Archives |
This page has archives. Topics inactive for30 days are automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III. |
| Hello MSGJ, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on thisseasonal occasion. Spread theWikiLove by wishing another user aMerry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Wishes fromVestrian24Bio |
Clickhere to see the Christmas message I wrote...💞!Vestrian24Bio12:56, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| The Technical Barnstar | |
| I believe this award is appropriate for your work onTemplate:Vital article link. The template is quite useful to the Vital Articles project, and I appreciate your efforts.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔)03:14, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello, I'mZackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions toTemplate:Vital article link/doc. When you were adding content to the page, you addedduplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks.Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing)15:30, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk)09:05, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Set index article section is currently unused and undocumented. Do you have a plan for it? Unused templates are typically deleted. –Jonesey95 (talk)15:02, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The way the articles are now is correct. The confusion between these genera was introduces by a taxonomic database and other followed this. I have read that in a research article somewhere. I will try to find it for you (not right now though). But please don't move the articles. The systematics as presented on CoL is correct and I used that one.B33tleMania12 (talk)15:59, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for catching and undoing five instances of duplicate WikiProject additions that I inadvertantly made. The reason is that they used WP or wikiProject instead of the usual WikiProject, which I did not catch and skip. I regret the error. Is there a pathway to forgiveness that I may follow? —ADavidB13:17, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]