Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Multiplivision! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you foryour contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try theTask Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Again, welcome!Rtkat3 (talk)20:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the cookies,Rtkat3!!! :DMultiplivision (talk)17:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.Rtkat3 (talk)01:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you please stop disruptive editing inNo Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie? It's a Nickelodeon Original Film, not a Nickelodeon Movies film. If you don't stop editing, then I will. Thank you.Akhil K. (talk)17:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop. It's shown in the opening AND closing of the film that it is aNickelodeon Movies production.Multiplivision (talk)17:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I must remind you that whatYOU are doing is highly disruptive as you're literally engaging in an edit war. Knock it off.Multiplivision (talk)17:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So please, with all due respect, please stop.Multiplivision (talk)17:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Fine. I will stop.Akhil K. (talk)18:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Multiplivision. I'm going to remove Nickelodeon Movies in the category and in the infobox inNo Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie, and I'm also going to removeNo Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie inList of Nickelodeon Movies productions article too if you say yes. The reason why I'm going to remove the film is because the movie confirms thatNo Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie is only a Nickelodeon Original Film. There's no such credit as Nickelodeon Movies in trailer, and see IMDb for details. Thank you.Akhil K. (talk)01:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No.Multiplivision (talk)02:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onPaw Patrol. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Hikingboii (talk)01:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not know how page formats are supposed to work forinternationally co-produced television series? If it's produced between Canada and the United States, it's not supposed to beAmerican-Canadian. That is meant to be absent from the page as per the Manual of Style.Multiplivision (talk)02:35, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Get. It. Right.Multiplivision (talk)02:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link that explains that.Hikingboii (talk)05:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just… stop reverting the edits.PLEASE. It's going to get tiresome.Multiplivision (talk)05:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like I just said, please provide a link that explains what you're talking about.Hikingboii (talk)05:06, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Find it yourself.Multiplivision (talk)12:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like that I couldn’t link for that. You will have to discuss onTalk:Paw Patrol. I will also have to discuss with another user that knows this (maybe an admin).Hikingboii (talk)14:10, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplivision is correct, perMOS:TVCOUNTRY.Barry Wom (talk)14:29, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the link. Now I get it.Hikingboii (talk)15:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mWaxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Teresa Gallagher, but you didn't provide areliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content beverifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your changewith a citation, your edit is archived in thepage history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page.seeWP:DOBWaxworker (talk)14:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did atThe Bourne Supremacy (film), without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article.Please don't add information that you know is unsourced (and should be sourced) with a CN tag. If you'd like to add information but are struggling with finding a source, you're welcome to start a discussion at the article's Talk page.DonIago (talk)16:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,Multiplivision!Skydance Media will introduce the Skydance brand on August 7, 2025, after themerger ofSkydance Media,National Amusements andParamount Global. OK!LogoFan2007 (talk)16:18, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... okay?Multiplivision (talk)16:23, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Multiplivision! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixingtypos or reverting obviousvandalism. Any edit that changes themeaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you.IzzySwag (talk)04:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to make these big changes to the lead sentences of the articles, you should first open up a discussion on the talk page. The common consensus has been that these films are animated despite their brief live-action scenes.Zingo156 (talk)03:57, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesNorth Vancouver andJohn Kay. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)07:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of24 hours foredit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk)02:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did atA Minecraft Movie, you may beblocked from editing.Barry Wom (talk)10:36, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Before wholesale changing images on a bunch of featured articles, it would be best if you brought it up on the talk page.Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^talk15:02, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did atThe Curious Case of Benjamin Button (film), without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you.DonIago (talk)19:39, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"particularly in the process of the metamorphosis of Pitt's character". Shouldn'tthat be sourced?Multiplivision (talk)19:58, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but you added an entire new section to the article without providing a single citation. With 906 edits I'd think you must have suspected that might draw notice.DonIago (talk)20:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My big question is that: how are the VFX companies that have worked on the film in need of sources? Aren't they listed in the credits of the movie?Multiplivision (talk)20:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are needed if/when you want to claim which VFX companies worked on what effects for the film. We don't typically list VFX companies in an article simply for the sake of listing them, but rather strive to provide some context to the reader.DonIago (talk)02:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Bean movie (1997) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:08, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Star Trek Generations Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Star Trek II poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:49, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Star Trek VI poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Star Trek III poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:49, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Star Trek IV poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Star Trek V poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)17:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedBig Talk Studios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJames Griffiths.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recentlychanged theKing Kong (2005 video game) article to use dmy dates instead of mdy dates. Could you explain this shift in style? It appears to go againstMOS:DATERET andMOS:STYLEVAR, but I wanted to check with you first to see what you think. —Paper Luigi^{T •C}04:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the dates to the DMY format because the lead production country is New Zealand. NZ uses the DMY format, so it made sense for the article to use that format.Multiplivision (talk)12:13, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Multiplivision! Your additions toHop (film) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have addedcopyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in thepublic domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under asuitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to preventcopyright andplagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate asmall portion of a source. Anydirect quotations must be enclosed in doublequotation marks (") and properly cited using aninline citation. More information is available on thenon-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, seeHelp:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all informationin your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead tocopyright issues and is not permitted; seeWikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must stillcite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, onlyfreely licensed orpublic domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to oursister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of ournon-free content criteria;Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: Ifyou hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, youmay be able to license the text for publication here. Please seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance withWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, seeHelp:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in beingblocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)13:31, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did toRockstar Vancouver. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based onstrongnational ties to the topic. For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please seethis page. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you.–Rhain☔(he/him)21:56, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]