) with804 tournament points
5. Sammi Brie (submissions) with635 tournament points
6. TheDoctorWho (submissions) with386 tournament points
7. AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with373 tournament points
8. Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with362 tournament points

Our high scorers in the final round were:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,035 round points, mostly from 19 good articles and 21 did you know articles about athletes
• vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) with 819 round points, mostly from 13 good articles and 11 did you know articles about a wide range of topics from abortion topics to African cities
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) with 508 round points from 9 good articles, 4 good topic articles and 6 did you know articles mainly about Philippines topics, along with 19 good article reviews

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 2featured articles, 4featured lists, 106good articles, 5good topic articles, 178 article reviews, 76did you know articles, and 9in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field during the competition.

• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, with 12 featured articles total, and the featured topic prize, with 9 featured topic articles in total
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize, with 10 featured lists total
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, submitting the only featured picture in the entire contest during round 3
• History6042 (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize, with 127 featured content reviews. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize, with 100 good articles total, and the DYK prize, with 147 did you know articles in total. He will also share the ITN prize, with 20 in the news articles in total.
• TheDoctorWho (submissions) wins the good topic prize, with 16 good topic entries in total
• Arconning (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, with 68 good article reviews in total

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

• Sammi Brie (submissions), with 27 good articles in round 3, and 45 good article reviews in round 1
• Tails Wx (submissions), with 10 in the news articles in round 3

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited tosign up to participate. The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2026 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges,Cwmhiraeth (talk ·contribs ·email),Epicgenius (talk ·contribs ·email),Frostly (talk ·contribs ·email),Guerillero (talk ·contribs ·email) andLee Vilenski (talk ·contribs ·email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:25, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself fromWikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

 You are invited to join the discussion atTalk:Doctor Eggman § Robotink as "Alias".sjones23 (talk -contributions)14:05, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Sorry for bothering you right now but i noticed that you started work on DKC2. If you need help finding more contemporary English reviews about the game, then let me know and i'll put them on the talk page of the game. If you want some help of course. Have a good day!Roberth Martinez (talk)18:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:45, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]