• Archive forNovember 28, 2004 throughJune 17, 2006 now atUser talk:RJFJR/Archive1
• Archive forJune 17, 2006 throughOctober 24, 2006 now atUser talk:RJFJR/Archive2
• Archive forOctober 25, 2006 through 16:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC) now atUser talk:RJFJR/Archive3

The wikitech-lmailing list is normally the best place to look for such updates. From what I remember of it, they needed new disks in order to do the dumps, and the new disks arrived but there was something wrong with them, and so they're waiting on a new set of new disks. You're likely to get a better answer either by asking on that mailing list, or over IRC inirc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-tech, than from my memory; those are the right places to ask. --ais523 18:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello,
ברוך הבא מלך המשיח

שהחיינו וקיימנו והגיענו לזמן הזה
Could you tell me please if this song is from Avraham Fried or someone else?And on wich album does it appears?—Precedingunsigned comment added byDjampa (talk •contribs)08:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Djampa (talk)08:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a google on "Baruch HaBa Melech HaMashiach" (including quotes for exact match) and it found a few hits, including[1]. I can't say whether this is authoritative but it may point you in the correct direction. You may want to ask at theWikipedia:Reference desk, possibly as language, humanities, or miscellaneous.RJFJR (talk)15:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your welcome message. I would send you a private message but I dont know if it exists among wikipedians, therefore feel free to delete this messageEnisbayramoglu (talk)10:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here here!JohnXCitizen (talk)02:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I recently saw that theWikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce was given the historical tag. As a former member and someone who really appreciated the contributions of the group...

		The Epic Barnstar
		Here is an Epic Barnstar for helping run a project (Cleanup Taskforce) that is now historical. ~03:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for filling in the red link at zinc cadmium sulfide. :-) --IvoShandor (talk)18:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   has given you a kitten! Gifts of kittens promoteWikilove and holiday spirt. Hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and raise the holiday spirit! Sendkittens to others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

  04:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the greetings. Brazilian user here.Best wishes.—Precedingunsigned comment added byFrajolex (talk •contribs)11:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this discussionWikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Final_Fantasy_Legend_name_translation_woes.2C_mk._II

There is an ongoing issue with Kung Fu Man over an edit dispute which is getting out of hand, and I'm fairly certain the user is relying on sockpuppets to make revisions to the article. Check the revision history yourself to verify this. Also, I've been receiving harassing comments and threats from this user and am not sure where to turn for help. Please get involved and try to act as the voice of reason. Thank you.74.242.123.2 (talk)01:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly oppose the removal of items from article without discussing it first. If I revert the item removed without discussing it, then I will be blocked for "edit warring" and for being a "disruptive editor." The person who removed the item does not get blocked for "edit warring." The person removing the statement without discussing it first, is not labelled a "disruptive editor".

So, let´s discuss this matter. I think the statement: "Deflation is a contraction in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods and services." should stay in the lead since it accurately defines what deflation is.

Discussion regarding all the above matters invited.

PennySeven (talk)17:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the original author of the statement.

PennySeven (talk)17:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally various editors should partake in the discussion and not just two. I state again, RJFJR, who agrees with you to remove the statement: "Deflation is a contraction in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods and services"? Remember, I did not put it there in the first place. Another, third party, editor put it there. He/she and I agree that it should be in the article. You take it out. Democratically that is 2 against one. The statement should stay. Please put it back, thank you.

PennySeven (talk)18:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to point out again that I am not the author of the statement. So, I have no personal interest in this statement, except for improving Wikipedia.

PennySeven (talk)17:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove statements from articles without first discussing it.I know you will not be blocked for "edit warring" or for being a "disruptive editor" as I would be if I should revert your removal, but, please discuss statements on the talk page before you remove them.

PennySeven (talk)18:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irv (talk)20:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RJFJR. You have new messages atCasey56's talk page.
You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry -- pls disregard if I left this on the wrong person's User Talk page.Irv (talk)20:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the note about the 'post, looks like someone fixed it already. --phoebe /(talk to me)16:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for welcome message on my talk page... :)slash (talk)20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RJFJR. You have new messages atWhpq's talk page.
You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The subject's publisher's website is a pretty frail reed to lean on, especially for NPOV reasons. --Orange Mike |Talk15:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that it's a website, but that it'sher publisher's website. A publisher is a commercial enterprise, whose goal is to sell books. They do that in part by selling the authors, as well as the books. The more notable they make an author sound, the more likely they are to sell the reader on that author's book. Thus, there isan inherent COI and an uncertainty as toreliability of source. These pages are the venue of the publisher's publicity department, not editorial. --Orange Mike |Talk20:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have a source for the information you added inthis edit? I'm trying to get this article properly referenced.OrangeDog(talk •edits) 17:32, 18 March 2009

An editor has nominatedCryptic Fate, an article which you have created or worked on, fordeletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptic Fate and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove thearticles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.Jezhotwells (talk)22:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

Oooops! sorry forgot the important bit.Jezhotwells (talk)16:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear RJFJR,

I am a student in Seoul National University in South Korea doing a research project on Wikipedia. I am very impressed about your insight and active contributions. I thought you could provide some opinions really worthwhile. So, would it be possible for you to take some time off and give an online interview via E-mail? It would provide my project a lively voice of an actual administrator. And this will be of a great meaning; your experience, concerns, opinions and ideas would add a lot to my project. Actually I'm in real need of something concrete; for my project is about the mechanism a biased version of explanation is settled, and as you will probably guess, understanding such things involves a lot more than just watching explicit process. Again, I would really, really appreciate your help.

If you are willing to give some help, would you mind mailing me swiftly? I have a list of questions about Wiki. Thanks a lot. I also leave this message to other administrators' user talk for my research. And further I'm a starter so I couldn't find your e-mail address. Please don't be upset about that.

bongeun319@hanmail.net------------

Sincerely, BongeunMyarchives (talk)07:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed your recent edits toForces sweetheart. You have added the{{stub}} template. This is fine and your contributions are appreciated. But in future, to aid in the expansion of articles, such as this one, please use a more specific stub template. A list of stub templates can be found here:Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/List of stubs. Thank you. --01:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing,Japanese cultural artifacts controversy, has been listed fordeletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese cultural artifacts controversy (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Enki H. (talk)23:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my mistake. I must have put July without noticing. Sorry about that; I was editing in a hurry after a long day.Copana2002 (talk)

Hello, RJFJR. You have new messages atWikipedia:Help_desk#white_space_at_top_of_article_because_of_pictures.
You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PhantomSteve (Contact Me,My Contribs)13:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to do the split, please finish it properly - links between the new articles, categories, removing material only relevant to one family member etc. Thank you.Johnbod (talk)20:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RJFJR, this is an automated message fromSDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added toDoc Freemans has been removed. It was removed byJclemens with the following edit summary '(Decline prod, has sourcing, probably meets GNG. Feel free to AfD.)'. Please considerdiscussing your concerns with Jclemens before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article toAfD for community discussion. Thank you,SDPatrolBot (talk)21:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)(Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]

Thanks for moving the list of chapters back to its own page. It was like that before but someone decided to move it to the main article which I found to be a tad messy.crazzycorbe (talk)04:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofAndrew Wailes, and it appears to include a substantial copy ofhttp://www.rmp.org.au/conductor.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note onthe maintainer's talk page.CorenSearchBot (talk)13:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to add your input to the discussion atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 August 28#Reba_McEntire/Reba. --œ^™03:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RJFJR. You have new messages atDabomb87's talk page.
You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dabomb87 (talk)22:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedThe Bowmans, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bowmans. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Joe Chill (talk)19:45, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a re-write ofCarbon burning process, an Astronomy article. I added a couple of references which covered all my changes. The page previously had lots of warnings about lack of references and style. I am hoping that I have improved it enough for some of these to be lifted. I also contacted user:Rursus who posted on theCarbon burning process talk page and who's page says he's an astronomer saying roughly what I am saying here. I only did minor edits before so would appreciate some feedback. I have chased up all my links and checked the page history for the version prior to my edit. Thanks for your timePuzl bustr (talk)13:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a follow-up, I've added some more footnote refs, some of which I have combined as journal article refs and external links, whilst leaving the external links section blank. This is probably bad style, so would like some advice. I'd like to have the article footnote ref in the ref list and the URL in the external link, but don't know how one does this so that the reader can connect the footnote to the URL except the way I've done it. I also explained why one needs stellar models to computer temperatures and densities for carbon burning, and the figures vary based upon the stellar mass, and linked to a database which gives these figures. Hope this helps explain why it was not so easy to give a simple reference for the temp and density for the fusion processes sections which you queried about.Puzl bustr (talk)14:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to clean up this Astronomy article by explaining the difference between R136 and R136a, about which there had been confusion. Changed all refs to ADSABS citations, and tried to make the refs complete. Gave simple explanation of what R136 is and what its component R136a is. Removed star chart for R136a (since article supposed to be about R136, see above about confusion) and all references to section on R136a, now defunct. Added refs for all this. Hopefully it can lose some warnings now.Puzl bustr (talk)17:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brain fart, and I usually check but I was writing it as I was being called to a meeting. Thanks again.SPhilbrickT16:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was an unclosed ref tag, i.e. "</ref" ... meaning everything after this was being included in that ref, including the reflist tag itself, which thus couldn't be shown...Evercat (talk)18:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've recently expandedList of personal protective equipment by body area. I'd like to move this article toUsage of personal protective equipment. Thoughts?username 1 (talk)20:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That list was split off fromPersonal protective equipment because it was too 'listy'. With your reorganization you might want to put some of your new material into the sectionPPE by hazard atPersonal protective equipment.RJFJR (talk)21:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey RJFJR, i just recieved your message in my inbox, i assume it was a reply to my minor edits to some pages. did i do something wrong or is this standard to send out that message to new people who have made small edits? im not trying to step on peoples toes or their hard work on their articles, i was just adding a few links within wikipedia that i thought may be helpful to readers.

i may be confused here, im just wondering if im doing the right thing, i mean no harm and if im doing it wrong/without permission etc please let me know ill stop and revert what ive done pronto.

sorry, im just confused. :S have a nice day!! -mackMackdiesel5 (talk)18:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TheCondorcet method article doesn't make a lot of sense when it includes links to itself, via this redirect. I don't see any discussion of the proposed "merge and redirect" on either article's talk pages, so I'm reverting it. I may be missing an AfD discussion or something, but before you remove large amounts of content please discuss it with others. --BlueGuy213 (talk)00:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. I didn't see the archived talk pages on Condorcet method, where several people suggested the change. Sorry, I've reverted myself. However, removing the links to Condorcet criterion within the major article would probably be a good idea. --BlueGuy213 (talk)01:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, thanks! But could you create the GA review page with what you just told me, because I'm pretty sure it's essential to have that. Or just put it on the talk. Thanks again!The Flash^{talk}16:45, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay; I didn't notice that. I just looked over the review and it looks fine. Thanks again,The Flash^{talk}16:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's everything as well. :)The Flash^{talk}16:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RJFJR/Archive4! I noticed you display aservice award, and would like to invite you tojoin the discussion over aproposed revamping of the awards. If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! —(in question)00:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RJFJR! The requirements for theservice awards have been updated, and you may no longer be eligible for the award you currently display. Don't worry! Since you have already earned your award, you are free to keep displaying it. However, you may also wish to update to thecurrent system. Sorry for any inconvenience. —(in question)10:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In issue 42 of PS238, Dax, an Argonian royal, tells Julie she looks like a member of the First Royal House of Argos. Then Atlas unveils his Argonite, and poor Julie is so badly affected she falls off the spaceship. On the cover of the next issue, 43, she is seen flying the Flag of Argos!So far, this is strictly factual. Speculation: Atlas, Julie, and most if not all of the 84 FISS people (including the first Meta in the PS 238 universe) are Argonian Royals sent to Earth and kept in the dark to keep them safe from the cut-throat civil wars of the Royal Houses of Argos.I've never played the RPG. What more information does it provide about Argos, Atlas, Julie, Ron, and the FISS Metas? Das Baz, aka Erudil17:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you for all the information! Gotta say the following:

• Only Argonians are vulnerable to Argonite, just as only Kryptonians are vulnerable to Kryptonite. So if poor Julie is affected badly by Argonite, of course she is from Argos.
• It's a Thereain'tnojustice shame that such a nice kid as Ron should be afflicted with such a rotten name. Of course, in the Argosian language it probably means something very positive and cool. It's just bad cosmic luck it means what it does in English.
• Atlas, Ron, Julie and Dax are all related, members of the Royal Family of Argos. The other 81 FISS metas are also probably refugees from Argos (of course they don't know it.)
• Julie has thought of herself, all her life, as a poor underprivileged ordinary meta-girl - and now she is about to find out she is the lawful Queen of a great planet! That is going to blow her mind.
• Remember Mr. Terrific? Also from Argos, I bet.
• In the original concept of Kryptonite, it was totally harmless to earth humans. Later it developed that if you wore it next to your skin for a long time, it would give you cancer. Then in "Smallville" it developed that it causes meta-mutations in Earthlings. If you give it to Spider-Man, it will make him more powerful. What effect, if any, will Argonite have on Earthfolk?
• Argosians seem to be afflcited with low self-esteem (Ron, Julie, Forak) or arrogant bullies like Dax. Maybe Dax has an inferiority complex turned inside out. That happens with Earth bullies.

Das Baz, aka Erudil19:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

As i receive several notes to improve my article and now also face some possible "clean up" of the page i write You in hope to get some helt here.

First, as You noticed, Im quite new on Wiki so I still have to lear lot of things. Is there anyone on Wiki that can help me in creating an article? I found on some page that there is possibility to write help talk to get soem assistance but I dont understand how to do that. Yesturday i learned how to sign message and it took me 30 minutes to find out how to do witch make me feel a little stupid here.

I reviewed my article and i can not see anything wrong with it! The references and the sources are there! Maybee I just dont undertand some policy and what more is required of me but since I do not understand and english is not my native language i really need some help here. Im not used with creating side or articles at all, the only way I learn is to watch how other people do and I copy that.

Could You please review my article and tell me what i should do? The inline citation message is something I dont understand, how pratically to change something.

I would be very helpfull of any help!

Best regards,Camdan (talk)22:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Article One of the United States Constitution has a few "citation needed" templates. • Ling.Nut12:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings again :)

I have some problems with the copyright of the pictures i have in the articles of Danielewicz and Bohdanow. I did wrong firt time so I reloaded pictures again adding some tags and information abour sources and it seems still not correct. I really dont know what to do! Can You tell me what to change to make it right!? I supose to add some tag...i thought i already di and I have no clue how to change or improve!

Best regards,Camdan (talk)13:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

A while ago you worked on the articleDarkSpace. I have recently tried to improve the article and I'm looking for feedback. I realize you're an admin and are probably pressed for time, but since you took an interest I wanted to let you know there have been changes. If you have any suggestions let me know! --Culix (talk)04:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The review process at the above article lapsed, but i have corresponded with Reywas and have taken over reviewing this article. While it is the best of the pieces on the US Constitutional Articles, i think it has a long way to go, including some systemic problems that all the Article articles share. I have outlined the issues at the GA review page. You might want to take a look. Sorry you have had to wait so long on this. I may drop a note on the page of a few other active US law editors. Cheers,hamiltonstone (talk)23:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just wanted to bringthis to your attention.Amsaim (talk)18:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I need some help with an article im working on and it start to be quite big already and its just half of it. Suggestions about how to devide it more properly, common feedback and so on. I would aprriciate a lot if You could just look at it and suggest something. The artile name: Clan of Ostoja.

Many thanks for Your help before!

Camdan (talk)17:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleChristy Byrne has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage of this individual found at RS - all the mentions I can find are very minor (most as part of a list of players, others mentioning role in a specific game, but no more than a short sentence). Unreferenced for almost 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. --/|\16:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note thatChristy Byrne occurs in the template on that page and something should be done to the template as well if deletion occurs. History page says it may have been prodded before.RJFJR (talk)18:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents ofJoe Cali (inventor), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page:Joe Cali. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please seeHelp:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please seeWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in anedit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note onthe maintainer's talk page.CorenSearchBot (talk)14:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents ofJoe Cali (author), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page:Joe Cali. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please seeHelp:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please seeWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in anedit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note onthe maintainer's talk page.CorenSearchBot (talk)14:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your question has been answered atTalk:Georgia HaseTrackinfo (talk)19:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJoe Cali (inventor) has beenproposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, allbiographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least onesource that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeWikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask atWikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you canrequest that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Rettetast (talk)08:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, fordeletion. The nominated article isCyberBunker. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see alsoWikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments toWikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberBunker (2nd nomination). Please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove thearticles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by abot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk)01:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJoe Cali (inventor) has beenproposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, allbiographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least onesource that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeWikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask atWikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you canrequest that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Clubmarx (talk)16:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deprodded it. Now fix the article. DGG ( talk)21:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain to me why you did wrote on my page: "({{subst:welcome}} ~~~~)" ?

Arthur MILCHIOR (talk)15:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok.Out of curiosity, what was the page I edited you were watching ? "logspace" ? I mean, I did edit many pages since I created the account. (By the way, is there a way to find all the pages I did edited ? I guess this information is in wikipedia's database since my nickname should be in the history of the page I did edit; but I don't know if there is a way to find this information quickly)—Precedingunsigned comment added byArthur MILCHIOR (talk •contribs)03:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I still thinkthis needs some heavy cleanup.Geschichte (talk)07:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear RJFJR,

thank you for your message! Have a nice day!

Tardigrada2008 (talk)20:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing,Manuel Agrella, has been listed fordeletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Agrella. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.jmcw (talk)13:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RJFJR! Thank you for your contributions. I am abot notifying you on behalf of thethe unreferenced biographies team that1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Thebiographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensureverifiability, all biographies should be based onreliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current60 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the{{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Joe Cali (inventor) -Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk)01:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not meaning to be hostile about this but:Edward Bishop (Salem) was under construction. Were you bored ? Lots of folks get bored and just run through making thousands of edits because they are bored. I was working on that article and your trying to put that one section into a "neat little package" didn't really help at all. The article is part of a task group. Is there going to be a problem if I continue working on this article or was this just randomly a case of that you wanted to do some editing ?John5Russell3Finley (talk)15:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your comment, how's about if YOU finnish editing the article up to the point where YOU can remove the cleanup tag all by yourself, failing that I will treat your actions as vandalism and take the apropriate actionJohn5Russell3Finley (talk)23:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it, and plan to look at the suggested resources - as I do find basic edits pretty tough still. Wikipedia is amazing and I plan to stay as involved as I can.—Precedingunsigned comment added byPhenylphree (talk •contribs)09:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, it's probably not the most appropriate word, really, I just like the sound of it.Bobtalk15:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the articleClinical Research Investigative Studies Program, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in thedeletion policy.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical Research Investigative Studies Program until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Dondegroovily (talk)00:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given

<ref name="mybook"> {{ cite book | title=Cat in the Hat | author = Dr. Seuss |page=3}} </ref>

I know I can use that ref again as

<ref name="mybook">

but then it would reference page 3.

How can I have another footnote to that same book but to page=6  ?
Is there a better forum for this question?
I tried looking it up in the template:cite_book help and ref help. --Javaweb (talk) 05:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)JavawebThanks for the quick response and suggestingWikipedia:Help_desk. I'll tell you if I get a solution.Javaweb (talk) 23:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)JavawebTemplate:Sfn looks like my answer.Javaweb (talk)23:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Javaweb[reply]

I greatly appreciate your efforts to police Wikipedia, but today I started an article, and got called away before being able to work on it. Within a matter of hours youput a proposal for deletion tag on it.

Clearly, a 1 second "grace period" on new articles would be silly (we'd be wasting too much time flagging "works in progress"), but one weekseems far too long. If there's a happy medium, where is it, and why?Do we have any historical data that could be used to drive a sensible policy(e.g.: 24-48 hours) ?

JonDePlume (talk)19:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just an alternative idea: When you are starting an article, put it in a sandbox page rather than publishing it to the world:From Wikipedia, put this in the search box:User:JonDePlume/evercookieand then tell wikipedia you want to start a page by this name. When you are ready for worldwide publication, you can move the page to its new home.—Precedingunsigned comment added byJavaweb (talk •contribs)21:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the articleJoe Cali (inventor), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in thedeletion policy.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Cali (inventor) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Gigs (talk)15:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a new id contributing nothing but vandalism. SeeSpecial:Contributions/Serr2161Reversing the edits are squandering editor's timeCould you take a please take a look when you have a chance?I will be putting a polite note on theUser_talk:Serr2161 page—Precedingunsigned comment added byJavaweb (talk •contribs) 19:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)UPDATE: Problem has been resolved by others. Please ignore this request for help. --Javaweb (talk)19:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb[reply]

Special:Contributions/24.113.35.16 shows that ip address generates vandalism. Could you take a peek and see what can be done to minimize futuredamage, perhaps a block or ban? The ip address has been warned on the Talk pageJavaweb (talk) 23:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb Thank you for your quick reply and the guideline.Javaweb (talk)00:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb[reply]

Talk:List of life extension-related topics  The Transhumanist22:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can I refactorthis slightly so it's clear what was a list and what was a talkpage section? And I completely agree with you on removing them.tedder (talk)17:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to refactor.RJFJR (talk)17:15, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
The article onMalleswaram is just written like an essay. For example:Huge student community is visible from the numerous tutorials that are available and more so if one visits the CCD, the Mantri Mall, Sankey Tank and numerous chaat shops. Even shops like Veena Stores and CTR give you a picture of the whole of India having a dish of "idli-vada" and asking for some more "chutney".
and this too:New CCD coming up in front of Sankey Tank and McDonald's just opposite to the 13th Cross Malleswaram Market / Bus Stand on Sampige Road. Only thing missing is a non-veg fast food joint which is affordable.
Even the sectionProminent Landmarks looks like an advertising of the area. I believe that the section should not be included and the entire article reviewed and re-wrttien to look like an encyclopedia. Thanks,Abhishek191288 (talk)12:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The section "Prominent Landmarks" lists some eat-outs, schools & colleges, book stores, temples, Hindu religious establishments (Matha), grocery stores/ vegetable markets, etc in Malleswaram. This is clearly not encyclopedic. Infact, I was about to delete it, but by then you moved it to the talk page.Abhishek191288 (talk)15:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMonster Player Kill has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found a single published (gBooks)WP:RS mention in Geektionary: From Anime to Zettabyte, an A to Z Guide to All Things Geek, Adams Media, 2011 . Given the 2011 publication date it could well be sourced from this long unreferenced article. FailsWP:N andWP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Jeepday(talk)23:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancientDacia. Would you like tojoin theWikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of thearticles related to these topics. We needhelp expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need moreimages. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk)21:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The articleUSA Bowl has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable semi-pro football game, failsWP:N,WP:GNG, andWP:NSPORTS. No sources cited, failsWP:RS (only link is organization's website). Any team that could be declared a "national champion" ought to have a source available somewhere if it's even remotely notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Paul McDonald (talk)14:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The songs require songwriter credits. :)Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Article_body. Cheers!Andrzejbanas (talk)17:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He was a senior partner in a notable firm, the article has a source and others can be found, at least I've scoped a few on Google Books that would work. It certainly doesn't qualify for a prod. Like I said, you can take it to AFD, I really don't care, and it won't bother me at all. But it should be done right.IvoShandor (talk)

Apologies if this is to the wrong person or in the wrong place. You are the most recent admin I could find who has been involved with the page in question.

Rothesay_Netherwood_School I reverted that due to some blatant vandalism (a school run by elves, located in the glorious Emerald Forest among other things). You might want to keep an eye on it.—Precedingunsigned comment added by68.37.225.222 (talk)03:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For your eagle eye in spotting the longstanding hoax articleUpton H. Pennyworth. Thanks! —CactusWriter(talk)17:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NIce surprise to have a personal welcome! Slightly curious as to why you, not that it matters, just curious on wikiprocedure being new and all.— Precedingunsigned comment added byFilmmaker2011 (talk •contribs)17:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it could have been the page move request I asked for, which I noticed still hasn't been done, could you oblige old chap?Filmmaker2011 (talk)18:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After so many contributions and so much work, I was reprimanded by one of the wikipedia administrators concerning a comment I posted in the discussion section forNelly Furtado. I cannot and do not wish to remove all my previous contributions but some form of hara-kiri is demanded. Is it possible to remove my user:talk page? If so, how?TonyMath (talk)03:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Halo RJFJR!

Thank you very much for your nice words of welcome!

Here comes my questions. I’m present on english Wikipedia with username Krzysztofiaczek (since 20 January 2008). I have created a global account on polish Wikipedia and I’like to delete my old Krzysztofiaczek (User ID: 6240065) account because I dont't need it. How can I do this? I’d like to transfer all old edits history to the present account and copy my old user page and paste it to the new one to introduce myself. Is it possible too?

Awaiting your reply with great pleasure.

Kind regards! --Krzysztof 13 (talk)13:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a major revision of the theService Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.

Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.

Herostratus (talk)13:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you jumped two levels, to Master Editor. Congratulations, and thank you for your many contributions!Herostratus (talk)13:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome message on my talk page! Nice palindrome username too. I have followed your advice and have written my first article. Hope it followed the rules correctly! Here is my first article,Gala IncMtstaffa (talk)03:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you had added the weight/inspection stations to the exit list. They should be added though as separate lines like the toll plazas.DanTD (talk ·contribs) removed your additions, but I think if you had added them like the toll plazas, he might not have reverted that addition. I'm still in favor of moving all of that stuff into the exit list though, so ping me if you need help. Also, we have a discussion atWT:USRD about old and new exit numbers that will affect this article.Imzadi 1979 →22:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Idid like the idea of adding them in the same way as toll plazas at first, as per the discussion. But then I realized that this format was eliminated from a segment ofInterstate 95 in Maryland that had it's own page, and that these features are considered motorist services, so perhaps they're better off in the existing chapter. ----DanTD (talk)12:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I disagree. The fact that one article did something isn't binding consensus. Many other articles list services in the junction/exit list tables.U.S. Route 491, afeatured article that appeared on the Main Page for July 4 included an inspection station in its junction list. In fact every British motorway article lists their motorway services in the junction list as separate entries unless combined with a GSJ (grade-separated junction) complete with "Services" as the junction number. Since we seem to agree to pull the old exit numbers, I can convert the entire table for the article over to the{{jctexit}}//{{jctbridge}} templates which will simplify adding in the various additions. Why should we have three mileage-based lists (exits/toll plazas, weigh stations and rest areas) when they can be listed all in one place?Imzadi 1979 →19:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, so why wereMaryland House,Chesapeake House, andDelaware House eliminated from the exit lists of I-95 in Maryland and Delaware? And are you planning to add this to other highway articles? ----DanTD (talk)20:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I don't know.MOS:RJL#What to include says that they should be added back.Imzadi 1979 →22:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your most gracious welcome. I do have questions relating toredirects. I successfully did one forAgum-Kakrime, a legitimate alias, but I wish to start an article forKurigalzu I and I find somebody else has already redirected it to a table of kings in the article on theKassites. This may have been sensible in the absence of an article, but frankly, this is a rare example of a Kassite king with a fair amount of material worthy of a dedicated article. How do I un-redirect, so I can create a new article?

I am contemplating redirecting the character “Nazi-Bugash / Shuzigash” to the tail-end of theBurna-Buriash II article, where he is briefly referenced as “son of a nobody”, which is, I believe, the ancient Mesopotamians telling us that he isn’t notable enough for his own article. Obviously I wouldn’t want to do this if later evidence emerges to the contrary, so the ease of un-redirecting is critical.BigEars42 (talk)02:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your welcome message.Thank you!MajaEdits (talk)17:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your question at MOS and realized the coverage on the footnote help page was incomplete. I just added a section on embedding ref notes within footnotes if you're interested. —kwami (talk)00:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate the way, new contributors are greeted here. What you could not know, is that my first edit in the german wikipedia was back in 2004, and since then I have been contributing there regularly. Only in the last months I have started to edit the english WP as well. Have a good time and "herzliche Grüße" from germany! --J.Ammon (talk)10:05, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia. I may call upon your services very soon; the article I am working on is proving to be quite tricky.Tristanlbailey (talk)13:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RJFJR,I truly appreciate your greetings: ("I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your messages ondiscussion pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place{{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!")

Now:

1. If you can send your regular e-mail address to me, I will have, as a beginner, much easier way of communication (I hope it is "legal").

2. Delete "Hidden Categories"

In the"Magnetic Tower of Hanoi" article, I find these hidden categories:

   Category:All articles with dead external links   Category:All articles with unsourced statements   Category:Articles with dead external links from November 2009   Category:Articles with unsourced statements from September 2011

What are these categories? How did they get in? How can they be removed?!

Thanks again,

Uri

~~~~

Hello RJFJR,Thank You for Your Greetings and Your intention to help, when help is needed. all the best.Mn-imhotep (talk)07:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol –Survey Invitation Hello RJFJR! TheWMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please clickHERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please seeNPP Survey.Global message delivery 12:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, RJFJR. You have new messages atEnrique r25's talk page.
Message addedEnrique r25 (talk)05:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi, this message is to let you know aboutdisambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.For more information, see theFAQ or drop a line at theDPL WikiProject.

Bushmen healing and rock art (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked toHunting and gathering

Anysuggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)13:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]