User talk:Redvers
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Redvers has not edited Wikipediasince June 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
 .svg) male • gay • married • a socialist • a vegetarian • Welsh • an atheist • and through hail and snow I'd go just to moon you
|
 | Thisedit request toUser:Redvers/New Users has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Please replaceentire content with the following:
.gif)
#REDIRECT [[Help:Your first article]]{{Rcat shell|{{R to help namespace}}}}This is to fix a double redirect, as the target has moved. (Even though the editor is inactive, this page has numerous existing links to it.)–Wdchk (talk)02:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done however@Wdchk: I've reduced the protection level and you may edit it directly. —xaosfluxTalk11:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done: Thank you for reducing the protection level. Once this was done, a bot was able to fix the double redirect. Then I added thercat. (This thread applies to the subpageUser:Redvers/New UsersUser:Redvers/New Users.)–Wdchk (talk)18:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectInglés. Since you had some involvement with theInglés redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. —Yours sincerely,Soumyabrata (talk •subpages)14:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The articleEric Syddique has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
FailsWP:NPOL having only been elected at a local level. References do not speak toWP:GNG criteria of significant coverage about the individual.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bondegezou (talk)15:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Infobox military memorial has beennominated for merging withTemplate:Infobox monument. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.PPEMES (talk)13:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The articleThe Beachcomber (TV series) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not seem to meet the notability guidelines. Sources that would give this potential to be notable cannot be located.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.aaronneallucas (talk)03:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beachcomber (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.