User talk:Ke an
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, Ke an, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete theWikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit theTeahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by typing fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, orask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!Moonraker (talk)10:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like Lithuanian is prohibited even here. :D Okey, let's discuss in English. You have removed "Juodkrantė Monto de Sorĉistinoj Raganų Kalnas 29 kartludo.jpg|Ragana (witch) and devil in theHill of Witches." from Lithuania. Do you really think it looks like a profanation? I thought it was quite cute because it is an old woman as described in the paganic sources. Plus it allows to mentionHill of Witches which is a worth visiting paganic location (enjoyed it myself years ago). --Pofka (talk)19:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ke an: Hi, I saw that you was very involved into the dispute about the Corruption section in Lithuania.Detektyw z Wilna started a discussion about it with Wikipedia administrators atWikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Lithuania#Corruption and your arguments would be very welcome there. --Pofka (talk)14:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ke an: Mačiau, kad sukūreiWikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#User:Detektyw z Wilna, bet pavartyk apie ką jis dažniausiai rašo. Labai primena zombį:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Detektyw_z_Wilna&offset=20171118143057&target=Detektyw+z+Wilna. Kol kas turbūt dar nei vieno pozityvaus pakeitimo. Vien tik negatyvumo ryškinimas visur visomis išgalėmis. --Pofka (talk)11:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedLouis Hjelmslev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLithuanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:09, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alcoholism is yet another problem that was introduced during the Soviet times.Jonaitis, Marius."Alkoholizmas - tylusis lietuvių tautos genocidas?".DELFI.lt. Retrieved30 July 2012. Trying to combat this issue,Seimas prohibited to sell alcohol to people younger than 20 years old and it is prohibited for shops to sell alcohol from 8:00 p.m to 10:00 a.m from Monday to Saturday, while on Sundays it is limited to 3:00 p.m."Viskas: nuo šiandien alkoholio prekyba keičiasi iš esmės".DELFI.lt. Retrieved1 January 2018.
I think this one is accurate and limitations are important. Soviet times made it popular much more than before. Villages looks like this today because of these 50 years. --Pofka (talk)10:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at theWikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Alexis Jazz (talk)10:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please opt-in toUser:SineBot as you seem to forget signing every once in a while. You have more than 800 edits so SineBot is ignoring you now.Alexis Jazz (talk)10:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Enterprise Lithuania logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click onthis link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question onWikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk)10:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello,Ke an!Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --RoySmith(talk)16:37, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onDraft:Lithuanian Innovation Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguouscopyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy fromhttps://ukmin.lrv.lt/en/sector-activities/innovation/innovation-support-measures. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofsentences. This part is crucial:say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then youmust verify that externally by one of the processes explained atWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look atWikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a questionhere.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)17:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Lithuanian Innovation Centre logo EN - 12 04 2018.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.ShakespeareFan00 (talk)11:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKursenieki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBaltic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have just added a new comprehensive section about Environment in Lithuania, however some of the data duplicates with the introduction of the Geography section. Maybe you have ideas how it could be solved? I was unable to decide what edits should be made in order to avoid duplications (e. g., about Aukštojas Hill and percentage of forest zones in Lithuania) without destroying this quite good introduction completely because some of these sentences does not fit to other sections and are valuable. --Pofka (talk)16:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ke an: You have been gone for some days. Not sure if you saw this, so adding a ping template here. --Pofka (talk)21:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance withHelp:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typo corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, thereversion of clear-cutvandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". But adding content is never a "minor" edit. Thanks,Renata (talk)13:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I noticed that you often forget to add spaces before brackets in your edits. E.g., inBaltistics: "and culture(history, literature, folklore, mythology) of the Baltic nations". I think it is required or I missed something in grammar? :D --Pofka (talk)18:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The articleBaltistics has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is simply a definition.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. --Danetalk01:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you.Alexis Jazz (talk)23:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It doesnot imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
TheArbitration Committee has authoriseddiscretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision ishere.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This meansuninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, ourstandards of behavior, or relevantpolicies. Administrators may impose sanctions such asediting restrictions,bans, orblocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
Robert McClenon (talk)17:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You've beenwarned per theresult of the edit warring complaint. You may be blocked if you make any further reverts atCorruption in Lithuania unless you get a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Thank you,EdJohnston (talk)03:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Lithuanian aerospace association logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.ShakespeareFan00 (talk)19:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Lithuanian Space Science and Technology Institute logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described insection F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.ShakespeareFan00 (talk)19:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I think we did a great job expanding theLithuania's article. I still have a few ideas there, but it is probably almost finished. I believe that our next target should be Lithuania's capitalVilnius article because it looks quite empty compared to other capitals pages (e.g.,Paris) and it attracts quite a lot of visitors. You have a lot of great knowledge and our edits perfectly complements each other. Article of Paris seems to have a perfect structure and we can use it as an example. --Pofka (talk)16:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I think we need to find a better illustration than this one inLithuania because it is of a very poor quality and reminds videos from the 90s of 240p. There is no place for such quality pictures in FA/GA. I replaced it with:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closing_ceremony_for_Iron_Sword_2014.jpg, however if you find anything better - replace with it. --Pofka (talk)11:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedLithuania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageNew York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)09:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake with the image. I was sure that the last edit was made by the Litvinist editor who insists that Belarus is the "real" Lithuania, and I completely missed your change. My apologies. –Sabbatino (talk)22:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We do not remove dead links. The information still can be found in internet archives. Please tag these links with template{{dead link}}.Staszek Lem (talk)00:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creatingMO Museum.
ANew Page PatrollerVexations just taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:
Please add references to independent, reliable sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here andpingme. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at theTeahouse.
Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Vexations (talk)11:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created,Vilnius City Opera, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Boleyn (talk)09:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, friend. You changed and wrote "Undo vandalism again. We don't need low visual and statistical quality images here". Can you answer on some question?1) First sentence is very funny. Do you know, what is "vandalism"? A rhetorical question2) "We don't..." - who is "we"? Maybe "you" is more correct?3) "We don't need low visual and statistical quality images here" - why is my map have low visual and statistical quality? My map have qualuty better, than a map before, and statistical quality is better - more options. So i don't understand, what's wrong?I'll edit back my version. if you don't answer, so i'm waitingThank youLandRussia (talk)07:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you cancreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
scope_creep (talk)12:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ke an. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creatingŽygimantas Liauksminas.
ANew Page PatrollerBoleyn just taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:
This has been tagged for 2 issues.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here andpingme. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at theTeahouse.
Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk)09:57, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition toChristmas Eve has been removed, as it appears to have addedcopyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence ofpermission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please readWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofcontent, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policywill beblocked from editing. SeeWikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Diannaa 🍁 (talk)13:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PLS read overWP:GALLERY andWP:SANDWICH. I assume you want people to be able to read the article.--Moxy (talk)15:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I noticed recently that an edit war was starting to emerge inLithuania's article. I'm currently very busy with my real life and I will not be able to actively review what is being done in this article, so your input in protecting it from unmotivated edits would be very welcome. I partly agree with Moxy's statements that there may be too many illustrations and we should avoid the "sandwich style", so I kept only essential illustrations. I think something needs to be done with "Science and technology" section because it clearly has the "sandwich style". Maybe we should only keep the Simonavičius illustration because it is probably the most special achievement of the Lithuanians science? In my opinion, Gimbutas, Greimas and Kubilius should be kept only in the text. --Pofka (talk)12:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
There is an IoT manufacturer based in Lithuania, which produces trackers and routers. I'm trying to create a Wikipedia page about the company. However, my draft was declined some time ago and recently I decided to try and fix the page.
The provided reason for the decline was that the page read more as an advertisement than an encyclopedic article and the references I used were mostly to their website. I've made some changes to the draft and was wondering if you could check it out and give me some guidelines on what may be wrong? In my opinion, the main issue right now is that I can't find any references to third party sources for the information provided, but the information used seems very basic (year they started the company, what they produce, some other activities, etc.)
Link to my draft:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Teltonika)
Best regards,DziugasDziugas1 (talk)06:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I recently got an invitation to theLietuvos Vikimedijos dalyvių grupė project. It is a newly created group which main aim is to improve Lithuanians collaboration in the foreign languages Wikipedia articles. I thought that you might be interested in joining such project. If yes, add your name and talk page link to the "Susidomėję dalyviai" section. Vogone is the creator of the group. --Pofka (talk)11:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Ke an, Thank you for improving the Jonas Noreika article. I haven't looked over your edits, but over all they seem helpful, for balance, focus, neutrality and readability. I may work more on that article later.AndriusKulikauskas (talk)19:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ke an: Hi, I want to note thatRepublic of Užupis may easily qualify as amicronation. Keep in mind that micronation means it is NOT RECOGNISED by any government and that's exactly what Užupis is: somewhere between reality and a complete prank. If you look at the micronation wikipedia article, you will notice that even such territories as thePrincipality of Sealand andPrincipality of Seborga (VERY close to Užupis situation) qualifies as a micronation, so Užupis definitely is something similar to this (and possibly even better micronation than something like Sealand because it has constant inhabitants). While theRepublic of Paulava definitely is amicrostate (because it was officially recognised by King and the Great Seimas). Some sources even describes the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a three independent states federation: Lithuania, Poland and Paulava. In this case, it is very important to distinguish micronation from a microstate because these are completely different (and it was done in the section of the article). --Pofka (talk)13:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ Ke an, seamingly, you are Lithuanian.
Therefore, I am very astonished, that you deny or do not know that term.
I had prepared a reply, which is no more needed, as your proposal has been declined by somebody else:
Sorry, but these are not facts. Basically situation was like this: Lithuania took over Vilnius from Soviet union in October 1939, after Soviet invasion of Poland. They quickly realised that majority of inhabitants are Polish, and because they conisdered Polish rule over the city as "occupation" they made a law that stripped everyone of citizenship who wasn't able to prove that was permanent inhabitant of the city in July 1920. It was their excuse to get rid of majority of Polish inhabitants. They were labelled "aliens" ("ateiviu") and because of lack of citizenship they were not able to get a job and so on. Of course some of them emigrated to Vilnius in interwar period (nothing unusual about this, people travel from town to town), but majority were either unable to provide any eligeble prove or did not want to this, because of their patriotism and so on. Also the numbers are wrong, number of all aliens was 87 616, but only 55 382 of them were adults, the rest was children. Also again it is not true that all of them imigrated to Vilnius in interwar period. Even cited source does not claim that! The actual quote of cited source is like this (book of Regina Žepkaitė): "Gausiausią lenkų "ateivių" grupe sudare darbininkai. Lietuvos raudonojo kryžiaus duomenimis, jų buvo 11 320, su šeimu nariais - 35 181 žmogus. Tai sudarė 42% visų "ateivių". Toks didelis lenk "ateiviu" darbininkų burys susidarê dèl kelių priežasčių. Daugelis jų buvo vietiniai Vilniaus ir krašto gyventojai, bet negalėjo dokumentais irodyti savo teisés i pilietybę. Kai kurie darbininkai tikėiosi gauti geras pašalpas iš užsienio; dar kitus veikė lenkų nacionalistu propaganda, skatinusi likti ištikimais Lenkijos valstybei ir neieškoti Lietuvos pilietybės", abd in English: "The largest group of Polish "aliens" was made up of workers. According to the data of the Lithuanian Red Cross, there were 11,320 of them and 35,181 people with family members. This accounted for 42% of all "aliens". Such a large group of Polish "alien" workers is due to several reasons. Many of them were local residents of Vilnius and the country, but could not document their rights to citizenship. Some workers were hoping to get good foreign benefits; Others was influenced by propaganda of Polish nationalists who encouraged to remain loyal to the Polish state and not seek Lithuanian citizenship". So even cited, Lithuanian source is not claiming that all of them were some kind of "settlers" as article suggest. Also it is against commons sense, sheer demographic data does not indicate such big influx of inhabitants during interwar periodMarcelus (talk)09:45, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at theWikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ke an and edit-warring at Adolfas Ramanauskas - at your service.--Ymblanter (talk)21:28, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Ymblanter (talk)21:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atAdolfas Ramanauskas shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Jayjg(talk)22:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Swarm~{sting}04:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]An article you recently created,Jurgis Pliateris (1810), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969TT me11:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creatingDidžioji Kova military district.
User:Onel5969 while examining this page as a part of ourpage curation process had the following comments:
Please be careful of simply cutting and pasting information from other sources onto Wikipedia. SeeWP:COPYVIO.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ .
Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969TT me11:46, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure whether you are aware of this, but articles you are creating routinely contain copyright violations. (They also contain POV issues, but right now we are not talking about them). Right at this moment,Žemaičiai military district andKęstutis military district are waiting for copyright violations to be revision-deleted, and I will do this in a couple of minutes. I did two more articles earlier this week. May I please remind you that repeated addition of copytighted material to the articles is unacceptable and will likely lead to a block. Thank you for understanding.--Ymblanter (talk)18:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ke an (talk)15:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ke an:Hi once again,
You recently edited theLithuanian Activist Front article, however I noticed that something is wrong with its style. I have in mind the "Controversy section" where the sentence "He published a number of leaflets illustrating German and Soviet crimes in Lithuania and the Lithuanian resistance, for example, In the Name of the Lithuanian People (1946) and Appeal to" is cut by the quotes and continues behind them "the United Nations on Genocide (1951). In 1964 he published a book Alone, all alone about the Lithuanian armed resistance.". I think this needs to be fixed somehow. --Pofka (talk)15:23, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created,Leonas Prapuolenis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can improve the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace,please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~OxonAlex- talk07:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you cancreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk)23:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]Your recent editing history atLithuania proper shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Seethe bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Nick Moyes (talk)19:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please, stop removing historical names of Lithuanian settlements. Polish, Russian/German names are used in all the documents before 1918, so they are important for searching information in the archives. Some of older names are even more correct that standardized Lithuanian versions (ex.Dziewaltowo >Deltuva,Syrwidgale >Servitgaliai). Just add 'formerly' or 'historically' that it would clear as they are obsolete now.Hugo.arg (talk)10:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is norm to list all historical or other local names in English wikipedia (seeLviv,Miskolc,Samsun,Hradec Králové, etc.). Other wikipedias may not have the necessary articles to check the name (ex. for a small settlement) or historical name could be not currently in use (like pre-revoliutionary Russian names, German names). They may be 'distorted' but they there used in official data. I am working with recovering census datae of Lithuanian settlements from various pre-1918 or interwar Polish, German and Russian sources. To have these names are vital to quicken the search. The same goes when seraching in old maps. By "correct" I have ment "correct etymologicaly", ex.Syrwidgale is "Sirvydgaliai" (nameSirvydas +galas (as Vandžiogala, Betygala, etc.) but then these names there 'relithuanized' some errors occurred (like "Servitgaliai"). If you see1923 census data you will notice how most place names differ from the current ones. So, these "official names" is a resoult of a long transformation process, and why this should be hidden? The note 'formerly' or 'historically' should make it clear, that these names aren't officialy in use no more (although in Wilenszcyzna Polish namesde facto are currently used).Hugo.arg (talk)17:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Pofka: Maybe you could suggest possible ways/best practice? -Ke an (talk)12:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedKėdainiai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJanusz Radziwiłł. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
At your service.--Ymblanter (talk)15:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい)15:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ke an(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked per Yblanter requests to block without providing any evidence of "pushing nationalist POV" (just a quote from Ymblanter without any evidence, nor diffs !), just by simple wish to block me which he repeated many times instead of analysing the 3RR case reported by me !!. In order to block me he even invented other multiple false accusations. It is worth to note, that the behaviour of Ymblanter exceeds good will, non-biased behaviour on Wikipedia and he is abusing his power as administrator. I see the block as a personal attack of Ymblanter and overall as a very harmfull practice.Ke an (talk)16:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
As others have stated, it is trivially easy to find examples of nationalist POV-pushing in your edit history, even without any prior familiarity with this case (I just cmd-F searched for reverted edits and found plenty)signed,Rosguilltalk17:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Given that your previous block was for trying to whitewash the biography of a Lithuanian national hero, and that now you're sparring over whether a surname is Lithuanian, I'm not sure why I'd suspect anything else. Ymblanter had nothing to do with the block, I acted alone. And finally, you still haven't addressed your obvious personal attacks towards Ymblanter; baseless accusations of chauvinism and bias are clearly beyond the pale.The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい)16:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:National Cyber Security Centre of Lithuania logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)02:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
