By the way, I am in support for the Yu-Gi-Oh Abridged Series to have it's own page. Anyone agree?Srsrox (talk)22:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Megatard.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set ofimage copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag fromthis list, click onthis link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message onWikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk)00:06, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srsrox. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,Dr. Shelby, for deletion because it's abiography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dr. Shelby to be deleted, pleaseadd a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note onmy talk page.

Thanks,Mdy66 (talk)02:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. It is incorrectly edited now and needs to be deleted until a proper source is out there about who really is portraying "Dr. Shelby". Thank you for your alertness!Srsrox (talk)21:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srsrox, seeing as you originally proposed the split of the WWE NXT article, you are invited to participate in a discussion regarding the status of the three NXT articlesin a WP:PW discussion here.Starship.paint (talk)03:42, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have joined.Srsrox (talk)13:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, man, you made the question (on the NXT Wrestling talk page), but you did not aswered it yet. I know both of us agree, so I still waiting for the right decision to be chosen. The other guy that agrees (WWE+TNAMustCombine!) is blocked now.NJZombie agreed too, but he wants the "History of NXT show" article to come to an end and it will turn the article to long. Thanks for your attention.WWEJobber (talk)18:43, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for the update. I will answer. I just didn't want to answer right after. It's almost like double-posting.Srsrox (talk)23:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srsrox. You have new messages atWalter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added20:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

BTW: You should have discussed on the article's talk page, not mine.Walter Görlitz (talk)20:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia. I noticed your recent edit toHawk Nelson does not have anedit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!Walter Görlitz (talk)20:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I did add one for the last 20 edits I've done on articles with that one exception. I'm beginning to think you're intentionally watching me for the very trivial things that I don't do. Can you please stop hawking me and assume I'm attempting to do things in good faith? I really don't need a big brother watching for my every step I do. It's ok to let me know if things aren't being done; it's another to almost stalk everything I do. ESPECIALLY when you can see on the contributions that generally I have done a good job editing.I notice now you're watching me after I questioned something of you.Srsrox (talk)21:10, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stating that I'm "watching me after I questioned something of you" is incorrect. Hawk Nelson has been on my watch list forabout 18 months now. At the time I reminded you here, you had made two such edits in a row and I didn't want it to continue. Sorry you feel watched. It's not a good faith/bad faith issue, it's a reminder. Some editors don't ever supply edit summaries. The fact that you're editing incorrectly is a separate issue. --Walter Görlitz (talk)21:25, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would have named the song article with brackets, but Wikipedia for some reason feels the need to prevent me from being able to do so.HotHat (talk)21:36, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I can see what you mean. Oh well. Sorry for the name change anyways. NORMALLY, it's with ( ), but Tomlin used [ ]. Oh well, thanks for doing your best!Srsrox (talk)21:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 6, Issue 1 • Winter 2013 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Wikidata Q&A USRD Cup returns Project looks ahead to new year	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for CA, FL, and PA
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk)19:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srsrox. You have new messages atDcheagle's talk page.
Message added04:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dcheagle •talk •contribs04:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srsrox,Eduemoni↑talk↓ has given you a shinning smiling star! You see, these things promoteWikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread theShinning Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

THIS IS A TEST! IT WORKED!srsrox^{BlahBlahBlah...}20:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Project creates route list standard Driving down under Meta and Wikidata update ACR becoming active, changing USRD Cup wraps up	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, OK and WA
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk)22:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 6, Issue 3 • Summer 2013 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Rewriting Infobox road and incorporating Wikidata Driving around the Pearl of the Orient Fixing our shields licensing	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, MN and WI
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk)22:19, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 6, Issue 4 • Fall 2013 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Final push for 2013 goals A New York state of merger Templates, Lua, and sister projects	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, IA, MD, MI, and PA
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk)03:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 7, Issue 1 • Winter 2014 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features 2013 in review The Moon is rising: our Lua progress so far Looking ahead to 2014 The Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, OH, PA, UT, WA, and WV
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 7, Issue 2 • Spring 2014 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Under a moonlit (and lightning-quick) sky: Lua, , and what's next The new and improved HWY Cup Making shields 101 The Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news in brief Five years ago... A chat with our newest USRD members
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk)07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf ofImzadi1979[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleWindows 9 (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows 9 (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Codename Lisa (talk)19:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 7, Issue 3 • Summer 2014 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features The U.S. Roads Portal: A great gateway to the project HWY Cup a success in improving the articles of WikiProject Highways	State and national updates None submitted
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979,21:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Maple Syrup Report Portal selected articles and pictures	Features The U.S. Roads Project Is Turning 10! 2014: The Year in Review Setting the bar for 2015	State and national updates CA, DE, MD, MI, MS, MP, OR Project news
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi1979 (talk ·contribs)10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for putting inChris Tomlin discography. I do have some feedback on it.

• The 9-pt font is too small and not needed. He has a lot of albums but not an overwhelming number in comparison to the FL-rated discographies.
• Split off Passion albums section. Those can merge with thePassion Worship Band article and replace whatever table is there. The latter article is underdeveloped at the moment and could use that content.

-AngusWOOF (talk)19:21, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Be part of the turnaround... now become part of the solution Raising the speed limit on KML creation RCS coming for the Texas FM/RM routes The bar is set for 2015	State and national updates CA, DE, MI In other project news...
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi1979 (talk ·contribs)18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Route description 101 The nitty gritty of in-depth research	State and national updates Editor updates In other project news...
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi197912:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 •About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Road to the past: Some tips on researching history sections Getting to know the editors behind the lenses	State and national updates State updates In other project news...
Archives •Newsroom •Full Issue •Shortcut:WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf ofImzadi197905:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—delivered byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi1979 (talk) on23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

—delivered byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi1979 (talk) on22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the20,000 Challenge, aiming for 20,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to theUnited States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See morehere!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srsrox. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

—delivered byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi1979 on01:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srsrox. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srsrox. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Achange to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
'''''<font face="Times New"><span>[[User:Srsrox|<big><span>srsrox</span></big>]] [[User talk:Srsrox|<sup><font color="#000000">BlahBlahBlah...]]</font></sup></span></font>'''''

Fixed signature:
'''''<span><span>[[User:Srsrox|<big><span>srsrox</span></big>]] [[User talk:Srsrox|<sup><span>BlahBlahBlah...</span></sup>]]</span></span>'''''

More information is available atWikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message atWikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. –Jonesey95 (talk)19:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! This fix is still needed. Your recent contributionat this talk page added multiple syntax errors to the page. Please take a moment to follow the instructions above. –Jonesey95 (talk)15:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—delivered byMediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf ofImzadi 1979 → on19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]