User talk:Pjesnik21
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hi, hoping to find some compromise on this article -- can we discuss further onTalk:Dubravka_Ugrešić if needed?MichelCastagne (talk)
Hello, Pjesnik21. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,Nikol Bulat, for deletion because it's abiography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Nikol Bulat to be deleted, pleaseadd a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note onmy talk page.
Thanks,Wgolf (talk)16:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toNikol Bulat may have broken thesyntax by modifying 10 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show⇨) |
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)20:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Nikol Bulat.jpg, which you've attributed tohttp://www.tportal.hr/showtime/estrada/97311/Seksi-Nikol-Bulat-i-zeljko-Pervan-se-dohvatili-alata.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created inyour upload log.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Green Giant (talk)10:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofSahara (music band), and it appears to include material copied directly fromhttp://www.andreasite.eu/?page_id=1149.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is notpublic domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)CorenSearchBot (talk)20:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Tvoje Lice Zvuči Poznato (Croatia) Logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set ofimage copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag fromthis list, click onthis link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message onWikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk)00:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text fromList of House of Anubis episodes into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.If trying for a split, seeWP:SPLIT and propose one on the source page. Then do it properly if there is no opposition to the proposal.Geraldo Perez (talk)16:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:The Touchstone of Ra (2013 film poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)01:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The articleNikol Bulat has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Natureium (talk)18:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pjesnik21. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did atAlisson, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Mattythewhite (talk)22:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleEngland–Croatia football rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/England–Croatia football rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Jmorrison230582 (talk)09:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onKim Petras discography; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Silovaću tebe i tetkovića u šupčine do smrti jazavčino rvacka Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.bonadeacontributionstalk19:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploadingFile:Misici - Senidah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCroatia–Serbia football rivalry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesRed card andAleksandar Mitrović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)07:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDejan Lovren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJoe Gomez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)08:28, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Croatia national football team crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedMario Mandžukić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)10:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atEra Istrefi shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –Βατο (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)peško prestani šiljit kitevinu na šiptarku i prebaci se na olmovicu— Precedingunsigned comment added by93.143.82.58 (talk)17:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedČetiri godine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDanijel Popović (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)14:57, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit toCesc Fàbregas does not have anedit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. Thesummaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With aWikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by settingPreferences →Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.Thanks!Walter Görlitz (talk)20:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNikola Vlašić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRussian Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)16:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to explain why I have reverted your edit on the graph in this article. It is much easier to edit and to change the graph with section for months rather than to have one section for all days, which could lead to a cluster in which it is hard to differentiate what day is associated with the corresponding value. Thanks --Tuvixer (talk)10:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onMaya Berović; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Vanjagenije(talk)21:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk)22:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require directreliable sources for additions. For details seethe content guideline,the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.
Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as theburden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.
Thank you.Toddst1(talk)18:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atBojan Krkić, you may beblocked from editing.Mattythewhite (talk)19:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did toCroats of Bosnia and Herzegovina, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use thesandbox for that. Thank you.——Serial#12:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk)13:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDejan Lovren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRussian Cup.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--WEBDuB (talk)20:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I see you added new information about the 25th anniversary. But quotes such as “ Minister Vulin stated: "And whichever Serb they buy or bring over to a celebration of extermination of Serbs and place him alongside Ante Gotovina and other Ustashas, they won't be able to change the truth about the civil war they provoked, about massacring and killing Serbian children in refugee columns."” Should there not be some follow up to the factual validity of what Vucic is claimed? Otherwise readers would take all these quotes as fact.OyMosby (talk)14:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just added all significant information I could find in Croatian and Serbian media. I have no idea what other information I should to add.Pjesnik21 (talk)15:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPersecution of Croats in Serbia during Yugoslav Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSlankamen.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Senidah on MAC 2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim offair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
_Logo.png){kind=link}
_Logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg%26amp%3baction%3dedit%26amp%3bredlink%3d1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Aspects (talk)00:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Senidah on MAC 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Rina Sawayama - Come Des Garçons (Like The Boys) (Pabllo Vittar x Brabo Remix).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCroatia national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIvo Grbić.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atKiril Simonovski. Your edits appear to bedisruptive and have been or will bereverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia'spolicies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result inloss of editing privileges. Thank you.Jingiby (talk)19:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2020–21 GNK Dinamo Zagreb season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesFree transfer andBojan Knežević.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2020–21 NK Osijek season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageOlimpija Ljubljana.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Senidah - Ko je.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)04:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Senidah - Piješ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)04:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! The Daily Mail reference you added atLuka Modrić needs to go. SeeWP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards,Robby.is.on (talk)22:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unreferenced orpoorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did atIvan Rakitić. Content of this nature could be regarded asdefamatory and is in violation ofWikipedia policy. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.Sakiv (talk)22:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pjesnik21. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Pocket Palma".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!00:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,@Pjesnik21:, Pjesnik21, sorry to interrupt, can you help me please, I have no idea why the new edits at Croatia national football team got reverted for "vandalism". What? It's not vandalism. I'm trying to rearrange some parts of the article, omit some unnecessary stuff and fixing the tone a little bit, if you see fit, can you help return the article to the version at 15:52, 9 October 2020 that was edited by you, please? Thanks.2402:9D80:20D:53F6:73D6:F832:87A:BF0B (talk)13:10, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey do you hear me? Pls help me as I said above.42.113.119.56 (talk)12:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need to edit the article as it is good as it already isPjesnik21 (talk)13:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Senidah - Viva Mahalla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Dodaj uspijeh Hrvatskih rukometašica u članakCinderella (sports), i to u podlistak Examples of Cinderellas that did not win the championship. Unaprijed hvala i sve čestitke kraljicama.Jolicnikola (talk)13:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedMirko Hrgović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCroatian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I've seen your edits onSergej Jakirović regarding his nationality. He has dual citizenship, Bosnian and Croatian and he will be marked as that. When it comes to flag icons, I'm gonna be putting the Bosnian flag since he is mainly reffered to as Bosnian by the media, and when he wasMaribor manager his flag icon was Bosnian and was portrayed by Slovenian media as Bosnian. He is also refferd to as Bosnian on many websites, mainlySoccerway.com andSofascore, so please keep in mind putting the Bosnian flag by his name. We'll keep the Bosnian and Croatian nationality on his main page. Thanks in advance!User:Kirbapara (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2020 (CET)
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Tribistovo poisoning until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
—Brigade Piron (talk)20:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onRené Redzepi; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.SamSailor17:34, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did toRené Redzepi. Doing so violates Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.The Banner talk11:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDaniel (Montenegrin singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMontenegrins in Croatia.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pozdrav Pjesniče, this issue has been debated several times and the outcome always favoured to write just city and country in infobox for Yugoslav cases, and write proper details like banovinas, republics and autonomous provinces in prose in the article, Some of the main reasons were the insistance of Kosovar editors in removing SR Serbia and adding Kosovo, or practical exemples like the lenght of SR Bosnia and Herzegovina,FkpCascais (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Wherever you see a republic in infobox be free to remove it, and this is how it should be displayed,exemple´FkpCascais (talk)19:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello@Pjesnik21: I hope you are well. It is a shame the disagreement we have had on theDua Lipa article. What I want to ask you is that you be a little more neutral, you are supporting to put a version of the Lipa ethnic controversy where there are conclusions like "alludes to the Illyrian theory of the origin of the Albanians" when none of the sources even mention the term "Illyrian" nor is the alleged nationality of Twitter users mentioned in any of the sources and is therefore in breach ofWP:NEUTRAL andWP:FORUM. I have reviewed your contributions and your editions are about articles related toYugoslavia and the countries that used to form it, which makes me think that you are Serbian or Croatian and coincidentally the dispute we are having is about a subject that has to do with Serbs. You have a history of edit wars on articles related to Yugoslavia and its countries, which makes me think that you act so that your point of view is reflected in Dua Lipa's article, but Wikipedia is not a forum to post our personal opinions about a topic. I will presume good faith and assume that you want to collaborate to improve this project, and therefore I ask you to to only improve the article instead of promoting biased and not very neutral information. That's why I ask you to comply with the policies of this encyclopedia or else I will have to report you. Thank you.Alexismata7 (talk)03:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Pjesnik21,
I quickly revertedthis with the comment "Vandalism", which was a bit hasty, as I realized afterwards. Sorry about that – usually when just the word "Nazi" is added anywhere, it tends to be vandalism!
I see you have already reverted my revert. I still believe your edit is not ideal, and should be "German Reich" instead. But I will do a bit of research what the style rules are pertaining to that here in the en-WP.
P.S.: As the son of a Munich born Father who fought in WW2, I am painfully aware of who was in power 1942, when Haneke was born. No missed history lessons there, nor an attempt to sugar-coat anything, by preferring the official designation of the time, as is the style rule in the German WP. --Sprachraum (talk)01:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
—NapHit (talk)16:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atNovak Djokovic, you may beblocked from editing.Theonewithreason (talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The content that I added atNovak Djokovic is sourced in the text.Pjesnik21 (talk)11:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unlike Djokovic, there is no credible source about Modric's and Ivanisevic's origin speculations. Furthermore, if Djokovic's mother is Croatian, then Djokovicis a Serbian person of Croatian descent. That is how genetics work.Pjesnik21 (talk)11:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Novak has a father, but category "Serbian people of Serbian descent" would not make any sense, right? Djokovic confirmed his heritage himself in a2006 interview withSlobodna Dalmacija. It is also confirmed by his maternal grandfather in a2020 interview withNova S. All sources about Modric's and Ivanisevic's origin are Serbian tabloids, which are both biased and untrustworthy.Pjesnik21 (talk)12:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Slobodna Dalmacija is not a tabloid. Plus, unlike Serbian tabloids that do not cite their sources and just pull stuff out of their ass, thisSlobodna Dalmacija article is aninterview with Novak himself, meaning he is saying that himself. Also, here is avideo of Dijana Đoković saying that she is a Croat when she was a guest atBalkanskom ulicom.Pjesnik21 (talk)13:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Slobodna Dalmacija are not a tabloid at all, let alone the worst one. But that is irrelevant at this point. Dijana says that her husband's relatives misunderstood that she said she is a singer (pevačica), when in reality she said she is a Croat (Hrvatica). No discussion is needed, one of Novak's ancestors is Croatian, therefore he is a person of Croatian descent.Pjesnik21 (talk)15:35, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, nobody denied his Serbian roots. It was you who denied his Croatian roots when you removed his page fromCategory:Serbian people of Croatian descent.Pjesnik21 (talk)15:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atMateo Kovačić.Mattythewhite (talk)00:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A da ti napraviš članak o Jadranki Barjaktarović, da prevedeš sa srpskog jezika? Ne bi bilo zgoreg. Uglavnom, unapred hvala.Jolicnikola (talk)23:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDavid Frankfurter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBritish Mandate of Palestine.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atRita Ora shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Binksternet (talk)20:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atGrigor Dimitrov. —J. M. (talk)17:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPërparim Hetemaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBaltic Cup.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In future, do not remove extra sources when they are needed to prove a chart position, as you didhere atTinashe discography. You will be reverted and warned in future. Thanks.Ss11204:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedFocus (Ariana Grande song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageHowling.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I saw you added the international stats table forJosip Juranović. Thanks! Going forward, please use the standard table layout atWikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. It is the result of past discussions of the community of football editors atWikipedia:WikiProject Football. Kind regards,Robby.is.on (talk)14:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, intoChlöe. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits thepage history, which islegally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to bemoved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account isfour days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may behidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates aredirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions atrequested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them atWikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.LizRead!Talk!16:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have noticed that youoften edit without using anedit summary. Please do your best toalways fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box inyour preferences. Thanks!SNUGGUMS (talk /edits)14:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I restore most of your recent edits but you don't need to linking common words such as "rapper" or "casino" in articles, a lot of people already know what these things are. Common cities like New York City and Las Vegas don't have to be linked either.TheAmazingPeanuts (talk)22:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding your addition ofPitchfork to the ratings template onAnimal (Kesha album), please keep the reviews to 10 per what it says atTemplate:Album ratings. Remove one if there are already 10. Thank you.Ss11212:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really think this helps? It doesn't. Most of those articles mention the song inother sections, ingreater detail, than its listing in the track listing section. Please stop doing this. I will revert this if I see you doing it any further.Ss11212:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mTbhotch. Your recent edit(s) to the pageMarry the Night appear to have added incorrect information, so they have beenreverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, pleasecite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use yoursandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.(CC)Tbhotch™21:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onCategory:Macedonian people of Ukrainian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.LizRead!Talk!18:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Baš si glup k'o kurčina, majke ti se ustaške najebem— Precedingunsigned comment added by109.175.38.135 (talk)22:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm created article ofJadranka Barjaktarović so i would ask you to fix if there are any mistakes and delete the unnecessary parts if there are any. Of course I made it with a prefix until that article is fully ready.Jolicnikola (talk)23:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created,Marina Tucaković songwriting discography, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.signed,Iflaq(talk)17:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atMilutin Milanković.Theonewithreason (talk) 25. November 2021 (UTC)
_(Pabllo_Vittar_x_Brabo_Remix).jpeg%26amp%3baction%3dedit%26amp%3bredlink%3d1){kind=link}
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GiantSnowman07:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply] | The Original Barnstar |
| I am a great admirer of your work regarding Croatian football. Your work has inspired me to create Croatian Wikipedia pages for all missing Dinamo Zagreb players. Recently, I have even started updating player stats on a weekly basis, just like you. I have translated dozens of English Wikipedia articles which you have edited and expanded them to the point where they are bigger than their English language counterparts (e.g.hr:Dani Olmo, e.g.hr:Lovro Majer). Currently I am in the process of expandinghr:Mislav Oršić. I'd also like to invite you back to hr.wiki (Croatian Wikipedia). Hr.wiki isn't as bad as it was previously. All the bad POV admins have either been banned or have left the project (e.g. Kubura, SpeedyGonsales). If you wish not to return, we could at least cooperate in cross-language creation and expansion of articles. Cheers!Croxyz (talk)19:59, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCroatia national football team results (2020–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAleksandr Golovin.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia'sbiographies of living persons policy by insertingunsourced orpoorly sourceddefamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --Hipal (talk)19:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded thehr.wiki article forPetar Bočkaj. Fell free to translate it. P.S. idk if you saw the award which I gave you.Croxyz (talk)00:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Pjesnik21, I appreciate your edits on Croatian footballers includingMarcelo Brozović,Šime Vrsaljko,Ivan Perišić,Mario Pašalić, and more. Could you please follow the WFP MOS guidelines for editing the stats table though? Divisions are really not supposed to be rowspanned at all as it looks better on mobile devices, plus the consensus is to not rowspan across different clubs at all. Cheers.Rupert1904 (talk)23:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDream Doll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAbsurdist.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unreferenced orpoorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia aboutliving (or recently deceased) persons, as you did toGrimes (musician). Thank you.Suonii180 (talk)14:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atCharli XCX discography, you may beblocked from editing.Ss11223:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You unlink pop music but then thinkall these other words should be linked...you need to readWP:OVERLINK. Please try to avoid linking in quotes, especially this many to very common terms in a musical context (beat, chorus, crescendo...really?). Thank you.Ss11212:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pjesnik21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Marina Tucaković songwriting discography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)18:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atSo Sad So Sexy shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Ss11214:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A chain of links is preferred in chronologies, and weshould not have multiple chronologies per the consensus atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 62#Multiple infobox chronologies, so yes, itdoes make sense.Ss11214:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pjesnik21. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Marina Tucaković songwriting discography".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!17:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Pjesnik21, may I remind you to provide a source for the information you added on Dejan Ljubičić's brother? Thank you,Modussiccandi (talk)10:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On the one hand, you are partially correct,Billboard 'Hits of the World' charts track both streaming and downloads.WP:RECORDCHARTS says to use charts that are recognised in their country as a measure of popularity and success. These charts are in their infancy and there's no evidence that they are widely accepted in the countries they are published for. The HDU chart is the long established chart for Croatia and is widely accepted as a measure of a song's success. Therefore it becomesWP:INDISCRIMINATE to include multiple charts for the sake of it. You need consensus to include it. PerWP:BRD, you werebold, you werereverted (which means there's no census), the responsibility is now on you todiscuss and get a consensus.>>Lil-unique1(talk) —12:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onNight Time, My Time. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing. -FlightTime(open channel)21:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedLana (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEquestrian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNilüfer Yanya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNilüfer.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Much more ofthis and I'm reporting you to an administrator. As I have told and linked you to before, Wikipedia's guidelines state "be conservative when linking within quotations" perMOS:LINKSTYLE, and you apparentlystill cannot stop yourself from adding links to basically every term in quotes. Enough is enough. Next time I see ridiculous edits likethis you're being reported.Ss11207:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding, removing orchanging genres, as you did toAll Up in Your Mind, without providing asource or establishing aconsensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your ownpoint of view are considereddisruptive. Thank you.Ss11210:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atMegan Thee Stallion discography, you may beblocked from editing.Ss11220:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We do not include albums that don't have a link to an article.Queen Radio: Volume 1 will never have an article as its just a playlist of songs that are already released.>>Lil-unique1(talk) —13:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't usually like to block editors for things as minor as overlinking, but your talk page really is concerning. You've received so many unanswered/unaddressed warnings for overlinking, edit warring, unsourced additions, etc. it's unacceptable. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. You can't just be ignoring these concerns and do whatever you want.
Your block expires in1 week when you return, I hope you'll start workingwith other editors, not just ignoring them all the time.Sergecross73msg me14:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain your contributions using a descriptiveedit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did atList of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 2020, may be confused withvandalism. Thank you. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook15:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, another case of looking and not realizing what was going on. Thank you for reverting my edit!TheCartoonEditor(he/him/they)(talk)(contribs)00:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It would be sad to see you blocked over this, but you were asked at least five times before to leave edit summaries, and you refuse toengage in communication, which is mandatory. Please, it would be a shame to lose you as editor, but you were blocked twice before. --Muhandes (talk)09:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2022 FIFA World Cup controversies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page2022 Iranian protests.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCroatia national football team records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCanada national football team.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In case you did not notice those positions arewp:red links. Fix them, please? Your edit results:Defensive Midfielder,Attacking Midfielder. Try usingwp:Show preview. Thank youAdakiko (talk)10:18, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCroatian kuna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKoruna.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For months now, editors have been asking you to communicate about edits you're making. You've refused. People have made simple requests, like stop overlinking articles. You've refused. As I've said, Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Refusing to discuss contentious edits is not an option.
Your account is blocked from editing. All you need to do is respond to this discussion and
If you do this, your account will be unblocked immediately. If you don't, your account will remain blocked. (And any future accounts you create will be blocked on-sight.)
You may need toWP:PING me if this takes you more than a few days to respond.
It's all up to you now.Sergecross73msg me19:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Liverpool F.C. matches in international competitions (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.