User talk:Kangaru99
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Welcome!
Hello, Kangaru99, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom(Talk)22:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nick. Here's the link explaining notability for events in date articles:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the yearRklawton17:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You wrote me a nice note about the euthanasia article. I've been on a somewhat inadvertent wikibreak, unrelated to this article. Not sure when I can get back to it. Sorry. Take care,HG |Talk05:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kangaru. The first sentence currently in the article is the size of a paragraph, but is one single sentence. I personally, believe that your sentence that you have provided is better than the current one. It is shorter, and the current sentence givestoo much description of the term in the one opening sentence, and this description should be spread out equally in the opening paragraphs, and not in the one sentence. However, there is a separate article for animal euthanasia, so "terminating the life of a terminally ill person or animal" should become "terminating the life of a terminally ill person". You may wish to also shorten up the Greek etymology, and put it within a footnote, which can be placed at the bottom of the article along with references (see theNotes section onCharles Darwin, which has several of these inline notes).
Kind regards,Sebi [talk]10:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot16:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed onthe SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. --SuggestBot16:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notability does not apply to content. /Blaxthos(t /c )16:30, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
From the history of the article onZachary Taylor, you appear to be a notable contributor to it. As a result, I thought you might like to get involved in a discussion I have started on the talk page concerning a proposal to change the main picture in the infobox:[1] If you do get involved, thank you.Terrakyte (talk)15:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reyour message: I had forgotten about that issue. I think you are correct that a consensus has not been achieved nor likely to with the editors involved. The issue could use some additional editors involved in the discussion to reach a consensus. You might try bringing up the issue again on theNeutral Point of View Noticeboard, though the original alert by Kollision is still there, or request athird opinion. --Gogo Dodo (talk)19:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey can we work more on expanding the Zachary Taylor suicide issue?— Precedingunsigned comment added by177.196.15.73 (talk)23:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either theArticle Feedback Tool orPage Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign uphere.
In addition, we'll be holding anoffice hours session at21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks!Okeyes (WMF) (talk)11:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Work Ganicall 18:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added byGanicall (talk •contribs)
Hello, Kangaru99. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]