User talk:De Administrando Imperio
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Archives |
So your telling me if a terrorist is arrested it's not a terrorist incident? All of you have got it wrong just because people never listed arrests in the older list's doesn't mean they can't be listed in 2010, but I'm not listing anything on that page anymore, there is not co-operation whatsoever and usually always arguments. You do what you want idc.USAir Flight 621 (talk)09:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on thecoordinator academy course and in theresponsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TheFebruary 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)23:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedTimeline of the War on Terrorism (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atthe discussion page. Thank you.JokerXtreme (talk)21:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedTimeline of the War on Terrorism, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of the War on Terrorism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.JokerXtreme (talk)23:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
May I suggest that you withdraw your proposed deletion of this article? Its clear that your proposal will not pass consensus, and you are wrong: It is not a claim made solely by Eritrea: Ethiopia states that 25 Eritrean soldiers were killed in a rebel attack, and that this was a cover-up by the Eritrean goverment, so its clear that something happened over there. Ah, well, nothing new in the horn of Africa.--RM(Be my friend)03:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've enable theautoreviewer right on your account. This allows the pages you create to be marked as patrolled automatically and bypassSpecial:NewPages. If you have any questions, or wish the right removed, please let me know.Tim Song (talk)03:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Voting for theMilitary history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of2001 Angola train attack at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneathyour nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!Thelmadatter (talk)15:58, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 | OnMarch 27, 2010,Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article2001 Angola train attack, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page(here's how,quick check ) and add it toDYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on theDid you know? talk page. |
--Cirt (talk)09:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofMakombo massacre, and it appears to include a substantial copy ofhttp://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900SID/ASHU-83XSZR?OpenDocument&RSS20=18-P. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note onthe maintainer's talk page.CorenSearchBot (talk)19:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ive created a basic shell for the article. It seems to be one of the largest actions against the pirates so far. It looks like the seychellian vessel engaged a captured dhow in combat, sunk it and rescued the crew. Then on the way back to port it was attacked by 3 more pirate vessels, sunk two of them and then finally made it back to port. Feel free to expand it. I'm busy today but will likely work on it a great deal tommorow.XavierGreen (talk)21:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition toTimeline of the Naxalite-Maoist insurgency has been removed, as it appears to have addedcopyrighted material to Wikipedia withoutpermission from the copyright holder. Forlegal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofarticle content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.Nick-D (talk)00:11, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TheMarch 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 | On 11 April 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article2010 Thai political protests, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page. |
-- |19:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, fordeletion. The nominated article isTimeline of the War on Terror. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see alsoWikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments toWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of the War on Terror. Please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove thearticles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by abot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk)01:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to know your opinion concerninga proposal I made, which I think represents a decent compromise.--The Devil's Advocate (talk)03:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TheApril 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)20:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| On 5 May 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the articleMay 2010 Greek protests, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page. |
--HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?22:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| On 6 May 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the articleMV Moscow University, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page. |
--HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?18:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Bold and you can also beWP:Civil about itIt is quite a simple task to undo something if controversy arises. I went through talk and said so and i also went back for the infobox to talk, yet i didnt revert it.Lihaas (talk)17:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| On 27 May 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article2010 Kingston unrest, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page. |
--BorgQueen (talk)11:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TheMay 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)21:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The articleNicola De Martino has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.01:19, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to2010 Ayn clashes has been removed, as it appears to have addedcopyrighted material to Wikipedia withoutpermission from the copyright holder. Forlegal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofarticle content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.Nick-D (talk)00:28, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members | |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. | |
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)19:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| On 3 August 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the articleAdaisseh incident, which you created and mostly wrote from scratch. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page. |
--HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?21:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Regarding your recentedit to this article, I'd like to note, first, that one of the pictures in question has been nominated for deletion on commons (by me) and that the request remains to be dealt with. If you object to its deletion on commons, the appropriate thing to do would be to take up the issue there. In my judgment, those pictures of non-notable individuals (including two children) are patently unethical and there is no case for their restoration - we don't want to create a situation where someone can say to either child, "Oh, you're that neo-Nazi Croatian kid with his picture on Wikipedia". Second, please note that your edit undid two of my edits to the article, and that one of them had nothing to do with the pictures.This edit simply changed the article to be consistent with the manual of style, and if you look through the article's history you'll see that its main effect was to undo an earlier change of mine and restore the wording to what it was before.UserVOBO (talk)00:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy | |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. | |
This has been an automated delivery byBrownBot (talk)22:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ive helped organise your article along a bit, but it needs some more cleaning. a couple of sources for the background part i read today, (ill look for them later) or perhaps the links would be good). Also need a prose clean up (paragraphs per attack type/strength maybe in order). and then some reaction/responsibility when you find it, if you do ;)Lihaas (talk)02:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| On 26 August 2010,In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article25 August 2010 Iraq bombings, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on thecandidates page. |
--tariqabjotu10:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An article that you have been involved in editing,Battle of Mogadishu (2010), has been proposed for amerge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by goinghere, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.Out of Phase User (talk)18:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've just reverted your additions to this article as they were copied and pasted, with only minor changes, from the news story. This is a copyright violation and has the potential to land Wikipedia in legal problems. Please take the time to write your own summary of the story.Nick-D (talk)10:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.Nick-D (talk)10:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply].
Following up on the above warnings, I've just conducted some random checks of your recent edits and have found that a high proportion of them are text copied and pasted with no or only minor changes from news websites. This is totally unacceptable and you have been warned previously against this behaviour. Example diffs are:[1],[2],[3],[4]. These are from just the last few days, and in light of the warnings you've received for this over the last few months I've got no doubt that there are many more. As you cannot be trusted to not violate copyright I've set the block duration to indefinite.Nick-D (talk)10:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Possible copyvios in:
--DAI (Δ)12:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there - I suspect we are going to need to do a systemic work through of the articles you've created and your other contributions as I have found some more lifting of words in other articles. To that end, I have requested that acopyright contributor investigation be opened. The relevant listing ishere. --Mkativerata (talk)20:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvios:2008 timeline of the War in Somalia is huge to check - to make it easier - I am sure 95% is copyvio, dead links anyway. Is anyone checking this talk page?--DAI (Δ)07:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound | |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants | |
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)23:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] | |
TheMilitary history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast yourvote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Daviestalk19:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals | |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate sectionhere. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit thenewsroom.BrownBot (talk)20:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] | |
Thanks for uploadingFile:Flag HOS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currentlyorphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Courcelles04:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered,File:First chechen war header.png, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk)01:57, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know (I am supposed to - this is what it says).Ottawahitech (talk)14:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Irbil.01.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)21:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articlePersecution of Serbs and other non-Albanians in Kosovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Serbs and other non-Albanians in Kosovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.— ZjarriRrethues — talk11:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Iraq shooting down.gif, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)19:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Hajduk-jugend.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created inyour upload log.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Kellyhi!10:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploadingFile:Eritreafiring.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk)22:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Taepodong2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for uploadingFile:Ramallah 2002.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so thecopyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing theimage description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to theimage use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is alist of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)18:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleList of massacres of the Iraq War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of massacres of the Iraq War until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.MSJapan (talk)05:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Vergarolla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The fileFile:Chuetsu earhquake, 2004.jpg has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to thepage history of each individual file for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)01:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at2010 Ayn clashes. Doing so is considered to bevandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use thesandbox. Undersection G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in theloss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Jacob300 (talk)18:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Campaignbox Libya-US has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Brandmeistertalk15:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on2010 Ayn clashes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Jacob300 (talk)15:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Ein saheb strike.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Grapesofwrath.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Mogadishu march 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)19:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Georgia-Russia has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.WikiCleanerMan (talk)14:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2008 Jerusalem bulldozer attack has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Thebiguglyalien (talk)06:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Grapesofwrath.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectRa'ad 1 has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 16 § Ra'ad 1 until a consensus is reached.Steel1943 (talk)00:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
