Some user worried why i monitor Azerbaijani-related articles and revert destructive changes specially two enemies of Azeris: Kurds whom without knowing anything about history of Azerbaijan and Atropatane tries to force people that everywhere is Kurdistan. There are lots of ancient maps of Atropatane or Azerbaijan. they should educate themselves.Another group is persians who thinks Azeris are their slave and forever should live with them. Human rights allow people to decide to choose his neighbors. Persians can not keep Azeris forever in the jail.

If some users or admins think that defending my ethnic is war, no problem call it 'war'. i always have historical reasons or reference. What about destructive and baiased kurds or persians. Do they provide any reason? it seems to me that people call my defense as war they don't track carefully what was the original text? was there any reference for that or no? if specially kurds come and destroy text without providing a reason. then i will appear to revert it.However, if they provide a good reference, i will not revert, even it is not good for my ethnic.Sehend July 24th.

Iwarned you only a few hours ago to stop mass-reverting on all these pages without discussion. You responded by reverting on three pages and then adding personal attacks on your talk page. This is not tolerated here. I've previously asked you to make an effort to edit constructively but you have apparently ignored my advice.Wikipedia is not a battleground. It is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, or nurture hatred or fear. I have blocked you for one week because of this. Virtually all of your edits have caused disruption on one page or another -- you're simply going to have to learn how to discuss your edits instead of constantly reverting. Your comments above are also offensive and violate Wikipedia's policy onpersonal attacks. When you return from your block, please review the policies I've mentioned in my initial warning.Khoikhoi08:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sehend, I really don't want to have to extend your block but I feel that I am forced to. A week or two is not a long time.Please sit your block out and return once it has expired. Simply reverting again and again will get nothing accomplished: you are not allowed to edit while you are blocked. Your original block has been extended to two weeks and it will only get longer if you continue to evade it. Please stop.Khoikhoi06:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has now been extended to a month. It will be even longer the next time you evade it. Reverting like thiswon't work because the pages you've been edit warring on can easily be locked. You are very close to being banned, Sehend. This type of behavior is not tolerated, and it's not going to get you your version of these articles.Khoikhoi19:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your continued block evasion and your edit summarieshere, I have blocked youindefinitely. I explained to you that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, where people are supposed to worktogether as opposed to against each other. I also explained to you that Wikipedia is not a battleground. You have repeatedly ignored my explanations by continuing to evade your block by reverting on these pages. It also appears that you are the same person asElick txu, who was indefinitely blocked for "Trolling, disruption only (sockpuppetry, edit warring, personal attacks)." You were apparently given asecond chance, so I cannot see any reason to assume good faith anymore. The clear problem is your fundamentally uncollaborative approach to editing, and this time you have used up all your chances.Khoikhoi05:43, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]