User talk:lp0 on fire
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hi Lp0 on fire! I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!Bearian (talk)02:15, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | HelloLp0 on fire! The thread you created at theTeahouse, You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedExact sequence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKernel. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)19:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related togender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently edited a page related toarticles aboutliving or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.
| HelloLp0 on fire! The thread you created at theTeahouse, You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Hello mr Lp0 on Fire how are you doing??? Can i add every informations about dosojin but with a lot of words and details please??? Don't worry i wont use ai2A02:1388:2086:BF35:0:0:E09F:E962 (talk)05:44, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| HelloLp0 on fire! The thread you created at theTeahouse, You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
maybe they stopped updating it but it says 2025 on the page so it's probably black magic86.124.190.212 (talk)08:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding a situation about another editor that involves a comment you have posted. The thread isUser:Gordon Maximo and bludgeoning at Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules#RfC: A simple clarification to IAR. — Newslinger talk18:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Lp0 on fire. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might findWikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards thesandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to avandal when they've been previously warned. These warnings end up accumulating on vandals and are a measure for future editors and eventualy administrators. Thank you!BrandNewSaint (talk)18:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please check sources for such claims before restoring controversial content. Most, if not all of that waswp:UGC. New editors may not be aware ofwp:RS. CheersAdakiko (talk)20:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lp0 on fire. After reviewing your request, I haveenabledrollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on mytalk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, seeWikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) andWikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks!Malinaccier (talk)16:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just posted this question on a Talk page
and wanted to flag it in case you had any advice for me on this topic.Kirsten Jørgensdatter (talk)18:02, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located atSpecial:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located atSpecial:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
asilvering (talk)01:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey therelp0 on fire (neat username btw), I've reported theContributions/~2025-32582-97 vandal toWP:AIV § User-reported. There seems to be multiple vandals (using different IPs in different countries, so likely separate vandals) active on that page, I'll add them to the report. Might be reasonable to ask for some protection for this page as well.--Gurkubondinn(talk)14:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,I noticed you graded the page I made onopen knot theory. This is not to complain about the grade, I'm happy it didn't rapidly deleted. I was wondering though if you had any suggestions on how the page could be improved?ProfKnots (talk)11:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Lp0, I'm trying to add Broken Money as a published book for Lyn Alden, what is the correct process & formatting to do so?I've included the ISBM number, do you also want a reference source to a publisher or the author's announcement:https://www.lynalden.com/broken-money/Please let me know what details I'm missing, thanks!— Precedingunsigned comment added by~2025-33615-87 (talk)17:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, lp0 on fire,
I was reviewing upcoming articles that had been tagged for Proposed Deletion (PRODs) and saw that you had tagged 26 over a period of 10 minutes! Please do not ever do that again. By cutting and pasting a deletion nomination, whether for CSD, PROD, or AFD/RFD/CFD/etc., you can post these requests in a few seconds or minutes but it takes much longer for other editors and admins to review each one separately and make sure that it is a valid nomination. For some AFDs, some editors can spend a few hours looking for additional sources when it just took 5 minutes for the deletion nominator to post the request.
Please pace yourself. Consider nominating between 1-5 articles/day instead of dozens. This is much more considerate to your fellow editors. I see you are a fairly new editor, so this is just another lesson to learn as you gain more experience here. Good luck with your editing. If you have questions about Wikipedia's deletion processes or PROD, do not hesitate to bring them tothe Teahouse. Thank you.LizRead!Talk!00:18, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I got a "Welcome!" message from you in my talk page although I have been making edits for some time now. It's probably because I recently changed my username. It's not an issue at all, I'm just informing you in case you are interested. I assume there some automatic method of posting these messages and maybe you'd like to update it. But it's not really a big problem since username changes are not very common.μινγκ κε μινγκ / ming ke ming (talk)13:27, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]