User talk:Manyareasexpert
Page contents not supported in other languages.
|
Can you give me the exact quote regarding not speaking in court, both in Russian and your translation into English, as well as lawyer Ershov's full name? I have found relevant information regarding the rights of the accused in pre-2014 Ukraine, which is supposed to be the basis of DPR law. I will be able to reintroduce that text as well as put it in context once you do. Thanks.— Precedingunsigned comment added byNicosa77 (talk •contribs)
Moved toTalk:Holodomor § HolodomorI think at this point continued engagement is a bad idea. Let's just drop it and see how Solaire proceeds in 3 days.Courcelles (talk)13:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, please note thatWP:GS/RUSUKR extends to all articles with any content about Russo-Ukrainian War (all pages with content related to theRusso-Ukrainian War,broadly construed
). So this would include edits onSlava Ukraini. Thanks.Mellk (talk)08:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear User, I haven’t meet you here before (I am on Wikipedia since 2004, nearly the very beginning) and I would like to thank you very much for your patience and the other things. I am quite afraid that some people just want to associate the word “fascist” or “nazi” (Goodwin point earned) to everything that comes from Ukraine. As I have studied Ukrainian (and not Russian) perhaps I have a bias, but in my point of view, as I have also studied the earliest forms of democracy in the Cossacks’ society (much before the birth of democracy in England or Iceland), I do not associate Ukraine to fascism and so. I am just quite afraid to see as strong and vigorous as never the far-right ideas in our countries. So thank you again for resisting.Arorae (talk)13:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, sorry to bother you, I can't edit the page myself and I saw you were discussing the topic in the talk page. The voice says this is the deadliest conflict for children in 21st century, but this is absolutley contradicted by other reliable sources. Just for example, Save the children talks about 85k children dead by starving in the Yemeni civil war---->[1] and I really can't see how less than 6k children died in the Syrian civil war (300k civilian deaths), just to make one example. Thank you if you care to read. --2001:B07:646C:20FA:68DE:1B27:972E:B296 (talk)20:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#POV_claims regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.RBut (talk)20:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
proposed sourcing requirementElinruby (talk)00:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Manyareasexpert! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version ofNovorossiya (confederation) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that theedit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on articletalk pages to try to reachconsensus. If you are unable to agree atTalk:Novorossiya (confederation), please use one of thedispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. -Knowledgekid87 (talk)14:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Manyareasexpert, I've opened a 3O request regarding our standstilled discussion in re:Roman Shukhevych. Please seeWikipedia:Third opinion for more details. I hope it can help us develop a consensus. A friendly reminder that this process is not binding - this is a consensus building process, not an enforcement one.Carlp941 (talk)23:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Manyareasexpert, I was just about to revert my contribution too. At first it seemed to me like it was analysis done independently of the source. Thanks :)Oneequalsequalsone (talk)00:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located atSpecial:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located atSpecial:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
—Femke 🐦 (talk)16:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please dont edit that again. Thanks,nableezy -16:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for providing these refs. This is a lot of digest. But I have to be elsewhere for a few days and return later.My very best wishes (talk)23:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The pageRuniversalis has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done undersection R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from thearticle namespace to a differentnamespace except theCategory,Template,Wikipedia,Help, orPortal namespaces.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion atWikipedia:Deletion review.LizRead!Talk!20:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related toEastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully andconstructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template. If you have questions, please contact me or ask at theArbitration Committee Clerks Noticeboard.Mellk (talk)01:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedOld East Slavic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRus. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)05:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please explain what is meant by "Don't be red - will be greeted with more respect 😎" on your user page?AdamBlacktalk •contribs11:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Manyareasexpert. Thank you for your work onOperation "Successor". Another editor,Voorts, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Please remember to tag redirects that you create perWP:REDCAT.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Voorts}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
voorts (talk/contributions)22:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Civility Barnstar | |
| You show incredible restraint given what you are dealing with, and do an excellent job of not letting editors bait you into trouble. Keep it up! You know doing anything else is just doing what they want you to do. :)TylerBurden (talk)16:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atCulture of Ukraine. Your edits appear to bedisruptive and have been or will bereverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia'spolicies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result inloss of editing privileges. Thank you.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)21:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you need help fixing up theBogdan Khmelnitsky Battalion article? If so I can help you. I already found sources from the ISW about the battalion being attached to tactical formation Cascade.Salfanto (talk)13:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Manyareasexpert, I'm afraid you are mistaken.
First,I did provide a RS and I also made this clear in the edit summary of myreverted edit. This source[4] (Frontline/Associated press) qualifies as WP:RS. As you can see, I have also improved the citation of theOHCHR report by adding a reference to the relevant paragraphs (paragraphs 35-36).
Second, and most importantly, I explicitly explained in the edit summary that thissource was misrepresented in the article lead. I'm sorry to point this out to you, but your16 July edit adding that the OHCHRpublished a report which didn't find "that Russia committed any war crimes"
is a clear case of source misrepresentation because it attributes a claim by thejournal.ie[5] directly to the OHCHR (in quotes). As you can easily verify, the OHCHR said nothing about Russian war crimes, and in particular the OHCHR did not say that it hadn't found that Russia had committed any war crimes.
Your reverted edit has other flaws (e.g. it doesn't comply withMOS:NOBOLD), but I'd rather continue this conversation on the article talk page.Gitz (talk) (contribs)08:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please note that the category "Russian war crimes in Ukraine" is also questionable
I trust that these International and Western sources now satisfy your curiosity because, the truth always comes out.
Inevitably, Einstein’s fame and the great success of his theories created a backlash. The rising Nazi movement found a convenient target in relativity, branding it “Jewish physics” and sponsoring conferences and book burnings to denounce Einstein and his theories. The Nazis enlisted other physicists, including Nobel laureates Philipp Lenard and Johannes Stark, to denounce Einstein. One Hundred Authors Against Einstein was published in 1931.Sebforbes (talk)20:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
grateful for your work trying to prevent russian propagandists spreading lies on Wikipedia and toning down real criticism62.197.35.21 (talk)14:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Manyareasexpert,
Can you give a more in-depth explanation of your reasoning for your recent removal of some paragraphs---well many---from the Holodomor page? I didn't really understand your edit summary. Just interested!
Thanks!Alexysun (talk)07:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Refrain from deleting information that have trusted sources backing them, If you have an argument against a source, find proof that they may not be trusted, or findmultiple other trusted sources outside of bandera's country that disprove the statements.
Once again, Refrain from vandalising according to your own unproved personal believes, especially when there's evidence for the claims you try to swipe under the rug.TruthfulSpeech (talk)21:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at theWikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding North Korean involvement in the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topicRussian Invasion of Ukraine.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
--Rc2barrington (talk)00:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Dispute Resolution Barnstar | |
| For effecting an Eastern Europe topic ban on a user that has over a very long time caused significant disruption to high-importance articles. Thanks!Lklundin (talk)18:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I just completed your technical request atWP:RMTR and wanted to reply to your question on your talk page since pings can get lost easily at RMTR. If someone contests the move, you should revert the move and open an RM if you still wish to proceed. There's not really any special procedure otherwise. Hope this helps! :)Sennecaster (Chat)17:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the source I added, not others.138.124.19.190 (talk)15:07, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As I know you are aware of it I will, not link to it, but I wanred one participant so in fairness I must warn you as well.Slatersteven (talk)16:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.isa.p (talk)22:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The BushrangerOne ping only00:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]Hi MAE. I closed your recent AE filing. It would not be helpful to hold simultaneous discussions at both AE and ANI. If you want to file later at AE, you are welcome to do so, but please know that AE is intended mainly as a place to pursue sanctions against other editors, not for general review of your own conduct.Firefangledfeathers (talk /contribs)22:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bythe consensus of the Wikipeida community, you have beentopic banned from the subjects of the Holocaust, Nazism, Eastern European political organizations post-1941, and Jewish history broadly construed. -The BushrangerOne ping only21:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please let me know if you have any questions. --Tamzin[cetacean needed](they|xe|🤷)23:11, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]Manyareasexpert istopic-banned fromthe Holocaust, Nazism, politics in Eastern European since 1941, and Jewish history, allbroadly construed. "Politics" should be construed particularly broadly, and explicitly includes military and paramilitary entities.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you atWikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of anArbitration Committee decision. The thread isManyareasexpert. Thank you.TurboSuperA+(connect)06:28, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Manyareasexpert,
Even though I have been actively participating here (on Wikipedia) with my own account for no longer than approximately half a year, I witnessed on numerous occasions that Wikipedia has been facing a coordinated and unrestrained dissemination of pro-Russian, pro-CCP, anti-Ukrainian, anti-European, anti-American, and anti-Western propaganda (Russian information war against Ukraine,Active measures,State-sponsored Internet propaganda,Russian web brigades, etc.).
While there have been numerous editors who have been deliberately spreadingRussian disinformation andAnti-Ukrainian sentiment, bias, and propaganda, I have noticed that there are also not so few editors who have been, just like you, trying to effectively debunk their biased, defamatory, false, and propagandistic talking points as well as counter anti-Ukrainian smear with truth, facts, and verified information.
Considering this, I would like to express my gratitude and appreciation for your tireless work and efforts in preserving Wikipedia's articles as honest, truthful, unbiased, and factually correct as possible. Many people, including myself, strongly support all the excellent work that you and other like-minded individuals have been doing, as it has been about time to counter Russian state-sponsored propaganda effectively, as it has, unfortunately, engulfed evenWikipedia.
Last but not least, if you would like to read more about this, I recommend you reading some of the following articles, as they offer a great insight into the Kremlin's coordinated cyber-campaign that aims not only to poison Wikipedia with false facts but also to influenceLarge language models (such asGPT-5.2,Grok (chatbot),Gemini (language model),Claude (language model),Llama (language model),Apertus (LLM), etc.) through feeding them with false information and distorted half-truths.
-https://www.global-influence-ops.com/russian-information-warfare-campaign-ai-wikipedia/
-https://checkfirst.network/pravda-network-worldwide-expansion-and-llm-wikipedia-pollution/
-https://dfrlab.org/2025/03/12/pravda-network-wikipedia-llm-x/
Best regards,