Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits toEidagale have been undone by an automated computer program calledClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very fewmistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, pleaseread about it,report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at theintroduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:Eidagale waschanged byMuuse8(u)(t) ANN scored at 0.873511 on 2023-08-28T01:44:21+00:00

Thank you.ClueBot NG (talk)01:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only as established in Garhajis can the Ciidagalle clan tree be corrected.Jamac yassin (talk)18:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citingverifiable andreliable sources, as you did withthis edit toEidagale. Before making any potentially controversialedits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.Materialscientist (talk)02:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits toEidagale have been undone by an automated computer program calledClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very fewmistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, pleaseread about it,report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at theintroduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:Eidagale waschanged byMuuse8(u)(t) ANN scored at 0.952244 on 2023-09-01T16:22:01+00:00

Thank you.ClueBot NG (talk)16:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you forcontributing the pageDraft:Abokor Muuse to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to theEnglish version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. Pages in foreign languages will not be kept here, and may bedeleted if they are not translated into English. Thank you.—Paper9oll(🔔 •📝)06:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost, I am requesting that Wikipedia follow its policy and publish this article in Somali because this tribe is Somali. If any foreigners wish to view it, however, they may do so in any language in the world. In addition, I am grateful to wikipedia holders for their support in enabling me to demonstrate how the abokor muuse clan was concealed by some individuals of his ethnicity.Muuse8 (talk)08:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the language to EnglishMuuse8 (talk)08:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mThriftycat. I noticed that inthis edit toGarhajis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with anedit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Thriftycat^{Talk •Contribs}00:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did atGarhajis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please useyour sandbox for that. Thank you.Thriftycat^{Talk •Contribs}20:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read abouthow this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Thriftycat^{Talk •Contribs}20:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mMaterialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one ofyour recent contributions—specificallythis edit toMadhiban—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse or theHelp desk. Thanks.Materialscientist (talk)09:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did withthis edit toMadhiban. Your edits appear to bevandalism and have beenreverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.Materialscientist (talk)09:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did withthis edit toMadhiban, you may beblocked from editing.Materialscientist (talk)09:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did withthis edit toMadhiban.Materialscientist (talk)09:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did atSamaale, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉)13:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atSamaale, you may beblocked from editing.☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉)23:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Muuse8! I agree with UrielAcosta below. Please do not change information that is already sourced andcite external sources for any new information you add (please do not cite Wikipedia articles: seeWikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source). In addition, please usethe edit summary field to explain your edits, especially when you remove information, such as you did here[1][2][3]. The edit summary field looks like this:

You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by settingPreferences →Editing →Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.If you do not heed these warnings, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. To avoid this, please respond to this message. If you have any questions, please ask them, as I will be happy to help you. Thanks,☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉)19:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding citations from Wikipedia itself, which as a user-edited site is not a reliable source (see:WP:CIRCULAR).
And, of course, stop making changes to sourced information. If you don't understand why your edits have been reverted then ask on a talk page, but stop your edit warring.UrielAcosta (talk)16:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isUser:Muuse8. Thank you.☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉)13:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblockedindefinitely from editing for failure to discuss editing and reverts onarticle talk pages when required..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have now made 400+ edits to Wikipedia, nearly all to articles - andnot once have you edited an article talk page. In many cases they have been wholesale removal of content. In some situations, you have been reverted - but then just go back and continue to make the same edits, in effectedit warring.

Youmust start using the article talk page. Please readWP:BRD andWP:DR and once you have, confirm that you have read and understood your responsibilities around discussion - and commit to following them moving forward. Place the unblock template on your talk page with that commitment and understanding, and you will be unblocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Daniel (talk)20:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muuse8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Abokor Muuse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)18:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Muuse8

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameDclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I'veproposed an article that you started,Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle, for deletion because it meets one or more of ourdeletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top ofthe article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this:{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click thePublish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember toexplain why you think the article should be kept onthe article's talk page andimprove the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later byother means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk)17:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Muuse8, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle.

Deletiondiscussions usually run for seven days and arenot votes.Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions isnotability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk)19:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]