Welcome!

Hello, Jionunez, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page andHow to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using theArticle Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your messages ondiscussion pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place{{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!Aboutmovies (talk)07:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to theMilitary history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Ournavigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• Theannouncement and open task box is updated very frequently. You canwatchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following:{{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project'smain discussion page; it is highly recommended that youwatchlist it.
• The project has severaldepartments, which handlearticle quality assessment,detailed article and content review,writing contests, andarticle logistics.
• We have a number oftask forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set ofguidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are manyarticles that need attention, as well as a number ofreview alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of theproject coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around!Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)05:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You haveresponses.—Vchimpanzee • talk •contributions •19:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, see, that's why wetry not to bite the new people. There are some unpleasant people and the nature of your mistake—along with the QPQ thing, which made you look like you'd done at least five nominations already—made me think you were one of them. You reallyarewelcome to jump in and make mistakes and, as long as you're well-intentioned and a good sport about it, most of the people around here are more than ready to help you out. Thanks again for taking the time to help out and make this place better. — LlywelynII08:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mReferenceBot. I haveautomatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On theMuziris beach page,your edit caused anunsupported parameter error(help). (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,ReferenceBot (talk)00:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whatsup yung bruva, I noticed your reply in the Facebook page and I thought I'd drop you a message. Keep it up! Regards from The Netherlands, Amin(Talk)11:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofLong Military Service Cross (Spain) at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneathyour nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!North America¹⁰⁰⁰15:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On22 December 2016,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleOrder of the Lion (Malawi), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that in 1967, PresidentHastings Banda established theOrder of the Lion,Malawi's second-highest honor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Order of the Lion (Malawi). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Order of the Lion (Malawi)), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

— Maile (talk)00:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for theMilitary Historian andNewcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to allactive members of the Military History WikiProject.

On27 January 2017,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleLong Military Service Cross (Spain), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatJuan Carlos I of Spain approved theLong Military Service Cross in 2002, even though it was established in 1958? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Long Military Service Cross (Spain). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Long Military Service Cross (Spain)), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Harrias^talk01:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running itsMarch Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be foundhere for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards,AustralianRupert (talk) &MediaWiki message delivery (talk)07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:Wikipedians who like Shaman King requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T16:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creatingExpert Action Badge, Jionunez!

Wikipedia editorElliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful article!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321'stalk page.

Learn more aboutpage curation.

Elliot321 (talk)18:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shaman King user templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T19:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from theMilitary history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on theelection page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators,AustralianRupert (talk)10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On8 October 2017,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleBorder Police of Georgia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that theBorder Police of Georgia have continued to help enforce Georgian sovereignty overAbkhazia andSouth Ossetia since the end of theRusso-Georgian War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Border Police of Georgia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,Border Police of Georgia), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk02:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jionunez. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: theMilitary Historian of the Year and theMilitary History Newcomer of the Year. Theco-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage:here andhere. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions atTalk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 theMilitary history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members ofWikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign uphere.

For the Milhist co-ordinators,AustralianRupert andMediaWiki message delivery (talk)10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located atSpecial:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located atSpecial:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Swarm♠03:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you recently accepteda pending change toAugust 14 that did not included a direct source. You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt fromWP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details seethe WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. You should have rejected this edit. I was able to find a source for this date of birth that I could add to the DOY page.

Please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. Theburden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you.Toddst1(talk)14:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the correction. I have taken this into account for other pending change reviews on Days of the Year pages. If I may ask, is there a section where I may read specific policies such as this, as I was recently told by another administrator to only revert unambiguously poor edits?Jionunez (talk)08:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If I may butt in here, there are other possibilities between letting an edit stand untouched and outright reverting it. You can add a {{cn}} tag, for example. This gives someone a little time to find a a source. --John (talk)10:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you toassume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --John (talk)07:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do rarely interact with other editors and have only received pending changes reviewer rights a few hours ago. Would you be able to tell me where I made my mistakes, so as not to repeat them?Jionunez (talk)07:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was the merit ofthis edit? --John (talk)08:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I felt that the wording of the edit had unnecessarily negative connotations and did not meet a neutral point of view. As for the caption of the edit, I realise it may have been more productive to contact an administrator about the edit warring, but in the moment I felt that the introduction of a third party would be sufficient to deescalate the situation. Was I mistaken in either of these assumptions?Jionunez (talk)08:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you were mistaken in both. The edit was a good one, and I have reinstated it. If you're going to revert, please make sure what you are reverting is an unambiguously poor edit. --John (talk)09:20, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, but I have no knowledge of, or experience in, the subject.Jionunez (talk)08:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September,Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon,Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team. Cheers,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, thevoting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all,March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier!Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team.Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)02:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020Military history WikiProject newcomer andHistorian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it!Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December!Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Hey y'all, theApril 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on theAutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed atWP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles atWP:GAN orWP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted atWP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up atWikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at thedrive talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jionunez. AtWikiProject My Little Pony, I'm trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name is currently listed on theactive members list and you are active on Wikipedia. Would you consider yourself active on WikiProject My Little Pony? Please{{ping}} me in your reply and seeour project talk page for the latest updates. Thanks!Pamzeis (talk)04:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running,please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted atthe 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted atthe 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this linkhttps://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.eduApolo1991 (talk)14:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. Voting is conducted using simpleapproval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurringhere If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see you are a member of WikiProject Awards. I’m seeking feedback on some suggested updates to theAcademy of Achievement page. I have a conflict of interest, would you be able to do a review?Jarc12030 (talk)19:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votesvote here andhere respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year.Hawkeye7 (talk ·contribs) viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your votehere by 23:59 UTC on 29 September!MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for theWikiProject Military Historynewcomer of the year andmilitary historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are openhere andhere respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for theWikiProject Military Historynewcomer of the year andmilitary historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your voteshere andhere respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcomingWikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for theWikipedia:WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Voting closes at 23:59 UTC on 29 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecurrent coord team.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:25, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]