User talk:ParkinsonProject
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, ParkinsonProject, andwelcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name ontalk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see ourhelp pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free toleave me a message or place "{{helpme}}
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedJürgen Locadia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesEmmen andWillem II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Please readWikipedia:Identifying reliable sources andWikipedia:Neutral point of view before you make edits such as the one you were making at Miiko Albornoz. A minor news site with extremist views is not a reliable source. Since this is such a sensitive and highly controversial matter I believe it's common sense that we should wait until his name is confirmed by reliable sources such as DN, SDS, Sydsvenskan and so on. Statements such as this needs more than one source, especially if that source is like the one you used. Also when we do have those sources I would refrain from using the exact words that you did; 1. The player is only a suspect, he is not gulity until proven so in court. 2. The crime classification is not "våldtäkt mot barn" but "sexuellt utnyttjande av barn" as is mentioned in several reliable sources. I would also ask of you to please refrain from offensive language when discussing with me. Let's just wait this out until we have more to go on. Thanks! --Reckless182 (talk)10:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mSome jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more ofyour recent contributions toMound of Glory because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use thesandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. The reverted edit can be foundhere.--some jerk on the Internet(talk)00:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mSome jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more ofyour recent contributions toGlory hole (sexual slang) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use thesandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. The reverted edit can be foundhere.--some jerk on the Internet(talk)00:41, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedArmenians in the Baltic states, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageArarat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To put it simply, your edits to that article are messes.This bit that I reverted andthis bit that I reverted are both messes. And, despitethis revert by you, none of that mess will be in the Pedophilia article. None of it. Sexual attraction to a 15-year-old is not even pedophilia, which you would know if you had actually read and grasped the lead of the article. Oh, andyour humor does not belong in that article in the least.Flyer22 (talk)02:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia. Please make sure to include anedit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.Thanks!Frze> talk07:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Pedophilia, it is recommended that you use thepreview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reducesedit conflicts, and prevents clogging uprecent changes and thepage history. Thank you. --Frze> talk07:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, regarding your recent edits: You needreliable sources to support your assertions in the article. Wikis like Wiktionary are not reliable sources. Please do not repeatedly revert to restore your poorly-sourced or unsourced material. If you keep doing it, it is callededit warring and you may be blocked for it.Zad6819:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Zad6819:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]~~~~. I signed your username for you above.Flyer22 (talk)22:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.
The complete report of this case was at the 3RR noticeboard.Permanent link to the report.EdJohnston (talk)22:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ParkinsonProject. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, last year you created an article onVladimir Sarenpya. A year later it still contains no supporting references.
It would be wonderful if you could address this problem. I am unable to find anything significant in the English language about him, but have put a template on the page to suggest that someone might like to help by translating theRussian article about him. Thanks.Nick Moyes (talk)23:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The articleMartin Lund Pedersen has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
FailsWP:GNG andWP:NFOOTY having never played in afully professional league or in a senior international fixture.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Kosack (talk)19:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The articleJean Claude Arnault has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Cahk (talk)08:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ParkinsonProject. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Sam Sailor. ParkinsonProject, thanks for creatingHafnia (food company)!
I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hafnia Konserves was bought by Jyske Andelsslagteriers Konservesfabrik i 1971. I doubt we can find sources to make this passWP:NCORP.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.
SamSailor19:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ParkinsonProject. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,Hafnia (food company), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}Also,be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or onthe article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.
SamSailor19:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleHafnia (food company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hafnia (food company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.SamSailor13:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onHafnia (food company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Szzuk (talk)18:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ParkinsonpProject, Greetings. Pls note that your creation ofRami Rantanen has been moved toDraft:Rami Rantanen. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is theWP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such asfacebook,twitter,instagram,imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such asThe Guardian,Sydney Morning Herald,CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example,Random House orCambridge University Press). Pls see
Once you have provided inline citations, you could move back the page to "article" to resubmit. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers atthe Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visitWP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk)06:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello ParkinsonProject,
I wanted to let you know that I just taggedSkandiamannen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you cancontest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.
CentreLeftRight✉00:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to giveArktisk Stadion a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits thepage history, which islegally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to bemoved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account isfour days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may behidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates aredirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions atrequested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them atWikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.PRehse (talk)08:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectTrysenko. Since you had some involvement with theTrysenko redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.PamD12:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ParkinsonProject. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Rami Rantanen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate forarticle space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion underCSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may requestuserfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are availablehere.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.Bot0612 (talk)04:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ParkinsonProject. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
