This user is busy inreal life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

May 2007 – December 2010 2011 January 2012 - February 2012 March 2012 - May 2012 June 2012 - July 2012 August 2012 - September 2012 October 2012 - November 2012 December 2012 - January 2013 February 2013 - May 2013 June 2013 - July 2013 August 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - March 2014 April 2014 - June 2014 July 2014 - August 2014 September 2014 - October 2014 November 2014 - December 2014 January 2015 - February 2015 March 2015 - May 2015 June 2015 - July 2015 August 2015 - September 2015 October 2015 - December 2015 January 2016 - March 2016 April 2016 - May 2016 June 2016 - July 2016 August 2016 - September 2016 October 2016 - December 2016 January 2017 - March 2017 April 2017 - June 2017 July 2017 - September 2017 October 2017 - December 2017 January 2018 - March 2018 April 2018 - June 2018 July 2018 - September 2018 October 2018 - December 2019 January 2019 - March 2019 April 2019 - June 2019 July 2019 - September 2019 October 2019 - December 2019 January 2020 - March 2020 April 2020 - June 2020 July 2020 - September 2020 October 2020 - December 2020 January 2021 - March 2021 April 2021 - June 2021 July 2021 - September 2021 October 2021 - December 2021 January 2022 - March 2022 April 2022 - June 2022 July 2022 - September 2022 October 2022 - December 2022 Janaury 2023 - March 2023 March 2023 - June 2023 July 2023 - September 2023 October 2023 - December 2023 January 2024 - March 2024 April 2024 - June 2024 July 2024 - September 2024 October 2024 - December 2024 January 2025 - March 2025 April 2025 - June 2025 July 2025 - September 202

Ponyo, if you have a moment, can you keepMTB18 (talk ·contribs) away from2025 Moroccan Gen Z protests? This nonsense with the infobox is out of hand!   –Skywatcher68 (talk)22:15, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What evenis that?? Some sort of AI slop? P-blocked for a week.--Ponyo^{bons mots}22:18, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo, I noticed you salted the pagesGizelle Bryant andGizelle A Bryant for persistent sockpuppetry. I created a draft article for Bryant atDraft:Gizelle Bryant, as I do believe she is notable enough for an article. Would you be willing to review the draft and recreate the article? Thanks in advance.Mellamelina (talk)00:09, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft you've written is very similar to the article that was deleted based on consensus atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gizelle Bryant. In fact, the deleted article has even more content and assertions of notability than your draft, so I'm not so sure it would survive another AfD. That being said, the draft is protected against recreation by s specificsock, so if the draft is reviewed and approved I (or another admin) can lower the protection so it can be moved.--Ponyo^{bons mots}16:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo, I found your page from a few days ago when you blockedStudDoctor9000 (talk ·contribs) for being a sockpuppet (I was involved in the conversation that originally led to the master being blocked). Apologies if I should take this straight to a notice board, but I was wondering if we could get some page protection atSalt Lake City International Airport? There's an IP editor who, every few days, edits the page with the same edits. The edits are not constructive and I have constantly reverted the edits since the user started doing this, which has been going on for almost 2 years now (here's one I reverted from October 2023:[1]). I eventually brought it to the talk page over a year ago in June 2024 (seen here:[2]) which eventually led to the page being protected for 2 months[3]. This stopped the IP for a bit, but they eventually started up their edits again this past May[4] and have been doing it consistently ever since. I've left constant talk page messages and warnings on several of the IPs, but the user never responds and they have never once used an edit summary. Just wondering what you think would be the best way to have this handled or if we can get the page protected again (for longer this time if possible). Again, I apologize if I should go straight to a notice board, I'm just not sure the best course of action given how long this has been going on. Thanks! (VenFlyer98 (talk)23:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC))[reply]

The IP range is a small and consistent one (seethese contribs) so a partial block would be a simple solution. I was a bit conflicted on this though as it is, at heart, a content dispute. That being said, while there was no consensus for the naming atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Archive 20#Washington National Name, there is a very narrow consensus for the Washington–National link atTalk:Salt Lake City International Airport. As the IP has never made an argument at all for their preferred version, I've partial blocked the range from the article.--Ponyo^{bons mots}15:41, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Ponyo, atDalal (surname), I have reverted this edit:[5] which you can see at[6], but for some reason, the history shows the revert has been undone, even when it was not (maybe because of removing the references header at[7].) Can you fix it please? Thanks, ~Rafael (He, him) •talk •guestbook •projects22:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't change automatic filter log notes.--Ponyo^{bons mots}22:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo is there someone who can? ~Rafael (He, him) •talk •guestbook •projects22:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverted part of your own edit, so the filter tag is correct. There is no reason to remove it - it has no impact on anything.--Ponyo^{bons mots}22:13, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Thought you should be aware that it appearsUser:AreyanT101 is block evading withthis edit. I'm not particularly interested in playing whack-a-mole with however many IPs this person will inevitably use, so I've requested temporary ECP.GSK(talk •edits)02:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. I see thatToBeFree has amended the block.--Ponyo^{bons mots}20:12, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was independently of any block evasion. I just think they should be required to create an unblock request and thought you might have been afraid of blocking indefinitely in response to someone reverting you. Thanks for the ping!~ ToBeFree (talk)23:49, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ponyo! I see you regularly revert this longtime bugger who originally edited asUser:Abdulaziz999982 and later resorted to socks. Can you please use your powers and check if these three accountsUser:BDN2,User:BD85 andUser:Marzst are somehow the same person? Because like inDeidré Laurens, the IP i mentioned edited in which they changed the subject title due to a move which was very recently done by BDN2, resulting in a revert by myself due to being arbitrary and lacked consensus for the new title. Thankyou.zoglophie^•talk•16:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More : Lookhere, their edits are one after another, changing names without any consensus in the respective talk pages of the subjects. Same in 2024 African Badminton Championships page history. I'm sure there are many more examples which definitely prove both of them are actually the same and longtime vandal Abdul.zoglophie^•talk•02:36, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Zoglophie: could you please start anSPI oulining the suspected accounts and the evidence? A Clerk will review and action follow-up in necessary.--Ponyo^{bons mots}20:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ponyo,

On behalf of the Kwara State University Wikimedia Fan Club, I would like to request review and unblocking of one of our members’ accounts on wikipedia.Her accounts appear to have been blocked, and we believe this may have happened unintentionally. This user is active contributor in Wikimedia projects and members of our university club

User:Grace0011We sincerely appreciate your time and support, and we assure you that our team will continue to uphold Wikimedia’s guidelines and standards going forward.Pet002 (talk)11:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pet002: There was no error in the blocking, and the reason for the block is noted on Grace0011's user talk page. Grace0011 wasincorrectly linking hundreds upon hundreds of common terms contrary to Wikipedia's Manual of Style. This was brought to their attention repeatedly, including with a short-term block, yet they continued without responding to any of the concerns raised by fellow editors. The path forward to an unblock is for Grace0011 to post an appeal on their talk page that demonstrates an understanding as to why they were blocked and will communicate with others when concerns are raised, as is required on this collaborative project. This is further explained atWP:GAB.--Ponyo^{bons mots}19:04, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo,

Thank you for this information

Is it on her talk page or somewhere else?Pet002 (talk)20:02, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pet002:, you can find the informationhere.--Ponyo^{bons mots}20:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ponyo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You canremove this notice at any time by removing the{{You've got mail}} or{{ygm}} template.

–LuniZunie ツ_(talk)18:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LuniZunie: Are you sure that you hit send? Nothing has come through on my side.--Ponyo^{bons mots}18:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure, are you part of oversight? The mail was sent there.–LuniZunie ツ_(talk)18:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That will go through OTRS. You don't need to provide email notifications when emailing the oversight team as it will show up in the queue automatically.--Ponyo^{bons mots}18:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Apologies for that then.–LuniZunie ツ_(talk)19:01, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem!--Ponyo^{bons mots}19:02, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You recently placed a CU block on2A00:1370:8186:3825:F8D8:A280:79A3:63F8(talk ·contribs ·WHOIS). Allow me to point out this duck,128.71.94.4(talk ·contribs ·WHOIS), (diffs:[8],[9]) and also2607:740:27:0:9B2E:9D65:19F7:F56B(talk ·contribs ·WHOIS) (diffs:[10],[11])Geogene (talk)19:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both blocked; I'll look at some semi-protections as well.--Ponyo^{bons mots}19:16, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Geogene (talk)19:26, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ponyo, Please kindly checkUser talk:Grace0011 and Help her with neccessary stepss, Thank You.Pet002 (talk)20:39, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pet002: I've already followed up there and left a question this morning that has not yet been answered.--Ponyo^{bons mots}20:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check out2600:1010:B212:7235:4CB7:8F50:5B0B:AD27?–LuniZunie ツ_(talk)20:42, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i noticed that you have blocked sockpuppets, however, you are putting this template on the bottom of the page, which is WRONG. Next time, put this template on a section that says "October 2025". On AquilatorG10's talk page you put the template on a completely unreleated topic!🧀 CheeseGuy 🧀11:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CheeseGuy164: Now you wouldn't happen to be AquilatorG10, would you?ChildrenWillListen (🐄 talk,🫘 contribs)11:43, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged and blocked by another admin as14 novembre. --Yamla (talk)11:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked128.4.0.0/16 (block range ·block log (global) ·WHOIS (partial)) after my report atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrew5/Archive#12 September 2025 - the rangeblock expired and I think the Andrew5 activity continues to be obvious (and started up almost immediately after the expiration). Not sure if I should go to SPI again.wizzito |say hello!02:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest you also look at the history ofTropical Storm Mario (2025).wizzito |say hello!02:34, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked.--Ponyo^{bons mots}20:43, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles |November 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with#NOV25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later usingHashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part?Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourselfhere.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)07:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Was about to warnUser:BACHIR0000000000009999999999999999999NINIPATALOPATALOPOPOLOLOMOMOABDEL666666K77777777 for the ef stuff they got into. -Flower24.155.147.109 (talk)19:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you were a step ahead. Thank you.CNMall41 (talk)22:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. I saw your message, starting digging through their contribs, and other StayCalmOnTress socks kept popping up in the histories. Soyou were the one ahead, I just caught up!--Ponyo^{bons mots}22:31, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Noindexed pages