You have recently edited a page related topost-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.
⇒SWATJesterShoot Blues, Tell VileRat!18:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You've reverted to a broken link because you missed my correction edit after finding the working link that supports the claim being made.SydCarlisle (talk)19:25, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm an old guy who likes to mentor new people. Please read this essay:WP:STICK.Bearian (talk)08:57, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]