User talk:QwertyForest
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user has analternative account namedQwertyForest (public). |
 | This user is a regular, and is indifferent tobeing templated. You may choose to template or not template them at your own discretion. |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following ascontentious topics:
|
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
TipsHappy editing! Cheers, --Aunva6talk -contribs20:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, QwertyForest,
You have only been editing for two weeks but your edits are not those of a brand new editor. Your first two edits were comments in AFD deletion discussions...most new editors don't even know about the AFD area until they have been editing for weeks or months but you headed right there. If you previously edited Wikipedia with other accounts, you need to identify them on your User page or your conduct might prompt questions about sockpuppetry.
Better to be open and honest with your past editing experience because you clearly know your way around the project that an editor with your experience wouldn't know. Thank you.LizRead!Talk!02:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thanks for reverting vandalism. However, there have been several cases where vandals have made more than one edit and you haven't completely reverted the vandalism, such as atAlexander Cartwright,Betty Shabazz,Digital library, andHeinrich Klaasen. This arguably happened with your edit toFawaz Gerges too, but that was a much more unusual situation. Please make sure you have reverted all the edits by a user when doing vandalism-fighting. I would very strongly recommend that you use semi-automated tools to help you revert vandalism and warn users likeTwinkle orRedWarn. Also, above you mentioned not being able to find typos to fix; there's always thetypo team. There's alsoWikiProject Guild of Copy Editors if that's your thing.Graham87 (talk)16:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there,
This draft is entirely an advertisement, and you are attempting to defend it by contesting G11. I recognize that you are new here; however, please identify the sections that are not spammy. Additionally, avoid engaging with content that you do not fully comprehend, that would be more helpful. Thank you.Hitro talk16:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just wanted to tell you that the "this discussion" link on your userpage does not work because there's a pipe at the end of the anchor name. Have a good day, —Alien333 (what I did &why I did it wrong)19:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, QwertyForest. Do youreally hopeFetishise Asians or Hate Asians - Your Choice has a great day? Just wondering.Bishonen |tålk18:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Hi, I noticed you reverted my accepted edit onKoeri because the parameter should be 'name' instead of 'caste_name'. I checked theTemplate:Infobox caste documentation, that only specifies a caste_name. Should the template/documentation be adjusted?Rofraja (talk)15:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, that "citation" was made more in jest that anything else (although I am a native speaker, by the way). But the information I provided was in earnest.
I'd love to add a source, but I do not how (I'm on mobile) and what exactly would qualify as a source in this case. I have an article from doxologia.ro, one of the most important Orthodox publications in the country, titled, somewhat jovially, "Sfinții Sfântului Munte" (The Saints of the Holy Mountain), and you'll find there Mount Athos being refered to as the Holy Mountain in several places. If you'd be so kind as to clarify for me whether this is a reliable source and eventually add it for me or at least show me how to add it myself, I'd be very grateful.
https://doxologia.ro/sfintii-sfantului-munte2A02:2F0E:509:2B00:E49B:C452:9DFE:2DFC (talk)12:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit here. I promise it's nothing personal, but it's generally good practice for non-administrators not to add block notices, especially since, with how you signed it, it makes it look as though you revoked their talk page access. I get that you were likely trying to be helpful, but if an admin revokes talk page access and doesn't leave a notice, they probably have a good reason for not doing so (i.e.,sockpuppetry,long-term abuse, et al). I'm not trying to come down on you, just letting you know for future reference. Thank you.JeffSpaceman (talk)12:03, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello,QwertyForest!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!DoubleGrazing (talk)08:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi there. I noticed you removed my tagging of speedy deletion atDraft:Sławomir Suchanowski saying it is coherent English text. I am a native English speaker and not one word of it is in coherent English. It is a load of random characters and letters, with a couple of links, appearing not to link with the subject in any way whatsoever. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags when they clearly should be on an article. You also failed to notify the user that the speedy deletion tag had been removed, suggesting a problem with your edit in the first place.ScrabbleTiles (talk)10:45, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism, hoaxes, fictional material,coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material.(emphasis mine). The first part of the draft also Google-translates as: "Sławomir Suchanowski
Edits likethis generally aren't going to help much. They want attention, soWP:DENY is the best tack to take.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)19:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,I would like to clarify that the account was providing incorrect information. There is no South Korean singer by the name of Zile, and Itzy consists of five members. The account was editing misleading information , which I believe was a misunderstanding. I am confident that I used the correct tag .Additionally, I have noticed that the account’s contributions regarding ITZY have already been reverted. I am awaiting your response and any further clarification on the matter.Thank you.Randompersonediting (✍️•📚)08:41, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I want to delete this file. But I should useF1 will more better. Thanks.Stevencocoboy (talk)10:35, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I found a vandalism onABCya. Can you revert it?Hxd46 (talk)15:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. If they do it again, try reporting them toWP:AIV.QwertyForest (talk)15:55, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]Should you add 'to revision by (User)' when you revert an edit? The pageABCya has no constructive edit.Hxd46 (talk)16:08, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello QwertyForest. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion ofUser:Natalia.itzel.samano/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Drafting article is a valid use of user space and the draft is not so pomotional as to requireWP:TNT. Thank you.Whpq (talk)16:56, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've followed up what you said inbyiur email. Thanks for letting me know about it.JBW (talk)08:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is a throw-away account, so I won't be using it again.H6b5d42s (talk)13:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This page should not be speedily deleted because it is being used for Wikipedia-related activities. Was also nominated by a now-blocked sock. --QwertyForest (talk)17:04, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Would you like to review my GA nomination of Mario Kart 7?TzarN64 (talk)20:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Keep up the good work. I see you've had pieces of advice from established editors. If you feel it would benefit you, take a look atWikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/AcademyKnitsey (talk)17:08, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi, I've just reverted your reversal ofPrivat Group lead editing. It's common knowledge, that the bank is a state-owned. Please, have a look at the articlePrivatBank.Thank you78.81.123.235 (talk)08:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have granted your account anIP block exemption. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia throughfull blocks affecting yourIP address when you are logged in.
Please read the pageWikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section onIP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.PhilKnight (talk) 19:51, 12 August 2025 (UTC)PhilKnight (talk)19:51, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed yourG15 speedy deletion nomination ofDraft:GloCritterz, which I have deleted. Good catch! However, I noticed you didn't inform the editor about the speedy deletion nomination. Make sure you're informing editors before they have their work deleted so they can learn Wikipedia's policies. :)Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)13:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Self-trout I don't know how I forgot that. I've now checked Twinke and it looks like it still doesn't have G15, so I'll have to be careful to look for who created it. Best regards,QwertyForest (talk)19:02, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, QwertyForest,
Unless the article has been tagged with a BLPPROD tag, once it has been de-PROD'd, it can't be re-PROD'd again, for any reason. BLPPRODs are different because they are wholely dependent on references and sources but with regular PRODs, please don't put a PROD tag back after it has been removed. It has to go toWP:AFD next. Thank you.LizRead!Talk!21:24, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
