Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Manvi1820

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Manvi1820,welcome to Wikipedia! I wanted to thank you for submittingDraft:Southern Berlin suburban railway toArticles for creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia. We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

If you have general editing questions, theTeahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to theArticles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out onmy talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! ~Liancetalk17:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Tuzkan Lake has been accepted

[edit]
Tuzkan Lake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk)12:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Waldbad Zeischa has been accepted

[edit]
Waldbad Zeischa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk)12:55, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Canine Demodicosis has been accepted

[edit]
Canine Demodicosis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk)00:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Dux Mogontiacensis has been accepted

[edit]
Dux Mogontiacensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk)16:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Dresden Leipzig railway station has been accepted

[edit]
Dresden Leipzig railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk)00:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Essen Cathedral Treasury Hs. 1 has been accepted

[edit]
Essen Cathedral Treasury Hs. 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xrimonciam (talk)08:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Lower Kochertal railway has been accepted

[edit]
Lower Kochertal railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk)00:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Southern Berlin suburban railway has been accepted

[edit]
Southern Berlin suburban railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadspike[Talk]10:04, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Vicke Schorler has been accepted

[edit]
Vicke Schorler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadeacontributionstalk13:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Itzelberger Lake has been accepted

[edit]
Itzelberger Lake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WormEater13 (talkcontribs)15:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Västgötabergen has been accepted

[edit]
Västgötabergen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk)13:25, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Windmills in Berlin has been accepted

[edit]
Windmills in Berlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here)10:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Manvi1820. Thank you for your work onItzelberger Lake. Another editor,Moriwen, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Beautiful translation work, thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Moriwen}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Moriwen (talk)23:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Moriwen:
Thankyou soo much!Manvi1820 (talk)09:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Freital East-Possendorf railway line has been accepted

[edit]
Freital East-Possendorf railway line, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk)21:01, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Gotthard Neumann has been accepted

[edit]
Gotthard Neumann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk)01:13, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Maasdorf (Bad Liebenwerda) has been accepted

[edit]
Maasdorf (Bad Liebenwerda), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk)16:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Zeischa village school has been accepted

[edit]
Zeischa village school, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk)20:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

[edit]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $250 worth of prizes for architectural articles. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦Dr. Blofeld16:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Castellum Mattiacorum has been accepted

[edit]
Castellum Mattiacorum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk)19:47, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Lake Wolayer has been accepted

[edit]
Lake Wolayer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk)20:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Max Honsell has been accepted

[edit]
Max Honsell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk)17:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Thalberg, Bad Liebenwerda has been accepted

[edit]
Thalberg, Bad Liebenwerda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs)02:12, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Chain boat navigation on the Elbe and Saale rivers has been accepted

[edit]
Chain boat navigation on the Elbe and Saale rivers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸15:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Timișoara horse-drawn railway has been accepted

[edit]
Timișoara horse-drawn railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~/Bunnypranav:<ping>08:59, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Suanhild has been accepted

[edit]
Suanhild, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lijil (talk)09:06, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Gröben (Ludwigsfelde) has been accepted

[edit]
Gröben (Ludwigsfelde), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia12:02, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Lotto Thüringen Arena on the Rennsteig has been accepted

[edit]
Lotto Thüringen Arena on the Rennsteig, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My"blotter")05:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Caspar Schmalkalden has been accepted

[edit]
Caspar Schmalkalden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk)17:20, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Mainz Rose Monday parade has been accepted

[edit]
Mainz Rose Monday parade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)20:29, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Schmargendorf Town Hall has been accepted

[edit]
Schmargendorf Town Hall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk)23:28, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Tabula Siarensis has been accepted

[edit]
Tabula Siarensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk)17:14, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:New Berlin horse-drawn tramway has been accepted

[edit]
New Berlin horse-drawn tramway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JacobTheRox(talk | contributions)21:20, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Babesiosis of dogs has been accepted

[edit]
Babesiosis of dogs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CoconutOctopustalk11:17, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Stone House (Frankfurt am Main) has been accepted

[edit]
Stone House (Frankfurt am Main), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk)23:05, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Oscar Paret has been accepted

[edit]
Oscar Paret, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk)02:59, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Prostitution in ancient times (September 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shocksingularity was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission,Prostitution in ancient Rome, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Also seeProstitution in ancient Greece
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
Shocksingularity (talk)04:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello,Manvi1820!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Shocksingularity (talk)04:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Rudolph Wilde Park has been accepted

[edit]
Rudolph Wilde Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk)17:51, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Dättwil has been accepted

[edit]
Dättwil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk)12:54, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Velgast–Prerow railway line has been accepted

[edit]
Velgast–Prerow railway line, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk)21:48, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Savoy trade (September 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it atSavoy trade instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This article seems to largely cover the same ground asAnnexation of Savoy, which already exists as an article. Is it possible for you to add the information from this draft into that article instead? Otherwise, maybe add to the talk page of this draft why you think it deserves a seperate stand alone article. Have a great day.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
Absurdum4242 (talk)13:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Caspar Schmalkalden

[edit]

On18 September 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleCaspar Schmalkalden, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was* ... thatCaspar Schmalkalden's 17th-century travelogue describes noises made by animals like thethree-toed sloth and thehedgehog fish? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Caspar Schmalkalden. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Caspar Schmalkalden), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free tonominate it.

Gatoclass (talk)03:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Swiss Charitable Society has been accepted

[edit]
Swiss Charitable Society, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadspike[Talk]15:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Etzelwerk has been accepted

[edit]
Etzelwerk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk)19:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mainz Rose Monday parade

[edit]

On21 September 2025,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleMainz Rose Monday parade, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theMainz Rose Monday parade includes more than 9,000 participants from Germany and abroad? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Mainz Rose Monday parade. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Mainz Rose Monday parade), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free tonominate it.

PMC(talk)12:03, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Fuchsstadt Earth Station has been accepted

[edit]
Fuchsstadt Earth Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Shocksingularity (talk)21:10, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:David-Henri de Meuron has been accepted

[edit]
David-Henri de Meuron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!11:36, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Isaak Faesch has been accepted

[edit]
Isaak Faesch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!11:37, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Hans Christoffel (mercenary) has been accepted

[edit]
Hans Christoffel (mercenary), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!02:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Christian Lübke has been accepted

[edit]
Christian Lübke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!03:05, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Franziszeischer cadastre has been accepted

[edit]
Franziszeischer cadastre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!20:37, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Hermannstraße (Berlin-Neukölln) has been accepted

[edit]
Hermannstraße (Berlin-Neukölln), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passengerpigeon (talk)16:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Kesslerloch has been accepted

[edit]
Kesslerloch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk)15:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Halheim Fort has been accepted

[edit]
Halheim Fort, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LuniZunie ツ(talk)20:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification:Draft:Pauline Buisson has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Pauline Buisson. Thanks!MCE89 (talk)09:42, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The necessary changes has been done.Manvi1820 (talk)09:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Pauline Buisson (October 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Toadspike was:
This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is no possible way a source from 1787 (ref 3) can cited for events "From 1787 onward". Ref 4, cited for two whole paragraphs, doesn't mention Pauline Buisson at all. Please rewrite this so that the sources cited verify the article prose.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
Toadspike[Talk]11:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Pauline Buisson (October 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk)12:15, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding your translations

[edit]

Hi there. After reviewingDraft:Pauline Buisson, I had a look at your other articles and am concerned that many of them may have the same issues with sourcing. It looks like you are removing the existing citations from the dewiki articles you're translating, translating their text into English, and then tacking on new citations at the end of each paragraph. For instance, onIsaak Faesch you've removed or replaced many of the existing citations fromde:Isaak Faesch and added new citations for the unsourced paragraphs, all without changing the underlying text. At best this is a case of writing the articleWP:BACKWARDS, but in many cases your new citations don't seem to come close to verifying the text that you’ve translated from dewiki. For instance, as @Toadspike pointed out onDraft:Pauline Buisson, on some occasions you've used sources that were written before the events they're being cited for, or that don't mention the subject at all.

Can you talk me through your process for translating articles, and how you are ensuring that the new citations you’re adding verify the contents of the articles? Thank you.MCE89 (talk)15:39, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as for the referencing part I take referencing part from literature section as well, which is present in the original article as sometimes there are less relevant sources in the original article so for Isaak Faesch I took references from literature section as I thought that they might be reliable as they are present in literature section. But I think that this process is not working as the way I was thinking it to be. I would request you to guide me if this process is not reliable and I need to change it.Manvi1820 (talk)15:48, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is not that the sources are unreliable, it's that you seem to be placing citations after random paragraphs completely unrelated to the cited source. Aninline citation at the end of a sentence or paragraph should support all of the content since the previous inline citation or the start of the paragraph.Toadspike[Talk]16:31, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thankyou @Toadspike and @MCE89 for highlighting this issue regarding my articles. I will review all the articles which have this problem and correct them with the correct placing of the sources after the right paragraph.Manvi1820 (talk)16:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@7804j, could you please take a look at this situation andDraft:Pauline Buisson? I really appreciate the work of OKA, but this is not a good look. I will be keeping an eye on things and I hope you can do the same.Toadspike[Talk]16:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for flagging. I'll look into this7804j (talk)17:24, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Toadspike @MCE89 I wanted to share a quick update on this. We've looked into the situation and indeed this is absolutely unacceptable behavior by Manvi1820. We have immediately cancelled her OKA stipends, so she will no longer be working with us.
It is unfortunate that we only noticed this now, thanks again for bringing it to our attention! Usually, such quality issues would get detected much earlier (looking at the long history in the talk page, no similar issues were raised before, so this may have started recently). We suspect there could even have been some degree of intentional concealment here, or at least reckless negligence.
We will be reviewing her previously published articles to look for these issues, and fix these. This is definitely not even close to the standards that we expect from OKA contributors.7804j (talk)21:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for taking care of this. I am very happy with the OKA response here, it demonstrates a great deal of responsibility.Toadspike[Talk]21:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Manvi1820. I noticed that you've since submittedFlood protection in Dresden, which has exactly these same issues. You've taken a dewiki page that has a large amount of unsourced content (de:Hochwasserschutz in Dresden), and added inline citations that support very little of the article's text. To give just one example, take these sentences:
Originally, the Weißeritz flowed into the Elbe near the city centre, separating Friedrichstadt from it. In 1893, it was rerouted westward through Cotta for flood protection, with the former riverbed repurposed for railway facilities, making the relocation permanent.
You've citedthis Encyclopedia Britannica entry for these sentences, but I can't find anything in that source that's even remotely relevant to these claims.Verifiability means that the source you cite needs to clearly support the text of the article. That means that if you cite a source at the end of the paragraph, it should clearly include all of the information within that paragraph.
My general suggestion would be that it's probably best to stick to translating dewiki pages that are already reasonably well-cited. If a dewiki page that you translate has unsourced text or is poorly referenced, you need to find reliable sources and edit or rewrite the article to match those sources, rather than adding unrelated citations arbitrarily to the existing unsourced text. In the worst case, I would say it ismuch better to leave the text unreferenced, since that at least makes the issue apparent to other editors.MCE89 (talk)06:44, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, the references used in the original article are not applicable as the links to the references are expired, for this reason I had to find the references which at least match something in this article otherwise the whole article will be left unsourced as finding exact match is very complicated as some of the links are already expired and I cannot add links which are not searchable or verifiable.Manvi1820 (talk)06:59, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Citations do not just need to match something in the article, they need to actuallyverify the article's claims. When you add a citation, you are saying that if I read the cited source, it would confirm every claim made in the preceding sentence(s) of the article.
If the content on the dewiki pages you're translating is unsourced or the old citations are no longer usable, your options are:
  1. Leave the text unreferenced and tag it with a[citation needed] tag (not ideal, but preferable)
  2. Remove the text entirely
  3. Rewrite the text to match the contents of the new sources you're adding
But you cannot leave the text unchanged and add citations to sources that don't correspond to the text of the article.
As an side note, if some of the existing dewiki sources are now dead links, you can try searching theInternet Archive to see if the contents have been archived.Help:Using the Wayback Machine has some instructions for adding archive links to your citations that you might find helpful.MCE89 (talk)07:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikishovel Since you've just accepted this draft, could you please take a look at the thread above and let us know if you checked for these issues? If not, could you please un-accept? This isn't an issue AfC/OKA drafts usually have, so no fault on you if you missed it.Toadspike[Talk]07:34, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're right: I didn't review it carefully enough. I've moved the article back to draft. Thanks for the ping.Wikishovel (talk)08:03, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Flood protection in Dresden has been accepted

[edit]
Flood protection in Dresden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk)06:22, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flood protection in Dresden moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions toFlood protection in Dresden. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseI moved this to main space too soon. Please address the problems outlined atUser talk:Manvi1820#Concern regarding your translations before resubmitting, thank you.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Wikishovel (talk)08:03, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification:Draft:Flood protection in Dresden has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Flood protection in Dresden. Thanks!Wikishovel (talk)08:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:List of paintings by the Master of Meßkirch has been accepted

[edit]
List of paintings by the Master of Meßkirch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk)03:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Bingium (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article arrived for AFC with about a third of the text under multiple "citation needed" tags. This means that a lot of the article is not verified, and given the relatively high proportion, this sourcing needs to be worked on before being accepted. Some of it should not be too difficult, since the 1845 source already used appears to have text to help source the tribes and the early Roman location details in the first few pages.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk)22:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:High-Deck Estate has been accepted

[edit]
High-Deck Estate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk)02:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Desert Cultural Area has been accepted

[edit]
Desert Cultural Area, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk)03:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Manvi1820. Thank you for your work onLake Wolayer. Another editor,Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Mariamnei}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk)13:10, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Manvi1820. Thank you for your work onLake Wolayer. Another editor,Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Since there have been no substantial improvements since I left my original comments a week ago, I will be moving this to draft space. Please feel free to republish once it meets the criteria I mentioned in my previous comment. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Mariamnei}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk)13:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination ofLake Wolayer for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleLake Wolayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Wolayer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mariamnei (talk)09:51, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regardingDraft:Savoy trade

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Manvi1820. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Savoy trade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)14:09, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Manvi1820&oldid=1337976325"
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp