Archives |
| 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 |
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/1903 Albany College football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)02:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article2010 Millsaps Majors football team has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subject does not meet theWP:NSEASONS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Let'srun (talk)02:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Hey there,
I noticed that you've contributed a significant portion, around 30%, to theColumbine High School massacre, and I must say, it's really well done! I'm genuinely curious about what drew you to this topic and how you went about researching it. Thanks a bunch!"MajesticRZ (talk)18:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I'vebegun reviewing the articleHeraclitus you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPatrick Welsh --Patrick Welsh (talk)20:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should send it toWP:peer review first, as there's more major issues. The biggest is that it's mostly a series of short sub-sections, some only a few sentences long. These should be summarized into bigger sections, such as "early history" or "later history", etc. There's also enough cross-pollination withContinental philosophy that both articles should have a section comparing them to each other, with a lot of the same wording and sourcing.Harizotoh9 (talk)04:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleHeraclitus you nominated as agood article has failed
; seeTalk:Heraclitus for reasons whythe nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofPatrick Welsh --Patrick Welsh (talk)22:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
| The Surreal Barnstar | |
| For over 150,000 edits and nearly 13 years of service, I present to you the surreal barnstar~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk)18:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Template:Washington & Jefferson Presidents quarterback navbox has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Eagles 24/7 (C)20:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How confident are you thatthis image is from 1924? The URL you provided as a source is dead.DS (talk)21:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello, MisterCake. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forAnalytic philosophy at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome!Dhtwiki (talk)00:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
1899 Sewanee Tigers football team has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)23:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:1925 Alabama Crimson Tide football team photo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim ofnon-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails thefirst non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may haveno free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per thenon-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Moffitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hirolovesswords (talk)23:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/1927 Georgia vs. Yale football game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hirolovesswords (talk)12:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:Lee Nalley (ca 1949).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance withsection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Josh Milburn (talk)16:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement.
Take the surveyhere.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:BuckSpringNC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the{{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.
An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with ourcriteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука1306:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:PhillipsField.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)18:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Vaughn Blake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)01:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/1873 NYU Violets football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Szmenderowiecki (talk)17:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! I believe you were the first person to use this citation:
Patrick Garbin. "Bob McWhorter: "Everybody's All-American"". p. 6.
I found it onDick Jemison (who apparently was the person to say this quote originally), andseveral other pages, and it looks like you added it to Jemison's page. I'm not sure what you are referring to here. Patrick Garbin didn't seem to write anything with this title, and I can't find that quote ("When you mention football to an Athens fan its definition is Bob McWhorter, and vice-versa.") anywhere.
Do you happen to remember what you were citing when you added these claims? I would love to be able to fill out the citation to avoid this confusion in the future!Chew(V •T •E)01:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I today redirected1873 NYU Violets football team and other 1870s NYU season artiels, which you created, toNYU Violets football, 1873–1889. This is part of a broader effort about which I've opened a discussion atWikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Multi-season vs. individual season articles. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.Cbl62 (talk)22:30, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleList of Sewanee Tigers starting quarterbacks has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unable to find coverage of this grouping; failsWP:NLIST.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Let'srun (talk)03:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sewanee Tigers starting quarterbacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)20:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pop Warner has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)12:54, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectArt C. Jones has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 4 § Art C. Jones until a consensus is reached. —Bagumba (talk)07:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have made an edit for Reductio ad Absurdum describing it as "is the form of argument that attempts to establish the truth of a proposition by showing that assuming the proposition to be false leads to absurdity or a contradiction".
This is incorrect, according to the citations of that very phrase. The first citation, Brittanica, explicitly states that what you describe is but one single form of reductio ad absurdum - a form known as reductio ad impossibile.This is akin to changing the article for 'vehicle' so that it describes a car - one single form of a vehicle. There are other forms of vehicle, and there are other forms of reductio ad absurdum.~2025-34161-76 (talk)04:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/1881 Kentucky University football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.