User talk:RCRC
Page contents not supported in other languages.
To avoid bleeding links.
Thanks for your copyedits toTamil Nadu. --Sundar (talk ·contribs) 04:34, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
TheIndian Railways is the current INCOTW and your vote helped select it. Let's all now make it up to featured status. =Nichalp (Talk)= 19:40, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
Hello Ram Mallika,
Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.
The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.
The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.
Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.
In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available athttps://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.
We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.
Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them atm:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available atm:Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.
Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.
Sincerely,
Kizu Naoko
Philippe
Jon Harald Søby
Newyorkbrad
Tim Starling
For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee
This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents ofEtienne de Villiers, and it appears to include a substantial copy ofhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/biographies/biogs/worldwide/etienne_de_villiers.shtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note onthe maintainer's talk page.CorenSearchBot14:52, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I think this template already exists at{{ITF male profile}}. —MC21:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you blanked the redirect atM. K. Tyagaraja Bhagavadar. If you believe the redirect is invalid, then please submit it toWP:RFD. Thanks. →AA(talk) —10:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
On your edits to Notable people section inTrichy, if you had a chance to look at the history, you would see I recently curtailed the section and cleaned it. But an Anon undid it. So, I am reverting back to my edits, a couple of days ago. Feel free to chime in. -RC13:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In regards to this discussion:
FYI, when a discussion is active on talk, don't persuade by RVs. You make valid points and I agree with them. But, they still are champions and thus encyclopedia and every other tennis historian/authority has accepted them as is. Your point of NOT counting them towards their slams may or may not be accurate. But I am not debating that. It is just an issue of listing them as is, as they were awarded trophies that were legacy French championships, whether national or international. Insisting on displaying them different for the sake of being different is somewhat trivial. Clear footnotes has been made showing when the tourney name has been changed and thus started including them. If you feel that it doesn't distinguish enough, feel free to make a statement in the beginning of the article mentioning, "Pre 1925 French Opens were exclusive to French nationals who are part of the club etc.. and hence tradition suggest not counting them towards individual slam count etc..". That along with NPOV tag should be sufficient for all parties concerned to make the distinction you are seeking. Again, I am not taking a position on counting or not. Merely shading them grey IMHO just indicate persecution. If someone still makes them include on slam count, then RV as you desire - RC 01:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Actually what we have here is worse than simply 'greying out'. We have a gross misrepresentation of history. In fact, all four of the tournaments, in their early years, were simply 'local' (not 'international') tournaments. It is not hard to find evidence that the U.S. 'Open' was actually 'closed' in the early years:
http://www.all-about-tennis.com/tennisgrandslam.html
Entry was limited to only those clubs which were members of the United States National Lawn Tennis Association,
We see it was called the U.S. 'National' championships, not 'international'...
Yet we find the very first winner of the 'French' championships was a British man. So, not only is Fyunclick wrong on style, he's wrong on substance. Let things like qualitative assessment come from others. Simply state the results as-is.Ryoung12206:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thank you for your support of theArticle Improvement Drive. This weekAfrican American culture was selected to be improved tofeatured articlestatus. Hope you can help. |
CJ10:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image that you uploaded or altered,Image:1950s_Tennis_at_Pinelands_Club,_Cape_Town.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on theimage description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry atthe discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.Kellyhi!03:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As part of the tennis project, I have chosen you randomly to help out in the current edit war going on, discussedhere, Thank you so muchYosef1987 (talk)22:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this section that you created, I moved to its own page. I think this was done in good faith, but madeRoger Federer career statistics page way to longWP:SIZE, which I would love for you to update it to show the current matches! It will be hard to maintain though.BLUEDOGTN01:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When you can get to it see if you can't make the tables for all their matches, too!69.137.120.81 (talk)22:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, wastrue. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed tofalse in the next few days. This doesnot require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents ofWP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, thenthis discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf ofUser:Jarry1250,LivingBot (talk)18:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onUnited News of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clearcopyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy fromhttp://www.uniindia.com/eng/about.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look atWikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a questionhere.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.GabrielF (talk)07:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedScuderia Ferrari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJames Allison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:04, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RCRC. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Performance timelines should never include the lesser events (250 or 500 tournaments). This is spelled out in our consensus guidelines atProject Tennis Guidelines. Bring it up at the Tennis Project talk page if you want to change consensus. Thanks.Fyunck(click) (talk)21:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RCRC. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RCRC. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your recent edit toList of Vellalar sub castes appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a listshould have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia'snotability guideline. Thank you. -Arjayay (talk)20:13, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toPandiya Vellalar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources andit consists of machine-generated text.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)01:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RCRC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Pandiya Vellalar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)06:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, RCRC. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Pandiya Vellalar".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!05:24, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
