User talk:Pegship
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Category:United Kingdom museum stubs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.PearlyGigs (talk)20:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I've just made theExoristinae subcategory stub templates, but I can't find where inthe stub type list these would go in. Do you know?Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs)21:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectSua ( Folk music) has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14 § Sua ( Folk music) until a consensus is reached.1234qwer1234qwer417:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pegship. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Destination Moon (short story), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)08:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement.
Take the surveyhere.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleThe Jackrabbit Factor has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No reliable sources. Run of the mill, self-published self-help book. Author not notable. Not enough information to merge or redirect anywhere.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bearian (talk)13:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Coming with a question after checking on theKevin Huezopage. I saw that a while back you replaced a link that formerly held a player profile (and now serves as a redirect to the league’s main page) with the league’s main page. This new page doesn’t have anything specific about the player.
I’m leaning toward reverting the link (and marking it as a dead link on the page as it was before), but I’m curious for your opinion before I do so. I’m not immediately sure if there are guidelines on which link should be used in this scenario, and I figured you might have some knowledge. Thanks!Michaelwallace22 (talk)04:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleMuhammad Subuh Foundation has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. Run of the mill, very small, private foundation. Not enough information to merge, and a redirect would be redundant. BorderlinereligiousSpam.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bearian (talk)20:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Belphegorpbk.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't sure where to post this, but I'd still like your opinion on something. Should{{Sivagangai-geo-stub}} be renamed to{{Sivaganga-geo-stub}}? Nearly everything else, such as categories and articles, refers to the district as "Sivaganga". What do you think? -OpalYosutebito (talk)18:59, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.
We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thissurvey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view itsprivacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards,Sam Walton (talk)16:34, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Jieyang-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thestub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe template's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.OpalYosutebito (talk)17:57, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Guangzhou-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thestub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe template's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.OpalYosutebito (talk)17:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Heyuan-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thestub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe template's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.OpalYosutebito (talk)18:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 18 § Chinese geography stub templates for deletion on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.jlwoodwa (talk)18:46, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pegship. This message concerns theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Destination Moon".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with ourdraftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission, and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructionshere. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!DreamRimmer bot II (talk)16:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category:American football defensive back, 1920s birth stubs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. -OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』01:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Ukraine military unit and formation stubs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. -OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』01:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I have a new idea for a criteria for stub message templates getting intoStub message templates needing attention:O: a template that is potentiallyOversized (could have more than 60 transclusions). The reason why I'm bringing this up is because @Waacstats and I have been finding so many stub templates whose categories should be speedily created, and I think it would be easier to locate them all in one spot. Even if this doesn't work, you've still done a great job helping out the Stub Sorting project! -OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』13:59, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
