User talk:Lynch44
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 Archives (Index) |
This page is archived byClueBot III. |
 | The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For your assistance on the attacks on my user page today.livelikemusic(TALK!)21:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for helping fight random block template vandalism on my and other users talk pages!🪷nahida23:14, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi, I've reviewed a handful of your Argentinian town articles and just wanted to say that you've been doing great work! The ones I've seen all meetWP:NSETTLEMENT and are free from any problems requiring attention fromNPP. Thanks again for your efforts and happy editing,Zzz plant (talk)19:54, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lynch44, I just wanted to let you know that I have added thenew page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to thepage curation tools and can start patrolling pages from thenew pages feed. If you asked for this atrequests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance atWikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers atWikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone!signed,Rosguilltalk14:14, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lynch44, this isLuniZunie (though I am not currently logged in because I'm at school). I have been watching theErika Henningsen page due to a user appearing to make major COI edits. A new user and IP address made similar edits and I think it should be rolled back but I'm not quite sure. I would like a second opinion, and you've left a message on my talk page before and seem rather reliable. Can you potentially check the page out? I believe the most recent accurate revision would be the one on 02:58, 13 September 2025.165.140.214.226 (talk)15:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, just to let you know that there are a couple of problems withthis edit:
|class=Thank you! — Martin(MSGJ · talk)09:07, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lynch44. I noticed you accepted a pending change forthis content removal onExpo 2025 pavilions. Did you intend to do that? If so, I should just mention for awareness that this user has been disruptively removing the same content using multiple IPs, which was why the page was PC-protected in the first place. I don't mean to call you out or criticize, just providing some additional context for this. –Epicgenius (talk)22:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm normally always watching "my" contribs, but wasn't for about 15m (busey) . So thank you for reverting that obvious vandalism from people within this school district. -Flower24.155.147.109 (talk)20:41, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A look at page history shows an LLM-crafted insertion on stable articleWaterfront Market, and one minute later you tagged for speedy. Looking at the same situation, I've restored the previous version; the question may be discussed on its merits. You may PROD the page or take it to AfD if you wish. Without discussion, I'm not willing to G11 a page which provides cited claims of notability, an article written by a long-timeand current wikipedian.BusterD (talk)12:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
enough said (also i'm sorry if this is inappropriate im new to wikipodia)173.206.54.55 (talk)22:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, and thank you for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed your recentA1 speedy deletion nomination ofBarrister Nusrat Khan, which occurred 5 minutes after the article was created. PerNPPHOUR, articles shouldn't be nominated for speedy deletion if they have been meaningfully edited within the past hour, with exceptions for grossly inappropriate material (e.g., copyright, attack).
I understand and sympathize with wanting such short articles off Wikipedia, but we also need to recognize that it can come across asbitey to draftify an article too quickly -- especially considering that articles in mainspace do not need to be complete, and editors are allowed to develop articles in the mainspace.
I hope this makes sense. Thank you again for all your help with NPP. It's definitely appreciated! Take care,Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)16:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, asking for a second opinion again! Can you check out the talk page and recent contributions forUser:Erixcson8? Thanks!LuniZunie15:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello you reverted my comments in the discussion section. Did you read them? What I said was very clear, and I guess I assumed that the idea that "The Article would be improved if..." was self-evident. If I preface all my remarks with that idea, would you still believe it's a casual conversation as in a "forum" vs. a fairly self-evident statement about how the Article might be improved?Is English your first language?Are you a bot?Note, this is the 2nd time someone has reverted an edit that is pretty obviously a detailed statement about how the Article might be improved. In the first case, the suggestion was to delete a section that had nothing to do with the actual Article. Can you please explain your reasoning, within the context of having read what I actually posted? Thanks in advance.72.180.111.79 (talk)23:42, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for catchingthis, this user/ip range had been at this sneaky disruption for over a year, and I am glad you reverted that.Plasticwonder (talk)21:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
you RSD articles quicker than i can load them from recent changes lmao, keep up the good work mateJoBoGamer12:06, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to get ur opinino on the userUser:HappyOrNot2025 after they editedHappyOrNot and i noticed they had the same name. not sure if it isWP:COI or advertising, lmk what u thinkJoBoGamer12:25, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedFlyover (Apple Maps), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFukui.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lokah Chapter 1: Chandra (Diff ~1318087443)
Page history shows you accepted this revision. Since it's a cameo appearance, the reference must be provided perMOS:FILM. Thanks. — Benison(Beni · talk)07:54, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | A barnstar for you! |
| Congratulations on being the top 1stpending changes reviewer during 25 September—24 October 2025, accepting over 200 changes. :)[source/credit]randomdude121 16:18, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed onUser talk:GREATZUBLU BROTHERHOOD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note thatWikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.–LuniZunie ツ(talk)18:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]