User talk:Ktdk
Page contents not supported in other languages.
|
Your recent editing history atAll Nippon Airways shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.David Biddulph (talk)11:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The other users are accepting my edits for that pageKtdk (talk)11:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All the other users have accepted my edits and Carl Grass field was the user who disagrees with me the editors who are experienced than me have accepted my edits of if all other user disagrees with me then I would have stoppedKtdk (talk)15:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ktdk reported by User:David Biddulph (Result: ). Thank you.David Biddulph (talk)12:32, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk)15:07, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
All the other users have accepted my edits and Carl Grass field was the user who disagrees with me the editors who are experienced than me have accepted my edits of see the page history of Air Canada fleet All Nippon airways fleet and KLM fleetKtdk (talk)16:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When I moved the article to that KLM page one user didn't reverted my edit leaderofthewave user he didn't reverted back my edit and also see ANA fleet page history of this time that was not a valid reason for unblocking I will stop messaging after block expires I will go according to the procedure to move the page by talking in their respective talk pagesKtdk (talk)16:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ktdk ~ Just an adder, if you want to see a properly linked from the main ~ look ~here regards~mitch~ (talk)20:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did toTalk:Ethiopian Airlines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use thesandbox for that.You removed another editor's message. We don't just remove messages; it will be archived and deleted automatically in due course.David Biddulph (talk)08:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that you are trying to inflate demographics ofVijayawada and deflate those ofVisakhapatnam. You are using sources that suit your purpose. Wikipedia doesn't work that way. Please discuss on the talk page before making changes related to demographics.Sharkslayer87 (talk)06:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I noticed that you without explaining why and without looking at the given ref., have constantly removed Visakhapatnam from the destinations table. Here are the diff's of your removals[1][2][3]. This may be considered disruptive because apart from not explaining your edit or looking at the ref. you have probably ignored my previous reverts edit summary as well. Kindly do not remove VTZ again. Thank you!Bingobro(Chat)09:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello andwelcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions toWikipedia are appreciated, buta recent edit of yours to the pageSwami Vivekananda Airport has anedit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing anarticle's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to usethe sandbox to make test edits.Ktdk you reverted my edit calling it unsourced,[4] without looking at the provided source again! also you seem to have left something on my talk page regarding this which you removed.Bingobro(Chat)09:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Tiderolls13:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If I find that you revert another editor without first obtaining consensus on the article talk page I will block your account.Tiderolls13:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tide rollsif you see this u will understand I have agreed with user LeoFrank for a while regarding his domestic statement "I said no change in domestic statement untill consensus is made in talk page from my point of view this isn't a fair warningKtdk (talk)14:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[5] this is the link furtherly I haven't done any major edit warring my last edit was 6 October 2020 excluding today's edits if you see my edit history you will understandTide rolls before it's too late I have agreed to make consensus[6]Ktdk (talk)14:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ktdk
Thank you for creatingList of the busiest airports in Europe (2010–2015).
User:PKT, while examining this page as a part of ourpage curation process, had the following comments:
Hello - please note that this list has some undefined reference names. See the references section, where the undefined names are shown in bold red font, and please fix the issues.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|PKT}}. Please remember to sign your reply with~~~~ .
(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
PKT(alk)17:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@PKT: Well then I didn't check the missing references properly I will do it later. Furtherly it is not bold red it is bold black. 3 references are missing in that pageKtdk (talk)18:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Question: Why did you scrunch up the list of the names of the administrative divisions of Vietnam? I do notice that you made several tries before you got the results that you did. So I guess you worked on it pretty hard.Uporządnicki (talk)11:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
 |
| The WikiEagle |
| TheWikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
| Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Project •Project discussion •Members •Assessment •Outreach •The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members New Members
Number of active members: 386.Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions
| Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New/Ongoing Discussions On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes toThe WikiEagle atThe WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from themailing list. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text fromDefence Research and Development Organisation intoProjects of DRDO. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.DanCherek (talk)04:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPrototype Fast Breeder Reactor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJitendra Singh.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)06:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abey LEFTIST madarchod kitna terrorists ki choosega be bhosdike. Jaa pakistan me jaake apni gaand marwaa madarchod librandu183.87.33.4 (talk)18:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings @ Ktdk,
In regard to your recent good faithedit @ the articleEx-Muslims, we already do have separate article givingcountry wise details so we are not looking for country wise subsections in the articleEx-Muslims that being working as a summary article, hence I am inclined to revert your good faith edit if you do not mind.
Instead I request your copy edit help @Draft:Ex-Muslim activism in Kerala as and when you can spare the time.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk)15:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDixon Technologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTCL.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created,Zerodha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —DaxServer (t ·m ·c)18:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have copied this article from Italian WikipediaKtdk (talk)18:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello,Ktdk!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Akevsharma (talk)12:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
Hello, I'mSid95Q. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toRadhaKrishn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse or theHelp desk. Thanks.Sid95Q (talk)10:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectList of busiest airports by passenger traffic(2010-2015) has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11 § List of busiest airports by passenger traffic(2010-2015) until a consensus is reached.Steel1943 (talk)23:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ktdk. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Zerodha".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.✗plicit23:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
