User talk:LukeSurl
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 Archives |
Before 2006/04,2006/04–2007/04,2007/05–2011/12,2012,2013,2014a,2014b,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019,2020,2021 |
Template:School has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk)02:32, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The pictureFile:Sampson (horse).jpg appears in fact to beBrooklyn Supreme. See for examplehere andhere.DuncanHill (talk)00:07, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I removed as Not Done, as it was merged into the proposed page title and converted into a more expanded article.Sennecaster (Chat)18:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleBlood quota has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:Notability: the concept of the "Blood Quota," as described in the article, fails to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines.The sources cited in the article are primarily focused on Abimael Guzmán and the Shining Path, rather than on the "Blood Quota" concept itself. The term does not have the independent significance required for a standalone article.
- WP:Verifiability: the "Blood Quota" article contains several claims that are not adequately supported by citations from reliable sources.
- WP:NPOV - the tone is overwhelmingly negative and lacks balance, failing to provide a comprehensive view of the topic. For example, it describes the concept as one that "communist militants willfully promoted hatred and violence to attract adherents," which is a loaded statement that does not reflect a neutral perspective. Additionally, the article does not offer any counterpoints or broader historical context that could provide a more balanced view.
- WP:OR: Some parts of the article appear to be original analysis or synthesis of the Shining Path’s ideology and actions. For instance, the interpretation of the "Blood Quota" as a core tenet of Gonzalo Thought and its implications for the Shining Path’s strategy is not directly supported by the cited sources.
Therefore, it is appropriate that the article has been deleted from the Spanish Wikipedia, and it should not be reintroduced in EN.wiki in its current form. The writing is disorganized, with sections that are poorly structured and redundant. For example, the discussion of the Lucanamarca massacre is repeated in different sections without clear organization - this makes the article difficult to follow and understand. Additionally, the writing style is not sufficiently encyclopedic, with a tone that is more suited to a narrative or polemic piece rather than an objective, informative encyclopedia entry.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement.
Take the surveyhere.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}