User talk:Lugnuts
Page contents not supported in other languages.
I’ve worked with you on many articles and you were always a great editor to have around. Sad to see how your time on Wikipedia ended but maybe it is for the better. You left a legacy here and I hope that it is remembered positively. Hamza Ali Shah Talk02:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I only just saw. I'm so sorry.
Drmies (talk)21:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am so sorry about this L. You are one of the best here on WikiP and in real life. Thanks for all your editing and for the things you shared with me over the years. Best wishes always.MarnetteD|Talk22:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Original Barnstar | |
| I hereby award thisbarnstar to editor Lugnuts for his unrivalled and titanic contributions to the encyclopaedia.FeydHuxtable (talk)12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
I found out what happened a few weeks back and still can't believe it. Sorry I never said anything for you at the case, didn't see this one coming.FeydHuxtable (talk)12:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Since so many editors are reverting deletion notifications, have you consideredCategory:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages for preventing semi-automated deletion notifications from appearing on this talk page?NytharT.C11:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is sad to see that your time is Wikipedia ended the way it did. I am one who has benefitted from your stub articles. I wouldn't have probably bothered to add more material toDevraj Puri,Santosh Reddy,Syed Moinuddin and others if you hadn't already created stubs for them. People who consider stubs as evil may not understand it.Tintin13:06, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| I'm sad that your time on Wikipeda has ended. You had made many pages and worked tirelessly to make many pagesCoolberry-pedia (talk)22:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
| File:Kia Oval Pavilion.jpg | Top read of the day |
| Thetop read article yesterday was the2023 ICC World Test Championship final. It has achieved over a million readers since Lugnuts created it. Well played, sir!Andrew🐉(talk)10:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
On 13 June 2023,In the news was updated with an item that involved the article2023 ICC World Test Championship Final, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.Ktin (talk)19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Im a related, he my dads cusin. How does Lugnuts know about him.94.191.136.157 (talk)20:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Murphy (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)15:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Amstutz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)21:49, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Van Branteghem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)16:20, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paavo Hietala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)17:08, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurelio Terrazas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)17:12, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erkki Johansson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)17:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bawa Maung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:06, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Estwick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)01:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dušan Vujačić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)01:28, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Clauws until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)02:41, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Coerse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)11:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugène Schmitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)11:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Murphy (Indian athlete) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)11:28, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luigi Cerutti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)11:42, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Óscar Alvarado (athlete) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)11:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermann Eichholzer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)11:58, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articlePankaj Joshi (cricketer) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable cricketer. FailsWP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Tenshi! (Talk page)13:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginald Bare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)16:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Pappas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)17:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectAli Momeni has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 15 § Ali Momeni until a consensus is reached.Sports2021 (talk)23:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Devaux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)11:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piero Marchetti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)20:08, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neville Gadsden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)00:03, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitendra Banerjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)00:26, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Wijkander until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)00:38, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Léon Nossent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)01:28, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Lepenant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)22:01, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleLeopold Sax has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Played a single match and therefore likely fails SPORTSCRIT
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.JayCubby23:49, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einar Borges until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)00:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/José de Campos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.4meter4 (talk)18:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giancarlo Morpugo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lê Trung Trung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)19:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Simon (field hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)22:40, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurbachan Singh (athlete) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)18:59, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarhumas Murnikas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)19:12, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleEdmund Stadler has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Barely medaled at country-level competitions, dewiki is no better. Fails SPORTSCRIT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.JayCubby14:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Gee (bobsleigh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)02:13, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slobodan Jovanović (rower) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)01:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. B. Chavan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)22:50, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Lugnuts. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Kim Hye-yong".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!23:01, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgios Kalambokidis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:18, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Thompson (athlete) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:29, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Gasser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laddie Lewis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Griffith (bobsleigh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:54, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/José da Silva (sport shooter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)01:05, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Gillow (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Oaktree b (talk)02:05, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernst Trinkler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)01:01, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston McArthur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)01:06, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nil Kyaw Yin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)13:03, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Tracey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)13:10, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgios Venieris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)20:40, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Aly (gymnast) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)20:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Pim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)23:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadows of Memories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.🪶-TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN (💬)19:59, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryaman Birla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Zalaraz (talk)11:12, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Bassingthwaighte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)19:51, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleCharles Piot has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Was redirected and un-redirected. Appeared in one Olympics and is a LUGSTUB.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.RossEvans19 (talk)22:34, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleAndré Kimbu Mboma has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
FailsWP:SPORTSCRIT andWP:NOLY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.LibStar (talk)05:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Studer (wrestler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)20:10, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence Oung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)11:49, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georges Leroux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)00:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draginja Đipalović until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)01:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali El-Hefnawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)20:15, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleKim Song-suk has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Did not medal. No coverage I can find
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk)00:23, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectIzgrednici has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 25 § Izgrednici until a consensus is reached.PARAKANYAA (talk)05:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onAnkit Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.ThilioR O B O T🤖talk07:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sándor Krebs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Alexandermcnabb (talk)08:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Feutsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Alexandermcnabb (talk)10:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milan Ćulibrk (rower) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.⋆｡˚꒰ঌClara A. Djalim໒꒱˚｡⋆10:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleHans-Erik Pedersen has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
FailsWP:SPORTSCRIT andWP:NOLY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Dualpendel (talk)17:21, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fury (2016 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)20:02, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleJosef Kouba has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No sign of notability. No SIGCOV found, only databases.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.FromCzech (talk)10:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelos Voultsos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Servite et contribuere (talk)15:50, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Frei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)15:54, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Víctor Francis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Servite et contribuere (talk)15:56, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Way back, on January 4, 2014, in the article you started, there is this statement:
"Sennett directed his first film this year with D. W. Griffith, but was uncredited for his work."
The closest I've found are secondary discussions suggesting that the comic style ofThe Curtain Pole aligns strongly with Sennett's later work — but those seem to be interpretive rather than evidentiary. I would love to locate a citation supporting anything on the subject. Could you peek back where that came from? It's a cool tidbit. The closest I get to it are critics/scholars suggesting that the comic style is squarely in-line with Sennett's style... so, with those, the best I have is an inference (that Griffith let him drive a bit) – which, by itself, is worthy. –Eurodog (talk)18:57, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Vonlaufen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)01:22, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadri Usluoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Thebiguglyalien (talk)🛸03:27, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirdja Wihardja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.UtherSRG(talk)15:11, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoran Galović until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.⋆｡˚꒰ঌClara A. Djalim໒꒱˚｡⋆13:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milan Arežina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.⋆｡˚꒰ঌClara A. Djalim໒꒱˚｡⋆14:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragomir Kusmuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.⋆｡˚꒰ঌClara A. Djalim໒꒱˚｡⋆13:37, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gretchen Stumhofer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Kline •talk •contribs18:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Cutler (cyclist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.—Alex26337(talk)20:26, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Donovan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.—Alex26337(talk)20:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Grant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.—Alex26337(talk)20:36, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pala Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)16:05, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hossein Zarini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)16:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life Dacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Fram (talk)13:48, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Tetrick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Let'srun (talk)20:54, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Cooke (swimmer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.FOARP (talk)14:09, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Havemeyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.FOARP (talk)16:11, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valery Goncharov (diver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.⋆｡˚꒰ঌClara A. Djalim໒꒱˚｡⋆12:29, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Grace Christiansen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.