It is approximately1:26 PM in this user's locale. (Purge to update.)

This user talk page might bewatched by friendlytalk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

This page is archived for the years2015,2016.

Noting your tag for more references. I have this on my watchlist. Not saying the article can not be improved, but was there some specific part of the article caught your eye? (A general template is possibly not ideal for an article which already has footnotes and in-line notes?) I own a few of the books needed, so possibly can have a look tomorrow.--Andrew Lancaster (talk)22:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew Lancaster:, thank you for responding, and so quickly! I often try to go back to the talk page of an article I tag and explain the reasoning, but had a few hardware issues in the meantime. Specifically, seeing as how Books 1-7 had no citations, I thought the references were a bit lacking; the rest of the citations are confined to the last book, a comparison to more later works (especially Il Principe), and comparative commentary. The latter two are obviously more easily cited, despite the popularity of the foundational work itself. But what initially caught my eye was the unqualified statement, while undoubtedly true:

"That Babylon was conquered on the night of a festival by diverting the Euphrates River from its channel is also stated by Herodotus (1.191).(This is significantly different to the events as they are currently understood.)"

While that's accurate, I think such a statement needs a secondary source, and likely more than one (unless the citation comprehensively addresses exactly that point). I think Gibbon touches on it when discussing Julius Caesar, but since almost the entirety of my personal library is packed away, it wasn't a quick-ish fix for me.

It's not urgent business, especially as many classical articles (especially those on extant literature from antiquity) are lacking citations, and the article might stilltechnically qualify as a stub. But I thought it might benefit from the maintenance tag all the same, as it probably gets a bit more traffic than some others. I know some people find them an eyesore, though.

And thank you, again, for being so generous in offering to do legwork. I find the task of filling in references to existing prose, especially when confined to online research, rather tedious myself (albeit necessary).Quinto Simmaco (talk)17:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Keep in mind I am not promising :). Concerning just sourcing the narrative summary I guess that is a job for when someone has time to go through it, but not of the highest priority. That comment about Babylon is well spotted because implies secondary literature. I am aware of the fact that Herodotus tells the story differently, but not of modern secondary commentary. I suppose there must be some! --Andrew Lancaster (talk)08:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what we have in the specialised article on the same subject:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Opis#Aftermath--Andrew Lancaster (talk)08:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Beheading in Islam.Legobot (talk)04:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Political positions of Donald Trump.Legobot (talk)04:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:And you are lynching Negroes.Legobot (talk)04:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Korean ethnic nationalism.Legobot (talk)04:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Radha Madhav Dham.Legobot (talk)04:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Johor Bahru.Legobot (talk)04:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above page was tagged for speedy deletion perWP:CSD#U2 as an user page of a non-existent user. Although the page indicated that it would be for a bot run by you, since you never registered the QuackBot account I went ahead and deleted the page. If you do decide to register the account and want the page back, let me know and I will restore it. Thanks.–Grondemar01:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Real Irish Republican Army.Legobot (talk)04:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Saudi Arabia.Legobot (talk)04:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:List of common misconceptions.Legobot (talk)04:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Christmas.Legobot (talk)04:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Francis Spellman.Legobot (talk)04:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Nobel Oil Group.Legobot (talk)04:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Kfar Ahim.Legobot (talk)04:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Euphoria.Legobot (talk)04:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Dominion of Canada.Legobot (talk)04:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Atrocities in the Congo Free State.Legobot (talk)04:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Poland.Legobot (talk)04:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Ibn Tumart.Legobot (talk)04:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:British Empire.Legobot (talk)04:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Al-Raqqah.Legobot (talk)04:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Political appointments of Donald Trump.Legobot (talk)04:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Germany.Legobot (talk)04:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Government of the Republic of China.Legobot (talk)04:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Battle of France.Legobot (talk)04:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Robert Sungenis.Legobot (talk)04:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Operation Storm.Legobot (talk)04:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Taiwan.Legobot (talk)04:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia:Village pump (policy).Legobot (talk)04:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, January–June 2016.Legobot (talk)04:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography.Legobot (talk)04:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Self-hating Jew.Legobot (talk)04:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Buffalo–Niagara Falls metropolitan area.Legobot (talk)04:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Kara-Khanid Khanate.Legobot (talk)04:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Harem.Legobot (talk)04:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Shakya.Legobot (talk)04:23, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2017.Legobot (talk)04:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Cold War II.Legobot (talk)04:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, Quinto. We could really use an Editor who can quickly review the TALK section, determine what the consensus is about the lead, and confirm that to the group debating a few issues.

There was a photo, of anOld Order Mennonite buggy - taken nearby by not right in West Montrose - but after a lot of argument, pro and con, I gave in and deleted that. So ignore any Talk items about that.The only current dispute is about the lead which is really quite brief; you will find a few Talk threads about it.

Here is a summary of the situation as I see it:

This article hadnot a single citation until March 22, 2017 when I first read it. I added new content and many citations.Now, the argument is about the lead. An editor (who worked on the article extensively prior to March 22) complained about the reliability of the sources; we seemed to get consensus in Talk that theyare reliable.

He then objected to the content of the lead - although it was much the same as it was prior to my involvement.

He then said the sources do not support the content of the text. We were waiting for other involved editors to provide their comments about his new objections. He chose not to wait and deleted much of the lead and citations.I reverted that.

Perhaps I am biased but that's the way I see developments. Fresh eyes may help move toward a consensus, one way or the other. Cheers,Peter K Burian (talk)16:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:2017.Legobot (talk)04:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:2017.Legobot (talk)04:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Historicity of Jesus.Legobot (talk)04:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Algerian War.Legobot (talk)04:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:State atheism.Legobot (talk)04:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Oradour-sur-Glane massacre.Legobot (talk)04:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Old Norse religion.Legobot (talk)04:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Galkayo.Legobot (talk)04:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Malta convoys.Legobot (talk)04:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Mausoleum of Abu Huraira.Legobot (talk)04:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Tulle massacre.Legobot (talk)04:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting.Legobot (talk)04:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Linda Sarsour.Legobot (talk)04:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Family International.Legobot (talk)04:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Limes.Legobot (talk)04:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:Recent years.Legobot (talk)04:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onCategory talk:Years by country.Legobot (talk)04:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Linda Sarsour.Legobot (talk)04:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers.Legobot (talk)04:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while since we last spoke that one time, and since I noticed you were around again, I thought I would say hello. Feel free to come by again some time and we can catch up. Cheers,SwisterTwistertalk06:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heya,SwisterTwister! Thank you for the courteous hello. I'll be a little more active on Wikipedia in the next few weeks. While that mainly means mainspace content and copyediting, I'll very likely be dropping by the IRC channels as well. I'd be happy to catch up then. :) (PS, apologies for the old-fashioned ping).Quinto Simmaco (talk)04:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Turkey.Legobot (talk)04:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Catalan Republic (2017).Legobot (talk)04:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:2017 Las Vegas shooting.Legobot (talk)04:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Continent.Legobot (talk)04:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries.Legobot (talk)04:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:British Jews.Legobot (talk)04:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:New Albion.Legobot (talk)04:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Flag of Turkey.Legobot (talk)04:24, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quinto Simmaco. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Charles, Prince of Wales.Legobot (talk)04:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Ned Kelly.Legobot (talk)04:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Kashmir conflict.Legobot (talk)04:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Church of Satan.Legobot (talk)04:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Ireland.Legobot (talk)04:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:List of sovereign states.Legobot (talk)04:25, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:The Bible and violence.Legobot (talk)04:26, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Buffalo, New York.Legobot (talk)04:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Manzanar.Legobot (talk)04:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onTalk:Battle of Mosul (2016–2017).Legobot (talk)04:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thefeedback request service is asking for participation inthis request for comment onWikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers.Legobot (talk)04:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Quinto Simmaco. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties ofUnited States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented onWikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally,Colonial America, theConfederate States, theRepublic of Texas, multiplestates and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December,WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators onall Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receiveawards. Whether you want to claim theGold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited toparticipate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructionshere

Sent byZLEA at23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hi Quinto Simmaco. I wonder if you could help me by reviewing the above draft. It has been declined under WP:NPOV, but when I asked the administrator who declined it if they could point to a particular sentence or passage that violated the principle of neutrality, they admitted they couldn't point to a single one. They did however say that what concerns them is that I might be leaving out pertinent information because of my declared link to the subject of the piece. The only advice they could offer was to suggest I seek guidance from somebody on WikiProject Religion (you can read our conversationhere). Reading your profile, you seemed like a suitable person to ask. It would be greatly appreciated if you could give me your thoughts about what can be done to this piece to make it acceptable.Danthedervish (talk)16:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheEditor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weeklyEditor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. Theresponse from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up a citation.

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, bysubmitting your nomination forEditor of the Week today!MediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dominican literature has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs)01:47, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Monastic literature has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)07:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Molossians on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at00:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Rajput on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at15:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:2020 Bangalore riots on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at21:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Catholic Church sexual abuse cases on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at06:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Historical policy of the Law and Justice party on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at06:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Quinto Simmaco! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to theFeedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

1. Go to theFeedback Request Service page.
2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under theRfC and/orGA headings.
3. Paste{{Frs user|Quinto Simmaco|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), wherelimit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask onthe Feedback Request Service talk page, or onthe Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page.Thank you!Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]