Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit toChina–Russia border, you addedlinks to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please seeWikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you.Remsense ‥ 论18:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i won't do it again

- Nail <3Nail123Real (talk)18:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HelloNail123Real! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Can i link the word "coastline" in the kazakhstan page?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)04:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit toJesus, you addedlinks to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please seeWikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you.Remsense ‥ 论19:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

same thing as the china-russia border, i said i won't do it again, but i accidentally did it, because i forgot, i really promise this won't happen again, anytime soon.Nail123Real (talk)19:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happenedhalf an hour later. Please readMOS:OVERLINK.Belbury (talk)20:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dang itNail123Real (talk)20:48, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello andwelcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions toWikipedia are appreciated, buta recent edit of yours to the page2025 Kartalkaya hotel fire has anedit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing anarticle's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to usethe sandbox to make test edits."rip turkey" doesn't have anything to do with the contents of your edithere (the actual edit itself is completely fine)Grumpylawnchair [ALT](talk)18:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i was just saying "rest in peace turkey" because the situation was sadNail123Real (talk)18:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide more describtive edit summaries (as in, make the edit summaries describe your edit) in the future. You aren't in trouble.Grumpylawnchair [ALT](talk)18:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i would make it more verbose, soonNail123Real (talk)18:38, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to note that it would probably be best if you didn'trefer to spelling mistakes as 'vomit'. I'd guess that most people on this wiki don't speak English natively, so you should be nice to those who don't have great knowledge of the language; that comes with the added benefit of a lower chance of getting into conflict with other users. Of course, you did well fixing the mistakes (theyshould be fixed), but this is a volunteering project and nobody really appreciates their efforts being snarked at. :)WP:Etiquette has useful tips for keeping the atmosphere nice around here.☀Hijérovīt | ^þⰁ_č11:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh, so my list of languages are inaccurate, and thanks for saying that i fixed a part of wikipedia, Thanks -Nail123Real (talk)15:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toUnited Nations Security Council Resolution 2123. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Hey man im josh (talk)15:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nail123Real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:United Nations Security Council Resolution 2123, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)14:31, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i'll just submit for review, and if it gets deleted, then whatever, its so short, its not even goodNail123Real (talk)20:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Wikipedians interested in Molossia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.Liz^Read!Talk!03:39, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i am not even interested in this, just delete this right away, molossia is kind of cool but not THAT coolNail123Real (talk)10:50, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HiFree guy64 (talk)23:09, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloNail123Real! The thread you created at theTeahouse,ChatGPT usage, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:10, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okNail123Real (talk)14:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcgaylor was:

This submission provides insufficientcontext for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see theguide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a bare-bones draft, which needs more context and information before it is ready to be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:United Nations Security Council Resolution 2123 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jcgaylor (talk)15:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ehNail123Real (talk)18:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Nail123Real!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Jcgaylor (talk)15:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC