Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Stupac101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'mDieter Lloyd Wexler. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toDoughboys (Canadian band) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse or theHelp desk. Thanks.DieterLloydWexler02:29, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there:
Can you please explain? I linked the band member's page to his subsequent band? How is this not constructive?
ThanksStupac101 (talk)02:35, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant to say that I linked the band member's name to his subsequent page. I have seen this done all over Wikipedia.
ThanksStupac101 (talk)02:36, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again,
You also returned the links I updated to broken pages. Again, I had linked each band member's name to his newer band.
ThxStupac101 (talk)02:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again{{Ping|Dieter Lloyd Wexler}}
ThanksStupac101 (talk)02:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dieter Lloyd Wexler: Please advise Thank-you. ~~~~Stupac101 (talk)16:54, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

[edit]
This account has beenblocked indefinitely as asockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts isallowed, but using them forillegitimate reasonsis not, and that all edits made while evading a block or banmay be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you mayappeal this block by first reading theguide to appealing blocks, then adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.DrKay (talk)15:26, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Stupac101(block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi there: I am writing to appeal this unjustified block, as well as the revision of all my recent edits. I will provide you with a bit of context. I had asked my (under age) son to assist me with editing the page in question. You will see that together, we made a wide range of useful edits and additions. In the process, however, we discovered that he had run into trouble with making multiple accounts. In a nutshell, he is just a child and he did not understand why his other previous edits were being undone and he did not understand that it was wrong to create new accounts. We figured all of this out together and I advised him on what he had done wrong on how to make an appeal on his own behalf. But, I then also created my own account (this account) that he does not have access to in order to make appropriate new edits myself. So, you may have seen similar changes and IP address. But, you actually just blocked me and not my son. I hope you will see that I have done nothing but make valuable adds to this page and will reverse this decision and reinstate my changes. Thank-you!Stupac101 (talk)17:42, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

SeeWP:LITTLEBROTHER andWP:MEAT.Yamla (talk)18:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Stupac101(block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello again: I see that my appeal was almost instantly denied without any time for investigation. I am happy to provide whatever type of proof you would like between the situation between my son and I. Please just let me know what you require. In the meantime, however, I'm sure that if investigated, you will see that all of the edits from my son's accounts came from a different computer. And, you will also see that the Doughboys page is the single only page I have edited and where this whole thing started for my account. I appreciate that moderators are busy but I would appreciate more direction and consideration when it comes to an appeal process like this. Thank-you.

Decline reason:

Your son needs to get unblocked first. The Evpac account was blocked on February 16th, once that occurred, all editing should have ceased from your location(especially if about the same topic) as we have no way to know who is sitting at the computer operating two different accounts, if they are the same person or different persons. This is the reason for themeat puppetry policy. It doesn't matter if you were on different devices.331dot (talk)09:25, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Stupac101(block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Indeed, you cannot clear your account until your son is able to clear his. --asilvering (talk)05:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hi there: I really appreciate your response and consideration. However, in suggesting that my son needs to get my his account unblocked first, it is basically still insinuates that he and I really are the same person. And, it also means that I can never clear my account (which has done nothing wrong and has had very limited activity) unless he is able to clear his own. I respectfully feel that the real question here should be whether or not I actually am one of his sock puppets. I think that it actually should matter that all of these edits were done from different computers. For instance, I assume that if you look at my son's sock puppet accounts, you will see that they all used the same devices and they all worked on similar things. I think you will also see that he edited a whole bunch of random things until he was caught and then got blocked again. On the other hand, however, when it comes to me, you will see that my account only edited this one page and on my computer (which none of his other accounts has used). And, I have edited no other pages since. If I were actually him, why wouldn't I have used this device (my computer) at other times? And, if I were him, why would I have not used this Stupac99 account to edit other pages? I'm just hoping that someone can please investigate further to see that our patterns of behaviour actually do not align.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stupac101&oldid=1282719772"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp