HiSpinifex&Sand! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest atthe Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors likeChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered byHostBot on behalf of theTeahouse hosts 16:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

My bad. Was not my intention. Must have pushed the wrong buttons. I realy liked your additions. I only wanted to remove an extra Bert and an redundant birthday. Sorry for the inconviniance.Dragon Genoa (talk)09:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for clarifyingDragon Genoa, no worries.Spinifex&Sand (talk)05:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedGrampians National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageArapiles. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions; however,please remember the essential rule of respectingcopyrights.Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the pageGuillaume Brahimi, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though youcan clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is theteahouse, or you canclick here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom ofmy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —Diannaa (talk)13:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Earl (Australian sailor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

―Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb01:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Caleb.Spinifex&Sand (talk)03:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spinifex&Sand! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoidcopyright andplagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate asmall amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with doublequotation marks (") and cite the source using aninline citation. You can read about this atWikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See alsoHelp:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all informationin your own words and structure, in properparaphrase. Following the source's words too closely can createcopyright problems, so it is not permitted here; seeWikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources toverify the information and to demonstrate that the content is notoriginal research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.Fair use images must meet all ten of thenon-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, youmay be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable,to the world, into either thepublic domain (PD) or under asuitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See alsoHelp:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must beblocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.asilvering (talk)06:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Important note: I see you have been previously warned about respecting copyrights, but again have copied text. You must write using your own words. --Whpq (talk)01:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I am still relatively new to this, and do appreciate your help and guidance. I have redrafted the page on Agnes Smith and resubmitted for review. ~~Spinifex&Sand (talk)04:16, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you asilvering. I am still a relatively new editor, but do want to create good content and so your feedback is appreciated. Thank you for your feedback. I have resubmitted the Agnes Smith page for review. ~~Spinifex&Sand (talk)04:18, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDraft:Agnes Clifford Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguouscopyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy fromhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/community.28046921 andhttps://www.wvencyclopedia.org/print/Article/465/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look atWikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.asilvering (talk)06:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dusti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Agnes Clifford Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dusti^{*Let's talk!*}15:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AviationFreak was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Seethe notability guideline on creative professionals. I have a soft spot for West Virginia, but I don't think she quite clears the notability guideline. One book that won a few lower-tier awards and only one source that specifically covers the author is not enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Agnes Smith (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AviationFreak💬05:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks AviationFreak, that is constructive feedback. I will see what else I can find.Spinifex&Sand (talk)06:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spinifex&Sand. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Agnes Clifford Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.✗plicit03:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spinifex&Sand. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Agnes Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.✗plicit23:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you recently editedthis section on the Jeremy Griffith page, about the court case. In case you are not aware, that section was the subject of several lengthy discussions on the Talk pages. Your edits look OK to me (they have certainly made the content easier to understand) but I wanted to let you know it’s probably best to exercise caution when editing any discussion of legal proceedings, especially on a page where a lot of editors have had discussions about how best to present the content. And of course to be mindful of WP:BLP.Cabrils (talk)00:23, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mJlwoodwa. An article that you recently made,Nick Carroll, seemed to be generated using alarge language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can beunsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, andfictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please useyour sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.jlwoodwa (talk)05:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleNick Carroll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Carroll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk)20:53, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spinifex&Sand. Thank you for your work onScott Churchill. Another editor,Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Mariamnei}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk)11:07, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MariamneiSpinifex&Sand (talk)20:58, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia fromWikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who want to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. I noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any timeon our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is aparticipant list where you can sign up. Pleaseleave a message on the group's talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some help!
• Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia isguided byour medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recentsecondary sources to support information.Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
• The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot ofdiscussion that happens behind the scenes andthrough the editing policy. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a messageon the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any questions. I wish you all the best, and thank you for your help!
I wanted to leave a note as I had to remove your addition to themyalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome page because it relied on primary sources instead of secondary sources aspolicy for medical topics instructs. I hope this information will be helpful for your future editing!Innisfree987 (talk)07:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Innisfree987, thanks for the advice. Just curious why you removed that content, given its mostly based on a Science Daily article, which is a secondary source? The same material is also discussed here in The Guardian:https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/oct/08/scientists-say-they-have-first-blood-test-to-diagnose-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-me.

So I would have thought it would be OK to include those additions??

I am a bit new to editing Medical focussed articles, so I do appreciate your feedback.Spinifex&Sand (talk)00:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tag. In this instance, the Science Daily piece appears to be a press release, so that is a primary source, but additionallyWP:MEDPOP recommends against using news articles, so the Guardian isn’t ideal either. We’re looking for secondary sources from scientific authorities, like systematic reviews or major national guidelines. I know this can be somewhat counterintuitive: if you have a few minutes to readWP:MEDRS, it’s well worth the time!Innisfree987 (talk)03:15, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Thanks @Innisfree987. I will see what I can find.Spinifex&Sand (talk)20:28, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation
• User talk pages with large language model notices