The Bathing Women (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on the article'stalk page. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you cancreate articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwistertalk21:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article was in a draft status and not ready to publish, so I have moved it toDraft:Playing for Thrills so you can work on it at your own pace. This way it will not be deleted for being incomplete.

When you are ready to have it published, click Submit Draft and it will be reviewed by volunteer editors. Make sure it meets the requirements ofWP:Notability (books); you must show that the book hascoverage in serious media like professional reviews, newspaper/magazine articles discussing it, etc. Hope this helps!MatthewVanitas (talk)20:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:TieNingAuthor2006.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Whpq (talk)21:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toWang Shuo. I noticed that when you added the image to theinfobox, you added it as athumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (seeWP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as|caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing})20:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Photoofmianmian.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Whpq (talk)23:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Wangshuoimage.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Whpq (talk)23:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smmurphy was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use thesandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

With development, this could be a great wikipedia article, but it is currently very incomplete.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitwhen they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Playing for Thrills and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk or on thereviewer's talk page.
• You can also useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smmurphy^(Talk)17:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!S1d6arrett23,I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Smmurphy(Talk)17:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:LiuHengauthorphotography.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Whpq (talk)12:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:WangShuoAuthor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Ramaksoud2000^{(Talk to me)}23:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Tie Ning Author Toronto Star.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Whpq (talk)00:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Eugene Thacker.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (t • c)03:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:In The Dust of This Planet.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Whpq (talk)03:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:MiJianimage.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe file description page and add the text{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. Onthe file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Whpq (talk)03:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onFile:JonOssoff2017.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is anon-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of thenon-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under thefair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the{{Non-free fair use}} tag,along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.MB298 (talk)23:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Angela Davis: An Autobiography, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)01:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited yourArticles for Creation draft article submission, "Angela Davis: An Autobiography".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}} or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Legacypac (talk)20:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requiressignificant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject—see thegeneral guideline on notability,the golden rule and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing(seeWikipedia:Referencing for beginners andHelp:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information isverifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject isnotable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additionalreliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please seeWP:BOOKCRIT to understand the criteria applies to inclusion of articles about books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitwhen they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:The Compassionate Carnivore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk or on thereviewer's talk page.
• You can also useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk)12:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:The Technological Society, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)20:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:The Happiness Industry, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)21:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Outlaw culture: resisting representations, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)21:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Outlaw culture: resisting representations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Legacypac (talk)05:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "The Happiness Industry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Legacypac (talk)10:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "The Technological Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.TKK!bark with me!15:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. S1d6arrett23, thanks for creatingThe Happiness Industry!

I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please improve the page. Also, don't add red-link categories. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.

Happy holidays!^{Babymissfortune}04:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,William Davies (political writer), for deletion because it's abiography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want William Davies (political writer) to be deleted, pleaseadd a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note onmy talk page.

Thanks,

Happy holidays!^{Babymissfortune}04:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)01:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingWisecrack (Youtube Channel), S1d6arrett23!

Wikipedia editorSamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Wisecrack finally makes it's way onto Wikipedia, eh? Good, I always enjoy their content. Good job making the article.

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6'stalk page.

Learn more aboutpage curation.

SamHolt6 (talk)06:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.HasteurBot (talk)22:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:The Compassionate Carnivore, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)01:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that as of late, you like adding a bunch of content to articles but I don't see you discussing these edits on the talk pages. You cannot determine what Wikipedia says; that's doneby consensus. Please start discussing your edits.Chris Troutman (talk)19:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did atBen Shapiro, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Chris Troutman (talk)19:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, sorry about that I'm new to the editing.

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "The Compassionate Carnivore".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.HasteurBot (talk)04:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello S1d6arrett23,

I wanted to let you know that I just taggedEarthbound Trading Company for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk)01:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Playing for Thrills, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)01:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Playing for Thrills".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.JMHamo (talk)20:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content.RonBot (talk)17:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

13 Cameras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on the article'stalk page. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you cancreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Frayæ (Talk/Spjall)21:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,13 Cameras, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Drewmutt(^ᴥ^)talk21:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,The Means of Reproduction, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)20:44, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Sing a Battle Song, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Boleyn (talk)13:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content. SeeUser:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.RonBot (talk)18:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameMeatsgains and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’veproposed an article that you started,Libcom, for deletion because it meets one of therelevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top ofthe article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this:{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. ClickPublish Changes button.

But, please remember toexplain why you think the article should be kept, either in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page. At any case, please consider improving the page to address the issues raised or it may be deleted later anyway.

If you have any questions, leave a comment here andpingme.

Meatsgains^(talk)03:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Libcom should be deleted. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libcom.

If you're new to the process,articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide onhow to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk)03:19, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onTrigger Warning (organization) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Stefan2 (talk)20:50, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedLibcom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCounterpunch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get this cleaned up. 18:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Sid

Thanks for uploadingFile:LibcomLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content. SeeUser:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.RonBot (talk)18:03, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedContinuity and Rupture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTom Clark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content. SeeUser:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.RonBot (talk)18:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Antifa Logo-Unoficial.png, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Willy1018 (talk)14:11, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:David Epstein (sex offender), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:David Epstein (sex offender) and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofDraft:David Epstein (sex offender) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Cabayi (talk)09:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDraft:David Epstein (sex offender), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, such as atArticles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Cabayi (talk)12:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content. SeeUser:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.RonBot (talk)18:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedThe Dilemmas of Lenin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pagePlekhanov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:02, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onQiu Zhanxuan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Stefan2 (talk)21:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content. SeeUser:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.RonBot (talk)18:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedYue Xin (activist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLiu Yu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingThe Permanent Revolution and Results and Prospects. When you make an article it helps a lot if you can add references. For books like this one, references to reviewers are great. Blue Rasberry(talk)23:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content. SeeUser:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.RonBot (talk)18:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My praise below got reverted (!?) on the article's talk page, so copying the praise and encouragement here instead. Re:

   Hey, I've been trying to to expand Wikipedia's content regarding Chinese politics, in particular left wing dissent in the country. So, I'm going to try to expand this article with new sources, I will be primarily looking within non-English sources.

S1d6arrett23 (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Me: Do it. Ta also for your other China content!Zezen (talk)19:13, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The articleThe "S" Word: a Short History of An American Tradition... Socialism has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. DGG ( talk)01:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingThe Stalinist Legacy.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:

Hiya, Nice work on the article. Could use a bit more in the synopsis section, not having read the book I reworked the text used on Amazon. I'll probably remove the empty reception section completely if I can't find any reviews. Cheers

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ .

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk)10:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a writer ofPeking University Marxist Society andQiu Zhanxuan at Chinese Wikipedia, After reviewingPeking University Marxist Society andQiu Zhanxuan, I wonder whether you are equalified to edit. Please improve the quality, thanks. BTW, How is the level of your Chinese? If you can't check the original text, don't use theGoogle Translate.Fire and Ice12:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• • Apologies, I only have a little experience with Mandarin, so my abilities are limited. I'm planning on expanding the page with more thoroughly reviewed sources.

Category:LGBT Marxists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^{T • go beyond • bad idea}18:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The articleThe Political Thought of Abdullah Öcalan has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not separately notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. DGG ( talk)20:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added toCategory:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found atWP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact thebot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them atWikipedia talk:Non-free content. SeeUser:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages.RonBot (talk)18:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{PageViews graph|2000|Anarchism|en.wikipedia.org}}{{PageViews graph|2000|Socialism|en.wikipedia.org}}{{PageViews graph|2000|Marxism|en.wikipedia.org}}{{PageViews graph|2000|Communism|en.wikipedia.org}}{{PageViews graph|2000|Bernie Sanders|en.wikipedia.org}}

Hello, S1d6arrett23,

Thanks for creatingContinuity and Rupture! I edit here too, under the usernameBritishfinance and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know thatI have taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:-

Good structure and construction but more references and need to definitively reference that it meets WP notabililty criteria for such books. Well done.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit theTeahouse.

Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk)14:39, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Heavy Radicals, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Britishfinance (talk)20:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingYue Xin (activist).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:

It's unclear to me what the arrest of Qiu Zhanxuan has to do with reactions to Xin's detainment, but otherwise the article looks good.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ .

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill^talk23:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameElmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Meaning of Marxism should be deleted. Your comments are welcome overWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Meaning of Marxism.

You might like to note that suchdiscussions usually run for seven days and arenot ballot-polls. And,our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae(talk ·contribs)21:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onFile:TheFoundationsOfLeninismENglish10thAnn.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. Quail Armor 14:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added byQuail Armor (talk •contribs)

Thanks for creatingBuilding the Commune.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the book "Building the Commune", but note that other editors have pointed out some issues with the article's quality. See the notices at the top of the article and follow the links for guidance.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ .

Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs)15:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "The Means of Reproduction".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Phospheros (talk)13:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "13 Cameras".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.SITH(talk)22:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Trigger Warning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.UnitedStatesian (talk)00:32, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "The Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.JMHamo (talk)16:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Kill All Normies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.JMHamo (talk)16:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, " Revolutionary Communist Party 1968-1980".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.CptViraj(Talk)09:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started,Draft:The Verso Book of Dissent.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C)05:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Qiu Zhanxuan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Lapablo (talk)21:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Sing a Battle Song".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Lapablo (talk)14:50, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Continuity and Rupture: Philosophy in the Maoist Terrain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.CptViraj (📧)17:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Heavy Radicals: The FBI's Secret War on America's Maoists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk)07:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Heavy Radicals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.JMHamo (talk)20:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Red Guard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!00:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onSocialist Rifle Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, such as atArticles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.Dom from Paris (talk)07:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @S1d6arrett23: I deleted this article per the request above. Note that we haveDraft:Socialist Rifle Association. You edited that draft, so I guess you know about it. Instead of re-creating the deleted article, you can dedicate your time to improve the draft and submit it toWP:AfC.Vanjagenije(talk)09:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	Thank you
	Thank you for your appreciation 谢谢你赞赏我的修改CRau080 (talk)13:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click theJoin WikiProject button on theWikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at theWikiProject Socialism talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future!MarioGom (talk)09:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedLiquid Sound Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageArlington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onLarry Rice (pastor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguouscopyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy fromhttp://www.larryriceministries.org/biography. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look atWikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)01:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Workers' Collectives in America, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Bearcat (talk)16:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNew Communist movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRevisionism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, S1d6arrett23. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "A Theology of Liberation: History".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!JMHamo (talk)12:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Logo of the Red Guards Austin.png, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Wikiacc (¶)00:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRed Guards (USA) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet thenotability guideline for organisations or thegeneral notability guideline. The article hasone reliable source that discusses the group in depth; the others are variously primary sources, unreliable sources, or contain only passing mentions or no mentions at all. I haven't been able to find significant coverage elsewhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk)14:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRed Guards (USA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Guards (USA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk)17:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:A Personal Matter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedList of political magazines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDemocratic Left.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:CoverartZizekTheDayAftertheRevolution2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Voice of Baceprot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)21:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Waste disposal incidents in Missouri has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.User:Namiba20:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Continuity and Rupture.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJ. Moufawad-Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Moufawad-Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yue🌙05:45, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political history of Shenzhen has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.^SMason_Garrison19:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Activist groups based in St. Louis has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.^SMason_Garrison19:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Televangelists from Missouri has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.^SMason_Garrison19:42, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC