My reversion of your edit was intentional. Your source was a forum which deals with rumors, and that is not areliable source in any way. We only take logos fromofficial sources and we do not accept submissions from message board postings. No matter if it's true, we will only accept stories about the logo from reliable media or the network's PR itself, not a forum. Thank you.Nate•(chatter)22:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at thewelcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are consideredvandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may beblocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others.Nate•(chatter)05:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? I was just doing what you were trying to do. I addded citations to all of the informationin the article that doesn't have a valid source.Piepie2 (talk)15:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, you were trying totrying to make a point by adding unneeded fact tags to the article because your source is invalid since it was from a web forum and you weren't happy I removed it because it violates ourWP:NPOV policy. What you did by adding the fact tags is vandalism, and I was justified by removing your low-quality source. Please stop and read our rules for what can be considered a reliable source. Thank you.Nate•(chatter)20:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think you assume good faith at all. Nothing on that page has valid sources. Anybody can make up a contrived history and publish it. It is not right to allow any unsourced information on the page because it could be contrived.Piepie2 (talk)03:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That page hasn't been questioned at all, and it is sourced because it is common sense history even the vaguest of websearches can come up with. Once again, you are trying to make a point and that is not allowed at all. I have also reverted your logo add because it was not from an official source and too small for any use. Please stop.Nate•(chatter)04:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the information on the article is being questioned, by me. However since you believe all of the information on the page is sourceable, you should have no trouble adding sources to everything yourself. In hte meantime I'll be doing the proper thing and adding tags to the unsourced material. Thank you.Piepie2 (talk)18:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding fact tags perWP:Verifiability andWP:No original research isnot vandalism, seeWP:Vandalism to see what is and is not vandalism. Also I removed fact tags and added a refimprove tag as when most of an article is unsourced its better to use a refimprove tag.Powergate92Talk04:12, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did atNick Jr., you will beblocked from editing. You will not keep adding those tags. You are the only one with any issues about the article. You are mad because your source was rejected. Please realize we only usereliable sources and that continually adding inappropriate fact tags is vandalism. Source #1 gives us the premiere date so stop it, now.Nate•(chatter)20:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You do not tell me how I feel. You do not tell me my own intentions. I am the only one with issues about the article. There is nothing wrong with that. I'm going to keep doing what's right because it is m6y right to do what is right.Piepie2 (talk)02:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made toNick at Nite, did not appear to be constructive and has beenautomaticallyreverted byClueBot.

• Please usethe sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, andadministrators have the ability toblock users from editing if they repeatedly engage invandalism.
• Cluebot produces very fewfalse positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, pleasereport it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning:Nick at Nite waschanged byPiepie2(u)(t) deleting 9662 characters on 2010-01-07T20:56:47+00:00 . Thank you.ClueBot (talk)20:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review whatvandalism before I report you for beinguncivil. Remember that Wikipedia is built onconsensus and no one personowns and article.BOVINEBOY2008:)04:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not acuse me of being uncivil, I do not appreciate it. Also I am not a vandal.Piepie2 (talk)06:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I didn't try to accuse you for vandalizing. But labeling my edits as vandalism could be considered uncivil.BOVINEBOY2008:)14:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to maintain civility. Notice I wasn't the one that re-added the color scheme.BOVINEBOY2008:)15:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am civil. Notice you just added a comment under vandalism on my page, when your comment doesn't regard vandalism.Piepie2 (talk)15:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:DannyPhantomDSC00230.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takescopyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine thelicense and thesource of the file. If you know this information, then you can add acopyright tag to theimage description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created inyour upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.Leo04:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture myself...

That's fine, but you still need to specify whatlicense the image is released under.Leo07:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I haven't uploaded a picture in a long time and it looks like some things have changed. Can you tell me exactly what I need to do? ThanksPiepie2 (talk)01:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Piepie2. You have new messages atLeonard^Bloom's talk page.
Message added23:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A tag has been placed onBrainSurge (theme park attraction) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clearcopyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look atWikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.ttonyb (talk)04:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those words were already on Wikipedia for almost a year, and nobody had a problem with it.Piepie2 (talk)04:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:2nd Nickelodeon Universe logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)14:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]