This user is aware of the designation of the following ascontentious topics: the region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups theArab–Israeli conflict Heshouldnot be givenalerts for those areas.

Archives

Index1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20

Your feedback is requested atTalk:Sati (practice) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)17:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:List of states with limited recognition on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)09:31, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atWikipedia talk:Libel on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)11:31, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,@Kautilya3:,I included Meitei Pangals underMeitei people as no reliable sources were provided to show that they are a separate ethnic group. If you have any objections supported by verifiable sources, I will be happy to discuss and work together to improve the page.Thank you! Have a good day!Dreamer765 (talk)05:13, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamer765, that is not really appropriate. Since I have disputed it on the talk page, you need to arrive at aWP:CONSENSUS before making changes. Moreover, the infobox cannot be modified before the article body is.

You are welcome to proposeWP:NPOV content on the talk page, summarising all the viewpoints, and then we can discuss it. --Kautilya3 (talk)17:39, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Admin, I noticed user: Black Kite; reverted all my edits in the summary deceptive edits, which is highly misleading and inappropriate.

This admin kept various narrative, claims that the government or ruling ministry promoting/ endorsing the movie. Various criticism on government policy and views. Claiming Pakistan never attacked Kashmir leading to Raja's decision and other views. The article for readers looks one-sided biased opinions of ones against Article 370.

Neutral plot summary and introduction edits, fluffy reviews edits were reverted conveniently.SakuraSmart (talk)13:21, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HiSakuraSmart, I am not an admin. To find out whether some on is an admin, please go their user page, and under the "User" manu, look for "User groups".

Black Kite, on the other hand, is a very experienced admin, and their edits would be very well justified. Please pay attention to what they said. --Kautilya3 (talk)14:11, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I supposethis is the edit they characterised as carrying "deceptive edit summaries". TheMOS:LEAD is a summary of the article, which will by nature repeat the content explained in the article with more detail. You cannot remove it.

In general, you cannot make large-scale changes like that on a well-established page. Please make small edits, one section at a time, and give clear justifications for them n the edit summaries. If they are reverted, you need to discuss them on the talk page. Your edit was too large to even discuss. Please pick one specific issue at a time and raise it on the talk page. --Kautilya3 (talk)14:22, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I made large edits to avoid spamming. Doing multiple edits on fluffy exaggerated information, felt spamming, hence I one edit I made changes. I will keep that in mind. However, could you review my edits in general, and advice if product/ outcome of my edits were anywhere inappropriate or felt biased. As overall, I felt in cleansed/ maintained the article in professional tone. Your experience opinion will help meSakuraSmart (talk)15:10, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not enough to just do the "right" edits, but you also need to do them in the right way. Since Wikipedia is a collaborative project, everybody needs to be able to see and understand what changes you are making and why.

The condensation of the plot section are probably ok. The plot section right now is way too detailed.

Altering and condensing the "Historical accuracy" section is not ok. Anything you do that section would be contentious and you need to be really careful about it. --Kautilya3 (talk)16:15, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your inputs, getting your POV, I will be mindful henceforth. Historical details is deemed propoganda as per current article notes, and yes plot summary is way too detailed. Therefore, I thought to edit it. It looks one-way traffic at this moment, plus I think for movie it's too much detail.

Still, I respect your overall opinion and time.SakuraSmart (talk)17:39, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedJammu and Kashmir (princely state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMirpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested atTalk:2025 Bondi Beach shooting on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list ofFeedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time byremoving your name.

(replacingYapperbot)SodiumBot (botop|talk)17:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]