User talk:Lifebaka
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is aWikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other thanWikipedia, you are viewing amirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other thanWikipedia. The original talk page is located athttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lifebaka. |
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Lifebaka has not edited Wikipediasince January 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives | |||||||
| |||||||
This page has archives. Topics inactive for7 days are automatically archived4 or more at a time byLowercase sigmabot III. |
Please add new comments innew sections. I will respond to messages here unless you ask otherwise. Or, if you're notifying me of a problem, I'll probably just fix it and leave it at that. I can also be contactedby email.
Dear sir/madam Lifebaka,
we want to make another attempt at contributing to the previously deleted record:
IProd - Integrated management of product heterogeneous data
Previously, you'd detected a copyright infringement (you were absolutey right). We have now made an original piece of text describing this project. We feel iProd deserves a page, as it is closely related to the future ofKnowledge Based Engineering and provides more background material to the its appearance inFramework Programmes for Research and Technological Development.
Do we have your approval for giving it another shot?
Best regards,
Reinier
Details:
14:50, 22 September 2011 Lifebaka (talk | contribs) deleted page IProd - Integrated management of product heterogeneous data (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement ofhttp://www.iprod-project.eu/)— Precedingunsigned comment added byReiniervandijk (talk •contribs)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJackalwere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackalwere until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.TTN (talk)21:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've been using yourclosedrv.js script. Thanks for making that available. I've noticed that turning on thebeta syntax highlighting breaks your script; the text in the edit box doesn't get updated correctly. --RoySmith(talk)18:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAerial servant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerial servant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Not a very active user (talk)09:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRot grub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rot grub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Rorshacma (talk)16:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirectSimple englihs. The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 10#Simple englihs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.The Tips ofApmh16:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectGoth Family and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 25#Goth Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs13:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Template:NewdelrevCFD has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Jonesey95 (talk)00:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]