Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:PickleG13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege

[edit]

Today, I visited the page and found that you are in the top of the list with over 9،000 articles! I initially thought that you have created so many pages and you aren't autopatrolled yet. But looking at the stats I can conclude that most of the pages that are highlighted as mainspace articles are actually redirects nominated at RfD (that's a high number!). Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Unfortunately though your redirects' fate would be mass-deletion as far as it goes. Probably the same with the list of users with the most articles created (haven't checked that though) but thanks again for your contributions.ToadetteEdit (talk)05:15, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HiToadetteEdit! Thanks for reaching out. On the list of users with the most articles created, I believe I'm in the top few thousand editors, since I have a large number of active articles unrelated to redirects. The RfD nomination came as a shock to me, although I didn't do it to get my numbers up, but instead to contribute to Wikipedia to the best of my ability. What can I do to get to autopatrol privileges? I would love to continue to expand into the community and contribute, and continue to get better after ten years on Wikipedia.PickleG13 (talk)05:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is a tricky question. The standard for autopatrolled is 25 clean articles. But your recent article creations should comply with the policies, e.g.,WP:V,WP:NPOV,WP:Copyrights etc, and guidelines e.g.WP:N and others. It should rather preferably be the type of article as described atWp:The perfect article. AlthoughWP:GAs are better. That said, if a patroller finds you creating clean articles consistently, they can nominate you for autopatrol atWP:PERM/A. You can also request yourself, although IMO, this is a bit discouraged unless you have created hundreds of pages.ToadetteEdit (talk)05:40, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the advice,ToadetteEdit. I have been credited by Wikipedia with more than 300 articles, but I only believe that I really deserve credit for 109 of those. (This excludes all redirects, and all of these are listed on my page.) Appreciate your help, hope I'll meet the cut someday, and I would love to help you out with any of your own projects in any way that I can!PickleG13 (talk)05:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,PickleG13,
I just thought I'd let you know that ToadetteEdit has been community banned from working on this project. I don't think they gave you any bad advice. But just encourage you that if you are interested in being auto-patrolled, just apply for this permission. If there are issues, then the admin reviewing cases will let you know. But you won't know until you try. Good luck.LizRead!Talk!07:20, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much,Liz! Your encouragement gave me the push I needed to try. Please never hesitate to reach out if you need help with any projects or pages.PickleG13 (talk)20:28, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Great job on all of the redirects you have made!Red Director (talk)22:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much,Red Director! This is so meaningful to me, and I will take care of it with pride.PickleG13 (talk)21:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Script recommendation

[edit]

I have worked on adding categories to your redirects. Some I have not touched as maybe you know more about the subject matter and how to categorize them. I recommend this script to assist you:User:Eejit43/scripts/redirect-helper. Best wishes!Red Director (talk)22:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, PickleG13, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have such an experienced editor as a member of our project. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk)15:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much,Ipigott! I'm looking forward to helping the project. I've experienced problems in the past with creating pages for both living and deceased women on Wikipedia, even ones where notability seems entirely clear, so I will certainly reach out if I need any help.PickleG13 (talk)21:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2025

[edit]
Women in Red|July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343


Online events:

Announcements:

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available viaHumaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
  • 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

Tip of the month:

  • A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements,
    but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk09:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

"Thomas Gilou" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectThomas Gilou has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 18 § Thomas Gilou until a consensus is reached. -SquawkGuard (talk)07:20, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2025

[edit]
Women in Red|August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk)14:51, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi PickleG13, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded theautopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in thenew pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have beenrequested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload ofnew page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevantWikiProject templates,stub tags,categories, andincoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such asRater andStubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia'score content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become anew page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!voorts (talk/contributions)22:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment about2025 California proposed redistricting

[edit]

The page you created at2025 California proposed redistricting has a page about the act already (Election Rigging Response Act), not sure if a merge would be worthy or what, just not sure it needs the two separate pages.Yoblyblob (Talk) :)19:41, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have redirected the page to the proper target as the target was created first. Feel free to merge or anything elseYoblyblob (Talk) :)19:49, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

[edit]
Women in Red|September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as themost active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk)23:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi PickleG13. Thank you for your work onColleen Ferguson. Another editor,SunDawn, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|SunDawn}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawnContact me!00:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi PickleG13. Thank you for your work onRose Dunleavy. Another editor,SunDawn, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|SunDawn}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawnContact me!00:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the media

[edit]

You're mentioned in this article byThe Verge:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks. Cool stuff!मल्ल (talk)21:30, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I believe this is my first mention in a third-party source outside of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for sharing,मल्ल. The article is a compelling dive into our community's policies and influence, as well as the threats and problems we face around the world, which we shall continue to weather together. Hope to collaborate with you in the future!PickleG13 (talk)22:58, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Dame

[edit]

Hello, I saw. your article on Fred Dame, the Master Sommelier. I had some additional information I would like to talk to you about.

You can reach me at Ricercar@redshift.comMarkMark Ricercar Burger (talk)22:08, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HiMark, thank you for contributing to our Wikipedia community. I did not actually create this page, but simply added a short description for it.Valereee is the actual creator of the page, so I did want to flag this comment for them. However, it is not allowed for Wikipedia conversations to go offline in this manner, so I am unable to email you. Any information that you'd like to share is welcome on Talk Pages like this one, or the one forFred Dame.PickleG13 (talk)22:22, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mark Ricercar Burger, any information should be posted atTalk:Fred Dame.Valereee (talk)14:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related toarticles aboutliving or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)22:55, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedStefan Raetz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageChristian Democratic Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red|October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as themost active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"):Statistics available via various tools: previously,Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk)18:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

"Elvis Lives!" listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirectElvis Lives! has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 20 § Elvis Lives! until a consensus is reached.Roast (talk)00:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

[edit]
Women in Red|November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as themost active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously,Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk)17:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Paid contribution

[edit]

Hello,PickleG13, I noticed this discussion aboutnominating an article for deletion. I found someone on a website offering to write Wikipedia articles for moneyhere. Among the offerings was the page for this article and other articles created bythe same user. Please check if the user's articles are paid contributions. Thank you--Amr F.Nagy (talk)14:05, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - December 2025

[edit]
Women in Red|November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357

Recognized as themost active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk)22:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Redirect listed atRedirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 23 § Current U.S. state representative redirects until a consensus is reached.~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk)18:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - January 2026

[edit]
Women in Red|January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram|Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk)23:33, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Hey,PickleG13. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of theWikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)02:21, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Anniversary PickleG13 🎉

[edit]

Hey @PickleG13. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 11 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee❚❙❚❙❙20:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2026

[edit]
Women in Red|February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • JoinWikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia
    articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet.

Tip of the month:

  • Ourredlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram|Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk22:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PickleG13&oldid=1335915889"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp