User talk:RagaBhakta
Page contents not supported in other languages.
|
Glad to note your contributions to Music of India, in past couple of months. If you get a chance, take a look atWP:INMUSIC, which may interest you. You can sign up there and collaborate on developing articles on the subject(s). Once again, welcome to Wikipedia.VasuVR (talk,contribs)06:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAman Ali Khan has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Zzaffuto118 (talk)19:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.Thanks!220ofBorg08:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mDan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one ofyour recent contributions —the one you made withthis edit toTarana— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.Dan Koehl (talk)04:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did withthis edit toGirija Devi. Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.Dan Koehl (talk)04:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBaiju Bawra (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBhairav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atBirthday Havan. Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.Kishfan (talk)19:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This is youronly warning; if youvandalize Wikipedia again, you may beblocked from editing without further notice.Kishfan (talk)17:47, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled asvandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism candiscourage editors. Please seewhat is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.
You have clearly edit-warred across multiple articles and your claim that your edits are exempt from the three-revert rule because they are undoing vandalism does not stand up to scrutiny. The edits you're undoing are not vandalism. If you edit-war again, you will very likely be blocked from editing.DrKay (talk)06:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atIndian classical music shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.DrKay (talk)20:47, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time youvandalize Wikipedia, as you did atMohammed Rafi.Kishfan (talk)20:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:AmirKhan 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:22, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
